• 157 days with Linux

    From CrudeSausage@crude@sausa.ge to comp.os.linux.advocacy on Thu Dec 18 08:36:24 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vvBFbgyERaI>

    The entire video is filled with the compromises he had to make to do
    simple things such as talk to his friends in an online game or get
    DaVinci Resolve to work. Even after he more or less fell in love with
    the operating system, he was faced with needing to figure out how to
    configure the video editor so that he could edit the video he uploaded.
    For anyone who is being honest about Linux's shortcomings, this is a
    rather fun video.
    --
    CrudeSausage
    John 14:6
    Windows is fine.

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From vallor@vallor@vallor.earth to comp.os.linux.advocacy on Thu Dec 18 14:44:31 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    At Thu, 18 Dec 2025 08:36:24 -0500, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:

    <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vvBFbgyERaI>

    The entire video is filled with the compromises he had to make to do
    simple things such as talk to his friends in an online game or get
    DaVinci Resolve to work. Even after he more or less fell in love with
    the operating system, he was faced with needing to figure out how to configure the video editor so that he could edit the video he uploaded.
    For anyone who is being honest about Linux's shortcomings, this is a
    rather fun video.

    No.

    After 17 seconds, switched off.

    And you know why.
    --
    -v System76 Thelio Mega v1.1 x86_64 Mem: 258G
    OS: Linux 6.18.1 D: Mint 22.2
    NVIDIA RTX 3090Ti 24G (580.105.08) DE: Xfce 4.18 (X11)
    "There is no dark side of the moon. Really."
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From CrudeSausage@crude@sausa.ge to comp.os.linux.advocacy on Thu Dec 18 10:03:50 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 2025-12-18 9:44 a.m., vallor wrote:
    At Thu, 18 Dec 2025 08:36:24 -0500, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:

    <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vvBFbgyERaI>

    The entire video is filled with the compromises he had to make to do
    simple things such as talk to his friends in an online game or get
    DaVinci Resolve to work. Even after he more or less fell in love with
    the operating system, he was faced with needing to figure out how to
    configure the video editor so that he could edit the video he uploaded.
    For anyone who is being honest about Linux's shortcomings, this is a
    rather fun video.

    No.

    After 17 seconds, switched off.

    And you know why.

    Because the truth hurts, doesn't it?
    --
    CrudeSausage
    John 14:6
    Windows is fine.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From vallor@vallor@vallor.earth to comp.os.linux.advocacy on Thu Dec 18 15:19:03 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    At Thu, 18 Dec 2025 10:03:50 -0500, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:

    On 2025-12-18 9:44 a.m., vallor wrote:
    At Thu, 18 Dec 2025 08:36:24 -0500, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge>
    wrote:

    <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vvBFbgyERaI>

    The entire video is filled with the compromises he had to make to
    do simple things such as talk to his friends in an online game or
    get DaVinci Resolve to work. Even after he more or less fell in
    love with the operating system, he was faced with needing to
    figure out how to configure the video editor so that he could edit
    the video he uploaded. For anyone who is being honest about
    Linux's shortcomings, this is a rather fun video.

    No.

    After 17 seconds, switched off.

    And you know why.

    Because the truth hurts, doesn't it?

    Yeah, that's gotta be it -- not that stupid trolls
    are stupid, and I didn't want to sit through 30 minutes
    of it to make a point.
    --
    -v System76 Thelio Mega v1.1 x86_64 Mem: 258G
    OS: Linux 6.18.1 D: Mint 22.2
    NVIDIA RTX 3090Ti 24G (580.105.08) DE: Xfce 4.18 (X11)
    "A single fact can spoil a good argument."
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From pothead@pothead@snakebite.com to comp.os.linux.advocacy on Thu Dec 18 15:31:12 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 2025-12-18, vallor <vallor@vallor.earth> wrote:
    At Thu, 18 Dec 2025 10:03:50 -0500, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:

    On 2025-12-18 9:44 a.m., vallor wrote:
    At Thu, 18 Dec 2025 08:36:24 -0500, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge>
    wrote:

    <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vvBFbgyERaI>

    The entire video is filled with the compromises he had to make to
    do simple things such as talk to his friends in an online game or
    get DaVinci Resolve to work. Even after he more or less fell in
    love with the operating system, he was faced with needing to
    figure out how to configure the video editor so that he could edit
    the video he uploaded. For anyone who is being honest about
    Linux's shortcomings, this is a rather fun video.

    No.

    After 17 seconds, switched off.

    And you know why.

    Because the truth hurts, doesn't it?

    Yeah, that's gotta be it -- not that stupid trolls
    are stupid, and I didn't want to sit through 30 minutes
    of it to make a point.

    You lasted longer than me. I don't like the fast, stop frame, jumping
    around video as it gets me dizzy.
    --
    pothead

    Liberals claim to want to give a hearing to other views,
    but then are shocked and offended to discover that there
    are other views.

    William F. Buckley, Jr.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From CrudeSausage@crude@sausa.ge to comp.os.linux.advocacy on Thu Dec 18 10:56:36 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 2025-12-18 10:19 a.m., vallor wrote:
    At Thu, 18 Dec 2025 10:03:50 -0500, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:

    On 2025-12-18 9:44 a.m., vallor wrote:
    At Thu, 18 Dec 2025 08:36:24 -0500, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge>
    wrote:

    <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vvBFbgyERaI>

    The entire video is filled with the compromises he had to make to
    do simple things such as talk to his friends in an online game or
    get DaVinci Resolve to work. Even after he more or less fell in
    love with the operating system, he was faced with needing to
    figure out how to configure the video editor so that he could edit
    the video he uploaded. For anyone who is being honest about
    Linux's shortcomings, this is a rather fun video.

    No.

    After 17 seconds, switched off.

    And you know why.

    Because the truth hurts, doesn't it?

    Yeah, that's gotta be it -- not that stupid trolls
    are stupid, and I didn't want to sit through 30 minutes
    of it to make a point.

    Except that he's not a troll. He genuinely wanted to switch and made
    every effort to do so. Expectedly, you didn't even care what he had to
    say because the only truth you will accept about the Linux experience is
    that it is excellent. Much like the other Linux advocates, if someone
    faces trouble, "the problem is between the keyboard and the screen" or
    they didn't "RTFM" enough.

