• Joke of the Decade: Liberated Systemd

    From Distro Lackey@dl@lackey.com to comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.linux.misc on Mon Jun 22 13:14:02 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    Because of the hoopla over the Birth Date field (nonsense that I don't
    follow) someone has decided to fork systemd.

    The result is hilariously named Liberated Systemd:

    <https://linuxiac.com/someone-forked-systemd-over-its-new-birth-date-field/>


    Systemd is the lowest form of junk to ever enter the GNU/Linux universe.
    It is enslavement and degeneracy in the flesh and to refer to an innocuous
    fork as being "liberated" is the pinnacle of hypocrisy.

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Joel W. Crump@joelcrump@gmail.com to comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.linux.misc on Mon Jun 22 11:39:29 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 6/22/2026 9:14 AM, Distro Lackey wrote:

    Because of the hoopla over the Birth Date field (nonsense that I don't follow) someone has decided to fork systemd.

    The result is hilariously named Liberated Systemd:

    <https://linuxiac.com/someone-forked-systemd-over-its-new-birth-date-field/>


    Systemd is the lowest form of junk to ever enter the GNU/Linux universe.
    It is enslavement and degeneracy in the flesh and to refer to an innocuous fork as being "liberated" is the pinnacle of hypocrisy.


    The amazing thing is that you care.
    --
    Joel W. Crump

    86 47
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From jmj@jmj@energokod.gda.pl to comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.linux.misc on Mon Jun 22 19:57:57 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    W dniu 22.06.2026 o 17:39, Joel W. Crump pisze:
    86 47

    I have always wondered: what do these numbers in your signature mean? Is
    it some kind of CRC checksum?
    --
    Z totaliztycznym salutem!
    Jacek Marcin Jaworski, Pruszcz Gd., woj. Pomorskie, Polska 🇵🇱, UE 🇪🇺;
    tel.: +48-609-170-742, najlepiej w godz.: 5:00-5:55 lub 16:00-17:25; <jmj@energokod.gda.pl>, gpg: 4A541AA7A6E872318B85D7F6A651CC39244B0BFA;
    Domowa s. WWW: <https://energokod.gda.pl>;
    Mini Netykieta: <https://energokod.gda.pl/MiniNetykieta.html>;
    Mailowa Samoobrona: <https://emailselfdefense.fsf.org/pl>.
    UWAGA:
    NIE ZACIĄGAJ "UKRYTEGO DŁUGU"! PŁAĆ ZA PROG. FOSS I INFO. INTERNETOWE! CZYTAJ DARMOWY: "17. Raport Totaliztyczny - Patroni Kontra Bankierzy": <https://energokod.gda.pl/raporty-totaliztyczne/17.%20Patroni%20Kontra%20Bankierzy.pdf>

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Joel W. Crump@joelcrump@gmail.com to comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.linux.misc on Mon Jun 22 14:01:31 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 6/22/2026 1:57 PM, 🇵🇱Jacek Marcin Jaworski🇵🇱 wrote:

    86 47

    I have always wondered: what do these numbers in your signature mean? Is
    it some kind of CRC checksum?


    It's to show solidarity with James Comey, who was charged by Trump's
    corrupt DOJ with a death threat, having posted an image showing "86 47",
    which translates to removing the 47th president. It was not a death
    threat, it was about removing Trump politically.
    --
    Joel W. Crump

    86 47
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Rinaldi J. Montessi@rinaldij@alien.free to comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.linux.misc on Mon Jun 22 13:05:49 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 6/22/26 1:01 PM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
    On 6/22/2026 1:57 PM, 🇵🇱Jacek Marcin Jaworski🇵🇱 wrote:

    86 47

    I have always wondered: what do these numbers in your signature mean?
    Is it some kind of CRC checksum?


    It's to show solidarity with James Comey, who was charged by Trump's
    corrupt DOJ with a death threat, having posted an image showing "86 47", which translates to removing the 47th president.  It was not a death threat, it was about removing Trump politically.

    That depends on what prism you see the world through.
    --
    Cogito, ergo dubito
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Joel W. Crump@joelcrump@gmail.com to comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.linux.misc on Mon Jun 22 14:22:44 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 6/22/2026 2:05 PM, Rinaldi J. Montessi wrote:
    On 6/22/26 1:01 PM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
    On 6/22/2026 1:57 PM, 🇵🇱Jacek Marcin Jaworski🇵🇱 wrote:

    86 47

    I have always wondered: what do these numbers in your signature mean?
    Is it some kind of CRC checksum?

    It's to show solidarity with James Comey, who was charged by Trump's
    corrupt DOJ with a death threat, having posted an image showing "86
    47", which translates to removing the 47th president.  It was not a
    death threat, it was about removing Trump politically.

    That depends on what prism you see the world through.


    It's clear that it was not a death threat.
    --
    Joel W. Crump

    86 47
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From rbowman@bowman@montana.com to comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.linux.misc on Mon Jun 22 20:42:44 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On Mon, 22 Jun 2026 14:01:31 -0400, Joel W. Crump wrote:

    It's to show solidarity with James Comey, who was charged by Trump's
    corrupt DOJ with a death threat, having posted an image showing "86 47", which translates to removing the 47th president. It was not a death
    threat, it was about removing Trump politically.

    Putting aside his seashell art altogether Comey is the sort of person that gives weasels a bad name.
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From rbowman@bowman@montana.com to comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.linux.misc on Mon Jun 22 20:44:57 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On Mon, 22 Jun 2026 14:22:44 -0400, Joel W. Crump wrote:

    On 6/22/2026 2:05 PM, Rinaldi J. Montessi wrote:
    On 6/22/26 1:01 PM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
    On 6/22/2026 1:57 PM, 🇵🇱Jacek Marcin Jaworski🇵🇱 wrote:

    86 47

    I have always wondered: what do these numbers in your signature mean?
    Is it some kind of CRC checksum?

    It's to show solidarity with James Comey, who was charged by Trump's
    corrupt DOJ with a death threat, having posted an image showing "86
    47", which translates to removing the 47th president.  It was not a
    death threat, it was about removing Trump politically.

    That depends on what prism you see the world through.


    It's clear that it was not a death threat.

    I thought it was overblown. I've been 86'd but nobody tried to kill me; I
    just had to find another gin mill to give my trade to.
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From CrudeSausage@crude@sausa.ge to comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.linux.misc on Mon Jun 22 16:51:00 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 2026-06-22 1:57 p.m., 🇵🇱Jacek Marcin Jaworski🇵🇱 wrote:
    W dniu 22.06.2026 o 17:39, Joel W. Crump pisze:
    86 47

    I have always wondered: what do these numbers in your signature mean? Is
    it some kind of CRC checksum?

    86 means to eliminate, as in to assassinate someone. 47 refers to Donald
    J. Trump who is the 47th President of the United States. Unfortunately,
    Joel had no mind of his own and is a loyal subscriber to whatever
    leftists want. Right now, leftists believe that Muslims are their
    friends and that they will help each other reign in a socialist paradise
    as long as they can get rid of us pesky white Christians. Since leftists
    have a remarkably short memory, they conveniently ignore that every time
    there has been an alliance between Muslims and the left, the Muslims
    simply used the left to gain political power and then murdered every
    last one of them once they got it (as was the case in Iran). They'll let Christians and Jews live... until they can no longer pay the jizya tax
    at which point their options are conversion or death.

    These are facts and history shows it, but Joel is retarded and won't acknowledge reality. After all, he is convinced that he is Jesus Christ
    all the while not knowing a thing about God, the Old Testament, the New Testament, biology or technology.
    --
    CrudeSausage
    M4 MacBook Air
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From CrudeSausage@crude@sausa.ge to comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.linux.misc on Mon Jun 22 16:52:55 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 2026-06-22 4:44 p.m., rbowman wrote:
    On Mon, 22 Jun 2026 14:22:44 -0400, Joel W. Crump wrote:

    On 6/22/2026 2:05 PM, Rinaldi J. Montessi wrote:
    On 6/22/26 1:01 PM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
    On 6/22/2026 1:57 PM, 🇵🇱Jacek Marcin Jaworski🇵🇱 wrote:

    86 47

    I have always wondered: what do these numbers in your signature mean? >>>>> Is it some kind of CRC checksum?

    It's to show solidarity with James Comey, who was charged by Trump's
    corrupt DOJ with a death threat, having posted an image showing "86
    47", which translates to removing the 47th president.  It was not a
    death threat, it was about removing Trump politically.

    That depends on what prism you see the world through.


    It's clear that it was not a death threat.

    I thought it was overblown. I've been 86'd but nobody tried to kill me; I just had to find another gin mill to give my trade to.

    Once again, it takes a special kind of retard to believe that Comey
    wasn't referring to the _assassination_ of Trump. The whole "it means
    remove, not kill" argument is a ridiculous lie that only the dumbest
    elements of society (ie: Haitians, Somalians, Joel Crump) would believe.
    --
    CrudeSausage
    M4 MacBook Air
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Joel W. Crump@joelcrump@gmail.com to comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.linux.misc on Mon Jun 22 17:20:02 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 6/22/2026 4:42 PM, rbowman wrote:

    It's to show solidarity with James Comey, who was charged by Trump's
    corrupt DOJ with a death threat, having posted an image showing "86 47",
    which translates to removing the 47th president. It was not a death
    threat, it was about removing Trump politically.

    Putting aside his seashell art altogether Comey is the sort of person that gives weasels a bad name.


    I will confess, I'm not interested enough to study his career. It looks
    like you might be right, but it's just not important to me, to know about.
    --
    Joel W. Crump

    86 47
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From chrisv@chrisv@nospam.invalid to comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.linux.misc on Mon Jun 22 17:24:10 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    Joel W. Crump wrote:

    Rinaldi J. Montessi wrote:

    That depends on what prism you see the world through.

    It's clear that it was not a death threat.

    Well, here we have our definitive answer. Since Joel is wrong about pretty-much *everything*, it was a death threat.
    --
    'To call something with restrictions "Free" is hypocritical...
    Stallman uses absurd double talk in his cult BS.' - some thing
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Charlie Gibbs@cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid to comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.linux.misc on Mon Jun 22 22:43:22 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 2026-06-22, Rinaldi J. Montessi <rinaldij@alien.free> wrote:

    On 6/22/26 1:01 PM, Joel W. Crump wrote:

    On 6/22/2026 1:57 PM, 🇵🇱Jacek Marcin Jaworski🇵🇱 wrote:

    86 47

    I have always wondered: what do these numbers in your signature mean?
    Is it some kind of CRC checksum?

    It's to show solidarity with James Comey, who was charged by Trump's
    corrupt DOJ with a death threat, having posted an image showing "86 47",
    which translates to removing the 47th president.  It was not a death
    threat, it was about removing Trump politically.

    That depends on what prism you see the world through.

    Try common usage across the decades, for instance.
    There are many examples at

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/86_%28term%29

    and few of them involve violence.

    The article also contains this tidbit:

    Many pro-Trump figures, including Matt Gaetz and Jack
    Posobiec, who said they were enraged by Comey's use of
    "86" in reference to Trump, had previously directed the
    term at their own political opponents.

    Maybe it's time to round them up too, then.
    --
    /~\ Charlie Gibbs | No artificial
    \ / <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> | intelligence was
    X I'm really at ac.dekanfrus | used in the creation
    / \ if you read it the right way. | of this post.
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Joel W. Crump@joelcrump@gmail.com to comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.linux.misc on Mon Jun 22 18:46:37 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 6/22/2026 6:43 PM, Charlie Gibbs wrote:
    On 2026-06-22, Rinaldi J. Montessi <rinaldij@alien.free> wrote:
    On 6/22/26 1:01 PM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
    On 6/22/2026 1:57 PM, 🇵🇱Jacek Marcin Jaworski🇵🇱 wrote:

    86 47

    I have always wondered: what do these numbers in your signature mean?
    Is it some kind of CRC checksum?

    It's to show solidarity with James Comey, who was charged by Trump's
    corrupt DOJ with a death threat, having posted an image showing "86 47", >>> which translates to removing the 47th president.  It was not a death
    threat, it was about removing Trump politically.

    That depends on what prism you see the world through.

    Try common usage across the decades, for instance.
    There are many examples at

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/86_%28term%29

    and few of them involve violence.

    The article also contains this tidbit:

    Many pro-Trump figures, including Matt Gaetz and Jack
    Posobiec, who said they were enraged by Comey's use of
    "86" in reference to Trump, had previously directed the
    term at their own political opponents.

    Maybe it's time to round them up too, then.


    Aha!
    --
    Joel W. Crump

    86 47
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Brock McNuggets@brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com to comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.linux.misc on Mon Jun 22 22:55:25 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On Jun 22, 2026 at 3:46:37 PM MST, ""Joel W. Crump"" wrote <hXi_R.51750$HfK5.30155@fx24.iad>:

    On 6/22/2026 6:43 PM, Charlie Gibbs wrote:
    On 2026-06-22, Rinaldi J. Montessi <rinaldij@alien.free> wrote:
    On 6/22/26 1:01 PM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
    On 6/22/2026 1:57 PM, 🇵🇱Jacek Marcin Jaworski🇵🇱 wrote:

    86 47

    I have always wondered: what do these numbers in your signature mean? >>>>> Is it some kind of CRC checksum?

    It's to show solidarity with James Comey, who was charged by Trump's
    corrupt DOJ with a death threat, having posted an image showing "86 47", >>>> which translates to removing the 47th president. It was not a death
    threat, it was about removing Trump politically.

    That depends on what prism you see the world through.

    Try common usage across the decades, for instance.
    There are many examples at

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/86_%28term%29

    and few of them involve violence.

    The article also contains this tidbit:

    Many pro-Trump figures, including Matt Gaetz and Jack
    Posobiec, who said they were enraged by Comey's use of
    "86" in reference to Trump, had previously directed the
    term at their own political opponents.

    Maybe it's time to round them up too, then.


    Aha!

    The right wingers feign offense to obfuscate their true offenses.
    --
    It's impossible for someone who is at war with themselves to be at peace with you.
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Brock McNuggets@brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com to comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.linux.misc on Mon Jun 22 22:55:53 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On Jun 22, 2026 at 3:24:10 PM MST, "chrisv" wrote <0cdj3lpj3sh9b2s1q6njp987bb6po7o8ii@4ax.com>:

    Joel W. Crump wrote:

    Rinaldi J. Montessi wrote:

    That depends on what prism you see the world through.

    It's clear that it was not a death threat.

    Well, here we have our definitive answer. Since Joel is wrong about pretty-much *everything*, it was a death threat.

    Amazing how few adults understand what "86" means.
    --
    It's impossible for someone who is at war with themselves to be at peace with you.
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Sgt. Joe Friday@sgtjf1965@hotmail.com to comp.os.linux.advocacy on Mon Jun 22 19:12:30 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    In article <6a39bd79$2$23$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>, brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...

    On Jun 22, 2026 at 3:24:10PM MST, "chrisv" wrote <0cdj3lpj3sh9b2s1q6njp987bb6po7o8ii@4ax.com>:

    Joel W. Crump wrote:

    Rinaldi J. Montessi wrote:

    That depends on what prism you see the world through.

    It's clear that it was not a death threat.

    Well, here we have our definitive answer. Since Joel is wrong about pretty-much *everything*, it was a death threat.

    Amazing how few adults understand what "86" means.

    It's too bad the Arizona DES hasn't 86'd you off the
    public assistance roles Michael Glasser.
    It just occurred to me that it's possible that they are
    not aware of your long running scam.

    I might have solved that problem Michael Glasser as you
    have been reported to all Arizona agencies. It's the
    very least I can do to save the fine citizens of
    Arizona some coin.

    https://des.az.gov/report-fraud/report-suspected-fraud

    Happy trails Brock McNuggets.
    --
    All we want are the facts ma'am
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Joel W. Crump@joelcrump@gmail.com to comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.linux.misc on Mon Jun 22 19:30:00 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 6/22/2026 6:55 PM, Brock McNuggets wrote:
    On Jun 22, 2026 at 3:46:37 PM MST, ""Joel W. Crump"" wrote <hXi_R.51750$HfK5.30155@fx24.iad>:
    On 6/22/2026 6:43 PM, Charlie Gibbs wrote:
    On 2026-06-22, Rinaldi J. Montessi <rinaldij@alien.free> wrote:
    On 6/22/26 1:01 PM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
    On 6/22/2026 1:57 PM, 🇵🇱Jacek Marcin Jaworski🇵🇱 wrote:

    86 47

    I have always wondered: what do these numbers in your signature mean? >>>>>> Is it some kind of CRC checksum?

    It's to show solidarity with James Comey, who was charged by Trump's >>>>> corrupt DOJ with a death threat, having posted an image showing "86 47", >>>>> which translates to removing the 47th president. It was not a death >>>>> threat, it was about removing Trump politically.

    That depends on what prism you see the world through.

    Try common usage across the decades, for instance.
    There are many examples at

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/86_%28term%29

    and few of them involve violence.

    The article also contains this tidbit:

    Many pro-Trump figures, including Matt Gaetz and Jack
    Posobiec, who said they were enraged by Comey's use of
    "86" in reference to Trump, had previously directed the
    term at their own political opponents.

    Maybe it's time to round them up too, then.

    Aha!

    The right wingers feign offense to obfuscate their true offenses.


    "Anything goes".
    --
    Joel W. Crump

    86 47
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Joel W. Crump@joelcrump@gmail.com to comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.linux.misc on Mon Jun 22 19:30:40 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 6/22/2026 6:55 PM, Brock McNuggets wrote:
    On Jun 22, 2026 at 3:24:10 PM MST, "chrisv" wrote <0cdj3lpj3sh9b2s1q6njp987bb6po7o8ii@4ax.com>:
    Joel W. Crump wrote:
    Rinaldi J. Montessi wrote:

    That depends on what prism you see the world through.

    It's clear that it was not a death threat.

    Well, here we have our definitive answer. Since Joel is wrong about
    pretty-much *everything*, it was a death threat.

    Amazing how few adults understand what "86" means.


    The above is why I killfiled Chris.
    --
    Joel W. Crump

    86 47
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From rbowman@bowman@montana.com to comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.linux.misc on Mon Jun 22 23:37:11 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On Mon, 22 Jun 2026 17:24:10 -0500, chrisv wrote:

    Joel W. Crump wrote:

    Rinaldi J. Montessi wrote:

    That depends on what prism you see the world through.

    It's clear that it was not a death threat.

    Well, here we have our definitive answer. Since Joel is wrong about pretty-much *everything*, it was a death threat.

    Before the Comey furor '86' in my world meant 'You're shut off. Finish
    your drink, get the fuck out, and don't come back.' No death threat.

    Of course there might have been a death threat or two during the barroom
    brawl that got you kicked out.
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Brock McNuggets@brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com to comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.linux.misc on Mon Jun 22 23:43:36 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On Jun 22, 2026 at 4:30:40 PM MST, ""Joel W. Crump"" wrote <AAj_R.3219$ebO9.94@fx37.iad>:

    On 6/22/2026 6:55 PM, Brock McNuggets wrote:
    On Jun 22, 2026 at 3:24:10 PM MST, "chrisv" wrote
    <0cdj3lpj3sh9b2s1q6njp987bb6po7o8ii@4ax.com>:
    Joel W. Crump wrote:
    Rinaldi J. Montessi wrote:

    That depends on what prism you see the world through.

