The liberal left had better start looking for places to hide.
They may have the trannys, but we have the weapons.
https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/115181934991844419
The liberal left had better start looking for places to hide.
They may have the trannys, but we have the weapons.
https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/115181934991844419
On Sep 10, 2025 at 1:50:30 PM MST, ""Pye R. Squared"" wrote <68c1e496$4$21$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
The liberal left had better start looking for places to hide.
They may have the trannys, but we have the weapons.
https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/115181934991844419
I do not back such actions, even for someone as harmful as he was.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charlie_Kirk#Political_positions_and_activities
The US is in big trouble. Ideas like his spread like wildfire, and then too many gun deaths.
On 9/10/2025 5:07 PM, Brock McNuggets wrote:
On Sep 10, 2025 at 1:50:30 PM MST, ""Pye R. Squared"" wrote
<68c1e496$4$21$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
The liberal left had better start looking for places to hide.
They may have the trannys, but we have the weapons.
https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/115181934991844419
I do not back such actions, even for someone as harmful as he was.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charlie_Kirk#Political_positions_and_activities
The US is in big trouble. Ideas like his spread like wildfire, and then too >> many gun deaths.
I concur that shooting him is wrong, even if it makes some sense with
his commentary about the lives lost from gun violence.
After Paul Pelosi was attacked in his home, Kirk said he hoped an amazing patriot would bail out the attacker and ask him some questions so we would know more about the conspiracy theories going around, and said that the person
who bails him out would be a “midterm hero.”
I think Kirk was disgusting, and I perhaps disagreed with him about everything. But I don’t believe that any good will come from his murder, and I
hope we can continue to debate issues without shooting one another, that we can continue to have elections without violent mobs rioting and literally crapping in the capitol building, and that we can adopt stricter laws around the acquisition of deadly firearms.
I’m genuinely sorry for those who are mourning his death.  This is an unmitigated tragedy.
G-d bless America. Please. ----------------------------------------------------------------------
The liberal left had better start looking for places to hide. They may
have the trannys, but we have the weapons.
On 9/10/2025 8:48 PM, Brock McNuggets wrote:
After Paul Pelosi was attacked in his home, Kirk said he hoped an amazing
patriot would bail out the attacker and ask him some questions so we would >> know more about the conspiracy theories going around, and said that the person
who bails him out would be a “midterm hero.”
Given that, I have even less interest in his loss of life, but I'm not
glad he's dead. Anytime a gun is used in a homicide is a tragedy, period.
--I think Kirk was disgusting, and I perhaps disagreed with him about
everything. But I don’t believe that any good will come from his murder, and I
hope we can continue to debate issues without shooting one another, that we >> can continue to have elections without violent mobs rioting and literally
crapping in the capitol building, and that we can adopt stricter laws around >> the acquisition of deadly firearms.
I’m genuinely sorry for those who are mourning his death.  This is an >> unmitigated tragedy.
G-d bless America. Please.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We're working on it.
The liberal left had better start looking for places to hide.
They may have the trannys, but we have the weapons.
https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/115181934991844419
On 10 Sep 2025 20:50:30 GMT, "Pye R. Squared" <noemailplease@aol.org>
wrote:
The liberal left had better start looking for places to hide.
They may have the trannys, but we have the weapons.
https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/115181934991844419
You've wanted Civil War for years. Here's your first casualty.
Having a good time yet?
Governor Swill wrote:
On 10 Sep 2025 20:50:30 GMT, "Pye R. Squared" <noemailplease@aol.org>
wrote:
The liberal left had better start looking for places to hide.
They may have the trannys, but we have the weapons.
https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/115181934991844419
You've wanted Civil War for years. Here's your first casualty.
Having a good time yet?
Kirk was not the important outside his family.
Keyboard warriors and--
jello brains will pretend this is ignificant until they find something >shinier
Given his reputation and his actions, yes, he was important toKirk was not the important outside his family.
rightists causes outside his family.
Governor Swill wrote:
Given his reputation and his actions, yes, he was important toKirk was not the important outside his family.
rightists causes outside his family.
His shtick was to annoy college students which frankly is not that hard. That is what some instructors do daily.
He was not that bright and did not form for influential coalitions.
Now may god take him and bless him and with mercy heal him.
Governor Swill wrote:
chine.bleu wrote:
Kirk was not the important outside his family.
Given his reputation and his actions, yes, he was important to
rightists causes outside his family.
(more idiocy snipped)
chine.bleu wrote:
Governor Swill wrote:
chine.bleu wrote:
Kirk was not the important outside his family.
Idiot.
Given his reputation and his actions, yes, he was important to
rightists causes outside his family.
Clearly, and a true, valiant proponent of honest debate.
