From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

On 11/7/24 08:28, Scout wrote:

"Joel" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote in message news:g8gnij1jaddmhan7mhfki4ojepffqsbmeo@4ax.com...

Read topic.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent.  States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

Texas does not deny needed abortions.

Then why are women dying when denied needed care.
Some are quite young and others have families that will need
a mother.

The laws are badly written to ignore medical indication
for pregnancy terminations when the fetus is already dead in
the womb poisoning the woman and in other condition which
threaten the life of the mother and her possible child.

Desire to live and to care for the children you
have already brought into the world is a valid reason
for pregnancy termination.

bliss - at 88 will never worry about personal denial of abortion
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

On 2026-06-25, BobbieSellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextremeinvalid.com> wrote:

On 11/7/24 08:28, Scout wrote:

"Joel" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:g8gnij1jaddmhan7mhfki4ojepffqsbmeo@4ax.com...

Read topic.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent.  States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

Texas does not deny needed abortions.

Then why are women dying when denied needed care.
Some are quite young and others have families that will need
a mother.

The laws are badly written to ignore medical indication
for pregnancy terminations when the fetus is already dead in
the womb poisoning the woman and in other condition which
threaten the life of the mother and her possible child.

Desire to live and to care for the children you
have already brought into the world is a valid reason
for pregnancy termination.

bliss - at 88 will never worry about personal denial of abortion

Speaking for myself. if the mother's life is in imminent danger then
every procedure necessary to save her life should be allowed by law.
If the baby can be saved, great.
If not, the woman's life comes first.

Any law that prevents this is cruel and sick
Does any state have such a law?

Secondly, if the fetus does not have a heartbeat then while I don't like
it I support terminating the pregnancy. This would normally be very early in the pregnancy..

Other than that, abortion is murder of an innocent baby and sadly has become
an industry and is being used as just another method of birth control.
--
pothead

“The forest was shrinking, but the trees kept voting for the axe,
for the axe was clever and convinced the trees that because
his handle was made of wood, he was one of them".

---Author Unknown
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2