    It's clear that it was not a death threat.

    Well, here we have our definitive answer. Since Joel is wrong about
    pretty-much *everything*, it was a death threat.

    Amazing how few adults understand what "86" means.


    The above is why I killfiled Chris.

    He rarely has anything of value to add.
    --
    It's impossible for someone who is at war with themselves to be at peace with you.
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Brock McNuggets@brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com to comp.os.linux.advocacy on Mon Jun 22 23:53:35 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On Jun 22, 2026 at 4:12:30 PM MST, ""Sgt. Joe Friday"" wrote <MPG.44a38b66bed72cd6989720@paganini.bofh.team>:

    In article <6a39bd79$2$23$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>, brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...

    On Jun 22, 2026 at 3:24:10 PM MST, "chrisv" wrote
    <0cdj3lpj3sh9b2s1q6njp987bb6po7o8ii@4ax.com>:

    Joel W. Crump wrote:

    Rinaldi J. Montessi wrote:

    That depends on what prism you see the world through.

    It's clear that it was not a death threat.

    Well, here we have our definitive answer. Since Joel is wrong about
    pretty-much *everything*, it was a death threat.

    Amazing how few adults understand what "86" means.

    It's too bad the Arizona DES hasn't 86'd you off the
    public assistance roles Michael Glasser.
    It just occurred to me that it's possible that they are
    not aware of your long running scam.

    I might have solved that problem Michael Glasser as you
    have been reported to all Arizona agencies. It's the
    very least I can do to save the fine citizens of
    Arizona some coin.

    https://des.az.gov/report-fraud/report-suspected-fraud

    Happy trails Brock McNuggets.

    Whatever Sockboy.
    --
    It's impossible for someone who is at war with themselves to be at peace with you.
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From CrudeSausage@crude@sausa.ge to comp.os.linux.advocacy on Mon Jun 22 19:54:18 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 2026-06-22 7:12 p.m., Sgt. Joe Friday wrote:
    In article <6a39bd79$2$23$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>, brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...

    On Jun 22, 2026 at 3:24:10 PM MST, "chrisv" wrote
    <0cdj3lpj3sh9b2s1q6njp987bb6po7o8ii@4ax.com>:

    Joel W. Crump wrote:

    Rinaldi J. Montessi wrote:

    That depends on what prism you see the world through.

    It's clear that it was not a death threat.

    Well, here we have our definitive answer. Since Joel is wrong about
    pretty-much *everything*, it was a death threat.

    Amazing how few adults understand what "86" means.

    Oh, lucky us, our moral and intellectual superior Snit Brock McNuggets
    Michael Glasser Prescott Parasite and Computer Guy is here to educate us.

    Apparently, we do since even the administration felt there was a reason
    to investigate the matter. 86 is indeed used to mean assassinate, but
    that doesn't matter to Michael Glasser because the leftists who do the thinking for him had a ready explanation for him to bullshit us all with.

    < snip >
    --
    CrudeSausage
    M4 MacBook Air
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From vallor@vallor@vallor.earth to comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.linux.misc on Tue Jun 23 00:43:03 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    At Mon, 22 Jun 2026 17:24:10 -0500, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote:

    Joel W. Crump wrote:

    Rinaldi J. Montessi wrote:

    That depends on what prism you see the world through.

    It's clear that it was not a death threat.

    Well, here we have our definitive answer. Since Joel is wrong about pretty-much *everything*, it was a death threat.

    Okay, so every bar's 86 list is a hit list. Good to know.

    (Another thread in the toilet...)
    --
    -v System76 Thelio Mega v1.1 x86_64 Mem: 258G
    OS: Linux 7.1.1 D: Mint 22.3 DE: Xfce 4.18 (X11)
    NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090Ti (24G) (610.43.02)
    "Warning: Politicians can be hazardous to your wealth."
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Joel W. Crump@joelcrump@gmail.com to comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.linux.misc on Mon Jun 22 20:48:55 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 6/22/2026 8:43 PM, vallor wrote:
    At Mon, 22 Jun 2026 17:24:10 -0500, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote:
    Joel W. Crump wrote:
    Rinaldi J. Montessi wrote:

    That depends on what prism you see the world through.

    It's clear that it was not a death threat.

    Well, here we have our definitive answer. Since Joel is wrong about
    pretty-much *everything*, it was a death threat.

    Okay, so every bar's 86 list is a hit list. Good to know.

    (Another thread in the toilet...)


    Yeah, chrisv spoke, heh.
    --
    Joel W. Crump

    86 47
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Brock McNuggets@brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com to comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.linux.misc on Tue Jun 23 00:54:17 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On Jun 22, 2026 at 5:43:03 PM MST, "vallor" wrote <111ckqo$1tkt7$1@dont-email.me>:

    At Mon, 22 Jun 2026 17:24:10 -0500, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote:

    Joel W. Crump wrote:

    Rinaldi J. Montessi wrote:

    That depends on what prism you see the world through.

    It's clear that it was not a death threat.

    Well, here we have our definitive answer. Since Joel is wrong about
    pretty-much *everything*, it was a death threat.

    Okay, so every bar's 86 list is a hit list. Good to know.

    (Another thread in the toilet...)

    Right wingers respond from emotion, not reason.
    --
    It's impossible for someone who is at war with themselves to be at peace with you.
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From The Natural Philosopher@tnp@invalid.invalid to comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.linux.misc on Tue Jun 23 04:20:44 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 22/06/2026 23:55, Brock McNuggets wrote:

    The right wingers feign offense to obfuscate their true offenses.

    No, that's Left wingers.
    The right isn't interested in 'offence' or 'emotion'
    --
    There’s a mighty big difference between good, sound reasons and reasons
    that sound good.

    Burton Hillis (William Vaughn, American columnist)

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Joel W. Crump@joelcrump@gmail.com to comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.linux.misc on Mon Jun 22 23:25:18 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 6/22/2026 11:20 PM, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
    On 22/06/2026 23:55, Brock McNuggets wrote:

    The right wingers feign offense to obfuscate their true offenses.

    No, that's Left wingers.
    The right isn't interested in 'offence' or 'emotion'


    You can pretend so, but we see right through it, it is emotional
    reaction, you just cling to the idea that you're in control of things,
    you're pigs. The emotion is greed.
    --
    Joel W. Crump

    86 47
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Brock McNuggets@brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com to comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.linux.misc on Tue Jun 23 03:38:11 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On Jun 22, 2026 at 8:20:44 PM MST, "The Natural Philosopher" wrote <111cu2c$1vk6c$1@dont-email.me>:

    On 22/06/2026 23:55, Brock McNuggets wrote:

    The right wingers feign offense to obfuscate their true offenses.

    No, that's Left wingers.
    The right isn't interested in 'offence' or 'emotion'

    Not what we see here. Those on the left are looking to evidence for gender issues, economic plans, health care, pollution, man-made global climate
    change, holding people accountable for pedophelia, and more. The right is ignoring evidence as they demand special entitlements and worshipping the
    rich.
    --
    It's impossible for someone who is at war with themselves to be at peace with you.
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Brock McNuggets@brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com to comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.linux.misc on Tue Jun 23 05:20:07 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On Jun 22, 2026 at 8:25:18 PM MST, ""Joel W. Crump"" wrote <y0n_R.7380$NCT2.5706@fx03.iad>:

    On 6/22/2026 11:20 PM, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
    On 22/06/2026 23:55, Brock McNuggets wrote:

    The right wingers feign offense to obfuscate their true offenses.

    No, that's Left wingers.
    The right isn't interested in 'offence' or 'emotion'


    You can pretend so, but we see right through it, it is emotional
    reaction, you just cling to the idea that you're in control of things,
    you're pigs. The emotion is greed.

    Greed and a need to feel special as they protect their "in-group" and hate the "right" people.
    --
    It's impossible for someone who is at war with themselves to be at peace with you.
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Joel W. Crump@joelcrump@gmail.com to comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.linux.misc on Tue Jun 23 01:28:40 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 6/23/2026 1:20 AM, Brock McNuggets wrote:
    On Jun 22, 2026 at 8:25:18 PM MST, ""Joel W. Crump"" wrote <y0n_R.7380$NCT2.5706@fx03.iad>:
    On 6/22/2026 11:20 PM, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
    On 22/06/2026 23:55, Brock McNuggets wrote:

    The right wingers feign offense to obfuscate their true offenses.

    No, that's Left wingers.
    The right isn't interested in 'offence' or 'emotion'

    You can pretend so, but we see right through it, it is emotional
    reaction, you just cling to the idea that you're in control of things,
    you're pigs. The emotion is greed.

    Greed and a need to feel special as they protect their "in-group" and hate the
    "right" people.


    I've only begun to understand how important my life is. It's not pride,
    but feeling very lucky, despite how difficult it was to get to this point.
    --
    Joel W. Crump

    86 47
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From The Natural Philosopher@tnp@invalid.invalid to comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.linux.misc on Tue Jun 23 07:29:26 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 23/06/2026 04:38, Brock McNuggets wrote:
    On Jun 22, 2026 at 8:20:44 PM MST, "The Natural Philosopher" wrote <111cu2c$1vk6c$1@dont-email.me>:

    On 22/06/2026 23:55, Brock McNuggets wrote:

    The right wingers feign offense to obfuscate their true offenses.

    No, that's Left wingers.
    The right isn't interested in 'offence' or 'emotion'

    Not what we see here. Those on the left are looking to evidence for gender issues,
    Emotional issue. Not real

    economic plans, health care, pollution, man-made global climate
    change,
    Emotional issu. Not real
    holding people accountable for pedophelia, and more.
    Emotional issue
    The right is
    ignoring evidence as they demand special entitlements and worshipping the rich.

    Thats not the right. That's some weird concoction of personal and
    corporate greed,

    The true contrast between the left and the right is that the left is all ideological and emotionally appealing theory, where is the right is
    about achieving pragmatic results.

    The left is always going to fix the economy and make it right for the
    little person, but they never ever do. If they did - who would vote for
    them?
    --
    Of what good are dead warriors? … Warriors are those who desire battle
    more than peace. Those who seek battle despite peace. Those who thump
    their spears on the ground and talk of honor. Those who leap high the
    battle dance and dream of glory … The good of dead warriors, Mother, is
    that they are dead.
    Sheri S Tepper: The Awakeners.

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From The Natural Philosopher@tnp@invalid.invalid to comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.linux.misc on Tue Jun 23 07:33:38 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 23/06/2026 06:20, Brock McNuggets wrote:
    On Jun 22, 2026 at 8:25:18 PM MST, ""Joel W. Crump"" wrote <y0n_R.7380$NCT2.5706@fx03.iad>:

    On 6/22/2026 11:20 PM, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
    On 22/06/2026 23:55, Brock McNuggets wrote:

    The right wingers feign offense to obfuscate their true offenses.

    No, that's Left wingers.
    The right isn't interested in 'offence' or 'emotion'


    You can pretend so, but we see right through it, it is emotional
    reaction, you just cling to the idea that you're in control of things,
    you're pigs. The emotion is greed.

    Greed and a need to feel special as they protect their "in-group" and hate the
    "right" people.

    I assume you are talking about the Left?
    The people who can change gender just by wanting to, who can control the weather with windmills, who are so racist they hate white people with a passion, who cancel anyone who says anything different and who are the servants of the greedy and powerful ...
    And then claim its really the right who are like that?

    Oh and by the way, Donald Trump is about as right wing as Chairman Mao.
    --
    There’s a mighty big difference between good, sound reasons and reasons
    that sound good.

    Burton Hillis (William Vaughn, American columnist)

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Brock McNuggets@brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com to comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.linux.misc on Tue Jun 23 07:05:43 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On Jun 22, 2026 at 11:33:38 PM MST, "The Natural Philosopher" wrote <111d9c2$227b4$2@dont-email.me>:

    On 23/06/2026 06:20, Brock McNuggets wrote:
    On Jun 22, 2026 at 8:25:18 PM MST, ""Joel W. Crump"" wrote
    <y0n_R.7380$NCT2.5706@fx03.iad>:

    On 6/22/2026 11:20 PM, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
    On 22/06/2026 23:55, Brock McNuggets wrote:

    The right wingers feign offense to obfuscate their true offenses.

    No, that's Left wingers.
    The right isn't interested in 'offence' or 'emotion'


    You can pretend so, but we see right through it, it is emotional
    reaction, you just cling to the idea that you're in control of things,
    you're pigs. The emotion is greed.

    Greed and a need to feel special as they protect their "in-group" and hate the
    "right" people.

    I assume you are talking about the Left?

    Based on your feelings... but not the evidence. And your feelings lead you to the wrong conclusion... wrong if evidence s your value, anyway.

    The people who can change gender just by wanting to,

    That is what the right claims.

    who can control the weather with windmills,

    A slight bastardization of Trump saying windmills cause cancer and spew fumes.

    who are so racist they hate white people with a
    passion,

    Who said that? I suspect this is your FEELINGS based on noting white supremacy is bad.

    who cancel anyone who says anything different and who are the
    servants of the greedy and powerful ...

    Like late night show hosts and electing a "business man" who is greedy, powerful, and utterly incompetent and immoral.

    And then claim it's really the right who are like that?

    You just described the right.

    Oh and by the way, Donald Trump is about as right wing as Chairman Mao.

    Trump is what the right has become, in the US. MAGA. It is utter insanity.
    --
    It's impossible for someone who is at war with themselves to be at peace with you.
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Brock McNuggets@brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com to comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.linux.misc on Tue Jun 23 07:08:13 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On Jun 22, 2026 at 11:29:26 PM MST, "The Natural Philosopher" wrote <111d946$227b4$1@dont-email.me>:

    On 23/06/2026 04:38, Brock McNuggets wrote:
    On Jun 22, 2026 at 8:20:44 PM MST, "The Natural Philosopher" wrote
    <111cu2c$1vk6c$1@dont-email.me>:

    On 22/06/2026 23:55, Brock McNuggets wrote:

    The right wingers feign offense to obfuscate their true offenses.

    No, that's Left wingers.
    The right isn't interested in 'offence' or 'emotion'

    Not what we see here. Those on the left are looking to evidence for gender >> issues,
    Emotional issue. Not real

    See: you deny evidence. There is massive evidence on gender issues.

    economic plans, health care, pollution, man-made global climate
    change,
    Emotional issu. Not real

    More of your feelings based denials. OK.

    holding people accountable for pedophelia, and more.
    Emotional issue

    Well, if you see not backing pedophiles as merely "emotional" that is a you issue.

    The right is
    ignoring evidence as they demand special entitlements and worshipping the
    rich.

    Thats not the right.

    Well, it is what the right has become in the US. MAGA.

    That's some weird concoction of personal and
    corporate greed,

    The true contrast between the left and the right is that the left is all ideological and emotionally appealing theory, where is the right is
    about achieving pragmatic results.

    Please give examples.

    The left is always going to fix the economy and make it right for the
    little person, but they never ever do. If they did - who would vote for
    them?

    Democrats are far better for the economy than Republicans, based on the evidence. But, I will grant, the Democrats are not really the left -- both parties are paid for and beholden to the very rich. The Democrats throw a few bones to those on the left though.
    --
    It's impossible for someone who is at war with themselves to be at peace with you.
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Charlie Gibbs@cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid to comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.linux.misc on Tue Jun 23 07:08:46 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 2026-06-23, The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:

    On 23/06/2026 06:20, Brock McNuggets wrote:

    On Jun 22, 2026 at 8:25:18 PM MST, ""Joel W. Crump"" wrote

    <y0n_R.7380$NCT2.5706@fx03.iad>:

    On 6/22/2026 11:20 PM, The Natural Philosopher wrote:

    On 22/06/2026 23:55, Brock McNuggets wrote:

    The right wingers feign offense to obfuscate their true offenses.

    No, that's Left wingers.
    The right isn't interested in 'offence' or 'emotion'

    You can pretend so, but we see right through it, it is emotional
    reaction, you just cling to the idea that you're in control of things,
    you're pigs. The emotion is greed.

    Greed and a need to feel special as they protect their "in-group" and
    hate the "right" people.

    I assume you are talking about the Left?
    The people who can change gender just by wanting to, who can control the weather with windmills, who are so racist they hate white people with a passion, who cancel anyone who says anything different and who are the servants of the greedy and powerful ...
    And then claim its really the right who are like that?

    Oh and by the way, Donald Trump is about as right wing as Chairman Mao.

    Left, right... go far enough and they all meet around on the dark side.

    Political tags - such as royalist, communist, democrat,
    populist, fascist, liberal, conservative, and so forth -
    are never basic criteria. The human race divides politically
    into those who want people to be controlled and those who
    have no such desire. The former are idealists acting from
    highest motives for the greatest good of the greatest number.
    The latter are surly curmudgeons, suspicious and lacking in
    altruism. But they are more comfortable neighbors than the
    other sort.

    -- Heinlein: The Notebooks of Lazarus Long
    --
    /~\ Charlie Gibbs | No artificial
    \ / <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> | intelligence was
    X I'm really at ac.dekanfrus | used in the creation
    / \ if you read it the right way. | of this post.
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Brock McNuggets@brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com to comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.linux.misc on Tue Jun 23 07:09:26 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On Jun 22, 2026 at 10:28:40 PM MST, ""Joel W. Crump"" wrote <cQo_R.5576$3qE9.619@fx44.iad>:

    On 6/23/2026 1:20 AM, Brock McNuggets wrote:
    On Jun 22, 2026 at 8:25:18 PM MST, ""Joel W. Crump"" wrote
    <y0n_R.7380$NCT2.5706@fx03.iad>:
    On 6/22/2026 11:20 PM, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
    On 22/06/2026 23:55, Brock McNuggets wrote:

    The right wingers feign offense to obfuscate their true offenses.

    No, that's Left wingers.
    The right isn't interested in 'offence' or 'emotion'

    You can pretend so, but we see right through it, it is emotional
    reaction, you just cling to the idea that you're in control of things,
    you're pigs. The emotion is greed.

    Greed and a need to feel special as they protect their "in-group" and hate the
    "right" people.


    I've only begun to understand how important my life is. It's not pride,
    but feeling very lucky, despite how difficult it was to get to this point.

    Good to hear.

    I know I have done a lot of good in my life -- working at summer camps and as
    a teacher and as a teen mentor and far more. The attacks I face online is pissing in the ocean... not something I worry about.
    --
    It's impossible for someone who is at war with themselves to be at peace with you.
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Joel W. Crump@joelcrump@gmail.com to comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.linux.misc on Tue Jun 23 03:21:28 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 6/23/2026 3:09 AM, Brock McNuggets wrote:
    On Jun 22, 2026 at 10:28:40 PM MST, ""Joel W. Crump"" wrote <cQo_R.5576$3qE9.619@fx44.iad>:
    On 6/23/2026 1:20 AM, Brock McNuggets wrote:
    On Jun 22, 2026 at 8:25:18 PM MST, ""Joel W. Crump"" wrote
    <y0n_R.7380$NCT2.5706@fx03.iad>:
    On 6/22/2026 11:20 PM, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
    On 22/06/2026 23:55, Brock McNuggets wrote:

    The right wingers feign offense to obfuscate their true offenses.

    No, that's Left wingers.
    The right isn't interested in 'offence' or 'emotion'

    You can pretend so, but we see right through it, it is emotional
    reaction, you just cling to the idea that you're in control of things, >>>> you're pigs. The emotion is greed.