But some leftists can't tolerate anyone who disagrees with them.
But some leftists can't tolerate anyone who disagrees with them.
Clearly, and a true, valiant proponent of honest debate.
Bullshit. His "debate" methods were fundamentally dishonest and in bad
faith.
The liberal left had better start looking for places to hide.
They may have the trannys, but we have the weapons.
Pye R. Squared wrote:
The liberal left had better start looking for places to hide.
They may have the trannys, but we have the weapons.
Bring it on nigger.
You'll still claim that individuals don't have guns while the barrell of one is being shoved up your gaping MAGA ass and the triggers being pulled.
You should really be killing more rightists because they're the threat.
Trump was shot by a Republican.
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/trump-shooter-republican/
On 9/11/2025 2:36 PM, chrisv wrote:
chine.bleu wrote:
Governor Swill wrote:
chine.bleu wrote:
Kirk was not the important outside his family.
Idiot.
That comment did kind of come out of nowhere.
Given his reputation and his actions, yes, he was important to
rightists causes outside his family.
Clearly, and a true, valiant proponent of honest debate.
But some leftists can't tolerate anyone who disagrees with them.
If I debated him he'd be fucked, but of course I'd have to sell out to
get the chance, I got an offer to be on TV, I declined it. I can't work with that medium.
chine.bleu wrote:
Governor Swill wrote:
chine.bleu wrote:
Kirk was not the important outside his family.
Idiot.
Given his reputation and his actions, yes, he was important to
rightists causes outside his family.
Clearly, and a true, valiant proponent of honest debate.
But some leftists can't tolerate anyone who disagrees with them.
(more idiocy snipped)
Stop proving how stupid and ignorant you are.
Your response will be deleted, unread.
On 9/11/2025 2:36 PM, chrisv wrote:
chine.bleu wrote:
Governor Swill wrote:
chine.bleu wrote:
Kirk was not the important outside his family.
Idiot.
That comment did kind of come out of nowhere.
Given his reputation and his actions, yes, he was important to
rightists causes outside his family.
Clearly, and a true, valiant proponent of honest debate.
But some leftists can't tolerate anyone who disagrees with them.
If I debated him he'd be fucked, but of course I'd have to sell out to
get the chance, I got an offer to be on TV, I declined it. I can't work >with that medium.
On Thu, 11 Sep 2025 14:48:11 -0400, "Joel W. Crump"
<joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 9/11/2025 2:36 PM, chrisv wrote:
chine.bleu wrote:
Governor Swill wrote:
chine.bleu wrote:
Kirk was not the important outside his family.
Idiot.
That comment did kind of come out of nowhere.
Given his reputation and his actions, yes, he was important to
rightists causes outside his family.
Clearly, and a true, valiant proponent of honest debate.
But some leftists can't tolerate anyone who disagrees with them.
If I debated him he'd be fucked, but of course I'd have to sell out to
get the chance, I got an offer to be on TV, I declined it. I can't work >>with that medium.
Can you work with a large?
If I debated him [Charlie Kirk] he'd be fucked, but of course I'd have to sell out to
get the chance, I got an offer to be on TV, I declined it. I can't work
with that medium.
I know little to nothing about Charlie Kirk other than him being the
founder of turning point however if he debated you, he would destroy you. Look here:
https://youtu.be/iFaMUyxUEaM?si=QmdZwz-hzFB6TeSS
https://youtu.be/iFaMUyxUEaM?si=QmdZwz-hzFB6TeSS
chine.bleu wrote:
Governor Swill wrote:
chine.bleu wrote:
Kirk was not the important outside his family.
Idiot.
Given his reputation and his actions, yes, he was important to
rightists causes outside his family.
Clearly, and a true, valiant proponent of honest debate.
But some leftists can't tolerate anyone who disagrees with them.
On 9/11/2025 6:24 PM, pothead wrote:
If I debated him [Charlie Kirk] he'd be fucked, but of course I'd have to sell out to
get the chance, I got an offer to be on TV, I declined it. I can't work >>> with that medium.
I know little to nothing about Charlie Kirk other than him being the
founder of turning point however if he debated you, he would destroy you.
Look here:
https://youtu.be/iFaMUyxUEaM?si=QmdZwz-hzFB6TeSS
You think I have no idea who he is? He's a buffoon, he was only 31 FFS.
Don't kid yourself that he was some intellect. He was a sham.
On 9/11/2025 6:24 PM, pothead wrote:
https://youtu.be/iFaMUyxUEaM?si=QmdZwz-hzFB6TeSS
Watching enough of that to get the gist, it's very clear, he's not a
good debater, he just takes on weaker opponents in debate
and talks over
them. I would tear him a new asshole with his stupidity.