    I'm sure 2026 will be the year of Linux. The continued misery of
    configuring things ad nauseum to achieve the simplest things and the
    insertion of new bugs every day because faggots are insisting on
    rewriting everything in Rust should make the experience pleasant.
    --
    CrudeSausage
    John 14:6
    Windows is fine.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Chris Ahlstrom@OFeem1987@teleworm.us to comp.os.linux.advocacy on Thu Dec 18 12:37:27 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    vallor wrote this post by blinking in Morse code:

    At Thu, 18 Dec 2025 10:03:50 -0500, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:

    On 2025-12-18 9:44 a.m., vallor wrote:
    At Thu, 18 Dec 2025 08:36:24 -0500, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge>
    wrote:

    <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vvBFbgyERaI>

    The entire video is filled with the compromises he had to make to
    do simple things such as talk to his friends in an online game or
    get DaVinci Resolve to work. Even after he more or less fell in
    love with the operating system, he was faced with needing to
    figure out how to configure the video editor so that he could edit
    the video he uploaded. For anyone who is being honest about
    Linux's shortcomings, this is a rather fun video.

    No.

    After 17 seconds, switched off.

    And you know why.

    Because the truth hurts, doesn't it?

    Yeah, that's gotta be it -- not that stupid trolls
    are stupid, and I didn't want to sit through 30 minutes
    of it to make a point.

    A comment from that silly site:

    @Neon217 2 weeks ago

    Used to look for the local ISP in tech support. One of the
    agents, during training, asked why we didn't offer support for
    Linux systems. I spoke up before the trainer had a chance to,
    and said "Because if they are using Linux, they know more
    about computers than you do." and the trainer just pointed at
    me and said "basically that"

    He meant s/look/work.

    Another one:

    @jooanantny8945 2 weeks ago

    I switched my girl to fedora kde, installed the chrome,
    spotify and libreoffice. Recently asked her what it felt like
    now being a linux user. She'd forgotten she had linux on her
    laptop😂
    --
    Life begins at the centerfold and expands outward.
    -- Miss November, 1966
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From CrudeSausage@crude@sausa.ge to comp.os.linux.advocacy on Thu Dec 18 13:45:32 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 2025-12-18 12:37 p.m., Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
    vallor wrote this post by blinking in Morse code:

    At Thu, 18 Dec 2025 10:03:50 -0500, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:

    On 2025-12-18 9:44 a.m., vallor wrote:
    At Thu, 18 Dec 2025 08:36:24 -0500, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge>
    wrote:

    <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vvBFbgyERaI>

    The entire video is filled with the compromises he had to make to
    do simple things such as talk to his friends in an online game or
    get DaVinci Resolve to work. Even after he more or less fell in
    love with the operating system, he was faced with needing to
    figure out how to configure the video editor so that he could edit
    the video he uploaded. For anyone who is being honest about
    Linux's shortcomings, this is a rather fun video.

    No.

    After 17 seconds, switched off.

    And you know why.

    Because the truth hurts, doesn't it?

    Yeah, that's gotta be it -- not that stupid trolls
    are stupid, and I didn't want to sit through 30 minutes
    of it to make a point.

    A comment from that silly site:

    @Neon217 2 weeks ago

    Used to look for the local ISP in tech support. One of the
    agents, during training, asked why we didn't offer support for
    Linux systems. I spoke up before the trainer had a chance to,
    and said "Because if they are using Linux, they know more
    about computers than you do." and the trainer just pointed at
    me and said "basically that"

    He meant s/look/work.

    Another one:

    @jooanantny8945 2 weeks ago

    I switched my girl to fedora kde, installed the chrome,
    spotify and libreoffice. Recently asked her what it felt like
    now being a linux user. She'd forgotten she had linux on her
    laptop😂

    You'll know anyway when she decides that she no longer wants to speak to
    you.
    --
    CrudeSausage
    John 14:6
    Windows is fine.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From rbowman@bowman@montana.com to comp.os.linux.advocacy on Thu Dec 18 19:46:27 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On Thu, 18 Dec 2025 08:36:24 -0500, CrudeSausage wrote:

    <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vvBFbgyERaI>

    The entire video is filled with the compromises he had to make to do
    simple things such as talk to his friends in an online game or get
    DaVinci Resolve to work. Even after he more or less fell in love with
    the operating system, he was faced with needing to figure out how to configure the video editor so that he could edit the video he uploaded.
    For anyone who is being honest about Linux's shortcomings, this is a
    rather fun video.

    There obviously are applications that are only available or only work well
    on Windows. If they are your principal uses stay with Windows.

    As far as that specific video, I lasted 36 seconds before writing the guy
    off as an asshole.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From RonB@ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com to comp.os.linux.advocacy on Fri Dec 19 06:52:57 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 2025-12-18, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote: ><https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vvBFbgyERaI>

    The entire video is filled with the compromises he had to make to do
    simple things such as talk to his friends in an online game or get
    DaVinci Resolve to work. Even after he more or less fell in love with
    the operating system, he was faced with needing to figure out how to configure the video editor so that he could edit the video he uploaded.
    For anyone who is being honest about Linux's shortcomings, this is a
    rather fun video.

    These "shortcomings" or "compromises" don't effect me. I don't talk to my friends on a computer (I use a phone) or play online games. I don't know
    what DaVinci Resolve is. (So I'm definitely not missing it.) I think there
    are probably a lot of people who use computers the way I use them — for general purpose use.

    So, no reason for me to watch this video. Thanks anyhow.
    --
    Just because you play "dress up" doesn't
    mean I have to play "make believe."
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From RonB@ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com to comp.os.linux.advocacy on Fri Dec 19 06:54:37 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 2025-12-18, pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:
    On 2025-12-18, vallor <vallor@vallor.earth> wrote:
    At Thu, 18 Dec 2025 10:03:50 -0500, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:

    On 2025-12-18 9:44 a.m., vallor wrote:
    At Thu, 18 Dec 2025 08:36:24 -0500, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge>
    wrote:

    <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vvBFbgyERaI>

    The entire video is filled with the compromises he had to make to
    do simple things such as talk to his friends in an online game or
    get DaVinci Resolve to work. Even after he more or less fell in
    love with the operating system, he was faced with needing to
    figure out how to configure the video editor so that he could edit
    the video he uploaded. For anyone who is being honest about
    Linux's shortcomings, this is a rather fun video.

    No.

    After 17 seconds, switched off.

    And you know why.

    Because the truth hurts, doesn't it?

    Yeah, that's gotta be it -- not that stupid trolls
    are stupid, and I didn't want to sit through 30 minutes
    of it to make a point.

    You lasted longer than me. I don't like the fast, stop frame, jumping
    around video as it gets me dizzy.