    Greed and a need to feel special as they protect their "in-group" and hate the
    "right" people.

    I've only begun to understand how important my life is. It's not pride,
    but feeling very lucky, despite how difficult it was to get to this point.

    Good to hear.

    I know I have done a lot of good in my life -- working at summer camps and as a teacher and as a teen mentor and far more. The attacks I face online is pissing in the ocean... not something I worry about.


    It would be hard for anyone around here to get under my skin, yeah.
    --
    Joel W. Crump

    86 47
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From c186282@c186282@nnada.net to comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.linux.misc on Tue Jun 23 04:31:34 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 6/22/26 09:14, Distro Lackey wrote:
    Because of the hoopla over the Birth Date field (nonsense that I don't follow) someone has decided to fork systemd.

    The result is hilariously named Liberated Systemd:

    <https://linuxiac.com/someone-forked-systemd-over-its-new-birth-date-field/>


    Systemd is the lowest form of junk to ever enter the GNU/Linux universe.
    It is enslavement and degeneracy in the flesh and to refer to an innocuous fork as being "liberated" is the pinnacle of hypocrisy.

    Tisk !!!

    Systemd is JUST FINE all in all. It's NOT the
    evil Winders registry.

    However, like much, it all DEPENDS on WHAT YOU
    EXACTLY WANT/NEED.

    For some, SysV is more than good enough. However
    I trend towards daemons and systemd has a good
    setup for starting them, under conditions, and
    then watchdogging them.

    As per another current theme here, note that MX Linux
    can be installed, and even then selectively started,
    grub-customizer, as either SysV or systemd. These
    days I always go for systemd. But, on some extreme
    thin (Pi-0 or similar), I might go SysV just to keep
    the code extra tiny.

    Yes, DO see how it can be potentially abused and
    the added complication. Kinda OUR job to watch
    for that happening and act. Winders, you do what
    Gates TELLS you to do. With Linux we have choices.

    Again, What YOU Need for a particular thing at
    the moment. No general rule here.

    I'd like to see a 'systemd-lite' - maybe ten or
    twenty percent of the more neat-o stuff systemd
    can do.

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From The Natural Philosopher@tnp@invalid.invalid to comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.linux.misc on Tue Jun 23 10:33:33 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 23/06/2026 08:08, Brock McNuggets wrote:
    Emotional issue
    Well, if you see not backing pedophiles as merely "emotional" that is a you issue.

    The left in this country see paedophilia as perfectly acceptable behviour.
    --
    It is the folly of too many to mistake the echo of a London coffee-house
    for the voice of the kingdom.

    Jonathan Swift


    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From The Natural Philosopher@tnp@invalid.invalid to comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.linux.misc on Tue Jun 23 10:34:21 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 23/06/2026 08:09, Brock McNuggets wrote:
    I know I have done a lot of good in my life -- working at summer camps and as a teacher and as a teen mentor and far more.

    Are you a paedophile? That's generally their profile.
    --
    "Corbyn talks about equality, justice, opportunity, health care, peace, community, compassion, investment, security, housing...."
    "What kind of person is not interested in those things?"

    "Jeremy Corbyn?"


    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Carlos E. R.@robin_listas@es.invalid to comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.linux.misc on Tue Jun 23 11:38:18 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 2026-06-23 00:55, Brock McNuggets wrote:
    On Jun 22, 2026 at 3:24:10 PM MST, "chrisv" wrote <0cdj3lpj3sh9b2s1q6njp987bb6po7o8ii@4ax.com>:

    Joel W. Crump wrote:

    Rinaldi J. Montessi wrote:

    That depends on what prism you see the world through.

    It's clear that it was not a death threat.

    Well, here we have our definitive answer. Since Joel is wrong about
    pretty-much *everything*, it was a death threat.

    Amazing how few adults understand what "86" means.


    Why would I? I certainly don't.
    --
    Cheers,
    Carlos E.R.
    ES🇪🇸, EU🇪🇺;
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Carlos E. R.@robin_listas@es.invalid to comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.linux.misc on Tue Jun 23 11:45:52 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 2026-06-23 11:33, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
    On 23/06/2026 08:08, Brock McNuggets wrote:
    Emotional issue
    Well, if you see not backing pedophiles as merely "emotional" that is
    a you
    issue.

    The left in this country see paedophilia as perfectly acceptable behviour.

    That's ridiculous.
    --
    Cheers,
    Carlos E.R.
    ES🇪🇸, EU🇪🇺;
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Joel W. Crump@joelcrump@gmail.com to comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.linux.misc on Tue Jun 23 05:49:10 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 6/23/2026 5:33 AM, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
    On 23/06/2026 08:08, Brock McNuggets wrote:

    Emotional issue

    Well, if you see not backing pedophiles as merely "emotional" that is
    a you
    issue.

    The left in this country see paedophilia as perfectly acceptable behviour.


    Says who?
    --
    Joel W. Crump

    86 47
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From The Natural Philosopher@tnp@invalid.invalid to comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.linux.misc on Tue Jun 23 10:58:11 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 23/06/2026 10:38, Carlos E. R. wrote:
    On 2026-06-23 00:55, Brock McNuggets wrote:
    On Jun 22, 2026 at 3:24:10 PM MST, "chrisv" wrote
    <0cdj3lpj3sh9b2s1q6njp987bb6po7o8ii@4ax.com>:

    Joel W. Crump wrote:

    Rinaldi J. Montessi wrote:

    That depends on what prism you see the world through.

    It's clear that it was not a death threat.

    Well, here we have our definitive answer.  Since Joel is wrong about
    pretty-much *everything*, it was a death threat.

    Amazing how few adults understand what "86" means.


    Why would I? I certainly don't.

    I once got reported to the secret service for remarking that the only
    way to have true democracy in the USA was to have the president of the
    USA stark naked in the middle of a football pitch and the bleachers all
    full of people with loaded guns.

    Someone thought I was serious, apparently.
    --
    Renewable energy: Expensive solutions that don't work to a problem that doesn't exist instituted by self legalising protection rackets that
    don't protect, masquerading as public servants who don't serve the public.


    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From The Natural Philosopher@tnp@invalid.invalid to comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.linux.misc on Tue Jun 23 11:01:31 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 23/06/2026 10:45, Carlos E. R. wrote:
    On 2026-06-23 11:33, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
    On 23/06/2026 08:08, Brock McNuggets wrote:
    Emotional issue
    Well, if you see not backing pedophiles as merely "emotional" that is
    a you
    issue.

    The left in this country see paedophilia as perfectly acceptable
    behviour.

    That's ridiculous.

    I know.

    But since the truth is only a social construct, they decided to change it.

    https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2014/mar/02/how-paedophiles-infiltrated-the-left-harriet-harman-patricia-hewitt
    --
    Renewable energy: Expensive solutions that don't work to a problem that doesn't exist instituted by self legalising protection rackets that
    don't protect, masquerading as public servants who don't serve the public.


    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Carlos E. R.@robin_listas@es.invalid to comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.linux.misc on Tue Jun 23 12:06:13 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 2026-06-23 11:58, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
    On 23/06/2026 10:38, Carlos E. R. wrote:
    On 2026-06-23 00:55, Brock McNuggets wrote:
    On Jun 22, 2026 at 3:24:10 PM MST, "chrisv" wrote
    <0cdj3lpj3sh9b2s1q6njp987bb6po7o8ii@4ax.com>:

    Joel W. Crump wrote:

    Rinaldi J. Montessi wrote:

    That depends on what prism you see the world through.

    It's clear that it was not a death threat.

    Well, here we have our definitive answer.  Since Joel is wrong about
    pretty-much *everything*, it was a death threat.

    Amazing how few adults understand what "86" means.


    Why would I? I certainly don't.

    I once got reported to the secret service for remarking that the only
    way to have true democracy in the USA was to have the president of the
    USA stark naked in the middle of a football pitch and the bleachers all
    full of people with loaded guns.

    Someone thought I was serious, apparently.

    In an airport you can not joke about a bomb. It is taken seriously. The
    law says so.

    I don't remember where I read this... maybe Birmingham. Before 1980.
    --
    Cheers,
    Carlos E.R.
    ES🇪🇸, EU🇪🇺;
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From CrudeSausage@crude@sausa.ge to comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.linux.misc on Tue Jun 23 07:25:22 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 2026-06-22 11:20 p.m., The Natural Philosopher wrote:
    On 22/06/2026 23:55, Brock McNuggets wrote:

    The right wingers feign offense to obfuscate their true offenses.

    No, that's Left wingers.
    The right isn't interested in 'offence' or 'emotion'

    I'll give you a perfect example of the Montreal shooter yesterday. My
    brother was right where the shooting happened at the time, so this event
    is somewhat personal to me.

    The media tells us that the shooter was an "incel" who hated women and
    the Capitalist system. They're at a loss as to what his motives were. Meanwhile, they actually _have_ his 104-page manifesto. The only ones
    who bothered to do any kind of research are Rebel News, a right-wing
    media enterprise, who found out that the shooter was a Communist called
    Seth Hatfield from Alberta who hated Jews specifically, explaining why
    he went to an area where a lot of them could be found.

    Once again, the mainstream, leftist media lied to protect one of their
    own: a Communist. The moment a leftist of any kind is involved, the
    shields go up to prevent anyone from making the link between evil and
    leftism. If the shooter is a Muslim, they're "mentally ill." If the
    shooter is black, they find a way to blame the cops for racism. If,
    however, a white man did something as trivial as point out the truth
    that the darker a person's skin, the more dangerous they are, their mere
    words are enough for an army of cops to show up and beat him to a pulp.
    They will be arrested, dragged through the mud in the media and
    portrayed as the worst thing since Jack the Ripper. The dark-skinned
    demon might be arrested, but will released at the soonest convenience.
    --
    CrudeSausage
    M4 MacBook Air
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From CrudeSausage@crude@sausa.ge to comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.linux.misc on Tue Jun 23 07:31:08 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 2026-06-23 5:33 a.m., The Natural Philosopher wrote:
    On 23/06/2026 08:08, Brock McNuggets wrote:
    Emotional issue
    Well, if you see not backing pedophiles as merely "emotional" that is
    a you
    issue.

    The left in this country see paedophilia as perfectly acceptable behviour.

    Once the left realized that the majority of pedophiles lean left, they
    did everything in their power to defend them. That's part of why they
    embrace Islam so much, whose members often sexually assault people as
    young as twelve as they did in the French music festival a few days ago.
    Islam routinely votes for the left because of this protection, and even
    join the ranks of those political parties until they figure out that
    they can create their own. What's hilarious is the gratitude the Muslims
    show the left for their efforts protecting them: mass executions the
    moment they seize power.
    --
    CrudeSausage
    M4 MacBook Air
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From CrudeSausage@crude@sausa.ge to comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.linux.misc on Tue Jun 23 12:24:17 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 2026-06-23 5:45 a.m., Carlos E. R. wrote:
    On 2026-06-23 11:33, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
    On 23/06/2026 08:08, Brock McNuggets wrote:
    Emotional issue
    Well, if you see not backing pedophiles as merely "emotional" that is
    a you
    issue.

    The left in this country see paedophilia as perfectly acceptable
    behviour.

    That's ridiculous.


    Yes, it _is_ ridiculous that the left protects pedophiles just they lean
    left. That should be disqualifying behaviour and discourage people from
    voting for them, but leftists routinely delude themselves into believing
    that it isn't true, and happily accept whatever excuse or denial they
    receive.
    --
    CrudeSausage
    M4 MacBook Air
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Carlos E. R.@robin_listas@es.invalid to comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.linux.misc on Tue Jun 23 19:03:02 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 2026-06-23 18:24, CrudeSausage wrote:
    On 2026-06-23 5:45 a.m., Carlos E. R. wrote:
    On 2026-06-23 11:33, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
    On 23/06/2026 08:08, Brock McNuggets wrote:
    Emotional issue
    Well, if you see not backing pedophiles as merely "emotional" that
    is a you
    issue.

    The left in this country see paedophilia as perfectly acceptable
    behviour.

    That's ridiculous.


    Yes, it _is_ ridiculous that the left protects pedophiles just they lean left. That should be disqualifying behaviour and discourage people from voting for them, but leftists routinely delude themselves into believing that it isn't true, and happily accept whatever excuse or denial they receive.


    It is ridiculous that you think terrible things of the left. They are
    just people like you. Shame on you.
    --
    Cheers,
    Carlos E.R.
    ES🇪🇸, EU🇪🇺;
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Brock McNuggets@brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com to comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.linux.misc on Tue Jun 23 18:22:02 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On Jun 23, 2026 at 2:38:18 AM MST, ""Carlos E. R."" wrote <n9v2gbF7cqaU1@mid.individual.net>:

    On 2026-06-23 00:55, Brock McNuggets wrote:
    On Jun 22, 2026 at 3:24:10 PM MST, "chrisv" wrote
    <0cdj3lpj3sh9b2s1q6njp987bb6po7o8ii@4ax.com>:

    Joel W. Crump wrote:

    Rinaldi J. Montessi wrote:

    That depends on what prism you see the world through.

    It's clear that it was not a death threat.

    Well, here we have our definitive answer. Since Joel is wrong about
    pretty-much *everything*, it was a death threat.

    Amazing how few adults understand what "86" means.


    Why would I? I certainly don't.

    It is a common phrase -- but if you do not know it that is fine. No snark from me. Just know it does not mean what Trump says.
    --
    It's impossible for someone who is at war with themselves to be at peace with you.
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Brock McNuggets@brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com to comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.linux.misc on Tue Jun 23 18:22:20 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On Jun 23, 2026 at 2:34:21 AM MST, "The Natural Philosopher" wrote <111djut$253r2$6@dont-email.me>:

    On 23/06/2026 08:09, Brock McNuggets wrote:
    I know I have done a lot of good in my life -- working at summer camps and as
    a teacher and as a teen mentor and far more.

    Are you a paedophile? That's generally their profile.

    The fact you tie those things with such filth speaks of who YOU are.
    --
    It's impossible for someone who is at war with themselves to be at peace with you.
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Brock McNuggets@brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com to comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.linux.misc on Tue Jun 23 18:23:00 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On Jun 23, 2026 at 2:33:33 AM MST, "The Natural Philosopher" wrote <111djtd$253r2$5@dont-email.me>:

    On 23/06/2026 08:08, Brock McNuggets wrote:
    Emotional issue
    Well, if you see not backing pedophiles as merely "emotional" that is a you >> issue.

    The left in this country see paedophilia as perfectly acceptable behviour.

    Notice you feel the need to lie to push insults. Meanwhile Trump refuses to release the Epstein files and speaks sexually of his own daughters -- even as infants.
    --
    It's impossible for someone who is at war with themselves to be at peace with you.
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Brock McNuggets@brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com to comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.linux.misc on Tue Jun 23 18:23:31 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On Jun 23, 2026 at 12:21:28 AM MST, ""Joel W. Crump"" wrote <Ytq_R.11181$vH8f.10834@fx45.iad>:

    On 6/23/2026 3:09 AM, Brock McNuggets wrote:
    On Jun 22, 2026 at 10:28:40 PM MST, ""Joel W. Crump"" wrote
    <cQo_R.5576$3qE9.619@fx44.iad>:
    On 6/23/2026 1:20 AM, Brock McNuggets wrote:
    On Jun 22, 2026 at 8:25:18 PM MST, ""Joel W. Crump"" wrote
    <y0n_R.7380$NCT2.5706@fx03.iad>:
    On 6/22/2026 11:20 PM, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
    On 22/06/2026 23:55, Brock McNuggets wrote:

    The right wingers feign offense to obfuscate their true offenses. >>>>>>>
    No, that's Left wingers.
    The right isn't interested in 'offence' or 'emotion'

    You can pretend so, but we see right through it, it is emotional
    reaction, you just cling to the idea that you're in control of things, >>>>> you're pigs. The emotion is greed.

    Greed and a need to feel special as they protect their "in-group" and hate the
    "right" people.

    I've only begun to understand how important my life is. It's not pride, >>> but feeling very lucky, despite how difficult it was to get to this point. >>
    Good to hear.

    I know I have done a lot of good in my life -- working at summer camps and as
    a teacher and as a teen mentor and far more. The attacks I face online is
    pissing in the ocean... not something I worry about.


    It would be hard for anyone around here to get under my skin, yeah.

    They think they are so clever with their insults -- in reality they just prove us right.
    --
    It's impossible for someone who is at war with themselves to be at peace with you.
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Joel W. Crump@joelcrump@gmail.com to comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.linux.misc on Tue Jun 23 14:55:02 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 6/23/2026 2:23 PM, Brock McNuggets wrote:

    The attacks I face online is
    pissing in the ocean... not something I worry about.

    It would be hard for anyone around here to get under my skin, yeah.

    They think they are so clever with their insults -- in reality they just prove
    us right.


    It's something else how I'll see so much juvenile garbage on Usenet that
    I almost cancel my paid access, and then lo and behold something that
    matters happens, and I feel it's worth it still.
    --
    Joel W. Crump

    86 47
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Carlos E. R.@robin_listas@es.invalid to comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.linux.misc on Tue Jun 23 21:33:57 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 2026-06-23 20:22, Brock McNuggets wrote:
    On Jun 23, 2026 at 2:38:18 AM MST, ""Carlos E. R."" wrote <n9v2gbF7cqaU1@mid.individual.net>:

    On 2026-06-23 00:55, Brock McNuggets wrote:
    On Jun 22, 2026 at 3:24:10 PM MST, "chrisv" wrote
    <0cdj3lpj3sh9b2s1q6njp987bb6po7o8ii@4ax.com>:

    Joel W. Crump wrote:

    Rinaldi J. Montessi wrote:

    That depends on what prism you see the world through.

    It's clear that it was not a death threat.

    Well, here we have our definitive answer. Since Joel is wrong about
    pretty-much *everything*, it was a death threat.

    Amazing how few adults understand what "86" means.


    Why would I? I certainly don't.

    It is a common phrase -- but if you do not know it that is fine. No snark from
    me. Just know it does not mean what Trump says.


    Sure, but I'm not USAian. :-)
    Trump being wrong is no surprise, it is a given.
    --
    Cheers,
    Carlos E.R.
    ES🇪🇸, EU🇪🇺;
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Tim@nosuchemail@quirkl.org to comp.os.linux.advocacy on Tue Jun 23 19:59:44 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    The Natural Philosopher wrote:

    On 23/06/2026 08:09, Brock McNuggets wrote:
    I know I have done a lot of good in my life -- working at summer
    camps and as a teacher and as a teen mentor and far more.

    Are you a paedophile? That's generally their profile.

    Here is yet another tidbit that can be added to Brock's profile.

    It's a Facebook advertisment looking for a person to helpt with the GSA
    Michael Glasser and his then wife Anne Glasser are starting.

    GSA = Gender and Sexuality Alliance which is a club for kids and teens.

    The evidence is accumulating isn't it?

    https://ibb.co/kgz4Bnk5
    --
    --
    Tim
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From chrisv@chrisv@nospam.invalid to comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.linux.misc on Tue Jun 23 15:08:55 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    Carlos E. R. wrote:

    It is ridiculous that you think terrible things of the left. They are
    just people like you. Shame on you.

