On May 8, 2026 at 4:37:34 PM MST, ""Joel W. Crump"" wrote <2tuLR.534326$ZRIe.478812@fx22.iad>:
On 5/8/2026 7:15 PM, Brock McNuggets wrote:
On May 8, 2026 at 4:02:18 PM MST, ""Joel W. Crump"" wrote
<ZXtLR.316421$3L1.224468@fx45.iad>:
On 5/8/2026 5:45 PM, Kerwin wrote:
Alan wrote:
There is not one person reading this messages that thinks you're
telling the truth.
Not one.
Speak for yourself.
Brock McNuggets explanation makes far more sense than yours.
Why do you make shit up, expect readers to believe it and then
when they don't, you raise your white flag and run away?
My mind isn't small enough to follow the alleged evidence any one
of the posters are referencing - but when Alan makes Snit AKA Brock
his enemy, it smells rather fishy. Alan's entire life is devoted
to defending the greediest corporation in the history of the earth,
Apple, and Snit is a major enthusiast of Apple's products going
back as long as I've known him and more. It reeks of Alan
succumbing to the peer pressure, here on 2026 Usenet, trying to
bully Snit. It's pathetic. I hate Apple and yet Snit is my
friend. Alan is one of the bullies. What gives?!
OK, forget if his accusation is true or not. He says I "forged"
a PDF. I say I did not. Whatever. What is the full accusation
even? I do not get it. From what I can gather (and again I admit
I might be wrong!):
It was something like "I" posted a PDF where "I" tried to forge
an IP by covering the IP with the same IP on a different layer.
Somehow a different font made it seem "forged". The text was not
even edited, and meta data not even slightly "fixed". And then
"I" posted this to my own site with the idea that someone else
posted it first. But how does that even work?
My recollection is someone (Mackay maybe?) had multiple versions
and names for similar files and I did grab them and share copies
so people could see a timeline... but I think I goofed on my
naming or... who knows. Again, 2004 and I neither know nor care.
But with the idea of a "forgery by font change" not being
explained, and the idea the "forgery" was done to be as easy to
discover as possible, what he describes sounds like someone was
trying to frame me. Was in Mackay? Sandman? Alan himself (he
claims he discovered this forgery). I barely remember and both
don't know and don't really care. It was... again... 2004. I
think we can safely move on from some PDF silliness from then
that hurt nobody (that has been claimed anyway).
Just weird he and chrisv both got stuck on it all these years
later. Don't get it... just happy it seems both have backed off
a bit.
Even though I can't make sense of anyone's alleged evidence, I tend
to believe you because I've never known you to bullshit.
Thank you. I did not forge a PDF. Full stop. But in this case the
question to me is what the accusation even is. Usually at least they
can make that coherent... idiotic stuff like I made a plea bargain.
While provably false in my case, at least it is a coherent story!
Alan is a
stand-up guy *most* of the time - but he's been known to succumb to
emotion.
I agree. Marek was like that, years ago. He and I talked with the
agreement to not share -- but I think it is OK to say there is a lot
of peer pressure to hate the folks the trolls call "bad guys". People
fear the ostracization. That is my best guess here.
Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote in news:69fe7554$0$25$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On May 8, 2026 at 4:37:34 PM MST, ""Joel W. Crump"" wrote
<2tuLR.534326$ZRIe.478812@fx22.iad>:
On 5/8/2026 7:15 PM, Brock McNuggets wrote:
On May 8, 2026 at 4:02:18 PM MST, ""Joel W. Crump"" wrote
<ZXtLR.316421$3L1.224468@fx45.iad>:
On 5/8/2026 5:45 PM, Kerwin wrote:
Alan wrote:
There is not one person reading this messages that thinks you're >>>>>>> telling the truth.
Not one.
Speak for yourself.
Brock McNuggets explanation makes far more sense than yours.
Why do you make shit up, expect readers to believe it and then
when they don't, you raise your white flag and run away?