    I'm happy I didn't even try watching it.
    --
    Just because you play "dress up" doesn't
    mean I have to play "make believe."
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From RonB@ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com to comp.os.linux.advocacy on Fri Dec 19 06:56:12 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 2025-12-18, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
    On 2025-12-18 10:19 a.m., vallor wrote:
    At Thu, 18 Dec 2025 10:03:50 -0500, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:

    On 2025-12-18 9:44 a.m., vallor wrote:
    At Thu, 18 Dec 2025 08:36:24 -0500, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge>
    wrote:

    <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vvBFbgyERaI>

    The entire video is filled with the compromises he had to make to
    do simple things such as talk to his friends in an online game or
    get DaVinci Resolve to work. Even after he more or less fell in
    love with the operating system, he was faced with needing to
    figure out how to configure the video editor so that he could edit
    the video he uploaded. For anyone who is being honest about
    Linux's shortcomings, this is a rather fun video.

    No.

    After 17 seconds, switched off.

    And you know why.

    Because the truth hurts, doesn't it?

    Yeah, that's gotta be it -- not that stupid trolls
    are stupid, and I didn't want to sit through 30 minutes
    of it to make a point.

    Except that he's not a troll. He genuinely wanted to switch and made
    every effort to do so. Expectedly, you didn't even care what he had to
    say because the only truth you will accept about the Linux experience is that it is excellent. Much like the other Linux advocates, if someone
    faces trouble, "the problem is between the keyboard and the screen" or
    they didn't "RTFM" enough.

    I'm sure 2026 will be the year of Linux. The continued misery of
    configuring things ad nauseum to achieve the simplest things and the insertion of new bugs every day because faggots are insisting on
    rewriting everything in Rust should make the experience pleasant.

    You're misery and confusion using Linux is your problem, not mine.
    Windows is misery to me. For so many reasons.
    --
    Just because you play "dress up" doesn't
    mean I have to play "make believe."
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From RonB@ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com to comp.os.linux.advocacy on Fri Dec 19 06:59:28 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 2025-12-18, rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote:
    On Thu, 18 Dec 2025 08:36:24 -0500, CrudeSausage wrote:

    <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vvBFbgyERaI>

    The entire video is filled with the compromises he had to make to do
    simple things such as talk to his friends in an online game or get
    DaVinci Resolve to work. Even after he more or less fell in love with
    the operating system, he was faced with needing to figure out how to
    configure the video editor so that he could edit the video he uploaded.
    For anyone who is being honest about Linux's shortcomings, this is a
    rather fun video.

    There obviously are applications that are only available or only work well on Windows. If they are your principal uses stay with Windows.

    Exactly. Never could quite understand a Windows user's obsession with Linux. If you like Windows, use it. I like Linux, that's why I use it.

    As far as that specific video, I lasted 36 seconds before writing the guy off as an asshole.

    I'm really happy I didn't watch this video now. I see enough of these
    asses online as it is.
    --
    Just because you play "dress up" doesn't
    mean I have to play "make believe."
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From CrudeSausage@crude@sausa.ge to comp.os.linux.advocacy on Fri Dec 19 08:54:02 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 2025-12-19 1:52 a.m., RonB wrote:
    On 2025-12-18, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
    <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vvBFbgyERaI>

    The entire video is filled with the compromises he had to make to do
    simple things such as talk to his friends in an online game or get
    DaVinci Resolve to work. Even after he more or less fell in love with
    the operating system, he was faced with needing to figure out how to
    configure the video editor so that he could edit the video he uploaded.
    For anyone who is being honest about Linux's shortcomings, this is a
    rather fun video.

    These "shortcomings" or "compromises" don't effect me. I don't talk to my friends on a computer (I use a phone) or play online games. I don't know
    what DaVinci Resolve is. (So I'm definitely not missing it.) I think there are probably a lot of people who use computers the way I use them — for general purpose use.

    So, no reason for me to watch this video. Thanks anyhow.

    You have always been honest about your needs not being as advanced as
    others. Admittedly, even for me, Linux is fine for the majority of what
    I do especially since I make use of a number of open-source tools.
    Gaming is where I have to compromise, and the compromise is smaller
    every year. I can live without OPAL hardware encryption and my
    fingerprint reader rather easily in moving to Linux.
    --
    CrudeSausage
    John 14:6
    Windows is fine.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From CrudeSausage@crude@sausa.ge to comp.os.linux.advocacy on Fri Dec 19 08:55:34 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 2025-12-19 1:56 a.m., RonB wrote:
    On 2025-12-18, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
    On 2025-12-18 10:19 a.m., vallor wrote:
    At Thu, 18 Dec 2025 10:03:50 -0500, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote: >>>
    On 2025-12-18 9:44 a.m., vallor wrote:
    At Thu, 18 Dec 2025 08:36:24 -0500, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge>
    wrote:

    <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vvBFbgyERaI>

    The entire video is filled with the compromises he had to make to
    do simple things such as talk to his friends in an online game or
    get DaVinci Resolve to work. Even after he more or less fell in
    love with the operating system, he was faced with needing to
    figure out how to configure the video editor so that he could edit >>>>>> the video he uploaded. For anyone who is being honest about
    Linux's shortcomings, this is a rather fun video.

    No.

    After 17 seconds, switched off.

    And you know why.

    Because the truth hurts, doesn't it?

    Yeah, that's gotta be it -- not that stupid trolls
    are stupid, and I didn't want to sit through 30 minutes
    of it to make a point.

    Except that he's not a troll. He genuinely wanted to switch and made
    every effort to do so. Expectedly, you didn't even care what he had to
    say because the only truth you will accept about the Linux experience is
    that it is excellent. Much like the other Linux advocates, if someone
    faces trouble, "the problem is between the keyboard and the screen" or
    they didn't "RTFM" enough.

    I'm sure 2026 will be the year of Linux. The continued misery of
    configuring things ad nauseum to achieve the simplest things and the
    insertion of new bugs every day because faggots are insisting on
    rewriting everything in Rust should make the experience pleasant.

    You're misery and confusion using Linux is your problem, not mine.
    Windows is misery to me. For so many reasons.


    It might be, but look at who is being tasked with improving Linux
    nowadays: a bunch of homosexuals who believe that rejecting God and
    stating that they're non-binary or two-spirit is more important than
    actually improving the code. Even their choice of programming language
    is political. It's embarrassing.
    --
    CrudeSausage
    John 14:6
    Windows is fine.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From -hh@recscuba_google@huntzinger.com to comp.os.linux.advocacy on Fri Dec 19 13:10:09 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 12/19/25 01:56, RonB wrote:
    On 2025-12-18, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
    ...
    I'm sure 2026 will be the year of Linux. The continued misery of
    configuring things ad nauseum to achieve the simplest things and the
    insertion of new bugs every day because faggots are insisting on
    rewriting everything in Rust should make the experience pleasant.

    You're misery and confusion using Linux is your problem, not mine.
    Windows is misery to me. For so many reasons.

    Of course, a question is how dated is RonB's experience with Windows.