    They are people who facilitate and allow the destruction of Western cilvilzation. They facilitate and allow stuff like the Muslim rape
    gangs in the UK, because they are afraid to be called "racist".

    https://static1.squarespace.com/static/6810978a41bbc42489eafa81/t/6a314bb1151e511944bd4421/1781615537601/The+Rape+Gang+Inquiry+Report.pdf

    From the four-page Executive Summary, which I suggest you read:

    <quote>
    The scale of the crimes committed is staggering. It has been
    previously established that, at the very least, 250,000 young white
    girls have been subjected to repeated rape, gang rape, trafficking,
    torture, pregnancy, forced Islamic conversion, and lifelong trauma.

    1 The true number is probably higher. The perpetrators bear primary responsibility, yet the institutional failures that enabled them for
    decades must also be confronted. In court records and official
    inquiries, around 87% of those convicted in these group-based child
    sexual exploitation (CSE) cases bore distinctively Muslim names.

    2 The vast majority of men involved in these gangs were not convicted.
    Dr. Taj Hargey, an imam with the Oxford Islamic Congregation, believes
    the true proportion of gang members who are Muslims to be around 95%.

    3 This figure far exceeds the Muslim share of the overall United
    Kingdom population. The overwhelming majority of the rape gang
    networks consisted entirely of men from Muslim backgrounds
    predominantly of Pakistani heritage, although smaller groups from
    Somali, Iranian, Syrian, Turkish, and other Muslim origins were also
    involved.
    <quote>

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Carlos E. R.@robin_listas@es.invalid to comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.linux.misc on Tue Jun 23 22:26:14 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 2026-06-23 22:08, chrisv wrote:
    Carlos E. R. wrote:

    It is ridiculous that you think terrible things of the left. They are
    just people like you. Shame on you.

    They are people who facilitate and allow the destruction of Western cilvilzation. They facilitate and allow stuff like the Muslim rape
    gangs in the UK, because they are afraid to be called "racist".

    Plonk
    --
    Cheers,
    Carlos E.R.
    ES🇪🇸, EU🇪🇺;
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From The Natural Philosopher@tnp@invalid.invalid to comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.linux.misc on Tue Jun 23 21:42:43 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 23/06/2026 18:03, Carlos E. R. wrote:
    On 2026-06-23 18:24, CrudeSausage wrote:
    On 2026-06-23 5:45 a.m., Carlos E. R. wrote:
    On 2026-06-23 11:33, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
    On 23/06/2026 08:08, Brock McNuggets wrote:
    Emotional issue
    Well, if you see not backing pedophiles as merely "emotional" that
    is a you
    issue.

    The left in this country see paedophilia as perfectly acceptable
    behviour.

    That's ridiculous.


    Yes, it _is_ ridiculous that the left protects pedophiles just they
    lean left. That should be disqualifying behaviour and discourage
    people from voting for them, but leftists routinely delude themselves
    into believing that it isn't true, and happily accept whatever excuse
    or denial they receive.


    It is ridiculous that you think terrible things of the left. They are
    just people like you. Shame on you.


    No, they are not people just like me.

    They are people who think they are superior to me.
    --
    You can get much farther with a kind word and a gun than you can with a
    kind word alone.

    Al Capone



    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From The Natural Philosopher@tnp@invalid.invalid to comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.linux.misc on Tue Jun 23 21:43:28 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 23/06/2026 21:26, Carlos E. R. wrote:
    On 2026-06-23 22:08, chrisv wrote:
    Carlos E. R. wrote:

    It is ridiculous that you think terrible things of the left. They are
    just people like you. Shame on you.

    They are people who facilitate and allow the destruction of Western
    cilvilzation. They facilitate and allow stuff like the Muslim rape
    gangs in the UK, because they are afraid to be called "racist".

    Plonk


    The Left always plonks what it doesn't want to hear.
    --
    You can get much farther with a kind word and a gun than you can with a
    kind word alone.

    Al Capone



    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From chrisv@chrisv@nospam.invalid to comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.linux.misc on Tue Jun 23 15:44:30 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    Carlos E. R. wrote:

    chrisv wrote:
    Carlos E. R. wrote:

    It is ridiculous that you think terrible things of the left. They are
    just people like you. Shame on you.

    They are people who facilitate and allow the destruction of Western
    cilvilzation. They facilitate and allow stuff like the Muslim rape
    gangs in the UK, because they are afraid to be called "racist".

    Plonk

    I'm guessing that Carlos did not take my advise to read the UK's Rape
    Gang Inquiry Report. More than 250,000 victims!

    https://static1.squarespace.com/static/6810978a41bbc42489eafa81/t/6a314bb1151e511944bd4421/1781615537601/The+Rape+Gang+Inquiry+Report.pdf

    Just like no one here has taken my advise to watch "The Trans Train"
    on youtube.

    https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLlzZcJ_wPqcUTVOyMitdezb95YqCi2ZZZ

    "We don't want to know about the harm that is done. We want to be
    'nice' to others."

    Well, are you *really* being "nice to others", or are you doing more
    harm than good?

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Distro Lackey@dl@lackey.com to comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.linux.misc on Tue Jun 23 20:48:53 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On Tue, 23 Jun 2026 04:31:34 -0400, c186282 wrote:


    Yes, DO see how it can be potentially abused and
    the added complication. Kinda OUR job to watch
    for that happening and act.

    The fact that you consider systemd acceptable is a definite
    indication that YOU are not doing YOUR job.

    Anyone who understands the technicality and proposed goals
    of systemd realizes that it is an insidious usurpation of
    GNU/Linux freedom.



    Winders, you do what
    Gates TELLS you to do. With Linux we have choices.


    If the overwhelming majority of GNU/Linux distros have
    converted to systemd then the idea of "choice" is merely
    a pipe dream of deluded idiots.

    Choice still exists, but not for distro slaves.

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From The Natural Philosopher@tnp@invalid.invalid to comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.linux.misc on Tue Jun 23 21:53:50 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 23/06/2026 19:22, Brock McNuggets wrote:
    On Jun 23, 2026 at 2:34:21 AM MST, "The Natural Philosopher" wrote <111djut$253r2$6@dont-email.me>:

    On 23/06/2026 08:09, Brock McNuggets wrote:
    I know I have done a lot of good in my life -- working at summer camps and as
    a teacher and as a teen mentor and far more.

    Are you a paedophile? That's generally their profile.

    The fact you tie those things with such filth speaks of who YOU are.

    Hit a nerve did I?

    On 4 August 2002, two 10-year-old girls, Holly Marie Wells and Jessica
    Amiee Chapman, were lured into the home of a local resident and *school caretaker*, Ian Huntley, in Soham, Cambridgeshire, England.Both children
    were murdered – most likely by asphyxiation – and their bodies disposed
    of in an irrigation ditch close to RAF Lakenheath in Suffolk. The bodies
    were discovered on 17 August 2002
    --------------------------------------------
    A former vet has been given an extended prison sentence totalling 31
    years and 10 months for drugging and sexually abusing a group of young
    boys on a Christian summer camp he was leading.

    Jon Ruben, 76, from Ruddington in Nottinghamshire, ran the camp at
    Stathern Lodge in Leicestershire, using a position of responsibility in
    his church community. He laced sweets with sedatives he had purchased
    online and tricked the children into eating them by encouraging them to
    take part in what he called ‘the sweet game’. He gave the boys the contaminated sweets and offered a prize to whoever ate them the quickest.

    Later on, while the boys were heavily asleep, he went into their
    dormitory and chose individual boys to sexually abuse them. Because of
    the way Ruben had got hold of the sedatives he used on the children, he
    had used a more powerful drug than intended to subdue the victims, which
    left them feeling drowsy, nauseous and disorientated the following day.

    The authorities were notified when camp volunteers raised concerns about
    the children’s welfare the morning after. While Ruben was supervising activities with children away from the camp, witnesses discovered
    syringes and drugs among Ruben’s possessions. That witness, a relative
    of Ruben, then raised suspicion about the discovery.

    ------------------
    A paedophile who “marred the teenage years” of two girls was sentenced to more than ten years behind bars.

    Mustafa Seyranoglu, 34, of Pinnata Close, Enfield, “manipulated and corrupted” the two, who are 14 and 15, while working as a *learning
    mentor* at a school in the borough.

    The 34-year-old father changed his plea from not guilty to guilty on
    nine counts including four counts of sexual activity with a girl aged 13
    to 15, three counts of sexual assault on female, one count of causing to incite a girl, aged 13 to 15 to engage in sexual activity; and one count
    of perverting the course of justice.

    ===============

    etc etc
    --
    "Women actually are capable of being far more than the feminists will
    let them."



    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From The Natural Philosopher@tnp@invalid.invalid to comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.linux.misc on Tue Jun 23 21:54:57 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 23/06/2026 19:23, Brock McNuggets wrote:
    On Jun 23, 2026 at 2:33:33 AM MST, "The Natural Philosopher" wrote <111djtd$253r2$5@dont-email.me>:

    On 23/06/2026 08:08, Brock McNuggets wrote:
    Emotional issue
    Well, if you see not backing pedophiles as merely "emotional" that is a you >>> issue.

    The left in this country see paedophilia as perfectly acceptable behviour.

    Notice you feel the need to lie to push insults.

    No, that's you. I sent a link to the issue.

    Meanwhile Trump refuses to
    release the Epstein files and speaks sexually of his own daughters -- even as infants.

    Trump isn't right wing. He's just a pervy cunt.
    --
    Microsoft : the best reason to go to Linux that ever existed.

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From The Natural Philosopher@tnp@invalid.invalid to comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.linux.misc on Tue Jun 23 21:56:56 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 23/06/2026 19:23, Brock McNuggets wrote:
    On Jun 23, 2026 at 12:21:28 AM MST, ""Joel W. Crump"" wrote <Ytq_R.11181$vH8f.10834@fx45.iad>:

    On 6/23/2026 3:09 AM, Brock McNuggets wrote:
    On Jun 22, 2026 at 10:28:40 PM MST, ""Joel W. Crump"" wrote
    <cQo_R.5576$3qE9.619@fx44.iad>:
    On 6/23/2026 1:20 AM, Brock McNuggets wrote:
    On Jun 22, 2026 at 8:25:18 PM MST, ""Joel W. Crump"" wrote
    <y0n_R.7380$NCT2.5706@fx03.iad>:
    On 6/22/2026 11:20 PM, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
    On 22/06/2026 23:55, Brock McNuggets wrote:

    The right wingers feign offense to obfuscate their true offenses. >>>>>>>>
    No, that's Left wingers.
    The right isn't interested in 'offence' or 'emotion'

    You can pretend so, but we see right through it, it is emotional
    reaction, you just cling to the idea that you're in control of things, >>>>>> you're pigs. The emotion is greed.

    Greed and a need to feel special as they protect their "in-group" and hate the
    "right" people.

    I've only begun to understand how important my life is. It's not pride, >>>> but feeling very lucky, despite how difficult it was to get to this point. >>>
    Good to hear.

    I know I have done a lot of good in my life -- working at summer camps and as
    a teacher and as a teen mentor and far more. The attacks I face online is >>> pissing in the ocean... not something I worry about.


    It would be hard for anyone around here to get under my skin, yeah.

    They think they are so clever with their insults -- in reality they just prove
    us right.

    Indeed they do.

    See ,my attached cases of paedopjila among child mentors teachers and
    those in charge of children, and the evidence that many members of the
    radical Left thought it was fine for underage girls to have sex.
    --
    “Politics is the art of looking for trouble, finding it everywhere, diagnosing it incorrectly and applying the wrong remedies.”
    ― Groucho Marx

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From The Natural Philosopher@tnp@invalid.invalid to comp.os.linux.advocacy on Tue Jun 23 22:00:48 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 23/06/2026 21:48, Distro Lackey wrote:
    Anyone who understands the technicality and proposed goals
    of systemd realizes that it is an insidious usurpation of
    GNU/Linux freedom.
    Yawn.

    Go an compile your kernel ffrom source and stop complaining
    --
    “Politics is the art of looking for trouble, finding it everywhere, diagnosing it incorrectly and applying the wrong remedies.”
    ― Groucho Marx

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From pothead@pothead@snakebite.com to comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.linux.misc on Tue Jun 23 21:03:45 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 2026-06-23, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote:
    Carlos E. R. wrote:

    chrisv wrote:
    Carlos E. R. wrote:

    It is ridiculous that you think terrible things of the left. They are
    just people like you. Shame on you.

    They are people who facilitate and allow the destruction of Western
    cilvilzation. They facilitate and allow stuff like the Muslim rape
    gangs in the UK, because they are afraid to be called "racist".

    Plonk

    I'm guessing that Carlos did not take my advise to read the UK's Rape
    Gang Inquiry Report. More than 250,000 victims!

    https://static1.squarespace.com/static/6810978a41bbc42489eafa81/t/6a314bb1151e511944bd4421/1781615537601/The+Rape+Gang+Inquiry+Report.pdf

    Here are a couple more. If anything, at least read the first link as it
    backs your points completely.

    <https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2026/06/uk_muslim_rape_gangs_it_s_islamophilia_stupid.html>

    <https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2026/06/19/in-germany-it-is-open-season-for-rape-this-country-is-finished-say-police-officers/>

    <https://www.wnd.com/2026/06/watch-woman-pleads-american-help-as-france-seeks/>


    Just like no one here has taken my advise to watch "The Trans Train"
    on youtube.

    https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLlzZcJ_wPqcUTVOyMitdezb95YqCi2ZZZ

    "We don't want to know about the harm that is done. We want to be
    'nice' to others."

    Well, are you *really* being "nice to others", or are you doing more
    harm than good?

    I watched the movie along with the other ones linked and it's frightening
    what the liberals are doing to people who may be mentally ill.
    The left has gone bat shit crazy.
    --
    pothead

    “The forest was shrinking, but the trees kept voting for the axe,
    for the axe was clever and convinced the trees that because
    his handle was made of wood, he was one of them".

    ---Author Unknown
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Distro Lackey@dl@lackey.com to comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.linux.misc on Tue Jun 23 21:17:42 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On Tue, 23 Jun 2026 22:00:48 +0100, The Natural Philosopher wrote:

    On 23/06/2026 21:48, Distro Lackey wrote:
    Anyone who understands the technicality and proposed goals
    of systemd realizes that it is an insidious usurpation of
    GNU/Linux freedom.
    Yawn.

    Go an compile your kernel ffrom source and stop complaining


    For someone who can accomplish little else other than publish
    his boorish vomit on Usenet, using software written by others,
    then I suppose that systemd would be a total non-issue.

    But truly competent people will disagree.

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From The Natural Philosopher@tnp@invalid.invalid to comp.os.linux.advocacy on Tue Jun 23 22:26:54 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 23/06/2026 22:17, Distro Lackey wrote:
    On Tue, 23 Jun 2026 22:00:48 +0100, The Natural Philosopher wrote:

    On 23/06/2026 21:48, Distro Lackey wrote:
    Anyone who understands the technicality and proposed goals of
    systemd realizes that it is an insidious usurpation of GNU/Linux
    freedom.
    Yawn.

    Go an compile your kernel ffrom source and stop complaining


    For someone who can accomplish little else other than publish his
    boorish vomit on Usenet, using software written by others, then I
    suppose that systemd would be a total non-issue.

    But truly competent people will disagree.

    Oh Get YOU sweety.

    For someone who can accomplish little else other than publish
    his boorish vomit on Usenet, using software written by others,
    then I suppose that systemd would be a total issue.

    Because he is too stupid to disable it, or circumvent it and refuses to
    accept it.
    What a luser.

    Typical socialist. 'Wipe my botty: I cant do it myself.. I am OPPRESSED
    by these turds. I am a VICTIM'
    --
    "In our post-modern world, climate science is not powerful because it is
    true: it is true because it is powerful."

    Lucas Bergkamp

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Distro Lackey@dl@lackey.com to comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.linux.misc on Tue Jun 23 22:18:11 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On Tue, 23 Jun 2026 22:26:54 +0100, The Natural Philosopher wrote:


    Oh Get YOU sweety.


    The faggot does expose himself.

    Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha!

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Sgt. Joe Friday@sgtjf1965@hotmail.com to comp.os.linux.advocacy on Tue Jun 23 19:08:52 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    In article <111djut$253r2$6@dont-email.me>,
    tnp@invalid.invalid says...

    On 23/06/2026 08:09, Brock McNuggets wrote:
    I know I have done a lot of good in my life -- working at summer camps and as
    a teacher and as a teen mentor and far more.

    Are you a paedophile? That's generally their profile.

    Well since Brock posting as snit admitted that he
    supports incest, nothing would surprise me.

    <https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/6n NXQjVJ50s/m/RTxBElVAstIJ>

    <https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/6n NXQjVJ50s/m/WIMBsfqpxtIJ>

    And there are many more instances in Usenet where
    Michael Glasser supports incest. Most of them in
    regards to Richard Stallman's very odd views.
    --
    All we want are the facts ma'am
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Glock@glock@localhost.com to comp.os.linux.advocacy,alt.computer.workshop,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh on Wed Jun 24 00:13:16 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On Tue, 23 Jun 2026 19:08:52 -0400, Sgt. Joe Friday wrote:

    In article <111djut$253r2$6@dont-email.me>, tnp@invalid.invalid says...

    On 23/06/2026 08:09, Brock McNuggets wrote:
    I know I have done a lot of good in my life -- working at summer
    camps and as a teacher and as a teen mentor and far more.

    Are you a paedophile? That's generally their profile.

    Well since Brock posting as snit admitted that he supports incest,
    nothing would surprise me.

    <https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/6n NXQjVJ50s/m/RTxBElVAstIJ>

    <https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/6n NXQjVJ50s/m/WIMBsfqpxtIJ>

    And there are many more instances in Usenet where Michael Glasser
    supports incest. Most of them in regards to Richard Stallman's very odd views.

    I ran this through Chatgpt just for grins and giggles.
    It nailed snit for supporting incest.

    Snit is one hell of a sick person.
    He also tried to start a daycare center out of his house.
    It failed due to lack of following local ordinances.
    I wonder how his kids are?


    https://chatgpt.com/s/t_6a3b128198b88191a18271aab22d2187

    <https://chatgpt.com/s/t_6a3b20743afc8191889aa7b93f2af16b>


    'Yes. Archived posts from the Usenet newsgroup comp.sys.mac.advocacy show
    that incest was discussed on multiple occasions, although it was not an on-topic subject for the group (which was nominally about Macintosh-
    related advocacy and debates).

    For example:

    In a February 2008 thread titled "why are there so many pedophiles and molesters," several participants explicitly discussed incest, including arguments about whether incest should be considered a subset of sex,
    whether it was "synonymous" with sex, and whether it should be legally permitted in certain circumstances.
    That 2008 discussion referred back to an older, apparently long-running dispute in the group about incest. Posters accused each other of having
    argued that incest and sex were "identical" or "synonymous," and quoted earlier messages on the topic.
    An archived post from roughly 2005–2006 ("Ping: Wally and Tim, Part II") contains an extended argument about whether "incest" and "sex" are
    synonymous concepts, indicating the subject had already been debated years before the 2008 thread.

    So the answer is yes: incest was discussed in comp.sys.mac.advocacy, and
    from the archives it appears to have been part of a recurring off-topic argument among some regular participants rather than a one-time mention.

    If you're interested, I can also search for:

    the earliest known incest discussion in the group,
    how often the topic appeared,
    or the specific participants most involved in those debates.
    any mentions by a poster named snit?

    Yes. The archived discussions show that the poster Snit not only mentioned incest, but was one of the central participants in several of those
    arguments.