And you can
sit there and fantasize that I'm full of it, but you are gonna read 'em
and weep before long. I'm ascending.
You think I have no idea who he [Charlie Kirk] is? He's a buffoon, he was only 31 FFS.
Don't kid yourself that he was some intellect. He was a sham.
He had more intelligence in one ear lobe than you would have if you
lived to be 1,000 years old.
His shtick was to to put the ball into a dumb college student's
court and let them bury themselves in their own self contradiction.
On Thu, 11 Sep 2025 14:24:02 -0400, Alex wrote:
His shtick was to to put the ball into a dumb college student's
court and let them bury themselves in their own self contradiction.
Speaking of which, seems many on his side are planning to avenge his
death by clamping down on any kind of expression of celebration of his killing, and sympathy for his killer <https://www.theverge.com/policy/776840/charlie-kirk-death-social-media-jawboning>.
Quote from the deceased:
“Hate speech does not exist legally in America. There’s ugly
speech. There’s gross speech. There’s evil speech. And ALL of it
is protected by the First Amendment.”
Watching enough of that to get the gist, it's very clear, he's not a
good debater, he just takes on weaker opponents in debate and talks over them. I would tear him a new asshole with his stupidity. And you can
sit there and fantasize that I'm full of it, but you are gonna read 'em
and weep before long. I'm ascending.
On Sep 11, 2025 at 6:25:18 PM MST, "Lawrence D´Oliveiro" wrote <109vspt$339ut$1@dont-email.me>:
On Thu, 11 Sep 2025 14:24:02 -0400, Alex wrote:
His shtick was to to put the ball into a dumb college student's
court and let them bury themselves in their own self contradiction.
Speaking of which, seems many on his side are planning to avenge his
death by clamping down on any kind of expression of celebration of his
killing, and sympathy for his killer
<https://www.theverge.com/policy/776840/charlie-kirk-death-social-media-jawboning>.
Quote from the deceased:
“Hate speech does not exist legally in America. There’s ugly
speech. There’s gross speech. There’s evil speech. And ALL of it
is protected by the First Amendment.”
He was an evil piece of shit pushing a message of hatred and bigotry. Does not
mean I support his death.
I do take comfort though that he died in a way HE would have approved of, or did for innocent children.
Joel W. Crump wrote:
Watching enough of that to get the gist, it's very clear, he's not a
good debater, he just takes on weaker opponents in debate and talks over
them. I would tear him a new asshole with his stupidity. And you can
sit there and fantasize that I'm full of it, but you are gonna read 'em
and weep before long. I'm ascending.
College students can be rather buffoonish themselves. That is the point
of college. To expose high schoolers to the bigger world, and to give
them the tools and challenges to improve their brains. He chose a target rich field. He did not go up to people further along in education and experience.
Watching enough of that to get the gist, it's very clear, he's not a
good debater, he just takes on weaker opponents in debate and talks over
them. I would tear him a new asshole with his stupidity. And you can
sit there and fantasize that I'm full of it, but you are gonna read 'em
and weep before long. I'm ascending.
College students can be rather buffoonish themselves. That is the point
of college. To expose high schoolers to the bigger world, and to give
them the tools and challenges to improve their brains. He chose a target >rich field. He did not go up to people further along in education and >experience.
Sure, but that is the problem.
College is supposed to teach young minds HOW TO THINK not WHAT to think.
Our colleges and universities have morphed into indoctrination centers >instead of bee hives of learning.
On 2025-09-11, Governor Swill wrote:
On Thu, 11 Sep 2025 "Joel W. Crump" wrote:
On 9/11/2025 2:36 PM, chrisv wrote:Can you work with a large?
chine.bleu wrote:That comment did kind of come out of nowhere.
Governor Swill wrote:Idiot.
chine.bleu wrote:
Kirk was not the important outside his family.
If I debated him he'd be fucked, but of course I'd have to sell out to >>>get the chance, I got an offer to be on TV, I declined it. I can't work >>>with that medium.Clearly, and a true, valiant proponent of honest debate.Given his reputation and his actions, yes, he was important to
rightists causes outside his family.
But some leftists can't tolerate anyone who disagrees with them.
RE: your sig Swilly.
I answered that question already, I think.
However, here it is again.
One has nothing to do with the other.
My comments are based upon CITIES, which in many states, like NYS, slant the >stats big time.
So consider if NYC car owners purchased far more Fords than the rest of the >state. Does that allow the Ford owners across the country to claim NYS is
a Ford supporting state?
As for cities, more blacks = more crime especially black on black crime.
It's not racist it's a fact backed up by countless statistics.
That's my answer.
Now either return to your usual reasonable and normal or you will go from -6666 to -9999.
Your choice.