    Because IIRC, his disdain for Apple's MacOS was from the "Classic" OS ~9
    era, which OS X rendered obsolete a mere 24.75 years ago (March 2001).


    -hh

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From rbowman@bowman@montana.com to comp.os.linux.advocacy on Fri Dec 19 20:43:32 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On Fri, 19 Dec 2025 13:10:09 -0500, -hh wrote:

    On 12/19/25 01:56, RonB wrote:
    On 2025-12-18, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
    ...
    I'm sure 2026 will be the year of Linux. The continued misery of
    configuring things ad nauseum to achieve the simplest things and the
    insertion of new bugs every day because faggots are insisting on
    rewriting everything in Rust should make the experience pleasant.

    You're misery and confusion using Linux is your problem, not mine.
    Windows is misery to me. For so many reasons.

    Of course, a question is how dated is RonB's experience with Windows.

    Mine may be a little more current, like last Patch Tuesday. Install 25H2?
    A little while later, "Only fooling."

    I'm not heart broken since 25H2 is mostly slop. (Supposedly the word of
    the year)
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From CrudeSausage@crude@sausa.ge to comp.os.linux.advocacy on Sat Dec 20 08:25:11 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 2025-12-19 1:10 p.m., -hh wrote:
    On 12/19/25 01:56, RonB wrote:
    On 2025-12-18, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
    ...
    I'm sure 2026 will be the year of Linux. The continued misery of
    configuring things ad nauseum to achieve the simplest things and the
    insertion of new bugs every day because faggots are insisting on
    rewriting everything in Rust should make the experience pleasant.

    You're misery and confusion using Linux is your problem, not mine.
    Windows is misery to me. For so many reasons.

    Of course, a question is how dated is RonB's experience with Windows.

    Because IIRC, his disdain for Apple's MacOS was from the "Classic" OS ~9 era, which OS X rendered obsolete a mere 24.75 years ago (March 2001).

    I'm pretty sure that he's used a more recent version of MacOS.
    Regardless, I don't believe that he would be enjoy it considering the
    amount of unnecessary graphical elements in there compared to something
    like Cinnamon. I think he likes things simple, and I don't see what's
    wrong with that.
    --
    CrudeSausage
    John 14:6
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From rbowman@bowman@montana.com to comp.os.linux.advocacy on Sun Dec 21 05:51:12 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On Sat, 20 Dec 2025 08:25:11 -0500, CrudeSausage wrote:

    I'm pretty sure that he's used a more recent version of MacOS.
    Regardless, I don't believe that he would be enjoy it considering the
    amount of unnecessary graphical elements in there compared to something
    like Cinnamon. I think he likes things simple, and I don't see what's
    wrong with that.

    https://www.theregister.com/2025/12/19/pearos/?td=rt-3a

    "evived distro returns on Arch with KDE Plasma, global menus, and a
    familiar macOS-style sheen"

    Something for everybody.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From RonB@ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com to comp.os.linux.advocacy on Sun Dec 21 07:28:05 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 2025-12-20, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
    On 2025-12-19 1:10 p.m., -hh wrote:
    On 12/19/25 01:56, RonB wrote:
    On 2025-12-18, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
    ...
    I'm sure 2026 will be the year of Linux. The continued misery of
    configuring things ad nauseum to achieve the simplest things and the
    insertion of new bugs every day because faggots are insisting on
    rewriting everything in Rust should make the experience pleasant.

    You're misery and confusion using Linux is your problem, not mine.
    Windows is misery to me. For so many reasons.

    Of course, a question is how dated is RonB's experience with Windows.

    Because IIRC, his disdain for Apple's MacOS was from the "Classic" OS ~9
    era, which OS X rendered obsolete a mere 24.75 years ago (March 2001).

    I'm pretty sure that he's used a more recent version of MacOS.
    Regardless, I don't believe that he would be enjoy it considering the
    amount of unnecessary graphical elements in there compared to something
    like Cinnamon. I think he likes things simple, and I don't see what's
    wrong with that.

    The Mac OS looks pretty. That's about the only compliment I can really give it. As an OS it seems convoluted to me. If I was a graphic artist I would probably use it as it does (or used to) have the most advanced features in
    the Mac versions of the applications we used in the print shop. Also, if I wanted to unite all my Apple devices and buy into the Apple environment, I would probably like it. I definitely don't want that. I now have a "new" iPhone SE 3. I got fed up with Android. When I was setting the SE up it kept wanting to connect to my old MacBook Air (runs Monterey, BTW) and my old iPhone. I had to keep telling it no. I've managed to skip most of the set
    up, but it's nagging me to upgrade to iOS 26.x and finish setting it up. I think the version of the iOS I'm using is old enough not to have any of the
    AI crap so I'm keeping it there. Let it nag away. I'm not sure it's any
    better than Android. I wish the Blackberrys were still made.
    --
    Just because you play "dress up" doesn't
    mean I have to play "make believe."
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From RonB@ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com to comp.os.linux.advocacy on Sun Dec 21 07:30:03 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 2025-12-21, rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote:
    On Sat, 20 Dec 2025 08:25:11 -0500, CrudeSausage wrote:

    I'm pretty sure that he's used a more recent version of MacOS.
    Regardless, I don't believe that he would be enjoy it considering the
    amount of unnecessary graphical elements in there compared to something
    like Cinnamon. I think he likes things simple, and I don't see what's
    wrong with that.

    https://www.theregister.com/2025/12/19/pearos/?td=rt-3a

    "evived distro returns on Arch with KDE Plasma, global menus, and a
    familiar macOS-style sheen"

    Something for everybody.

    Not something I would want, but for any Mac user moving to Linux it might be nice.
    --
    Just because you play "dress up" doesn't
    mean I have to play "make believe."
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From vallor@vallor@vallor.earth to comp.os.linux.advocacy on Sun Dec 21 08:12:15 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    At Sun, 21 Dec 2025 07:28:05 -0000 (UTC), RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote:

    I wish the Blackberrys were still made.

    Before I bought my first Droid, I was waiting for Palm
    to get released on a carrier with their new "WebOS".
    (Verizon came out with Droids first, making them a
    "kingmaker".)

    I had a Palm Treo, and loved it. No, Apple didn't invent
    the "smart phone" -- Treo's were plenty smart, and they
    ran PalmOS. I could stream my favorite Internet music
    streams while out on walks. I could take pictures and
    video. I could check my email. It was a "smart phone"
    before there was such a name.

    ObLinux: Android uses Linux, and I trust that a lot more
    than "the competition"...