    For example, in a February 2008 thread, Snit wrote:

    "A while back there were a number of folks in CSMA who claimed incest was
    so similar to sex in general as to be considered synonymous."

    In the same thread, other posters quoted earlier statements they
    attributed to Snit, including:

    "I do not see any logical reason to disallow incest."

    and

    "I am torn on the incest question."

    The 2008 discussion itself largely revolved around disputes over what Snit
    had previously argued regarding incest, sex, legality, and terminology. Multiple participants (including Steve Carroll, Wally, and Tim Adams) referenced older debates involving Snit and incest.

    Based on the archives, the answer is yes—Snit discussed incest directly
    and was repeatedly involved in extended arguments about it in comp.sys.mac.advocacy.'
    --
    Glock
    Always Locked and Loaded.
    Bring it on snowflakes.

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Brock McNuggets@brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com to alt.computer.workshop,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,comp.os.linux.advocacy on Wed Jun 24 01:24:17 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On Jun 23, 2026 at 5:13:16 PM MST, "Glock" wrote <6a3b211c$0$23$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:

    On Tue, 23 Jun 2026 19:08:52 -0400, Sgt. Joe Friday wrote:

    In article <111djut$253r2$6@dont-email.me>, tnp@invalid.invalid says...

    On 23/06/2026 08:09, Brock McNuggets wrote:
    I know I have done a lot of good in my life -- working at summer
    camps and as a teacher and as a teen mentor and far more.

    Are you a paedophile? That's generally their profile.

    Well since Brock posting as snit admitted that he supports incest,
    nothing would surprise me.

    <https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/6nNXQjVJ50s/m/RTxBElVAstIJ>

    <https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/6nNXQjVJ50s/m/WIMBsfqpxtIJ>

    And there are many more instances in Usenet where Michael Glasser
    supports incest. Most of them in regards to Richard Stallman's very odd
    views.

    I ran this through Chatgpt just for grins and giggles.
    It nailed snit for supporting incest.

    Snit is one hell of a sick person.
    He also tried to start a daycare center out of his house.
    It failed due to lack of following local ordinances.
    I wonder how his kids are?


    https://chatgpt.com/s/t_6a3b128198b88191a18271aab22d2187

    <https://chatgpt.com/s/t_6a3b20743afc8191889aa7b93f2af16b>


    'Yes. Archived posts from the Usenet newsgroup comp.sys.mac.advocacy show that incest was discussed on multiple occasions, although it was not an on-topic subject for the group (which was nominally about Macintosh-
    related advocacy and debates).

    For example:

    In a February 2008 thread titled "why are there so many pedophiles and molesters," several participants explicitly discussed incest, including arguments about whether incest should be considered a subset of sex,
    whether it was "synonymous" with sex, and whether it should be legally permitted in certain circumstances.
    That 2008 discussion referred back to an older, apparently long-running dispute in the group about incest. Posters accused each other of having argued that incest and sex were "identical" or "synonymous," and quoted earlier messages on the topic.
    An archived post from roughly 2005–2006 ("Ping: Wally and Tim, Part II") contains an extended argument about whether "incest" and "sex" are
    synonymous concepts, indicating the subject had already been debated years before the 2008 thread.

    So the answer is yes: incest was discussed in comp.sys.mac.advocacy, and
    from the archives it appears to have been part of a recurring off-topic argument among some regular participants rather than a one-time mention.

    If you're interested, I can also search for:

    the earliest known incest discussion in the group,
    how often the topic appeared,
    or the specific participants most involved in those debates.
    any mentions by a poster named snit?

    Yes. The archived discussions show that the poster Snit not only mentioned incest, but was one of the central participants in several of those arguments.

    For example, in a February 2008 thread, Snit wrote:

    "A while back there were a number of folks in CSMA who claimed incest was
    so similar to sex in general as to be considered synonymous."

    In the same thread, other posters quoted earlier statements they
    attributed to Snit, including:

    "I do not see any logical reason to disallow incest."

    and

    "I am torn on the incest question."

    The 2008 discussion itself largely revolved around disputes over what Snit had previously argued regarding incest, sex, legality, and terminology. Multiple participants (including Steve Carroll, Wally, and Tim Adams) referenced older debates involving Snit and incest.

    Based on the archives, the answer is yes—Snit discussed incest directly
    and was repeatedly involved in extended arguments about it in comp.sys.mac.advocacy.'

    Gee, Sockboy, you pull up your own posts where you pull things out of context from 2008 and lie about it.

    At least that is four years more recent than 2004. Good job, I guess. LOL!
    --
    It's impossible for someone who is at war with themselves to be at peace with you.
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Brock McNuggets@brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com to comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.linux.misc on Wed Jun 24 01:34:51 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On Jun 23, 2026 at 1:56:56 PM MST, "The Natural Philosopher" wrote <111eruo$2hojc$9@dont-email.me>:

    On 23/06/2026 19:23, Brock McNuggets wrote:
    On Jun 23, 2026 at 12:21:28 AM MST, ""Joel W. Crump"" wrote
    <Ytq_R.11181$vH8f.10834@fx45.iad>:

    On 6/23/2026 3:09 AM, Brock McNuggets wrote:
    On Jun 22, 2026 at 10:28:40 PM MST, ""Joel W. Crump"" wrote
    <cQo_R.5576$3qE9.619@fx44.iad>:
    On 6/23/2026 1:20 AM, Brock McNuggets wrote:
    On Jun 22, 2026 at 8:25:18 PM MST, ""Joel W. Crump"" wrote
    <y0n_R.7380$NCT2.5706@fx03.iad>:
    On 6/22/2026 11:20 PM, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
    On 22/06/2026 23:55, Brock McNuggets wrote:

    The right wingers feign offense to obfuscate their true offenses. >>>>>>>>>
    No, that's Left wingers.
    The right isn't interested in 'offence' or 'emotion'

    You can pretend so, but we see right through it, it is emotional >>>>>>> reaction, you just cling to the idea that you're in control of things, >>>>>>> you're pigs. The emotion is greed.

    Greed and a need to feel special as they protect their "in-group" and hate the
    "right" people.

    I've only begun to understand how important my life is. It's not pride, >>>>> but feeling very lucky, despite how difficult it was to get to this point.

    Good to hear.

    I know I have done a lot of good in my life -- working at summer camps and as
    a teacher and as a teen mentor and far more. The attacks I face online is >>>> pissing in the ocean... not something I worry about.


    It would be hard for anyone around here to get under my skin, yeah.

    They think they are so clever with their insults -- in reality they just prove
    us right.

    Indeed they do.

    See ,my attached cases of paedopjila among child mentors teachers and
    those in charge of children, and the evidence that many members of the radical Left thought it was fine for underage girls to have sex.

    Cite.

    What we know is that Trump -- unlike Clinton -- does not want the Epstein
    files released, has had many credible accusations of sexual misconduct, has publicly bragged about watching underage naked girls in dressing rooms (and
    his daughter agreed that is what he does), talked about his daughters in
    sexual ways (even when one was an infant!), and more.

    We know Trump is a rapist and a pedophile. But the right does not care. Not
    one whit. Just as they do not care about Jan 6, his tax nonsense, or any of
    his other crimes. They back a fascist oligarch pushing echoes of Nazi Germany. --
    It's impossible for someone who is at war with themselves to be at peace with you.
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Brock McNuggets@brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com to comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.linux.misc on Wed Jun 24 01:35:27 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On Jun 23, 2026 at 1:54:57 PM MST, "The Natural Philosopher" wrote <111err1$2hojc$8@dont-email.me>:

    On 23/06/2026 19:23, Brock McNuggets wrote:
    On Jun 23, 2026 at 2:33:33 AM MST, "The Natural Philosopher" wrote
    <111djtd$253r2$5@dont-email.me>:

    On 23/06/2026 08:08, Brock McNuggets wrote:
    Emotional issue
    Well, if you see not backing pedophiles as merely "emotional" that is a you
    issue.

    The left in this country see paedophilia as perfectly acceptable behviour. >>
    Notice you feel the need to lie to push insults.

    You ignored this.

    No, that's you. I sent a link to the issue.

    Meanwhile Trump refuses to
    release the Epstein files and speaks sexually of his own daughters -- even as
    infants.

    Trump isn't right wing. He's just a pervy cunt.

    Trump is what the American right wing has become.
    --
    It's impossible for someone who is at war with themselves to be at peace with you.
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Brock McNuggets@brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com to comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.linux.misc on Wed Jun 24 01:36:53 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On Jun 23, 2026 at 1:53:50 PM MST, "The Natural Philosopher" wrote <111erou$2hojc$7@dont-email.me>:

    On 23/06/2026 19:22, Brock McNuggets wrote:
    On Jun 23, 2026 at 2:34:21 AM MST, "The Natural Philosopher" wrote
    <111djut$253r2$6@dont-email.me>:

    On 23/06/2026 08:09, Brock McNuggets wrote:
    I know I have done a lot of good in my life -- working at summer camps and as
    a teacher and as a teen mentor and far more.

    Are you a paedophile? That's generally their profile.

    The fact you tie those things with such filth speaks of who YOU are.

    Hit a nerve did I?

    No. I was stating a simple fact. You made an insane and unsupported accusation... one which came from YOUR way of thinking. It had nothing to do with me. You were sharing something about yourself.

    ...
    --
    It's impossible for someone who is at war with themselves to be at peace with you.
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Brock McNuggets@brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com to comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.linux.misc on Wed Jun 24 01:39:53 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On Jun 23, 2026 at 11:55:02 AM MST, ""Joel W. Crump"" wrote <cEA_R.2$HrW5.0@fx48.iad>:

    On 6/23/2026 2:23 PM, Brock McNuggets wrote:

    The attacks I face online is
    pissing in the ocean... not something I worry about.

    It would be hard for anyone around here to get under my skin, yeah.

    They think they are so clever with their insults -- in reality they just prove
    us right.


    It's something else how I'll see so much juvenile garbage on Usenet that
    I almost cancel my paid access, and then lo and behold something that
    matters happens, and I feel it's worth it still.

    I paid for a bunch on blackness years ago... and still have plenty left.

    I paid $16 in 2020.

    "You Have Used 26.18705 GBs Of Your 200 GBs Purchased."
    --
    It's impossible for someone who is at war with themselves to be at peace with you.
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From CrudeSausage@crude@sausa.ge to comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.linux.misc on Tue Jun 23 21:50:46 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 2026-06-23 4:08 p.m., chrisv wrote:
    Carlos E. R. wrote:

    It is ridiculous that you think terrible things of the left. They are
    just people like you. Shame on you.

    They are people who facilitate and allow the destruction of Western cilvilzation. They facilitate and allow stuff like the Muslim rape
    gangs in the UK, because they are afraid to be called "racist".

    https://static1.squarespace.com/static/6810978a41bbc42489eafa81/t/6a314bb1151e511944bd4421/1781615537601/The+Rape+Gang+Inquiry+Report.pdf

    From the four-page Executive Summary, which I suggest you read:

    <quote>
    The scale of the crimes committed is staggering. It has been
    previously established that, at the very least, 250,000 young white
    girls have been subjected to repeated rape, gang rape, trafficking,
    torture, pregnancy, forced Islamic conversion, and lifelong trauma.

    1 The true number is probably higher. The perpetrators bear primary responsibility, yet the institutional failures that enabled them for
    decades must also be confronted. In court records and official
    inquiries, around 87% of those convicted in these group-based child
    sexual exploitation (‘CSE’) cases bore distinctively Muslim names.

    2 The vast majority of men involved in these gangs were not convicted.
    Dr. Taj Hargey, an imam with the Oxford Islamic Congregation, believes
    the true proportion of gang members who are Muslims to be around 95%.

    3 This figure far exceeds the Muslim share of the overall United
    Kingdom population. The overwhelming majority of the rape gang
    networks consisted entirely of men from Muslim backgrounds –
    predominantly of Pakistani heritage, although smaller groups from
    Somali, Iranian, Syrian, Turkish, and other Muslim origins were also involved.
    <quote>


    What pains me is that the forced Islamic conversions will come for the
    rest of us in the next few years. It saddens me to know that because of
    our general apathy, those of us who come from ethnicities that actually accomplished something in history will be conquered by the descendants
    of savages who have done nothing good for the world. Once they've taken
    over, we will go backwards several hundred years rather than forward.
    The cancer will take over the whole of the Earthly body, and consume
    whatever healthy cell remains.
    --
    CrudeSausage
    M4 MacBook Air
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From CrudeSausage@crude@sausa.ge to comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.linux.misc on Tue Jun 23 21:51:30 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 2026-06-23 4:26 p.m., Carlos E. R. wrote:
    On 2026-06-23 22:08, chrisv wrote:
    Carlos E. R. wrote:

    It is ridiculous that you think terrible things of the left. They are
    just people like you. Shame on you.

    They are people who facilitate and allow the destruction of Western
    cilvilzation. They facilitate and allow stuff like the Muslim rape
    gangs in the UK, because they are afraid to be called "racist".

    Plonk

    Actually, I think you deserve a plonk way more than he does.

    *plonk*
    --
    CrudeSausage
    M4 MacBook Air
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From CrudeSausage@crude@sausa.ge to comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.linux.misc on Tue Jun 23 21:54:52 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 2026-06-23 4:42 p.m., The Natural Philosopher wrote:
    On 23/06/2026 18:03, Carlos E. R. wrote:
    On 2026-06-23 18:24, CrudeSausage wrote:
    On 2026-06-23 5:45 a.m., Carlos E. R. wrote:
    On 2026-06-23 11:33, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
    On 23/06/2026 08:08, Brock McNuggets wrote:
    Emotional issue
    Well, if you see not backing pedophiles as merely "emotional" that >>>>>> is a you
    issue.

    The left in this country see paedophilia as perfectly acceptable
    behviour.

    That's ridiculous.


    Yes, it _is_ ridiculous that the left protects pedophiles just they
    lean left. That should be disqualifying behaviour and discourage
    people from voting for them, but leftists routinely delude themselves
    into believing that it isn't true, and happily accept whatever excuse
    or denial they receive.


    It is ridiculous that you think terrible things of the left. They are
    just people like you. Shame on you.


    No, they are not people just like me.

    They are people who think they are superior to me.

    The mere fact that Carlos believes that it is wrong to think terrible
    things of the left, the people who think it is alright to murder anyone
    who disagrees with them, and who invited millions of murderous rapists
    from Africa to take over our societies, is enough to deserve a permanent
    place in my filter.
    --
    CrudeSausage
    M4 MacBook Air
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From CrudeSausage@crude@sausa.ge to comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.linux.misc on Tue Jun 23 22:07:00 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 2026-06-23 4:44 p.m., chrisv wrote:
    Carlos E. R. wrote:

    chrisv wrote:
    Carlos E. R. wrote:

    It is ridiculous that you think terrible things of the left. They are
    just people like you. Shame on you.

    They are people who facilitate and allow the destruction of Western
    cilvilzation. They facilitate and allow stuff like the Muslim rape
    gangs in the UK, because they are afraid to be called "racist".

    Plonk

    I'm guessing that Carlos did not take my advise to read the UK's Rape
    Gang Inquiry Report. More than 250,000 victims!

    The media told him that the person responsible for the report's release
    was dangerous <https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/restore-rupert-lowe-makerfield-andy-burnham-b2996600.html>,
    and he decided that the headline was as much reading as he was willing
    to do. If the mainstream media tells him that there is no fire in the
    building that's filling with smoke, that's enough for him. He is an embarrassment of a human being, but there are sadly many more just as
    ignorant as he is.
    https://static1.squarespace.com/static/6810978a41bbc42489eafa81/t/6a314bb1151e511944bd4421/1781615537601/The+Rape+Gang+Inquiry+Report.pdf

    Just like no one here has taken my advise to watch "The Trans Train"
    on youtube.

    https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLlzZcJ_wPqcUTVOyMitdezb95YqCi2ZZZ

    "We don't want to know about the harm that is done. We want to be
    'nice' to others."

    Well, are you *really* being "nice to others", or are you doing more
    harm than good?
    I was just telling my wife that according to a Polish guy I talk to on Telegram, if you point at a nigger in Poland and denounce him for having
    raped someone, not only will the supposed racist not be apologetic about
    the vocabulary he used to describe the criminal, but the police will
    quickly arrive to arrest the aforementioned coon. We were both shocked
    at the thought that there is a country out there where the person
    committing the crime is arrested rather than the white person denouncing
    it. *That* is what the left has done to the world. Our disbelief that
    such a thing is even possible in the West anymore speaks volumes about
    how the left has also conditioned us to accept that justice is inverted.

    There is no debating or even communicating with leftists with me
    anymore. These people have shown us what they can manage when given
    power and there is not one place they have had control over that has
    improved. These people are incompetent in every way and wholly
    dangerous. Not only should every one of their ideas be ignored, but they should be ridiculed at every opportunity and knocked out if they show
    even a shred of aggression. Not only are they responsible for the waves
    of useless parasites from the third world entering the West, but they
    have decimated education (both public and high-level), health care, law enforcement, the judicial system, social cohesion and countless
    economies. There is absolutely _nothing_ these people get right.

    They truly are the agent of Satan.
    --
    CrudeSausage
    M4 MacBook Air
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From CrudeSausage@crude@sausa.ge to comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.linux.misc on Tue Jun 23 22:12:03 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 2026-06-23 4:54 p.m., The Natural Philosopher wrote:

     Meanwhile Trump refuses to
    release the Epstein files and speaks sexually of his own daughters --
    even as
    infants.

    Trump isn't right wing. He's just a pervy  cunt.

    Geez, what a clown. Biden could have released the Epstein files too. Why didn't he? This is the guy who showered with his daughter, from her own admission. This is the old pervert who touched little girls
    inappropriately while on camera in public. If the Democrats wanted the
    release of those Epstein files so badly, they could have done it during
    his fraudulent, stolen presidency. In fact, if there were _anything_ at
    all they could have used against Trump or Republicans in general in
    those files, they would have done so. Either they are just as
    incompetent at releasing secret files as they are at everything else, or
    they were protecting fellow Democrats.

    Meanwhile, Snit Brock McNuggets Michael Glasser Prescott Parasite and
    Computer Guy continues to insist on embarrassing himself with his
    striking retardation every day.
    --
    CrudeSausage
    M4 MacBook Air
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From CrudeSausage@crude@sausa.ge to comp.os.linux.advocacy on Tue Jun 23 22:14:28 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 2026-06-23 5:00 p.m., The Natural Philosopher wrote:
    On 23/06/2026 21:48, Distro Lackey wrote:
    Anyone who understands the technicality and proposed goals
    of systemd realizes that it is an insidious usurpation of
    GNU/Linux freedom.
    Yawn.

    Go an compile your kernel ffrom source and stop complaining

    Has Larry "Distro Lackey Diego Garcia Nux Vomica Farley Flud Fabian
    Russell" written a bash script that controls a robot made of garbage he
    found lying around designed only to masturbate him yet? It seems like
    the logical next step.
    --
    CrudeSausage
    M4 MacBook Air
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From rbowman@bowman@montana.com to comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.linux.misc on Wed Jun 24 02:24:38 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On Tue, 23 Jun 2026 21:50:46 -0400, CrudeSausage wrote:

    What pains me is that the forced Islamic conversions will come for the
    rest of us in the next few years.