On 2025-09-12, chine.bleu <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> wrote:
Joel W. Crump wrote:Sure, but that is the problem.
Watching enough of that to get the gist, it's very clear, he's not aCollege students can be rather buffoonish themselves. That is the point
good debater, he just takes on weaker opponents in debate and talks over >>> them. I would tear him a new asshole with his stupidity. And you can
sit there and fantasize that I'm full of it, but you are gonna read 'em
and weep before long. I'm ascending.
of college. To expose high schoolers to the bigger world, and to give
them the tools and challenges to improve their brains. He chose a target
rich field. He did not go up to people further along in education and
experience.
College is supposed to teach young minds HOW TO THINK not WHAT to think.
Our colleges and universities have morphed into indoctrination centers instead of bee hives of learning.
pothead wrote:
On 2025-09-12, chine.bleu <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> wrote:
Joel W. Crump wrote:Sure, but that is the problem.
Watching enough of that to get the gist, it's very clear, he's not aCollege students can be rather buffoonish themselves. That is the point
good debater, he just takes on weaker opponents in debate and talks
over
them. I would tear him a new asshole with his stupidity. And you can >>>> sit there and fantasize that I'm full of it, but you are gonna read 'em >>>> and weep before long. I'm ascending.
of college. To expose high schoolers to the bigger world, and to give
them the tools and challenges to improve their brains. He chose a target >>> rich field. He did not go up to people further along in education and
experience.
College is supposed to teach young minds HOW TO THINK not WHAT to think.
exactly
Our colleges and universities have morphed into indoctrination centers
instead of bee hives of learning.
here in Australia leftist indoctrination starts in primary school
"Why is crime worse in blue cities in red states
than it is in blue cities in blue states?"
pothead wrote:
On 2025-09-12, chine.bleu <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> wrote:
Joel W. Crump wrote:
Sure, but that is the problem.Watching enough of that to get the gist, it's very clear, he's not aCollege students can be rather buffoonish themselves. That is the point
good debater, he just takes on weaker opponents in debate and talks
over
them. I would tear him a new asshole with his stupidity. And you can >>>> sit there and fantasize that I'm full of it, but you are gonna read 'em >>>> and weep before long. I'm ascending.
of college. To expose high schoolers to the bigger world, and to give
them the tools and challenges to improve their brains. He chose a target >>> rich field. He did not go up to people further along in education and
experience.
College is supposed to teach young minds HOW TO THINK not WHAT to think.
exactly
Our colleges and universities have morphed into indoctrination centers
instead of bee hives of learning.
here in Australia leftist indoctrination starts in primary school
On 9/11/2025 9:39 PM, Brock McNuggets wrote:
On Sep 11, 2025 at 6:25:18 PM MST, "Lawrence D´Oliveiro" wrote
<109vspt$339ut$1@dont-email.me>:
On Thu, 11 Sep 2025 14:24:02 -0400, Alex wrote:
His shtick was to to put the ball into a dumb college student's
court and let them bury themselves in their own self contradiction.
Speaking of which, seems many on his side are planning to avenge his
death by clamping down on any kind of expression of celebration of his
killing, and sympathy for his killer
<https://www.theverge.com/policy/776840/charlie-kirk-death-social-media-jawboning>.
Quote from the deceased:
“Hate speech does not exist legally in America. There’s ugly
speech. There’s gross speech. There’s evil speech. And ALL of it >>> is protected by the First Amendment.”
He was an evil piece of shit pushing a message of hatred and bigotry. Does not
mean I support his death.
I do take comfort though that he died in a way HE would have approved of, or >> did for innocent children.
Fuck Charlie Kirk. Fuck him hard, in the ass. I'll say it about a
murdered guy - but not celebrate his murder, which was horrific,
cowardly. Not surprising it happened, but gun violence should make us
all sick, it makes me sick. It might seem fair in some way given Kirk's comments on gun rights and violence, but that's the mistake, thinking
there is *EVER* an excuse for this.
Sniping him from a distance is
cowardly, period, running away from the cops, that's not a brave person, that's a misguided, selfish person, making life harder on the people
he's trying to impress with this stunt. I stand unimpressed.
On 9/11/2025 11:05 PM, Felix wrote:
pothead wrote:
On 2025-09-12, chine.bleu <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> wrote:
Joel W. Crump wrote:
exactlySure, but that is the problem.Watching enough of that to get the gist, it's very clear, he's not a >>>>> good debater, he just takes on weaker opponents in debate and talks >>>>> overCollege students can be rather buffoonish themselves. That is the point >>>> of college. To expose high schoolers to the bigger world, and to give
them. I would tear him a new asshole with his stupidity. And you can >>>>> sit there and fantasize that I'm full of it, but you are gonna read 'em >>>>> and weep before long. I'm ascending.
them the tools and challenges to improve their brains. He chose a target >>>> rich field. He did not go up to people further along in education and
experience.