My mind isn't small enough to follow the alleged evidence any one
of the posters are referencing - but when Alan makes Snit AKA Brock
his enemy, it smells rather fishy. Alan's entire life is devoted
to defending the greediest corporation in the history of the earth,
Apple, and Snit is a major enthusiast of Apple's products going
back as long as I've known him and more. It reeks of Alan
succumbing to the peer pressure, here on 2026 Usenet, trying to
bully Snit. It's pathetic. I hate Apple and yet Snit is my
friend. Alan is one of the bullies. What gives?!
OK, forget if his accusation is true or not. He says I "forged"
a PDF. I say I did not. Whatever. What is the full accusation
even? I do not get it. From what I can gather (and again I admit
I might be wrong!):
It was something like "I" posted a PDF where "I" tried to forge
an IP by covering the IP with the same IP on a different layer.
Somehow a different font made it seem "forged". The text was not
even edited, and meta data not even slightly "fixed". And then
"I" posted this to my own site with the idea that someone else
posted it first. But how does that even work?
My recollection is someone (Mackay maybe?) had multiple versions
and names for similar files and I did grab them and share copies
so people could see a timeline... but I think I goofed on my
naming or... who knows. Again, 2004 and I neither know nor care.
But with the idea of a "forgery by font change" not being
explained, and the idea the "forgery" was done to be as easy to
discover as possible, what he describes sounds like someone was
trying to frame me. Was in Mackay? Sandman? Alan himself (he
claims he discovered this forgery). I barely remember and both
don't know and don't really care. It was... again... 2004. I
think we can safely move on from some PDF silliness from then
that hurt nobody (that has been claimed anyway).
Just weird he and chrisv both got stuck on it all these years
later. Don't get it... just happy it seems both have backed off
a bit.
Even though I can't make sense of anyone's alleged evidence, I tend
to believe you because I've never known you to bullshit.
Thank you. I did not forge a PDF. Full stop. But in this case the
question to me is what the accusation even is. Usually at least they
can make that coherent... idiotic stuff like I made a plea bargain.
While provably false in my case, at least it is a coherent story!
Alan is a
stand-up guy *most* of the time - but he's been known to succumb to
emotion.
I agree. Marek was like that, years ago. He and I talked with the
agreement to not share -- but I think it is OK to say there is a lot
of peer pressure to hate the folks the trolls call "bad guys". People
fear the ostracization. That is my best guess here.
Snit, you are a FUCKING LIAR!
Here is but one thread where you make false claims about Marek Novotny.
And there are many more where you attacked him even after he gifted you a laptop for your wife to use.
You are a real piece of shit Michael Glasser / snit /Brock McNuggets
And make sure you read the other comments in the thread because people pounced on your lies.
What a fucking piece of shit you are snit.
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.os.linux.advocacy/c/7DIWTgWQEdM/m/Rl- GpPnhBAAJ
"Marek knows some CLI tools well, but he threatened my wife because I
noted
he was wrong about Linux:
Marek:
-----
Linux is a Server, A Cloud, A service, A mobile Platform, A
developers dream come true, A super cluster, a Main frame and a
DESKTOP. It's not JUST a desktop. You're a two-bit bullshit coward
who refuses to face what Linux actually is. It's too much for you,
obviously.
-----
Snit (referencing to the above quote):
----
But it is not all of those things. Not even close. It is USED by
those things but it is NOT those things.
-----
Marek then admitted I was right, claimed I did not know what I had taught
him (what?) and then threatened my wife.
The fact he did not even know this basic concept about Linux shows he is
NOT
very technically skilled in a general sense... even if he has some
focused
knowledge.
--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They
cannot
use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.
They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.