    Many years ago a frustrated penguin said "You're a little heathen!' when
    she realized I didn't even know there were 10 commandments let alone able
    to recite one on command/ Her conversion attempt didn't really take so I
    doubt some imam would have better luck. Nothing good ever came out of West Asia.

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From The Natural Philosopher@tnp@invalid.invalid to comp.os.linux.advocacy on Wed Jun 24 10:24:18 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 23/06/2026 23:18, Distro Lackey wrote:
    On Tue, 23 Jun 2026 22:26:54 +0100, The Natural Philosopher wrote:


    Oh Get YOU sweety.


    The faggot does expose himself.

    Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha!

    Oh gosh, one in the closet...
    --
    "It is an established fact to 97% confidence limits that left wing conspirators see right wing conspiracies everywhere"

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From The Natural Philosopher@tnp@invalid.invalid to comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.linux.misc on Wed Jun 24 10:47:25 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 24/06/2026 02:34, Brock McNuggets wrote:
    On Jun 23, 2026 at 1:56:56 PM MST, "The Natural Philosopher" wrote <111eruo$2hojc$9@dont-email.me>:

    On 23/06/2026 19:23, Brock McNuggets wrote:
    On Jun 23, 2026 at 12:21:28 AM MST, ""Joel W. Crump"" wrote
    <Ytq_R.11181$vH8f.10834@fx45.iad>:

    On 6/23/2026 3:09 AM, Brock McNuggets wrote:
    On Jun 22, 2026 at 10:28:40 PM MST, ""Joel W. Crump"" wrote
    <cQo_R.5576$3qE9.619@fx44.iad>:
    On 6/23/2026 1:20 AM, Brock McNuggets wrote:
    On Jun 22, 2026 at 8:25:18 PM MST, ""Joel W. Crump"" wrote
    <y0n_R.7380$NCT2.5706@fx03.iad>:
    On 6/22/2026 11:20 PM, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
    On 22/06/2026 23:55, Brock McNuggets wrote:

    The right wingers feign offense to obfuscate their true offenses. >>>>>>>>>>
    No, that's Left wingers.
    The right isn't interested in 'offence' or 'emotion'

    You can pretend so, but we see right through it, it is emotional >>>>>>>> reaction, you just cling to the idea that you're in control of things, >>>>>>>> you're pigs. The emotion is greed.

    Greed and a need to feel special as they protect their "in-group" and hate the
    "right" people.

    I've only begun to understand how important my life is. It's not pride, >>>>>> but feeling very lucky, despite how difficult it was to get to this point.

    Good to hear.

    I know I have done a lot of good in my life -- working at summer camps and as
    a teacher and as a teen mentor and far more. The attacks I face online is >>>>> pissing in the ocean... not something I worry about.


    It would be hard for anyone around here to get under my skin, yeah.

    They think they are so clever with their insults -- in reality they just prove
    us right.

    Indeed they do.

    See ,my attached cases of paedopjila among child mentors teachers and
    those in charge of children, and the evidence that many members of the
    radical Left thought it was fine for underage girls to have sex.

    Cite.

    What we know is that Trump -- unlike Clinton -- does not want the Epstein files released, has had many credible accusations of sexual misconduct, has publicly bragged about watching underage naked girls in dressing rooms (and his daughter agreed that is what he does), talked about his daughters in sexual ways (even when one was an infant!), and more.

    We know Trump is a rapist and a pedophile. But the right does not care. Not one whit. Just as they do not care about Jan 6, his tax nonsense, or any of his other crimes. They back a fascist oligarch pushing echoes of Nazi Germany.

    You keep identifying Trump with the Right.

    This is a huge mistake. He is nothing of the sort.

    He is a populists who has been funded for years and taken advantage of
    the absolute insanity of the American Left, to usurp power on behalf
    probably of Moscow amongst others.

    People are prepared to put up with his decadence as long as he gets a
    few needful things done. Unfortunately that is not all he is doing.

    Leaving the average American in a quandary., more woke shit, or more Trump.

    The irony of it is that it is that very woke shit that has also been
    funded by 'foreign powers'

    When all your putative 'leaders' are in a foreign powers pocket, its
    hard to know who to vote for.

    Trump is a disgusting individual. He has sold his soul to the highest
    bidder for the lowest pleasure so many times that there is nothing left
    but an empty sack of shit.

    What people need to stop doing is being tricked into having this
    pointless battle between 'Left' and 'right' They are owned by the sane
    people. They are funded by the same people, They are set at each others throats to ensure people don't notice that 'it doesn't matter who you
    vote for, the government always gets in'.

    The point of US politics is to destroy America. That's what Moscow
    wants. That's what Peking wants. That's what Iran wants.

    They own the Left and they own the Right and they absolutely own Trump.

    They fund the Greens. They fund Black Lives matter. They fund MAGA and
    the Ku Klux Klan. They fund LBGQT and they fund Pro Life.

    If it has the potential to divide and weaken, they fund it.

    Its so much cheaper than bombs and weapons.

    Putin thought he had bought America so they wouldn't join in, He was
    right. Unfortunately he hadn't bought enough of the EU or Briutaitin or
    Canada and especially he hadn't bough Ukraine, so he is on the point of
    losing a war he should never have started.

    To the point where even Belarus is deserting him and even Trump sees
    which way the wind is blowing and is doing another volte-face and about
    to help Ukraine.

    Bullshit baffles brains. Don't listen to what these groups and movements
    say, watch what they do and assume they are all in it for the money.

    The world then becomes a simpler place.
    --
    "It is an established fact to 97% confidence limits that left wing conspirators see right wing conspiracies everywhere"

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From CrudeSausage@crude@sausa.ge to comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.linux.misc on Wed Jun 24 05:51:56 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 2026-06-23 10:24 p.m., rbowman wrote:
    On Tue, 23 Jun 2026 21:50:46 -0400, CrudeSausage wrote:

    What pains me is that the forced Islamic conversions will come for the
    rest of us in the next few years.

    Many years ago a frustrated penguin said "You're a little heathen!' when
    she realized I didn't even know there were 10 commandments let alone able
    to recite one on command/ Her conversion attempt didn't really take so I doubt some imam would have better luck. Nothing good ever came out of West Asia.

    There is an adjective there, forced, which doesn't consider whether you
    are willing to convert or not. The people of Christian Syria, Christian
    Egypt and Christian Jordan didn't want to convert either, but they went
    ahead and did it when told that they would lose their heads otherwise.
    Islam doesn't care that you don't want to worship Satan, they insist
    upon it.
    --
    CrudeSausage
    M4 MacBook Air
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From The Natural Philosopher@tnp@invalid.invalid to comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.linux.misc on Wed Jun 24 10:53:24 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 24/06/2026 02:35, Brock McNuggets wrote:
    On Jun 23, 2026 at 1:54:57 PM MST, "The Natural Philosopher" wrote <111err1$2hojc$8@dont-email.me>:

    On 23/06/2026 19:23, Brock McNuggets wrote:
    On Jun 23, 2026 at 2:33:33 AM MST, "The Natural Philosopher" wrote
    <111djtd$253r2$5@dont-email.me>:

    On 23/06/2026 08:08, Brock McNuggets wrote:
    Emotional issue
    Well, if you see not backing pedophiles as merely "emotional" that is a you
    issue.

    The left in this country see paedophilia as perfectly acceptable behviour. >>>
    Notice you feel the need to lie to push insults.

    You ignored this.

    No, that's you. I sent a link to the issue.

    Meanwhile Trump refuses to
    release the Epstein files and speaks sexually of his own daughters -- even as
    infants.

    Trump isn't right wing. He's just a pervy cunt.

    Trump is what the American right wing has become.

    No, its what has usurped the right wing and pushed the conservatives
    aside, in the same way the Marxists and profiteers were allowed to take
    over the Left.

    Your political system is rotten to the core and under the control of
    foreign money

    While you scream hatred at each other to support one total cunt over
    another bunch of total cunts.

    All claiming the moral high ground.

    It would be pathetic if it wasn't so laughable.
    --
    When plunder becomes a way of life for a group of men in a society, over
    the course of time they create for themselves a legal system that
    authorizes it and a moral code that glorifies it.

    Frédéric Bastiat

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From The Natural Philosopher@tnp@invalid.invalid to comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.linux.misc on Wed Jun 24 11:00:37 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 24/06/2026 02:36, Brock McNuggets wrote:
    On Jun 23, 2026 at 1:53:50 PM MST, "The Natural Philosopher" wrote <111erou$2hojc$7@dont-email.me>:

    On 23/06/2026 19:22, Brock McNuggets wrote:
    On Jun 23, 2026 at 2:34:21 AM MST, "The Natural Philosopher" wrote
    <111djut$253r2$6@dont-email.me>:

    On 23/06/2026 08:09, Brock McNuggets wrote:
    I know I have done a lot of good in my life -- working at summer camps and as
    a teacher and as a teen mentor and far more.

    Are you a paedophile? That's generally their profile.

    The fact you tie those things with such filth speaks of who YOU are.

    Hit a nerve did I?

    No. I was stating a simple fact. You made an insane and unsupported accusation...

    Nop,. I made a very pertinent and well supported association

    Paedophiles are attracted to any job that gives them control over young children. Its established fact. The more they protest their do-goodery
    the more likely they are to be sticking their fingers up little girls
    cracks.

    Look up Sir Jimmy Savile.

    Your moralising do-goodery absolutely called out for that riposte.
    I have no idea whether I have 'done good' in this world or not.

    How could I possibly tell? I am an atheist. No big G tells me what is
    right and what is wrong.
    I haven[t the effrontery and sheer bald faced over inflated self esteem
    to claim that I have, and my experience is that most people who make a
    big thing out of it are trying to hide something else.

    one which came from YOUR way of thinking. It had nothing to do
    with me. You were sharing something about yourself.

    You would say that, wouldn't you?
    --
    Those who want slavery should have the grace to name it by its proper
    name. They must face the full meaning of that which they are advocating
    or condoning; the full, exact, specific meaning of collectivism, of its logical implications, of the principles upon which it is based, and of
    the ultimate consequences to which these principles will lead. They must
    face it, then decide whether this is what they want or not.

    Ayn Rand.

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From The Natural Philosopher@tnp@invalid.invalid to comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.linux.misc on Wed Jun 24 11:03:33 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 24/06/2026 02:50, CrudeSausage wrote:
    What pains me is that the forced Islamic conversions will come for the
    rest of us in the next few years. It saddens me to know that because of
    our general apathy, those of us who come from ethnicities that actually accomplished something in history will be conquered by the descendants
    of savages who have done nothing good for the world.

    Well they gave us a century of cheap oil.

    > Once they've taken
    over, we will go backwards several hundred years rather than forward.
    The cancer will take over the whole of the Earthly body, and consume whatever healthy cell remains.
    For sure,. Radical Islam, like Radical Creationisms, is pretty much
    inimical with the practice of science and technology.

    But you will get a Great World Caliphate, and plenty of unprotected sex.
    --
    Karl Marx said religion is the opium of the people.
    But Marxism is the crack cocaine.

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From The Natural Philosopher@tnp@invalid.invalid to comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.linux.misc on Wed Jun 24 11:14:28 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 24/06/2026 02:54, CrudeSausage wrote:
    The mere fact that Carlos believes that it is wrong to think terrible
    things of the left, the people who think it is alright to murder anyone
    who disagrees with them, and who invited millions of murderous rapists
    from Africa to take over our societies, is enough to deserve a permanent place in my filter.

    Carlos is not a bad person. He just thinks he is right. Because all the
    people he know think the same way.

    Bandar Log-ic

    "We all say i, so it must be true".

    He has never stopped to seriously think about any of it.

    Fire example I too, took global warming for granted, till the windmills started to appear.
    As a fully qualified electrical engineer and experience of accountancy
    and finance, I couldn't believe what I was seeing. You only needed to do
    a few calculations on the back of an envelope to see that of all the
    most useless ways to reduce atmospheric CO2, windmills and solar panels
    were it.

    No one ever did that back of the envelope calculation, not till recently anyway.


    And then the EU, bless its corrupt little cotton socks, ruled that
    instead of a carbon tax, on fuel, there would be a 'renewable
    obligation' thereby ruling out the most obvious and cost effective route
    to decarbonisation. Nuclear power.

    At that point I realised that 'renewable' energy at least, and quite
    possibly 'man made climate change' itself, were politically and
    commercially convenient lies.

    They had to be, after Al Gore called it all an inconvenient truth And he
    was a politician...
    --
    “Some people like to travel by train because it combines the slowness of
    a car with the cramped public exposure of 
an airplane.”

    Dennis Miller


    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From The Natural Philosopher@tnp@invalid.invalid to comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.linux.misc on Wed Jun 24 11:26:13 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 24/06/2026 03:12, CrudeSausage wrote:
    On 2026-06-23 4:54 p.m., The Natural Philosopher wrote:

     Meanwhile Trump refuses to
    release the Epstein files and speaks sexually of his own daughters --
    even as
    infants.

    Trump isn't right wing. He's just a pervy  cunt.

    Geez, what a clown. Biden could have released the Epstein files too. Why didn't he? This is the guy who showered with his daughter, from her own admission. This is the old pervert who touched little girls
    inappropriately while on camera in public. If the Democrats wanted the release of those Epstein files so badly, they could have done it during
    his fraudulent, stolen presidency. In fact, if there were _anything_ at
    all they could have used against Trump or Republicans in general in
    those files, they would have done so. Either they are just as
    incompetent at releasing secret files as they are at everything else, or they were protecting fellow Democrats.

    I make little distinction between the so called 'parties' in American politics,. They are all by and large rotten to the core, corrupted by
    the very power they exercise, in thinking they can get away with it.

    And they have.

    Anyone who thinks they are supporting a party that has only their
    interests at heat and is comprised of individuals whose odor of sanctity smells as sweet as their excrement is a damn fool. Carlos and his EU.
    They too are rotten to the core, And you cant get rid of them.

    At least in Britain we accept hat fact and realise at some levels that democracy is a way of getting rod of the turds that have floated to the
    top by flushing the bowl and installing a new selection of turds.

    People think I 'support Reform'...

    Well I don't. I merely will vote that way as the least odoriferous of
    the shit piles on offer, and once they too have become infiltrated by
    carpet baggers, grifters ,agents of foreign powers and probably
    paedophiles fraudsters and rapists, I will vote for someone else.
    --
    "When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign,
    that the dunces are all in confederacy against him."

    Jonathan Swift.

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From The Natural Philosopher@tnp@invalid.invalid to comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.linux.misc on Wed Jun 24 11:44:14 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 24/06/2026 10:51, CrudeSausage wrote:
    On 2026-06-23 10:24 p.m., rbowman wrote:
    On Tue, 23 Jun 2026 21:50:46 -0400, CrudeSausage wrote:

    What pains me is that the forced Islamic conversions will come for the
    rest of us in the next few years.

    Many years ago a frustrated penguin said "You're a little heathen!' when
    she realized I didn't even know there were 10 commandments let alone able
    to recite one on command/ Her conversion attempt didn't really take so I
    doubt some imam would have better luck. Nothing good ever came out of
    West
    Asia.

    There is an adjective there, forced, which doesn't consider whether you
    are willing to convert or not. The people of Christian Syria, Christian Egypt and Christian Jordan didn't want to convert either, but they went ahead and did it when told that they would lose their heads otherwise.
    Islam doesn't care that you don't want to worship Satan, they insist
    upon it.

    There is a curious historical fact...

    The Khazar Empire (8th-9th Century CE): A powerful medieval Turkic
    kingdom located between the Black and Caspian Seas, covering parts of modern-day southern Russia and Ukraine. The ruling elite and some of the population converted to Rabbinic Judaism. Historians agree the
    motivation was largely geopolitical: adopting Judaism allowed the
    Khazars to maintain strict political independence and neutrality while avoiding the influence of rival expanding empires, specifically the
    Christian Byzantine Empire and the Islamic Abbasid Caliphates
    --
    “The urge to save humanity is almost always only a false face for the
    urge to rule it.”
    – H. L. Mencken

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From CrudeSausage@crude@sausa.ge to comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.linux.misc on Wed Jun 24 14:55:10 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 2026-06-24 6:03 a.m., The Natural Philosopher wrote:
    On 24/06/2026 02:50, CrudeSausage wrote:
    What pains me is that the forced Islamic conversions will come for the
    rest of us in the next few years. It saddens me to know that because
    of our general apathy, those of us who come from ethnicities that
    actually accomplished something in history will be conquered by the
    descendants of savages who have done nothing good for the world.

    Well they gave us a century of cheap oil.

    The world could just as easily have obtained it from the good people of Alberta or the not-so-good people of Venezuela. Enriching the the worst
    place on Earth was a bad idea.

    ; Once they've taken
    over, we will go backwards several hundred years rather than forward.
    The cancer will take over the whole of the Earthly body, and consume
    whatever healthy cell remains.
    For sure,. Radical Islam, like Radical Creationisms, is pretty much
    inimical with the practice of science and technology.

    But you will get a Great World Caliphate, and plenty of unprotected sex.

    All of that doesn't matter as much to me as knowing that I will serve
    God in the next life rather than sitting in a cell in Hell.
    --
    CrudeSausage
    M4 MacBook Air
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From CrudeSausage@crude@sausa.ge to comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.linux.misc on Wed Jun 24 14:59:33 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 2026-06-24 6:14 a.m., The Natural Philosopher wrote:
    On 24/06/2026 02:54, CrudeSausage wrote:
    The mere fact that Carlos believes that it is wrong to think terrible
    things of the left, the people who think it is alright to murder
    anyone who disagrees with them, and who invited millions of murderous
    rapists from Africa to take over our societies, is enough to deserve a
    permanent place in my filter.

    Carlos is not a bad person. He just thinks he is right. Because all the people he know think the same way.

    Bandar Log-ic

    "We all say i,  so it must be true".

    He has never stopped to seriously think about any of it.

    Fire example I too, took global warming for granted, till the windmills started to appear.
    As a fully qualified electrical engineer and experience of accountancy
    and finance, I couldn't believe what I was seeing. You only needed to do
    a few calculations on the back of an envelope to see that of all the
    most useless ways to reduce atmospheric CO2, windmills and solar pane

    No one ever did that back of the envelope calculation, not till recently anyway.


    And then the EU, bless its corrupt  little cotton socks, ruled that
    instead of a carbon tax, on fuel, there would be a 'renewable
    obligation' thereby ruling out the most obvious and cost effective route
    to decarbonisation. Nuclear power.

    At that point I realised that 'renewable' energy at least, and quite possibly 'man made climate change' itself, were politically and
    commercially convenient lies.

    They had to be, after Al Gore called it all an inconvenient truth And he
    was a politician...

    All I can say for sure is that if ever something were truly an urgent
    problem, humanity would find an appropriate solution. Wind power fixes nothing, but creates a new problem in its constant need for de-icing and
    use of fossil fuels to do so. Solar power fixes nothing, but creates a
    new problem in its unrecyclable panels. If fossil fuels really do cause
    a significant issue for the world, a more realistic solution will
    emerge... and no, nuclear isn't it either.
    --
    CrudeSausage
    M4 MacBook Air
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From The Natural Philosopher@tnp@invalid.invalid to comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.linux.misc on Wed Jun 24 21:55:46 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 24/06/2026 19:55, CrudeSausage wrote:
    But you will get a Great World Caliphate, and plenty of unprotected sex.

    All of that doesn't matter as much to me as knowing that I will serve
    God in the next life rather than sitting in a cell in Hell.