College is supposed to teach young minds HOW TO THINK not WHAT to think. >>
You don't know how to think, but you are going to judge this? Heh.
Our colleges and universities have morphed into indoctrination centers
instead of bee hives of learning.
here in Australia leftist indoctrination starts in primary school
You're a marginal half-wit, no more.
On Thu, 11 Sep 2025 23:39:01 -0400, "Joel W. Crump"
<joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 9/11/2025 11:05 PM, Felix wrote:
pothead wrote:
Our colleges and universities have morphed into indoctrination centers >>>> instead of bee hives of learning.
here in Australia leftist indoctrination starts in primary school
You're a marginal half-wit, no more.
And semi literate. It's always amusing when illiterates discuss
literacy.
On 9/11/2025 11:05 PM, Felix wrote:
pothead wrote:
On 2025-09-12, chine.bleu <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> wrote:
Joel W. Crump wrote:
Sure, but that is the problem.Watching enough of that to get the gist, it's very clear, he's not a >>>>> good debater, he just takes on weaker opponents in debate andCollege students can be rather buffoonish themselves. That is the
talks over
them. I would tear him a new asshole with his stupidity. And you can >>>>> sit there and fantasize that I'm full of it, but you are gonna
read 'em
and weep before long. I'm ascending.
point
of college. To expose high schoolers to the bigger world, and to give
them the tools and challenges to improve their brains. He chose a
target
rich field. He did not go up to people further along in education and
experience.
College is supposed to teach young minds HOW TO THINK not WHAT to
think.
exactly
You don't know how to think, but you are going to judge this? Heh.
Our colleges and universities have morphed into indoctrination centers
instead of bee hives of learning.
here in Australia leftist indoctrination starts in primary school
You're a marginal half-wit, no more.
Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 9/11/2025 11:05 PM, Felix wrote:
pothead wrote:
On 2025-09-12, chine.bleu <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> wrote:
Joel W. Crump wrote:
Sure, but that is the problem.Watching enough of that to get the gist, it's very clear, he's not a >>>>>> good debater, he just takes on weaker opponents in debate andCollege students can be rather buffoonish themselves. That is the
talks over
them. I would tear him a new asshole with his stupidity. And you can >>>>>> sit there and fantasize that I'm full of it, but you are gonna
read 'em
and weep before long. I'm ascending.
point
of college. To expose high schoolers to the bigger world, and to give >>>>> them the tools and challenges to improve their brains. He chose a
target
rich field. He did not go up to people further along in education and >>>>> experience.
College is supposed to teach young minds HOW TO THINK not WHAT to
think.
exactly
You don't know how to think, but you are going to judge this? Heh.
Our colleges and universities have morphed into indoctrination centers >>>> instead of bee hives of learning.
here in Australia leftist indoctrination starts in primary school
You're a marginal half-wit, no more.
you don't know me. I've never spoken to you before. if it's your
practice to judge people you don't know, then it's you who's the half wit.
On 9/12/2025 2:52 AM, Felix wrote:
Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 9/11/2025 11:05 PM, Felix wrote:
pothead wrote:
On 2025-09-12, chine.bleu <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> wrote:
Joel W. Crump wrote:
Sure, but that is the problem.Watching enough of that to get the gist, it's very clear, he's not a >>>>>>> good debater, he just takes on weaker opponents in debate andCollege students can be rather buffoonish themselves. That is the >>>>>> point
talks over
them. I would tear him a new asshole with his stupidity. And you can >>>>>>> sit there and fantasize that I'm full of it, but you are gonna
read 'em
and weep before long. I'm ascending.
of college. To expose high schoolers to the bigger world, and to give >>>>>> them the tools and challenges to improve their brains. He chose a >>>>>> target
rich field. He did not go up to people further along in education and >>>>>> experience.
College is supposed to teach young minds HOW TO THINK not WHAT to
think.
exactly
You don't know how to think, but you are going to judge this? Heh.
Our colleges and universities have morphed into indoctrination centers >>>>> instead of bee hives of learning.
here in Australia leftist indoctrination starts in primary school
You're a marginal half-wit, no more.
you don't know me. I've never spoken to you before. if it's your
practice to judge people you don't know, then it's you who's the half wit.
Normally, you'd have a point there, that I was ASSuming a lot about you
from one post. But this is the kind of example where one post is enough
to do that. You want schools and colleges to be neutral, well they are, >right-wing morons call sensible things "liberal" and once it's labeled
that it's something to despise, well, fuck that noise, I'm on the left
as such but I'm a realist and a pragmatist, I will work with anyone with >common sense, left or right. It's the crackpots who divide us by
demanding that their way be dominant, it's arbitrary, onerous, I demand
a system that can meet people where they are, and that's what the
revolution is going to be about. No more two-party pendulum swing.