<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>"
On 2026-05-08 8:10 p.m., Chris wrote:
Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote in
news:69fe7554$0$25$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On May 8, 2026 at 4:37:34 PM MST, ""Joel W. Crump"" wrote
<2tuLR.534326$ZRIe.478812@fx22.iad>:
On 5/8/2026 7:15 PM, Brock McNuggets wrote:
On May 8, 2026 at 4:02:18 PM MST, ""Joel W. Crump"" wrote
<ZXtLR.316421$3L1.224468@fx45.iad>:
On 5/8/2026 5:45 PM, Kerwin wrote:
Alan wrote:
There is not one person reading this messages that thinks you're >>>>>>>> telling the truth.
Not one.
Speak for yourself.
Brock McNuggets explanation makes far more sense than yours.
Why do you make shit up, expect readers to believe it and then
when they don't, you raise your white flag and run away?
My mind isn't small enough to follow the alleged evidence any one
of the posters are referencing - but when Alan makes Snit AKA Brock >>>>>> his enemy, it smells rather fishy. Alan's entire life is devoted
to defending the greediest corporation in the history of the earth, >>>>>> Apple, and Snit is a major enthusiast of Apple's products going
back as long as I've known him and more. It reeks of Alan
succumbing to the peer pressure, here on 2026 Usenet, trying to
bully Snit. It's pathetic. I hate Apple and yet Snit is my
friend. Alan is one of the bullies. What gives?!
OK, forget if his accusation is true or not. He says I "forged"
a PDF. I say I did not. Whatever. What is the full accusation
even? I do not get it. From what I can gather (and again I admit
I might be wrong!):
It was something like "I" posted a PDF where "I" tried to forge
an IP by covering the IP with the same IP on a different layer.
Somehow a different font made it seem "forged". The text was not
even edited, and meta data not even slightly "fixed". And then
"I" posted this to my own site with the idea that someone else
posted it first. But how does that even work?
My recollection is someone (Mackay maybe?) had multiple versions
and names for similar files and I did grab them and share copies
so people could see a timeline... but I think I goofed on my
naming or... who knows. Again, 2004 and I neither know nor care.
But with the idea of a "forgery by font change" not being
explained, and the idea the "forgery" was done to be as easy to
discover as possible, what he describes sounds like someone was
trying to frame me. Was in Mackay? Sandman? Alan himself (he
claims he discovered this forgery). I barely remember and both
don't know and don't really care. It was... again... 2004. I
think we can safely move on from some PDF silliness from then
that hurt nobody (that has been claimed anyway).
Just weird he and chrisv both got stuck on it all these years
later. Don't get it... just happy it seems both have backed off
a bit.
Even though I can't make sense of anyone's alleged evidence, I tend
to believe you because I've never known you to bullshit.
Thank you. I did not forge a PDF. Full stop. But in this case the
question to me is what the accusation even is. Usually at least they
can make that coherent... idiotic stuff like I made a plea bargain.
While provably false in my case, at least it is a coherent story!
Alan is a
stand-up guy *most* of the time - but he's been known to succumb to
emotion.
I agree. Marek was like that, years ago. He and I talked with the
agreement to not share -- but I think it is OK to say there is a lot
of peer pressure to hate the folks the trolls call "bad guys". People
fear the ostracization. That is my best guess here.
Snit, you are a FUCKING LIAR!
Universally recognized.
Here is but one thread where you make false claims about Marek Novotny.
And there are many more where you attacked him even after he gifted you a
laptop for your wife to use.
You are a real piece of shit Michael Glasser / snit /Brock McNuggets
And make sure you read the other comments in the thread because people
pounced on your lies.
What a fucking piece of shit you are snit.
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.os.linux.advocacy/c/7DIWTgWQEdM/m/Rl-
GpPnhBAAJ
"Marek knows some CLI tools well, but he threatened my wife because I
noted
he was wrong about Linux:
Marek:
-----
Linux is a Server, A Cloud, A service, A mobile Platform, A
developers dream come true, A super cluster, a Main frame and a
DESKTOP. It's not JUST a desktop. You're a two-bit bullshit coward
who refuses to face what Linux actually is. It's too much for you,
obviously.