    Really?
    AFAIAC in the next life, if there is one, God can serve me.

    I deserve it
    --
    You can get much farther with a kind word and a gun than you can with a
    kind word alone.

    Al Capone



    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From pothead@pothead@snakebite.com to comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.linux.misc on Wed Jun 24 20:59:53 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 2026-06-24, The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
    On 24/06/2026 03:12, CrudeSausage wrote:
    On 2026-06-23 4:54 p.m., The Natural Philosopher wrote:

     Meanwhile Trump refuses to
    release the Epstein files and speaks sexually of his own daughters -- >>>> even as
    infants.

    Trump isn't right wing. He's just a pervy  cunt.

    Geez, what a clown. Biden could have released the Epstein files too. Why
    didn't he? This is the guy who showered with his daughter, from her own
    admission. This is the old pervert who touched little girls
    inappropriately while on camera in public. If the Democrats wanted the
    release of those Epstein files so badly, they could have done it during
    his fraudulent, stolen presidency. In fact, if there were _anything_ at
    all they could have used against Trump or Republicans in general in
    those files, they would have done so. Either they are just as
    incompetent at releasing secret files as they are at everything else, or
    they were protecting fellow Democrats.

    I make little distinction between the so called 'parties' in American politics,. They are all by and large rotten to the core, corrupted by
    the very power they exercise, in thinking they can get away with it.

    And they have.

    Same here which is why I have long stated that the DC swamp needs to
    be drained and completely reset and that goes for all parties.
    The entire place has become corrupt and since they all have
    something nefarious on the other guy, it's like a huge game of
    chicken to see who will blink first.



    Anyone who thinks they are supporting a party that has only their
    interests at heat and is comprised of individuals whose odor of sanctity smells as sweet as their excrement is a damn fool. Carlos and his EU.
    They too are rotten to the core, And you cant get rid of them.

    A huge problem.
    They are all out for themselves and to line their own pockets with
    money or power.
    It's just so obvious yet the public is unaware and complacent.



    At least in Britain we accept hat fact and realise at some levels that democracy is a way of getting rod of the turds that have floated to the
    top by flushing the bowl and installing a new selection of turds.


    I've always enjoyed watching the Brits arguing in the house and jumping
    over desks and so forth due to passion.
    At lease it's entertaining at some level.

    People think I 'support Reform'...

    Well I don't. I merely will vote that way as the least odoriferous of
    the shit piles on offer, and once they too have become infiltrated by
    carpet baggers, grifters ,agents of foreign powers and probably
    paedophiles fraudsters and rapists, I will vote for someone else.

    Same with me.
    I voted for Clinton, Obama 2x, Trump not because they were great candidates
    but because they were the the least likely to cause massive damage compared
    to the alternate candidates.

    It's pretty sad that in a country of some 350 million people these are the
    best candidates we can find to run for POTUS.

    And if you look at NY, things are so bad there for the younger people
    that they are lining up behind Communists like Mamdani and the 3 that
    won last night.

    And I don't blame them.

    also IMHO if these Communists drop the woke, DEI, LBGTQ+ catering to and continue
    promising "free stuff" this movement is going to sweep the country.
    Watch and see.
    --
    pothead

    “The forest was shrinking, but the trees kept voting for the axe,
    for the axe was clever and convinced the trees that because
    his handle was made of wood, he was one of them".

    ---Author Unknown
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From pothead@pothead@snakebite.com to comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.linux.misc,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh on Wed Jun 24 21:21:21 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 2026-06-24, The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
    On 24/06/2026 02:34, Brock McNuggets wrote:
    On Jun 23, 2026 at 1:56:56 PM MST, "The Natural Philosopher" wrote
    <111eruo$2hojc$9@dont-email.me>:

    On 23/06/2026 19:23, Brock McNuggets wrote:
    On Jun 23, 2026 at 12:21:28 AM MST, ""Joel W. Crump"" wrote
    <Ytq_R.11181$vH8f.10834@fx45.iad>:

    On 6/23/2026 3:09 AM, Brock McNuggets wrote:
    On Jun 22, 2026 at 10:28:40 PM MST, ""Joel W. Crump"" wrote
    <cQo_R.5576$3qE9.619@fx44.iad>:
    On 6/23/2026 1:20 AM, Brock McNuggets wrote:
    On Jun 22, 2026 at 8:25:18 PM MST, ""Joel W. Crump"" wrote
    <y0n_R.7380$NCT2.5706@fx03.iad>:
    On 6/22/2026 11:20 PM, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
    On 22/06/2026 23:55, Brock McNuggets wrote:

    The right wingers feign offense to obfuscate their true offenses. >>>>>>>>>>>
    No, that's Left wingers.
    The right isn't interested in 'offence' or 'emotion'

    You can pretend so, but we see right through it, it is emotional >>>>>>>>> reaction, you just cling to the idea that you're in control of things,
    you're pigs. The emotion is greed.

    Greed and a need to feel special as they protect their "in-group" and hate the
    "right" people.

    I've only begun to understand how important my life is. It's not pride,
    but feeling very lucky, despite how difficult it was to get to this point.

    Good to hear.

    I know I have done a lot of good in my life -- working at summer camps and as
    a teacher and as a teen mentor and far more. The attacks I face online is
    pissing in the ocean... not something I worry about.


    It would be hard for anyone around here to get under my skin, yeah.

    They think they are so clever with their insults -- in reality they just prove
    us right.

    Indeed they do.

    See ,my attached cases of paedopjila among child mentors teachers and
    those in charge of children, and the evidence that many members of the
    radical Left thought it was fine for underage girls to have sex.

    Cite.

    What we know is that Trump -- unlike Clinton -- does not want the Epstein
    files released, has had many credible accusations of sexual misconduct, has >> publicly bragged about watching underage naked girls in dressing rooms (and >> his daughter agreed that is what he does), talked about his daughters in
    sexual ways (even when one was an infant!), and more.

    We know Trump is a rapist and a pedophile. But the right does not care. Not >> one whit. Just as they do not care about Jan 6, his tax nonsense, or any of >> his other crimes. They back a fascist oligarch pushing echoes of Nazi Germany.

    You keep identifying Trump with the Right.

    This is a huge mistake. He is nothing of the sort.

    Brock/snit is not one of the brighter bulbs on the Xmas tree.
    Of course you are correct.
    trump is as far from a classic Reagan republican as Obama and AOC are
    from a JFK democrat.

    And even Biden whose entire political career was a more or less middle
    of the road, do no harm politician, went far left the day he was elected due to his handlers pushing him.

    He is a populists who has been funded for years and taken advantage of
    the absolute insanity of the American Left, to usurp power on behalf probably of Moscow amongst others.

    They are all on the take.
    Every single one of them.
    With Biden it was huge sums of money yet no product to offer.
    With Trump it's business connections to build, invest, whatever in
    exchange for political favors.

    Look at the number of politicians who have become wealthy after or during
    their political careers.
    It doesn't pass the sniff test.


    People are prepared to put up with his decadence as long as he gets a
    few needful things done. Unfortunately that is not all he is doing.

    There is always a policy that clicks with the voters and in general that
    is what drives the election.
    Like James Carville once said "it's the economy stupid" and he is right.

    Leaving the average American in a quandary., more woke shit, or more Trump.

    Bingo!!
    People were sick of woke, green, regulations, DEI and so forth and Trump promised to get rid of it all, which to his credit he has done.
    The border and illegal immigration was another huge issue.
    Trump has fixed that.


    The irony of it is that it is that very woke shit that has also been
    funded by 'foreign powers'

    It's the globalists who are doing it.
    They want a 2 class global society: the elite and the rest of us.
    Just like in Roman times.


    When all your putative 'leaders' are in a foreign powers pocket, its
    hard to know who to vote for.

    It comes down to the less of 2 evils.
    That's pretty sad :(



    Trump is a disgusting individual. He has sold his soul to the highest
    bidder for the lowest pleasure so many times that there is nothing left
    but an empty sack of shit.

    What people need to stop doing is being tricked into having this
    pointless battle between 'Left' and 'right' They are owned by the sane people. They are funded by the same people, They are set at each others throats to ensure people don't notice that 'it doesn't matter who you
    vote for, the government always gets in'.

    The point of US politics is to destroy America. That's what Moscow
    wants. That's what Peking wants. That's what Iran wants.

    They own the Left and they own the Right and they absolutely own Trump.

    They fund the Greens. They fund Black Lives matter. They fund MAGA and
    the Ku Klux Klan. They fund LBGQT and they fund Pro Life.

    If it has the potential to divide and weaken, they fund it.

    Its so much cheaper than bombs and weapons.

    Putin thought he had bought America so they wouldn't join in, He was
    right. Unfortunately he hadn't bought enough of the EU or Briutaitin or Canada and especially he hadn't bough Ukraine, so he is on the point of losing a war he should never have started.

    I'm not sure about that.
    What I know is Putin and others were fully aware that they could walk
    all over Biden, and they did.
    Stuff like, an invasion might be ok if it's a small one, or something like that comes to mind.

    Up to the current state, Trump was an unknown which is why they didn't screw with him.

    To the point where even Belarus is deserting him and even Trump sees
    which way the wind is blowing and is doing another volte-face and about
    to help Ukraine.

    Bullshit baffles brains. Don't listen to what these groups and movements say, watch what they do and assume they are all in it for the money.

    Another one of my favorite sayings is "follow the money".

    The world then becomes a simpler place.

    I would like that!
    --
    pothead

    “The forest was shrinking, but the trees kept voting for the axe,
    for the axe was clever and convinced the trees that because
    his handle was made of wood, he was one of them".

    ---Author Unknown
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From chrisv@chrisv@nospam.invalid to comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.linux.misc on Wed Jun 24 16:25:36 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    pothead wrote:

    chrisv wrote:

    I'm guessing that Carlos did not take my advise to read the UK's Rape
    Gang Inquiry Report. More than 250,000 victims!

    https://static1.squarespace.com/static/6810978a41bbc42489eafa81/t/6a314bb1151e511944bd4421/1781615537601/The+Rape+Gang+Inquiry+Report.pdf

    Here are a couple more. If anything, at least read the first link as it >backs your points completely.

    <https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2026/06/uk_muslim_rape_gangs_it_s_islamophilia_stupid.html>

    <https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2026/06/19/in-germany-it-is-open-season-for-rape-this-country-is-finished-say-police-officers/>

    <https://www.wnd.com/2026/06/watch-woman-pleads-american-help-as-france-seeks/>

    It's incredible how in many European countries they will throw people
    in prison for *speaking the truth*. These are our allies?

    Just like no one here has taken my advise to watch "The Trans Train"
    on youtube.

    https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLlzZcJ_wPqcUTVOyMitdezb95YqCi2ZZZ

    "We don't want to know about the harm that is done. We want to be
    'nice' to others."

    Well, are you *really* being "nice to others", or are you doing more
    harm than good?

    I watched the movie along with the other ones linked

    Well, I meant that, to my knowledge, no leftist has watched it.

    and it's frightening what the liberals are doing to people
    who may be mentally ill.

    And that they don't say "no" to *anyone*. That's *proof* that they
    are fscking evil.

    The left has gone bat shit crazy.

    An alliance of communists, Muslims, and useful idiots, determined to
    destroy western civilization.

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From CrudeSausage@crude@sausa.ge to comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.linux.misc on Wed Jun 24 19:40:06 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 2026-06-24 4:55 p.m., The Natural Philosopher wrote:
    On 24/06/2026 19:55, CrudeSausage wrote:
    But you will get a Great World Caliphate, and plenty of unprotected sex.

    All of that doesn't matter as much to me as knowing that I will serve
    God in the next life rather than sitting in a cell in Hell.

    Really?
    AFAIAC in the next life, if there is one, God can serve me.

    I deserve it

    I'm sure He appreciates your belief that He owes you one.
    --
    CrudeSausage
    M4 MacBook Air
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From CtrlAltDel@Altie@BHam.com to comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.linux.misc on Thu Jun 25 00:27:45 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On Tue, 23 Jun 2026 01:28:40 -0400, Joel W. Crump wrote:

    I've only begun to understand how important my life is. It's not pride,
    but feeling very lucky, despite how difficult it was to get to this
    point.

    You are a small-minded nitwit, Joel. Your personality would be non-
    existent if it weren't for hate and bitterness and feelings of victim-hood that give you the only succor to sustain yourself with.

    No grown-ups give a single fuck about how hard your life has been or has
    not been or how difficult it was for you to get to some non-determined
    spot where you now feel comfortable.

    Your rather small intellect is wholly consumed by hatred of political
    figures that you have never met or likely have never even seen in real
    life.

    Everyone feels let down and a sense of disappointment when their favored political personality or political party is not in power or lost an
    election or doesn't have control. Only the unfortunate few with underdeveloped minds, like yourself, allow these things to devour their personality and turn them into a raving, bug-eyed lunatic.

    Many times you have stated you wanted to kill the president or watch him
    die or piss on his grave, etc... or some type of tripe in this general category. It makes you seem retarded.

    If everyone who supported opposing political parties turned into
    slobbering idiots looking for attention by making outlandish statements
    and advocating for violence towards whatever party or person was in power,
    the world would be a sad place.

    Luckily, fruitcakes like you are outliers who believe their opinions are
    so very important that they just can't keep their stupid mouths shut, as
    if everyone just has to hear about how they feel because it really, really matters.

    I see you a just a fuck-up in life who wants to feel like they belong. You
    are the type of total loser and irredeemable failure that would happily
    belong to an organization like Antifa or Aryan Brotherhood just to be able
    to let out their pent-up angst and finally have other losers at life to confide in and feel important.

    People like you are sad. Your type deserve no pity, only ridicule. Maybe
    it has to do with all the dreams and ideas about someone's life never
    being even close to realized that makes some so angry and so shitty to be around and associate with.
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Joel W. Crump@joelcrump@gmail.com to comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.linux.misc on Wed Jun 24 20:34:07 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 6/24/2026 8:27 PM, CtrlAltDel wrote:

    I've only begun to understand how important my life is. It's not pride,
    but feeling very lucky, despite how difficult it was to get to this
    point.

    You are a small-minded nitwit, Joel. Your personality would be non-
    existent if it weren't for hate and bitterness and feelings of victim-hood that give you the only succor to sustain yourself with.

    No grown-ups give a single fuck about how hard your life has been or has
    not been or how difficult it was for you to get to some non-determined
    spot where you now feel comfortable.

    Your rather small intellect is wholly consumed by hatred of political
    figures that you have never met or likely have never even seen in real
    life.

    Everyone feels let down and a sense of disappointment when their favored political personality or political party is not in power or lost an
    election or doesn't have control. Only the unfortunate few with underdeveloped minds, like yourself, allow these things to devour their personality and turn them into a raving, bug-eyed lunatic.

    Many times you have stated you wanted to kill the president or watch him
    die or piss on his grave, etc... or some type of tripe in this general category. It makes you seem retarded.

    If everyone who supported opposing political parties turned into
    slobbering idiots looking for attention by making outlandish statements
    and advocating for violence towards whatever party or person was in power, the world would be a sad place.

    Luckily, fruitcakes like you are outliers who believe their opinions are
    so very important that they just can't keep their stupid mouths shut, as
    if everyone just has to hear about how they feel because it really, really matters.

    I see you a just a fuck-up in life who wants to feel like they belong. You are the type of total loser and irredeemable failure that would happily belong to an organization like Antifa or Aryan Brotherhood just to be able
    to let out their pent-up angst and finally have other losers at life to confide in and feel important.

    People like you are sad. Your type deserve no pity, only ridicule. Maybe
    it has to do with all the dreams and ideas about someone's life never
    being even close to realized that makes some so angry and so shitty to be around and associate with.


    No. You don't know me, you wasted your time rambling all that crap.
    --
    Joel W. Crump

    86 47
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From CtrlAltDel@Altie@BHam.com to comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.linux.misc on Thu Jun 25 01:20:42 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On Wed, 24 Jun 2026 20:34:07 -0400, Joel W. Crump wrote:


    No. You don't know me, you wasted your time rambling all that crap.

    You are an angry twat, Joel. You aren't special or unique, just demented
    and full of angst and feelings of inadequacy. I would be willing to bet
    good money that you haven't had a moment of true happiness and
    lighthearted satisfaction with yourself or your life in many years.

    You latch onto hate and divisiveness to give yourself some type of
    direction to make you feel, well, anything.

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Mitchell Holman@noemail@aol.com to comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.linux.misc,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh on Thu Jun 25 02:02:17 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote in news:111hhoh$3aa14$2@pothead.dont-email.me:

    On 2026-06-24, The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
    On 24/06/2026 02:34, Brock McNuggets wrote:
    On Jun 23, 2026 at 1:56:56 PM MST, "The Natural Philosopher" wrote
    <111eruo$2hojc$9@dont-email.me>:

    On 23/06/2026 19:23, Brock McNuggets wrote:
    On Jun 23, 2026 at 12:21:28 AM MST, ""Joel W. Crump"" wrote
    <Ytq_R.11181$vH8f.10834@fx45.iad>:

    On 6/23/2026 3:09 AM, Brock McNuggets wrote:
    On Jun 22, 2026 at 10:28:40 PM MST, ""Joel W. Crump"" wrote
    <cQo_R.5576$3qE9.619@fx44.iad>:
    On 6/23/2026 1:20 AM, Brock McNuggets wrote:
    On Jun 22, 2026 at 8:25:18 PM MST, ""Joel W. Crump"" wrote >>>>>>>>> <y0n_R.7380$NCT2.5706@fx03.iad>:
    On 6/22/2026 11:20 PM, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
    On 22/06/2026 23:55, Brock McNuggets wrote:

    The right wingers feign offense to obfuscate their true >>>>>>>>>>>> offenses.

    No, that's Left wingers.
    The right isn't interested in 'offence' or 'emotion'

    You can pretend so, but we see right through it, it is
    emotional reaction, you just cling to the idea that you're in >>>>>>>>>> control of things, you're pigs. The emotion is greed.

    Greed and a need to feel special as they protect their
    "in-group" and hate the "right" people.

    I've only begun to understand how important my life is. It's
    not pride, but feeling very lucky, despite how difficult it was >>>>>>>> to get to this point.

    Good to hear.

    I know I have done a lot of good in my life -- working at summer >>>>>>> camps and as a teacher and as a teen mentor and far more. The
    attacks I face online is pissing in the ocean... not something I >>>>>>> worry about.


    It would be hard for anyone around here to get under my skin,
    yeah.

    They think they are so clever with their insults -- in reality
    they just prove us right.

    Indeed they do.

    See ,my attached cases of paedopjila among child mentors teachers
    and those in charge of children, and the evidence that many members
    of the radical Left thought it was fine for underage girls to have
    sex.

    Cite.

    What we know is that Trump -- unlike Clinton -- does not want the
    Epstein files released, has had many credible accusations of sexual
    misconduct, has publicly bragged about watching underage naked girls
    in dressing rooms (and his daughter agreed that is what he does),
    talked about his daughters in sexual ways (even when one was an
    infant!), and more.

    We know Trump is a rapist and a pedophile. But the right does not
    care. Not one whit. Just as they do not care about Jan 6, his tax
    nonsense, or any of his other crimes. They back a fascist oligarch
    pushing echoes of Nazi Germany.

    You keep identifying Trump with the Right.

    This is a huge mistake. He is nothing of the sort.