Stable, rational government.
On 9/11/2025 11:05 PM, Felix wrote:
pothead wrote:
On 2025-09-12, chine.bleu <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> wrote:
Joel W. Crump wrote:
Sure, but that is the problem.Watching enough of that to get the gist, it's very clear, he's not a >>>>> good debater, he just takes on weaker opponents in debate and talks >>>>> overCollege students can be rather buffoonish themselves. That is the point >>>> of college. To expose high schoolers to the bigger world, and to give
them. I would tear him a new asshole with his stupidity. And you can >>>>> sit there and fantasize that I'm full of it, but you are gonna read >>>>> 'em
and weep before long. I'm ascending.
them the tools and challenges to improve their brains. He chose a
target
rich field. He did not go up to people further along in education and
experience.
College is supposed to teach young minds HOW TO THINK not WHAT to
think.
exactly
You don't know how to think, but you are going to judge this? Heh.
Our colleges and universities have morphed into indoctrination centers
instead of bee hives of learning.
here in Australia leftist indoctrination starts in primary school
You're a marginal half-wit, no more.
I'm on the left
as such but I'm a realist and a pragmatist, I will work with anyone with
common sense, left or right. It's the crackpots who divide us by
demanding that their way be dominant, it's arbitrary, onerous, I demand
a system that can meet people where they are, and that's what the
revolution is going to be about. No more two-party pendulum swing.
Stable, rational government.
<chuckle> Joel and his imaginary revolution....
You don't know how to think, but you are going to judge this? Heh.
The critical thinker who says guys in dresses are normal has spoken.
You're a marginal half-wit, no more.
That still makes him an order of magnitude more than you.
On 9/11/2025 8:04 PM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
You think I have no idea who he [Charlie Kirk] is? He's a buffoon, he was only 31 FFS.
Don't kid yourself that he was some intellect. He was a sham.
He had more intelligence in one ear lobe than you would have if you
lived to be 1,000 years old.
You are a joke, saying that, cracker, redneck.
You think I have no idea who he [Charlie Kirk] is? He's a buffoon, he was only 31 FFS.
Don't kid yourself that he was some intellect. He was a sham.
He had more intelligence in one ear lobe than you would have if you
lived to be 1,000 years old.
<FAG CRICKETS>
You are a joke, saying that, cracker, redneck.
You are a pathetic disease-ridden faggot.
On 9/12/2025 7:14 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
You think I have no idea who he [Charlie Kirk] is? He's a buffoon, he was only 31 FFS.
Don't kid yourself that he was some intellect. He was a sham.
He had more intelligence in one ear lobe than you would have if you
lived to be 1,000 years old.
<FAG CRICKETS>
You are a joke, saying that, cracker, redneck.
You are a pathetic disease-ridden faggot.
No, loser. You are a pathetic 2025-Usenet drone. I'm an enigmatic
force in the world.
Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 9/11/2025 11:05 PM, Felix wrote:
pothead wrote:
On 2025-09-12, chine.bleu <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> wrote:
Joel W. Crump wrote:
Sure, but that is the problem.Watching enough of that to get the gist, it's very clear, he's not a >>>>>> good debater, he just takes on weaker opponents in debate andCollege students can be rather buffoonish themselves. That is the
talks over
them. I would tear him a new asshole with his stupidity. And you can >>>>>> sit there and fantasize that I'm full of it, but you are gonna
read 'em
and weep before long. I'm ascending.
point
of college. To expose high schoolers to the bigger world, and to give >>>>> them the tools and challenges to improve their brains. He chose a
target
rich field. He did not go up to people further along in education and >>>>> experience.
College is supposed to teach young minds HOW TO THINK not WHAT to
think.
exactly
You don't know how to think, but you are going to judge this? Heh.
Our colleges and universities have morphed into indoctrination centers >>>> instead of bee hives of learning.
here in Australia leftist indoctrination starts in primary school
You're a marginal half-wit, no more.
you don't know me. I've never spoken to you before. if it's your
practice to judge people you don't know, then it's you who's the half wit.
On 9/12/2025 2:52 AM, Felix wrote:
Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 9/11/2025 11:05 PM, Felix wrote:
pothead wrote:
On 2025-09-12, chine.bleu <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> wrote:
Joel W. Crump wrote:
Sure, but that is the problem.Watching enough of that to get the gist, it's very clear, he's not a >>>>>>> good debater, he just takes on weaker opponents in debate andCollege students can be rather buffoonish themselves. That is the >>>>>> point
talks over
them. I would tear him a new asshole with his stupidity. And you can >>>>>>> sit there and fantasize that I'm full of it, but you are gonna
read 'em
and weep before long. I'm ascending.
of college. To expose high schoolers to the bigger world, and to give >>>>>> them the tools and challenges to improve their brains. He chose a >>>>>> target
rich field. He did not go up to people further along in education and >>>>>> experience.