-----
Snit (referencing to the above quote):
----
But it is not all of those things. Not even close. It is USED by
those things but it is NOT those things.
-----
Marek then admitted I was right, claimed I did not know what I had taught
him (what?) and then threatened my wife.
The fact he did not even know this basic concept about Linux shows he is
NOT
very technically skilled in a general sense... even if he has some
focused
knowledge.
--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They
cannot
use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow
superior by attacking the messenger.
They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.
<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>"
The mere fact that Snit Brock McNuggets Michael Glasser Prescott
Parasite and Computer Guy would claim that Marek admitted he was right
is a laugh.
In every possible way, Marek was more knowledgeable about
everything than our parasitic friend is.
As for threatening his wife, no
such thing ever happened. This is yet more evidence of what kind of a snot-nosed punk we are dealing with.
Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote in news:69fe7554$0$25$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
I agree. Marek was like that, years ago. He and I talked with the
agreement to not share -- but I think it is OK to say there is a lot
of peer pressure to hate the folks the trolls call "bad guys". People
fear the ostracization. That is my best guess here.
Snit, you are a FUCKING LIAR!
Here is but one thread where you make false claims about Marek Novotny.
And there are many more where you attacked him even after he gifted you a laptop for your wife to use.
You are a real piece of shit Michael Glasser / snit /Brock McNuggets
And make sure you read the other comments in the thread because people pounced on your lies.
What a fucking piece of shit you are snit.
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.os.linux.advocacy/c/7DIWTgWQEdM/m/Rl- GpPnhBAAJ
"Marek knows some CLI tools well, but he threatened my wife because I
noted
he was wrong about Linux:
Marek:
-----
Linux is a Server, A Cloud, A service, A mobile Platform, A
developers dream come true, A super cluster, a Main frame and a
DESKTOP. It's not JUST a desktop. You're a two-bit bullshit coward
who refuses to face what Linux actually is. It's too much for you,
obviously.
-----
Snit (referencing to the above quote):
----
But it is not all of those things. Not even close. It is USED by
those things but it is NOT those things.
-----
The mere fact that Snit Brock McNuggets Michael Glasser Prescott
Parasite and Computer Guy would claim that Marek admitted he was right
is a laugh.
In every possible way, Marek was more knowledgeable about
everything than our parasitic friend is. As for threatening his wife, no
such thing ever happened. This is yet more evidence of what kind of a snot-nosed punk we are dealing with.
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.os.linux.advocacy/c/7DIWTgWQEdM/m/Rl-GpPnhBAAJ
some thing wrote:
Joel W. Crump wrote:
some thing wrote:
(snittery snipped)
Even though I can't make sense of anyone's alleged evidence, I tend
to believe you because I've never known you to bullshit.
(snittery snipped)
Snit, you are a FUCKING LIAR!
Chris wrote:
some thing wrote:
Joel W. Crump wrote:
some thing wrote:
(snittery snipped)
Even though I can't make sense of anyone's alleged evidence, I tend
to believe you because I've never known you to bullshit.
OMG
(snittery snipped)
This thing can claim that it didn't "forge" a PDF all it wants, but it
*did* alter the original PDF and make it available on its Web site.
Its motive was to deny that it had been busted-for and was lying-about
using a sock-puppet.
THE "SNIT" THING'S WEB SITE WAS THE SOURCE OF THE ALTERED PDF'S.
The thing then *did* dishonestly rename the original and asserted that
the original was the altered version. The thing *did* *lie* and claim
that Steve Mackey altered the original.
Snit, you are a FUCKING LIAR!
That thing is a *shameless* fscking liar. Full stop.
| Sysop: | DaiTengu |
|---|---|
| Location: | Appleton, WI |
| Users: | 1,116 |
| Nodes: | 10 (0 / 10) |
| Uptime: | 86:08:12 |
| Calls: | 14,305 |
| Files: | 186,338 |
| D/L today: |
832 files (257M bytes) |
| Messages: | 2,525,504 |