    ObLinux2: "ObLinux" means "obligatory Linux", which is including
    something Linux-related in a Linux advocacy post.
    --
    -v System76 Thelio Mega v1.1 x86_64 Mem: 258G
    OS: Linux 6.18.1 D: Mint 22.2
    NVIDIA RTX 3090Ti 24G (580.105.08) DE: Xfce 4.18 (X11)
    "Chernobyl used Windows"
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From RonB@ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com to comp.os.linux.advocacy on Sun Dec 21 08:26:42 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 2025-12-21, vallor <vallor@vallor.earth> wrote:
    At Sun, 21 Dec 2025 07:28:05 -0000 (UTC), RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote:

    I wish the Blackberrys were still made.

    Before I bought my first Droid, I was waiting for Palm
    to get released on a carrier with their new "WebOS".
    (Verizon came out with Droids first, making them a
    "kingmaker".)

    I had a Palm Treo, and loved it. No, Apple didn't invent
    the "smart phone" -- Treo's were plenty smart, and they
    ran PalmOS. I could stream my favorite Internet music
    streams while out on walks. I could take pictures and
    video. I could check my email. It was a "smart phone"
    before there was such a name.

    I had a Treo also and (before that) a "mini-Treo," named Palm Centro. I
    really liked that little Treo, but it wasn't nearly as well built as the regular Treo versions. The Blackberry came later and I used it as long as I could, just like the Treo. The Q10, which was a really nicely desgined
    phone. I hated it when support ended for that one as well.

    ObLinux: Android uses Linux, and I trust that a lot more
    than "the competition"...

    ObLinux2: "ObLinux" means "obligatory Linux", which is including
    something Linux-related in a Linux advocacy post.

    --
    Just because you play "dress up" doesn't
    mean I have to play "make believe."
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Chris Ahlstrom@OFeem1987@teleworm.us to comp.os.linux.advocacy on Sun Dec 21 08:41:37 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    vallor wrote this post by blinking in Morse code:

    At Sun, 21 Dec 2025 07:28:05 -0000 (UTC), RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote:

    I wish the Blackberrys were still made.

    Before I bought my first Droid, I was waiting for Palm
    to get released on a carrier with their new "WebOS".
    (Verizon came out with Droids first, making them a
    "kingmaker".)

    I had a Palm Treo, and loved it. No, Apple didn't invent
    the "smart phone" -- Treo's were plenty smart, and they
    ran PalmOS. I could stream my favorite Internet music
    streams while out on walks. I could take pictures and
    video. I could check my email. It was a "smart phone"
    before there was such a name.

    I had a Palm Pixi+. It was a nice little phone, and the app store
    was decent.

    Had a couple of Android phones, then tried an iPhone, not bad, but
    too confining, so now I'm on a recent Samsung Galaxy S....

    Heh, didn't Trump think Biden was a...
    --
    I wish a robot would get elected president. That way, when he came to town,
    we could all take a shot at him and not feel too bad.
    -- Jack Handey
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From vallor@vallor@vallor.earth to comp.os.linux.advocacy on Sun Dec 21 14:51:18 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    At Sun, 21 Dec 2025 08:41:37 -0500, Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote:

    vallor wrote this post by blinking in Morse code:

    At Sun, 21 Dec 2025 07:28:05 -0000 (UTC), RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote:

    I wish the Blackberrys were still made.

    Before I bought my first Droid, I was waiting for Palm
    to get released on a carrier with their new "WebOS".
    (Verizon came out with Droids first, making them a
    "kingmaker".)

    I had a Palm Treo, and loved it. No, Apple didn't invent
    the "smart phone" -- Treo's were plenty smart, and they
    ran PalmOS. I could stream my favorite Internet music
    streams while out on walks. I could take pictures and
    video. I could check my email. It was a "smart phone"
    before there was such a name.

    I had a Palm Pixi+. It was a nice little phone, and the app store
    was decent.

    Had a couple of Android phones, then tried an iPhone, not bad, but
    too confining, so now I'm on a recent Samsung Galaxy S....

    I'm using a Pixel Pro 9 something-something.

    It's a good phone, frequent updates. Only issue I
    ran into once was trying to get a recorded video
    off it using USB. The "standard" way (ptp?) didn't
    work, I had to connect with debugging and grab the file
    off that way.

    Was a 5+GB video, so I imagine I was over some
    size limit for the standard media protocol.

    New dynamic sig code running below:
    --
    -v ASUS TUF DASH F15 x86_64 Mem: 16G
    OS: Linux 6.14.0-36-generic D: Mint 22.2 DE: Xfce 4.18 (X11)
    NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile (6G) (510.47.03)
    "Who needs Valium when you have a cat you can pet?"
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From CrudeSausage@crude@sausa.ge to comp.os.linux.advocacy on Sun Dec 21 20:04:23 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 2025-12-21 12:51 a.m., rbowman wrote:
    On Sat, 20 Dec 2025 08:25:11 -0500, CrudeSausage wrote:

    I'm pretty sure that he's used a more recent version of MacOS.
    Regardless, I don't believe that he would be enjoy it considering the
    amount of unnecessary graphical elements in there compared to something
    like Cinnamon. I think he likes things simple, and I don't see what's
    wrong with that.

    https://www.theregister.com/2025/12/19/pearos/?td=rt-3a

    "evived distro returns on Arch with KDE Plasma, global menus, and a
    familiar macOS-style sheen"

    Something for everybody.

    That trash icon in the screenshot definitely doesn't fit with the rest
    of the system.
    --
    CrudeSausage
    John 14:6
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From CrudeSausage@crude@sausa.ge to comp.os.linux.advocacy on Sun Dec 21 20:07:34 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 2025-12-21 2:28 a.m., RonB wrote:
    On 2025-12-20, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
    On 2025-12-19 1:10 p.m., -hh wrote:
    On 12/19/25 01:56, RonB wrote:
    On 2025-12-18, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
    ...
    I'm sure 2026 will be the year of Linux. The continued misery of
    configuring things ad nauseum to achieve the simplest things and the >>>>> insertion of new bugs every day because faggots are insisting on
    rewriting everything in Rust should make the experience pleasant.

    You're misery and confusion using Linux is your problem, not mine.
    Windows is misery to me. For so many reasons.

    Of course, a question is how dated is RonB's experience with Windows.

    Because IIRC, his disdain for Apple's MacOS was from the "Classic" OS ~9 >>> era, which OS X rendered obsolete a mere 24.75 years ago (March 2001).

    I'm pretty sure that he's used a more recent version of MacOS.
    Regardless, I don't believe that he would be enjoy it considering the
    amount of unnecessary graphical elements in there compared to something
    like Cinnamon. I think he likes things simple, and I don't see what's
    wrong with that.