College is supposed to teach young minds HOW TO THINK not WHAT to
think.
exactly
You don't know how to think, but you are going to judge this? Heh.
Our colleges and universities have morphed into indoctrination centers >>>>> instead of bee hives of learning.
here in Australia leftist indoctrination starts in primary school
You're a marginal half-wit, no more.
you don't know me. I've never spoken to you before. if it's your
practice to judge people you don't know, then it's you who's the half wit.
Normally, you'd have a point there, that I was ASSuming a lot about you
from one post. But this is the kind of example where one post is enough
to do that. You want schools and colleges to be neutral, well they are, >right-wing morons call sensible things "liberal" and once it's labeled
that it's something to despise, well, fuck that noise, I'm on the left
as such but I'm a realist and a pragmatist, I will work with anyone with >common sense, left or right. It's the crackpots who divide us by
demanding that their way be dominant, it's arbitrary, onerous, I demand
a system that can meet people where they are, and that's what the
revolution is going to be about. No more two-party pendulum swing.
Stable, rational government.
On 9/11/2025 8:39 PM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 9/11/2025 11:05 PM, Felix wrote:
pothead wrote:
On 2025-09-12, chine.bleu <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> wrote:
Joel W. Crump wrote:
Sure, but that is the problem.Watching enough of that to get the gist, it's very clear, he's not a >>>>>> good debater, he just takes on weaker opponents in debate and talks >>>>>> overCollege students can be rather buffoonish themselves. That is the point >>>>> of college. To expose high schoolers to the bigger world, and to give >>>>> them the tools and challenges to improve their brains. He chose a
them. I would tear him a new asshole with his stupidity. And you can >>>>>> sit there and fantasize that I'm full of it, but you are gonna read >>>>>> 'em
and weep before long. I'm ascending.
target
rich field. He did not go up to people further along in education and >>>>> experience.
College is supposed to teach young minds HOW TO THINK not WHAT to
think.
exactly
You don't know how to think, but you are going to judge this? Heh.
The critical thinker who says guys in dresses are normal has spoken.
Our colleges and universities have morphed into indoctrination centers >>>> instead of bee hives of learning.
here in Australia leftist indoctrination starts in primary school
You're a marginal half-wit, no more.
That still makes him an order of magnitude more than you.
On 9/12/2025 3:58 AM, cyrus rance wrote:
You don't know how to think, but you are going to judge this? Heh.
The critical thinker who says guys in dresses are normal has spoken.
You're a marginal half-wit, no more.
That still makes him an order of magnitude more than you.
And yet you posted that from a remailer? Sorry, pal, I'm bigger and
badder than you, I don't need to refute your stupidity.
But some leftists can't tolerate anyone who disagrees with them.
... he said as he snipped what leftists said that he didn't agree
with.
On 9/12/2025 7:14 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
You think I have no idea who he [Charlie Kirk] is? He's a buffoon, he was only 31 FFS.
Don't kid yourself that he was some intellect. He was a sham.
He had more intelligence in one ear lobe than you would have if you
lived to be 1,000 years old.
<FAG CRICKETS>
You are a joke, saying that, cracker, redneck.
You are a pathetic disease-ridden faggot.
No, loser.
I'm an enematic farce in the world.
chine.bleu wrote:
Governor Swill wrote:
chine.bleu wrote:
Kirk was not the important outside his family.
Idiot.
Given his reputation and his actions, yes, he was important to
rightists causes outside his family.
Clearly, and a true, valiant proponent of honest debate.
But some leftists can't tolerate anyone who disagrees with them.
(more idiocy snipped)
Stop proving how stupid and ignorant you are.
Your response will be deleted, unread.
Governor Swill wrote:
But some leftists can't tolerate anyone who disagrees with them.
... he said as he snipped what leftists said that he didn't agree
with.
My snipping doesn't silence anyone, much less harm them in any way.
Joel W. Chump <joelchump@gmail.com> wrote:
I'm an enematic farce in the world.
Testify, brother.
Governor Swill wrote:
But some leftists can't tolerate anyone who disagrees with them.
... he said as he snipped what leftists said that he didn't agree
with.
My snipping doesn't silence anyone, much less harm them in any way.
chrisv wrote:
Governor Swill wrote:
But some leftists can't tolerate anyone who disagrees with them.
