• Re: Trump admin blocks wind power citing nat

    From Rug Rat@1:135/250 to All on Tue May 5 21:17:36 2026
    One of the few things I agree with the Trump administration on.

    The problem with wind farms is that they are very hazardous to avian wildlife. Birds and Bats..

    Both of which are keystone species for pest control, pollenation, and seed spreading.

    It is not the enviromentally friendly energy source we have been lead to believe.

    Rug Rat (Brent Hendricks)
    Blog and Forums - www.catracing.org
    IMAGE BBS! 3.0 - bbs.catracing.org 6400
    C-Net Amiga BBS - bbs.catracing.org 6840

    Ham's Over IP - 104196
    --- CNet/5
    * Origin: The Rat's Den BBS (1:135/250)
  • From Rob Mccart@1:2320/107 to RUG RAT on Thu May 7 08:34:39 2026
    The problem with wind farms is that they are very hazardous to avian
    >wildlife. Birds and Bats..

    It is not the enviromentally friendly energy source we have been
    >lead to believe.

    And generally not nearly as productive as expected. A very few areas
    are quite good for them but many countries that built hundreds or
    thousands of turbines at great cost are just waiting for them to
    wear out so the can get rid of them. Often the actual output ends up
    being less than half the original estimate due to them not working
    in low or too high winds..

    ---
    * SLMR Rob * I'm from Quebec... What country are you from?
    * Origin: Capitol City Online (1:2320/107)
  • From August Abolins@1:153/757.21 to Rob Mccart on Thu May 7 18:07:00 2026
    Hello Rob!

    ** On Thursday 07.05.26 - 08:34, Rob Mccart wrote to RUG RAT:

    The problem with wind farms is that they are very hazardous to avian
    wildlife. Birds and Bats..

    It is not the enviromentally friendly energy source we have been
    lead to believe.

    And generally not nearly as productive as expected. A very few areas
    are quite good for them but many countries that built hundreds or thousands of turbines at great cost are just waiting for them to
    wear out so the can get rid of them. Often the actual output ends up
    being less than half the original estimate due to them not working
    in low or too high winds..

    I thought Spain and the Netherlands seemed to be doing well with them.
    --
    ../|ug

    --- OpenXP 5.0.64
    * Origin: My Westcoast Point (1:153/757.21)
  • From Rob Mccart@1:2320/107 to AUGUST ABOLINS on Sun May 10 15:16:53 2026
    It is not the enviromentally friendly energy source we have been
    lead to believe.

    And generally not nearly as productive as expected. A very few areas
    are quite good for them but many countries that built hundreds or
    thousands of turbines at great cost are just waiting for them to
    wear out so the can get rid of them. Often the actual output ends up
    being less than half the original estimate due to them not working
    in low or too high winds..

    I thought Spain and the Netherlands seemed to be doing well with them.

    I just remembered reading about a country that had built hundreds
    of them along the coast and the expense of operation was so high
    and the output so low that they were cursing the idea..

    We'd have to look up the current situation but the notes that I
    took at the time (about 2006) talked a lot about how harmful
    they were to people or animals living near them and how the
    power output was 'dirty' with high frequency spikes that damage
    the power systems and they bleed bleed power into the ground
    affecting humans and animals..

    Also, as I mentioned about ouput, a number of countries built
    enough turbines to supply 30% of their power (at full output)
    but in use found they virtually never even got close to that.

    Using that 30% as 100% full output Germany got only 14.7% output,
    Denmark got 20%, at times their 6000 turbines putting out Zero,
    and they had to keep their conventional power plants running at
    full power due to the unreliability of wind power.

    The UK got 24.1% and areas in the USA got between 20% and 23% but
    said that percentage output is declining every year.

    To get close to maximun output you need sustained winds at 30 mph,
    anything much lower or higher than that dramatically lowers output.

    A buildup of bugs can reduce output by 25% and salt build up near
    the ocean can reduce output by 20% to 30%..

    As I said, this information is not right up to date, much of
    it coming from an article called A Problem with Wind Power
    written by Science editor Eric Rosenbloom (Vermont) in 2006..
    So maybe they have found ways to improve things since then.

    ---
    * SLMR Rob * "Milhouse, we live in the age of cooties" - Bart Simpson
    * Origin: Capitol City Online (1:2320/107)