    The Mac OS looks pretty. That's about the only compliment I can really give it. As an OS it seems convoluted to me. If I was a graphic artist I would probably use it as it does (or used to) have the most advanced features in the Mac versions of the applications we used in the print shop. Also, if I wanted to unite all my Apple devices and buy into the Apple environment, I would probably like it. I definitely don't want that. I now have a "new" iPhone SE 3. I got fed up with Android. When I was setting the SE up it kept wanting to connect to my old MacBook Air (runs Monterey, BTW) and my old iPhone. I had to keep telling it no. I've managed to skip most of the set
    up, but it's nagging me to upgrade to iOS 26.x and finish setting it up. I think the version of the iOS I'm using is old enough not to have any of the AI crap so I'm keeping it there. Let it nag away. I'm not sure it's any better than Android. I wish the Blackberrys were still made.

    If you don't mind Apple integrating all your hardware, MacOS is great.
    IF you don't want it to integrate everything, it's painful. Luckily for
    me, I am more of the latter. Either way, I don't even know if I'll
    actually be able to get a Mac once this machine dies. Even though the
    idea seems most obvious to me, I'm still convinced that I won't bite the bullet and will get another Windows machine.
    --
    CrudeSausage
    John 14:6
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From RonB@ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com to comp.os.linux.advocacy on Mon Dec 22 10:54:47 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 2025-12-22, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
    On 2025-12-21 2:28 a.m., RonB wrote:
    On 2025-12-20, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
    On 2025-12-19 1:10 p.m., -hh wrote:
    On 12/19/25 01:56, RonB wrote:
    On 2025-12-18, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
    ...
    I'm sure 2026 will be the year of Linux. The continued misery of
    configuring things ad nauseum to achieve the simplest things and the >>>>>> insertion of new bugs every day because faggots are insisting on
    rewriting everything in Rust should make the experience pleasant.

    You're misery and confusion using Linux is your problem, not mine.
    Windows is misery to me. For so many reasons.

    Of course, a question is how dated is RonB's experience with Windows.

    Because IIRC, his disdain for Apple's MacOS was from the "Classic" OS ~9 >>>> era, which OS X rendered obsolete a mere 24.75 years ago (March 2001).

    I'm pretty sure that he's used a more recent version of MacOS.
    Regardless, I don't believe that he would be enjoy it considering the
    amount of unnecessary graphical elements in there compared to something
    like Cinnamon. I think he likes things simple, and I don't see what's
    wrong with that.

    The Mac OS looks pretty. That's about the only compliment I can really give >> it. As an OS it seems convoluted to me. If I was a graphic artist I would
    probably use it as it does (or used to) have the most advanced features in >> the Mac versions of the applications we used in the print shop. Also, if I >> wanted to unite all my Apple devices and buy into the Apple environment, I >> would probably like it. I definitely don't want that. I now have a "new"
    iPhone SE 3. I got fed up with Android. When I was setting the SE up it kept >> wanting to connect to my old MacBook Air (runs Monterey, BTW) and my old
    iPhone. I had to keep telling it no. I've managed to skip most of the set
    up, but it's nagging me to upgrade to iOS 26.x and finish setting it up. I >> think the version of the iOS I'm using is old enough not to have any of the >> AI crap so I'm keeping it there. Let it nag away. I'm not sure it's any
    better than Android. I wish the Blackberrys were still made.

    If you don't mind Apple integrating all your hardware, MacOS is great.
    IF you don't want it to integrate everything, it's painful. Luckily for
    me, I am more of the latter. Either way, I don't even know if I'll
    actually be able to get a Mac once this machine dies. Even though the
    idea seems most obvious to me, I'm still convinced that I won't bite the bullet and will get another Windows machine.

    I thought I would like Mac OS. I didn't for a few reasons. Mostly it's too "rigid" for me. You have to do things the "Mac way." I like customization.
    If Linux was taken away from me and I was told I had to choose between Mac
    OS or Windows, I think I would just quit using computers.
    --
    Just because you play "dress up" doesn't
    mean I have to play "make believe."
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From CrudeSausage@crude@sausa.ge to comp.os.linux.advocacy on Mon Dec 22 14:00:12 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 2025-12-22 5:54 a.m., RonB wrote:
    On 2025-12-22, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
    On 2025-12-21 2:28 a.m., RonB wrote:
    On 2025-12-20, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
    On 2025-12-19 1:10 p.m., -hh wrote:
    On 12/19/25 01:56, RonB wrote:
    On 2025-12-18, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
    ...
    I'm sure 2026 will be the year of Linux. The continued misery of >>>>>>> configuring things ad nauseum to achieve the simplest things and the >>>>>>> insertion of new bugs every day because faggots are insisting on >>>>>>> rewriting everything in Rust should make the experience pleasant. >>>>>>
    You're misery and confusion using Linux is your problem, not mine. >>>>>> Windows is misery to me. For so many reasons.

    Of course, a question is how dated is RonB's experience with Windows. >>>>>
    Because IIRC, his disdain for Apple's MacOS was from the "Classic" OS ~9 >>>>> era, which OS X rendered obsolete a mere 24.75 years ago (March 2001). >>>>
    I'm pretty sure that he's used a more recent version of MacOS.
    Regardless, I don't believe that he would be enjoy it considering the
    amount of unnecessary graphical elements in there compared to something >>>> like Cinnamon. I think he likes things simple, and I don't see what's
    wrong with that.

    The Mac OS looks pretty. That's about the only compliment I can really give >>> it. As an OS it seems convoluted to me. If I was a graphic artist I would >>> probably use it as it does (or used to) have the most advanced features in >>> the Mac versions of the applications we used in the print shop. Also, if I >>> wanted to unite all my Apple devices and buy into the Apple environment, I >>> would probably like it. I definitely don't want that. I now have a "new" >>> iPhone SE 3. I got fed up with Android. When I was setting the SE up it kept
    wanting to connect to my old MacBook Air (runs Monterey, BTW) and my old >>> iPhone. I had to keep telling it no. I've managed to skip most of the set >>> up, but it's nagging me to upgrade to iOS 26.x and finish setting it up. I >>> think the version of the iOS I'm using is old enough not to have any of the >>> AI crap so I'm keeping it there. Let it nag away. I'm not sure it's any
    better than Android. I wish the Blackberrys were still made.

    If you don't mind Apple integrating all your hardware, MacOS is great.
    IF you don't want it to integrate everything, it's painful. Luckily for
    me, I am more of the latter. Either way, I don't even know if I'll
    actually be able to get a Mac once this machine dies. Even though the
    idea seems most obvious to me, I'm still convinced that I won't bite the
    bullet and will get another Windows machine.

    I thought I would like Mac OS. I didn't for a few reasons. Mostly it's too "rigid" for me. You have to do things the "Mac way." I like customization.
    If Linux was taken away from me and I was told I had to choose between Mac
    OS or Windows, I think I would just quit using computers.