... he said as he snipped what leftists said that he didn't agree
with.
My snipping doesn't silence anyone, much less harm them in any way.
I thought you said my response would be deleted unread?
Message-ID: <6vi6ck95uvh8iq89fa71b9k3kng4l3o9se@4ax.com>
Yep, you sure did!
<laughs and points>
If you want an example of deleting and/or not reading posts, reply to
this one and I'll show you how it's done.
chrisv wrote:
Governor Swill wrote:
But some leftists can't tolerate anyone who disagrees with them.
... he said as he snipped what leftists said that he didn't agree
with.
My snipping doesn't silence anyone, much less harm them in any way.
I thought you said my response would be deleted unread?
Message-ID: <6vi6ck95uvh8iq89fa71b9k3kng4l3o9se@4ax.com>
Yep, you sure did!
<snip>
On 9/12/2025 3:31 AM, LeftistsAreFools wrote:
I'm on the left
as such but I'm a realist and a pragmatist, I will work with anyone with >>> common sense, left or right. It's the crackpots who divide us by
demanding that their way be dominant, it's arbitrary, onerous, I demand
a system that can meet people where they are, and that's what the
revolution is going to be about. No more two-party pendulum swing.
Stable, rational government.
<chuckle> Joel and his imaginary revolution....
You have no idea who I am, then.
The liberal left had better start looking for places to hide.
They may have the trannys, but we have the weapons.
https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/115181934991844419
chrisv wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:
<snip>
Just let it go, Chris.
The liberal left had better start looking for places to hide.
They may have the trannys, but we have the weapons.
https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/115181934991844419
On Thu, 11 Sep 2025 22:38:40 -0000 (UTC), "pothole," chromosomally and anatomically male but not the least bit masculine, and who is deathly afraid of Rudy, lied:
On 2025-09-11, Governor Swill wrote:
On Thu, 11 Sep 2025 "Joel W. Crump" wrote:
On 9/11/2025 2:36 PM, chrisv wrote:Can you work with a large?
chine.bleu wrote:That comment did kind of come out of nowhere.
Governor Swill wrote:Idiot.
chine.bleu wrote:
Kirk was not the important outside his family.
If I debated him he'd be fucked, but of course I'd have to sell out to >>>> get the chance, I got an offer to be on TV, I declined it. I can't work >>>> with that medium.Clearly, and a true, valiant proponent of honest debate.Given his reputation and his actions, yes, he was important to
rightists causes outside his family.
But some leftists can't tolerate anyone who disagrees with them.
RE: your sig Swilly.
I answered that question already, I think.
However, here it is again.
You haven't answered squat, poohead. You want to bang on daily about
how horrible crime infested Democrat cities are but you won't even acknowledge that at state level, that stat flips. You want to
maintain crime is entirely political, but if you're right, crime is
worse under Republicans.
Cities exist within states and cities within red states have worse
crime rates than cities within blue states. Red states outside cities
have higher crime rates than blue states outside cities.
THAT is the issue you keep dodging.
Yeah, crime is worse in cities than in other areas,
but why is it even worse in cities in red states?
Answer that or stfu with your daily crime whines.
One has nothing to do with the other.
So you're just going to lie about it? Cities and states have nothing
to do with each other?
My comments are based upon CITIES, which in many states, like NYS, slant the >> stats big time.
Here we go again, "The facts don't support my beliefs therefore the
facts are wrong."
So consider if NYC car owners purchased far more Fords than the rest of the >> state. Does that allow the Ford owners across the country to claim NYS is
a Ford supporting state?
Buying a Ford isn't a crime. Yet.
As for cities, more blacks = more crime especially black on black crime.
It's not racist it's a fact backed up by countless statistics.
I'm not disputing that either. In fact, I'm not disputing anything
you've claimed about urban crime. I just want know why you think
being in a red state amplifies the problem.
That's my answer.
It's not an answer, it's a dodge.
Now either return to your usual reasonable and normal or you will go from -6666 to -9999.
Your choice.
You think I care how you "score" me? You're a coward running from the
truth. Crime, especially violent crime, is worse under Republicans
than Democrats and you won't admit it.
Run, poohead, run!
You're a dishonest coward who can't face a fact, let alone himself.
Why is crime worse in red states? Why does Alaska, the least
populated state in the USA, the least "citified", have the nation's
highest crime rates?
| Sysop: | DaiTengu |
|---|---|
| Location: | Appleton, WI |
| Users: | 1,070 |
| Nodes: | 10 (0 / 10) |
| Uptime: | 158:56:16 |
| Calls: | 13,734 |
| Calls today: | 2 |
| Files: | 186,966 |
| D/L today: |
811 files (293M bytes) |
| Messages: | 2,418,682 |