    I wouldn't blame you. It's like building your stuff using a hammer, saw
    and nails and suddenly being told that you have to use a nail gun and
    and an electric saw. It takes a lot of the fun away from the task and
    the experience is very different than what you've grown up with.
    Rigidity are common themes in both Windows and Mac OS now.

    One of the things people don't mention often in Windows is how the
    operating system has a Smart App Control feature which blocks you from installing applications Microsoft deems to be unsafe. While it is in Evaluation mode, it mostly stays out of your way; once it's enabled, the
    most random of things is problematic. qBitTorrent, for example, was an
    issue for it. Install the same application from the Microsoft Store (and
    with a notification that you should pay for the open-source
    application), and it's safe.
    --
    CrudeSausage
    John 14:6
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From pothead@pothead@snakebite.com to comp.os.linux.advocacy on Tue Dec 23 00:25:09 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 2025-12-22, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
    On 2025-12-21 2:28 a.m., RonB wrote:
    On 2025-12-20, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
    On 2025-12-19 1:10 p.m., -hh wrote:
    On 12/19/25 01:56, RonB wrote:
    On 2025-12-18, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
    ...
    I'm sure 2026 will be the year of Linux. The continued misery of
    configuring things ad nauseum to achieve the simplest things and the >>>>>> insertion of new bugs every day because faggots are insisting on
    rewriting everything in Rust should make the experience pleasant.

    You're misery and confusion using Linux is your problem, not mine.
    Windows is misery to me. For so many reasons.

    Of course, a question is how dated is RonB's experience with Windows.

    Because IIRC, his disdain for Apple's MacOS was from the "Classic" OS ~9 >>>> era, which OS X rendered obsolete a mere 24.75 years ago (March 2001).

    I'm pretty sure that he's used a more recent version of MacOS.
    Regardless, I don't believe that he would be enjoy it considering the
    amount of unnecessary graphical elements in there compared to something
    like Cinnamon. I think he likes things simple, and I don't see what's
    wrong with that.

    The Mac OS looks pretty. That's about the only compliment I can really give >> it. As an OS it seems convoluted to me. If I was a graphic artist I would
    probably use it as it does (or used to) have the most advanced features in >> the Mac versions of the applications we used in the print shop. Also, if I >> wanted to unite all my Apple devices and buy into the Apple environment, I >> would probably like it. I definitely don't want that. I now have a "new"
    iPhone SE 3. I got fed up with Android. When I was setting the SE up it kept >> wanting to connect to my old MacBook Air (runs Monterey, BTW) and my old
    iPhone. I had to keep telling it no. I've managed to skip most of the set
    up, but it's nagging me to upgrade to iOS 26.x and finish setting it up. I >> think the version of the iOS I'm using is old enough not to have any of the >> AI crap so I'm keeping it there. Let it nag away. I'm not sure it's any
    better than Android. I wish the Blackberrys were still made.

    If you don't mind Apple integrating all your hardware, MacOS is great.
    IF you don't want it to integrate everything, it's painful. Luckily for
    me, I am more of the latter. Either way, I don't even know if I'll
    actually be able to get a Mac once this machine dies. Even though the
    idea seems most obvious to me, I'm still convinced that I won't bite the bullet and will get another Windows machine.

    So I have an iPhone 14 and Apple Watch Series 4.
    I also have a 1 year old Samsung Galaxy mid line model not with me ATM.
    Both are on Verizon.

    The biggest differences I notice, aside from the Apple walled garden, is
    that Carplay is light years ahead of Android Auto in terms of stability in both my
    2024 cars.

    Also app for app, the Apple versions seem more stable. Things like Zoom, MS Teams, Waze seem smoother on Apple.

    Another plus for Apple is out of the box there is very little bloatware where Verizon and Samsung load up the Galaxy with all kinds of crap. Some easy to remove
    and some not so easy.

    Things I don't like about the iPhone are mainly settings which never seem to
    be located where I suspect they will be.
    Calendar and email is also so-so especially support for Outlook.

    Android wins those 2.

    Carplay and Android Auto aside it's really a toss up though.
    --
    pothead

    Liberals claim to want to give a hearing to other views,
    but then are shocked and offended to discover that there
    are other views.

    William F. Buckley, Jr.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From RonB@ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com to comp.os.linux.advocacy on Tue Dec 23 04:37:23 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 2025-12-22, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
    On 2025-12-22 5:54 a.m., RonB wrote:
    On 2025-12-22, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
    On 2025-12-21 2:28 a.m., RonB wrote:
    On 2025-12-20, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
    On 2025-12-19 1:10 p.m., -hh wrote:
    On 12/19/25 01:56, RonB wrote:
    On 2025-12-18, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
    ...
    I'm sure 2026 will be the year of Linux. The continued misery of >>>>>>>> configuring things ad nauseum to achieve the simplest things and the >>>>>>>> insertion of new bugs every day because faggots are insisting on >>>>>>>> rewriting everything in Rust should make the experience pleasant. >>>>>>>
    You're misery and confusion using Linux is your problem, not mine. >>>>>>> Windows is misery to me. For so many reasons.

    Of course, a question is how dated is RonB's experience with Windows. >>>>>>
    Because IIRC, his disdain for Apple's MacOS was from the "Classic" OS ~9 >>>>>> era, which OS X rendered obsolete a mere 24.75 years ago (March 2001). >>>>>
    I'm pretty sure that he's used a more recent version of MacOS.
    Regardless, I don't believe that he would be enjoy it considering the >>>>> amount of unnecessary graphical elements in there compared to something >>>>> like Cinnamon. I think he likes things simple, and I don't see what's >>>>> wrong with that.

    The Mac OS looks pretty. That's about the only compliment I can really give
    it. As an OS it seems convoluted to me. If I was a graphic artist I would >>>> probably use it as it does (or used to) have the most advanced features in >>>> the Mac versions of the applications we used in the print shop. Also, if I >>>> wanted to unite all my Apple devices and buy into the Apple environment, I >>>> would probably like it. I definitely don't want that. I now have a "new" >>>> iPhone SE 3. I got fed up with Android. When I was setting the SE up it kept
    wanting to connect to my old MacBook Air (runs Monterey, BTW) and my old >>>> iPhone. I had to keep telling it no. I've managed to skip most of the set >>>> up, but it's nagging me to upgrade to iOS 26.x and finish setting it up. I >>>> think the version of the iOS I'm using is old enough not to have any of the
    AI crap so I'm keeping it there. Let it nag away. I'm not sure it's any >>>> better than Android. I wish the Blackberrys were still made.

    If you don't mind Apple integrating all your hardware, MacOS is great.
    IF you don't want it to integrate everything, it's painful. Luckily for
    me, I am more of the latter. Either way, I don't even know if I'll
    actually be able to get a Mac once this machine dies. Even though the
    idea seems most obvious to me, I'm still convinced that I won't bite the >>> bullet and will get another Windows machine.

    I thought I would like Mac OS. I didn't for a few reasons. Mostly it's too >> "rigid" for me. You have to do things the "Mac way." I like customization. >> If Linux was taken away from me and I was told I had to choose between Mac >> OS or Windows, I think I would just quit using computers.



    I wouldn't blame you. It's like building your stuff using a hammer, saw
    and nails and suddenly being told that you have to use a nail gun and
    and an electric saw. It takes a lot of the fun away from the task and
    the experience is very different than what you've grown up with.
    Rigidity are common themes in both Windows and Mac OS now.

    One of the things people don't mention often in Windows is how the
    operating system has a Smart App Control feature which blocks you from installing applications Microsoft deems to be unsafe. While it is in Evaluation mode, it mostly stays out of your way; once it's enabled, the most random of things is problematic. qBitTorrent, for example, was an
    issue for it. Install the same application from the Microsoft Store (and with a notification that you should pay for the open-source
    application), and it's safe.

    Even when I did use Windows, I did a lot of my work in DOS.
    --
    Just because you play "dress up" doesn't
    mean I have to play "make believe."
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From CrudeSausage@crude@sausa.ge to comp.os.linux.advocacy on Tue Dec 23 09:18:52 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 2025-12-22 7:25 p.m., pothead wrote:
    On 2025-12-22, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
    On 2025-12-21 2:28 a.m., RonB wrote:
    On 2025-12-20, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
    On 2025-12-19 1:10 p.m., -hh wrote:
    On 12/19/25 01:56, RonB wrote:
    On 2025-12-18, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
    ...
    I'm sure 2026 will be the year of Linux. The continued misery of >>>>>>> configuring things ad nauseum to achieve the simplest things and the >>>>>>> insertion of new bugs every day because faggots are insisting on >>>>>>> rewriting everything in Rust should make the experience pleasant. >>>>>>
    You're misery and confusion using Linux is your problem, not mine. >>>>>> Windows is misery to me. For so many reasons.

    Of course, a question is how dated is RonB's experience with Windows. >>>>>
    Because IIRC, his disdain for Apple's MacOS was from the "Classic" OS ~9 >>>>> era, which OS X rendered obsolete a mere 24.75 years ago (March 2001). >>>>
    I'm pretty sure that he's used a more recent version of MacOS.
    Regardless, I don't believe that he would be enjoy it considering the
    amount of unnecessary graphical elements in there compared to something >>>> like Cinnamon. I think he likes things simple, and I don't see what's
    wrong with that.

    The Mac OS looks pretty. That's about the only compliment I can really give >>> it. As an OS it seems convoluted to me. If I was a graphic artist I would >>> probably use it as it does (or used to) have the most advanced features in >>> the Mac versions of the applications we used in the print shop. Also, if I >>> wanted to unite all my Apple devices and buy into the Apple environment, I >>> would probably like it. I definitely don't want that. I now have a "new" >>> iPhone SE 3. I got fed up with Android. When I was setting the SE up it kept
    wanting to connect to my old MacBook Air (runs Monterey, BTW) and my old >>> iPhone. I had to keep telling it no. I've managed to skip most of the set >>> up, but it's nagging me to upgrade to iOS 26.x and finish setting it up. I >>> think the version of the iOS I'm using is old enough not to have any of the >>> AI crap so I'm keeping it there. Let it nag away. I'm not sure it's any
    better than Android. I wish the Blackberrys were still made.

    If you don't mind Apple integrating all your hardware, MacOS is great.
    IF you don't want it to integrate everything, it's painful. Luckily for
    me, I am more of the latter. Either way, I don't even know if I'll
    actually be able to get a Mac once this machine dies. Even though the
    idea seems most obvious to me, I'm still convinced that I won't bite the
    bullet and will get another Windows machine.

    So I have an iPhone 14 and Apple Watch Series 4.
    I also have a 1 year old Samsung Galaxy mid line model not with me ATM.
    Both are on Verizon.

    The biggest differences I notice, aside from the Apple walled garden, is
    that Carplay is light years ahead of Android Auto in terms of stability in both my
    2024 cars.

    I never tried Android Auto, but Apple CarPlay is absolutely stellar in
    my 2025 Infiniti QX60. The GPS, Siri and Apple Music in particular are wonderful. The quality of Apple's compression for their music does a
    wonderful job of highlighting the Bose speakers in the car.

    Also app for app, the Apple versions seem more stable. Things like Zoom, MS Teams, Waze seem smoother on Apple.

    Another plus for Apple is out of the box there is very little bloatware where Verizon and Samsung load up the Galaxy with all kinds of crap. Some easy to remove
    and some not so easy.

    Things I don't like about the iPhone are mainly settings which never seem to be located where I suspect they will be.
    Calendar and email is also so-so especially support for Outlook.

    Android wins those 2.

    Carplay and Android Auto aside it's really a toss up though.

    I won't be going back to Android simply because any time a person has a technical problem with their Android phone and ask me for assistance, I
    have to learn how their specific edition of Android operates before I
    can fix anything. You'd think that one operating system wouldn't have so
    many variations, but if you've always used the LG edition of Android and suddenly jump to the Samsung one, you get lost. I imagine it's the same
    if you go from Samsung to Motorola. It's a mess, one I simply refuse to tolerate any longer.
    --
    CrudeSausage
    John 14:6
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From rbowman@bowman@montana.com to comp.os.linux.advocacy on Tue Dec 23 23:18:31 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On Tue, 23 Dec 2025 09:18:52 -0500, CrudeSausage wrote:

    I won't be going back to Android simply because any time a person has a technical problem with their Android phone and ask me for assistance, I
    have to learn how their specific edition of Android operates before I
    can fix anything. You'd think that one operating system wouldn't have so
    many variations, but if you've always used the LG edition of Android and suddenly jump to the Samsung one, you get lost. I imagine it's the same
    if you go from Samsung to Motorola. It's a mess, one I simply refuse to tolerate any longer.

    I have somewhat limited experience with Android phones but moving from a 5 year old Nokia to a new Samsung wasn't a traumatic event. The Samsung
    works like my Amazon Fire tablets with the exception that the Fire doesn't have the Google Play Store. It can be loaded on most Fire devices but I
    never bothered.

    There is some 'abundance of caution'. Our Android app checked for the
    Android version. The release build wouldn't run on my older Android tablet
    so I modified the source and built my own apk. It ran fine. Part of that
    is to limit the number of versions QA has to address.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2