    Brock/snit is not one of the brighter bulbs on the Xmas tree.
    Of course you are correct.
    trump is as far from a classic Reagan republican as Obama and AOC are
    from a JFK democrat.

    And even Biden


    The 3 constants in life:

    1) Death
    2) Taxes
    3) Pothead jumping into a thread to
    change the subject to Biden.


    whose entire political career was a more or less middle
    of the road, do no harm politician, went far left the day he was
    elected due to his handlers pushing him.

    He is a populists who has been funded for years and taken advantage
    of the absolute insanity of the American Left, to usurp power on
    behalf probably of Moscow amongst others.

    They are all on the take.
    Every single one of them.
    With Biden


    See what I mean?






    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Joel W. Crump@joelcrump@gmail.com to comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.linux.misc on Wed Jun 24 22:12:27 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 6/24/2026 9:20 PM, CtrlAltDel wrote:

    No. You don't know me, you wasted your time rambling all that crap.

    You are an angry twat, Joel. You aren't special or unique, just demented
    and full of angst and feelings of inadequacy. I would be willing to bet
    good money that you haven't had a moment of true happiness and
    lighthearted satisfaction with yourself or your life in many years.

    You latch onto hate and divisiveness to give yourself some type of
    direction to make you feel, well, anything.


    Wrong, where are you coming up with that? I'm actually at a great place
    in my life.
    --
    Joel W. Crump

    86 47
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Brock McNuggets@brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com to comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.linux.misc on Thu Jun 25 02:21:56 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On Jun 24, 2026 at 2:21:21 PM MST, "pothead" wrote <111hhoh$3aa14$2@pothead.dont-email.me>:

    On 2026-06-24, The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
    On 24/06/2026 02:34, Brock McNuggets wrote:
    On Jun 23, 2026 at 1:56:56 PM MST, "The Natural Philosopher" wrote
    <111eruo$2hojc$9@dont-email.me>:

    On 23/06/2026 19:23, Brock McNuggets wrote:
    On Jun 23, 2026 at 12:21:28 AM MST, ""Joel W. Crump"" wrote
    <Ytq_R.11181$vH8f.10834@fx45.iad>:

    On 6/23/2026 3:09 AM, Brock McNuggets wrote:
    On Jun 22, 2026 at 10:28:40 PM MST, ""Joel W. Crump"" wrote
    <cQo_R.5576$3qE9.619@fx44.iad>:
    On 6/23/2026 1:20 AM, Brock McNuggets wrote:
    On Jun 22, 2026 at 8:25:18 PM MST, ""Joel W. Crump"" wrote >>>>>>>>> <y0n_R.7380$NCT2.5706@fx03.iad>:
    On 6/22/2026 11:20 PM, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
    On 22/06/2026 23:55, Brock McNuggets wrote:

    The right wingers feign offense to obfuscate their true offenses. >>>>>>>>>>>>
    No, that's Left wingers.
    The right isn't interested in 'offence' or 'emotion'

    You can pretend so, but we see right through it, it is emotional >>>>>>>>>> reaction, you just cling to the idea that you're in control of things,
    you're pigs. The emotion is greed.

    Greed and a need to feel special as they protect their "in-group" and hate the
    "right" people.

    I've only begun to understand how important my life is. It's not pride,
    but feeling very lucky, despite how difficult it was to get to this point.

    Good to hear.

    I know I have done a lot of good in my life -- working at summer camps and as
    a teacher and as a teen mentor and far more. The attacks I face online is
    pissing in the ocean... not something I worry about.


    It would be hard for anyone around here to get under my skin, yeah. >>>>>
    They think they are so clever with their insults -- in reality they just prove
    us right.

    Indeed they do.

    See ,my attached cases of paedopjila among child mentors teachers and
    those in charge of children, and the evidence that many members of the >>>> radical Left thought it was fine for underage girls to have sex.

    Cite.

    What we know is that Trump -- unlike Clinton -- does not want the Epstein >>> files released, has had many credible accusations of sexual misconduct, has >>> publicly bragged about watching underage naked girls in dressing rooms (and >>> his daughter agreed that is what he does), talked about his daughters in >>> sexual ways (even when one was an infant!), and more.

    We know Trump is a rapist and a pedophile. But the right does not care. Not >>> one whit. Just as they do not care about Jan 6, his tax nonsense, or any of >>> his other crimes. They back a fascist oligarch pushing echoes of Nazi Germany.

    You keep identifying Trump with the Right.

    This is a huge mistake. He is nothing of the sort.

    Brock/snit is not one of the brighter bulbs on the Xmas tree.

    This is you demonstrating your fear of my use of evidence. Your emotional response.

    You hate evidence.

    Of course you are correct.
    trump is as far from a classic Reagan republican as Obama and AOC are
    from a JFK democrat.

    He is the head of the Republican party. And the head of white supremacists
    such as you.

    And even Biden whose entire political career was a more or less middle
    of the road, do no harm politician, went far left the day he was elected due to
    his handlers pushing him.

    Far left? You are making things up again. He was a moderate. The US has no
    real far left.

    He is a populists who has been funded for years and taken advantage of
    the absolute insanity of the American Left, to usurp power on behalf
    probably of Moscow amongst others.

    They are all on the take.
    Every single one of them.
    With Biden it was huge sums of money yet no product to offer.

    They are all corrupt... but the current pedophile fascist oligarch pushing echoes of Nazi Germany is not in the same world... he is 1000x worse.

    With Trump it's business connections to build, invest, whatever in
    exchange for political favors.

    Spoke like a true white supremacist.

    Look at the number of politicians who have become wealthy after or during their political careers.
    It doesn't pass the sniff test.

    Any famous person gets paid well to speak and people buy their books, etc. But Trump is taking stealing from the American people to an unheard of level. But he is -- like you -- a white supremacist so you do not care.

    People are prepared to put up with his decadence as long as he gets a
    few needful things done. Unfortunately that is not all he is doing.

    There is always a policy that clicks with the voters and in general that
    is what drives the election.
    Like James Carville once said "it's the economy stupid" and he is right.

    Trump has been horrible for the economy... except for the rich.

    Leaving the average American in a quandary., more woke shit, or more Trump.

    Bingo!!

    "Woke" means having empathy and compassion.

    People were sick of woke, green, regulations, DEI and so forth and Trump

    DEI is simply saying white supremacists are bad. And green -- how dare people want to have a decent planet for their kids and grandkids. Woke -- having empathy.

    And you are against all of these.

    promised to get rid of it all, which to his credit he has done.
    The border and illegal immigration was another huge issue.
    Trump has fixed that.

    That is a complete lie... one told by white supremacists. You hate people who are not white... period.

    The irony of it is that it is that very woke shit that has also been
    funded by 'foreign powers'

    It's the globalists who are doing it.
    They want a 2 class global society: the elite and the rest of us.
    Just like in Roman times.

    That is what Trump is pushing. When Democrats are in power we get a stronger middle class.


    When all your putative 'leaders' are in a foreign powers pocket, its
    hard to know who to vote for.

    It comes down to the less of 2 evils.
    That's pretty sad :(


    You will always back the white supremacists.

    ...
    --
    It's impossible for someone who is at war with themselves to be at peace with you.
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Tim@nosuchemail@quirkl.org to comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.linux.misc on Thu Jun 25 02:42:14 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    Joel W. Crump wrote:

    On 6/24/2026 9:20 PM, CtrlAltDel wrote:

    No. You don't know me, you wasted your time rambling all that
    crap.

    You are an angry twat, Joel. You aren't special or unique, just
    demented and full of angst and feelings of inadequacy. I would be
    willing to bet good money that you haven't had a moment of true
    happiness and lighthearted satisfaction with yourself or your life
    in many years.

    You latch onto hate and divisiveness to give yourself some type of direction to make you feel, well, anything.


    Wrong, where are you coming up with that? I'm actually at a great
    place in my life.

    Silver Springs Maryland is a great place?
    News to me.
    Last time I had the misfortune to pass through that place it looked
    like a nigger nest.
    Are you a nigger perchance?
    --
    --
    Tim
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Joel W. Crump@joelcrump@gmail.com to comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.linux.misc on Wed Jun 24 22:46:28 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 6/24/2026 10:42 PM, Tim wrote:
    Joel W. Crump wrote:
    On 6/24/2026 9:20 PM, CtrlAltDel wrote:

    No. You don't know me, you wasted your time rambling all that
    crap.

    You are an angry twat, Joel. You aren't special or unique, just
    demented and full of angst and feelings of inadequacy. I would be
    willing to bet good money that you haven't had a moment of true
    happiness and lighthearted satisfaction with yourself or your life
    in many years.

    You latch onto hate and divisiveness to give yourself some type of
    direction to make you feel, well, anything.

    Wrong, where are you coming up with that? I'm actually at a great
    place in my life.

    Silver Springs Maryland is a great place?
    News to me.
    Last time I had the misfortune to pass through that place it looked
    like a nigger nest.
    Are you a nigger perchance?


    I live in Glenmont, actually, the hood of greater Silver Spring, but genetically I'm a massive cracker. I identify as black, however, so the answer to your question, essentially, is yes.
    --
    Joel W. Crump

    86 47
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From The Natural Philosopher@tnp@invalid.invalid to comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.linux.misc on Thu Jun 25 10:23:16 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 25/06/2026 00:40, CrudeSausage wrote:
    On 2026-06-24 4:55 p.m., The Natural Philosopher wrote:
    On 24/06/2026 19:55, CrudeSausage wrote:
    But you will get a Great World Caliphate, and plenty of unprotected
    sex.

    All of that doesn't matter as much to me as knowing that I will serve
    God in the next life rather than sitting in a cell in Hell.

    Really?
    AFAIAC in the next life, if there is one, God can serve me.

    I deserve it

    I'm sure He appreciates your belief that He owes you one.

    I bet he wont follow through on it though.
    --
    Climate Change: Socialism wearing a lab coat.

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Brock McNuggets@brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com to comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.linux.misc on Thu Jun 25 18:39:50 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On Jun 24, 2026 at 3:00:37 AM MST, "The Natural Philosopher" wrote <111g9s5$2sr2f$8@dont-email.me>:

    On 24/06/2026 02:36, Brock McNuggets wrote:
    On Jun 23, 2026 at 1:53:50 PM MST, "The Natural Philosopher" wrote
    <111erou$2hojc$7@dont-email.me>:

    On 23/06/2026 19:22, Brock McNuggets wrote:
    On Jun 23, 2026 at 2:34:21 AM MST, "The Natural Philosopher" wrote
    <111djut$253r2$6@dont-email.me>:

    On 23/06/2026 08:09, Brock McNuggets wrote:
    I know I have done a lot of good in my life -- working at summer camps and as
    a teacher and as a teen mentor and far more.

    Are you a paedophile? That's generally their profile.

    The fact you tie those things with such filth speaks of who YOU are.

    Hit a nerve did I?

    No. I was stating a simple fact. You made an insane and unsupported
    accusation...

    Nop,. I made a very pertinent and well supported association

    No. You are not. You are making a gross assumption based on your feelings.

    And it has nothing to do with me. Not a damned thing.

    You think of working with kids and jump to pedophilia. You. Not me.

    So what does that say about YOU?

    Paedophiles are attracted to any job that gives them control over young children. Its established fact. The more they protest their do-goodery
    the more likely they are to be sticking their fingers up little girls
    cracks.

    This does not mean those who work with kids are all suspects. YOU are the one who made that jump. Not me.

    So what does that say about YOU?


    Look up Sir Jimmy Savile.

    Your moralising do-goodery absolutely called out for that riposte.
    I have no idea whether I have 'done good' in this world or not.

    You should work on that. I know I do things to help others. I know I work to make things better.

    How could I possibly tell? I am an atheist. No big G tells me what is
    right and what is wrong.

    I am an atheist. That is not relevant.

    I haven[t the effrontery and sheer bald faced over inflated self esteem
    to claim that I have, and my experience is that most people who make a
    big thing out of it are trying to hide something else.

    I am not making a big thing out of it. It is just a fact. I seek to make
    things better. Might be from my Jewish upbringing where we are taught Tikkun olam, healing the world. I take that to heart.

    one which came from YOUR way of thinking. It had nothing to do
    with me. You were sharing something about yourself.

    You would say that, wouldn't you?

    I am stating a fact. What does YOUR jump say about YOU?
    --
    It's impossible for someone who is at war with themselves to be at peace with you.
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Brock McNuggets@brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com to comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.linux.misc on Thu Jun 25 18:42:13 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On Jun 24, 2026 at 2:53:24 AM MST, "The Natural Philosopher" wrote <111g9ek$2sr2f$7@dont-email.me>:

    On 24/06/2026 02:35, Brock McNuggets wrote:
    On Jun 23, 2026 at 1:54:57 PM MST, "The Natural Philosopher" wrote
    <111err1$2hojc$8@dont-email.me>:

    On 23/06/2026 19:23, Brock McNuggets wrote:
    On Jun 23, 2026 at 2:33:33 AM MST, "The Natural Philosopher" wrote
    <111djtd$253r2$5@dont-email.me>:

    On 23/06/2026 08:08, Brock McNuggets wrote:
    Emotional issue
    Well, if you see not backing pedophiles as merely "emotional" that is a you
    issue.

    The left in this country see paedophilia as perfectly acceptable behviour.

    Notice you feel the need to lie to push insults.

    You ignored this.

    No, that's you. I sent a link to the issue.

    Meanwhile Trump refuses to
    release the Epstein files and speaks sexually of his own daughters -- even as
    infants.

    Trump isn't right wing. He's just a pervy cunt.

    Trump is what the American right wing has become.

    No, its what has usurped the right wing

    Right... he has usurped it. MAGA and the right wing are now in many cases one and the same.

    It is fair to say the "left" is also the Democrats -- and I would argue there is a better left movement. But I think both parties are horrid. There are of course people on the right who reject MAGA. Thankfully. But even then, right wing thinking still tends to do what MAGA does and look to feelings over evidence.

    and pushed the conservatives
    aside, in the same way the Marxists and profiteers were allowed to take
    over the Left.

    This is not at all true.

    Your political system is rotten to the core and under the control of
    foreign money

    That I agree with.

    While you scream hatred at each other to support one total cunt over
    another bunch of total cunts.

    No argument here. Both parties are horrible -- with the Republicans being clearly and objectively far worse.


    All claiming the moral high ground.

    It would be pathetic if it wasn't so laughable.
    --
    It's impossible for someone who is at war with themselves to be at peace with you.
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Brock McNuggets@brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com to comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.linux.misc on Thu Jun 25 18:45:50 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On Jun 24, 2026 at 2:47:25 AM MST, "The Natural Philosopher" wrote <111g93d$2sr2f$6@dont-email.me>:

    On 24/06/2026 02:34, Brock McNuggets wrote:
    On Jun 23, 2026 at 1:56:56 PM MST, "The Natural Philosopher" wrote
    <111eruo$2hojc$9@dont-email.me>:

    On 23/06/2026 19:23, Brock McNuggets wrote:
    On Jun 23, 2026 at 12:21:28 AM MST, ""Joel W. Crump"" wrote
    <Ytq_R.11181$vH8f.10834@fx45.iad>:

    On 6/23/2026 3:09 AM, Brock McNuggets wrote:
    On Jun 22, 2026 at 10:28:40 PM MST, ""Joel W. Crump"" wrote
    <cQo_R.5576$3qE9.619@fx44.iad>:
    On 6/23/2026 1:20 AM, Brock McNuggets wrote:
    On Jun 22, 2026 at 8:25:18 PM MST, ""Joel W. Crump"" wrote
    <y0n_R.7380$NCT2.5706@fx03.iad>:
    On 6/22/2026 11:20 PM, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
    On 22/06/2026 23:55, Brock McNuggets wrote:

    The right wingers feign offense to obfuscate their true offenses. >>>>>>>>>>>
    No, that's Left wingers.
    The right isn't interested in 'offence' or 'emotion'

    You can pretend so, but we see right through it, it is emotional >>>>>>>>> reaction, you just cling to the idea that you're in control of things,
    you're pigs. The emotion is greed.

    Greed and a need to feel special as they protect their "in-group" and hate the
    "right" people.

    I've only begun to understand how important my life is. It's not pride,
    but feeling very lucky, despite how difficult it was to get to this point.

    Good to hear.

    I know I have done a lot of good in my life -- working at summer camps and as
    a teacher and as a teen mentor and far more. The attacks I face online is
    pissing in the ocean... not something I worry about.


    It would be hard for anyone around here to get under my skin, yeah.

    They think they are so clever with their insults -- in reality they just prove
    us right.

    Indeed they do.

    See ,my attached cases of paedopjila among child mentors teachers and
    those in charge of children, and the evidence that many members of the
    radical Left thought it was fine for underage girls to have sex.

    Cite.

    What we know is that Trump -- unlike Clinton -- does not want the Epstein
    files released, has had many credible accusations of sexual misconduct, has >> publicly bragged about watching underage naked girls in dressing rooms (and >> his daughter agreed that is what he does), talked about his daughters in
    sexual ways (even when one was an infant!), and more.

    We know Trump is a rapist and a pedophile. But the right does not care. Not >> one whit. Just as they do not care about Jan 6, his tax nonsense, or any of >> his other crimes. They back a fascist oligarch pushing echoes of Nazi Germany.

    You keep identifying Trump with the Right.

    You have noted his ties to the right... his usurping of the right.

    This is a huge mistake. He is nothing of the sort.

    He is a populists who has been funded for years and taken advantage of
    the absolute insanity of the American Left, to usurp power on behalf
    probably of Moscow amongst others.

    What "insanity" do you mean? If anything the "left" is not even "left". Both parties are paid for and beholden to the very rich.

    People are prepared to put up with his decadence as long as he gets a
    few needful things done. Unfortunately that is not all he is doing.

    He is getting nothing of value done... unless you value destruction of the US. And even more harm than that.

    Leaving the average American in a quandary., more woke shit, or more Trump.

    The irony of it is that it is that very woke shit that has also been
    funded by 'foreign powers'

    By "woke" do you mean having empathy and compassion?

    When all your putative 'leaders' are in a foreign powers pocket, its
    hard to know who to vote for.

    I hate the Democrats but anyone willing to put an R by their name should never get any votes.

    Trump is a disgusting individual. He has sold his soul to the highest
    bidder for the lowest pleasure so many times that there is nothing left
    but an empty sack of shit.

    And that is being kind.

    What people need to stop doing is being tricked into having this
    pointless battle between 'Left' and 'right' They are owned by the sane people. They are funded by the same people, They are set at each others throats to ensure people don't notice that 'it doesn't matter who you
    vote for, the government always gets in'.

    Agreed. And the wealthy are laughing all the way to the bank.

    The point of US politics is to destroy America. That's what Moscow
    wants. That's what Peking wants. That's what Iran wants.

    Trump is doing a faster job at that than I expected. But both parties have
    been doing so for some time.

    They own the Left and they own the Right and they absolutely own Trump.

    Agreed. That and the ultra-wealthy.

    They fund the Greens. They fund Black Lives matter. They fund MAGA and
    the Ku Klux Klan. They fund LBGQT and they fund Pro Life.

    How do they fund the Greens and Black Lives Matter?

    If it has the potential to divide and weaken, they fund it.

    Its so much cheaper than bombs and weapons.

    Putin thought he had bought America so they wouldn't join in, He was
    right. Unfortunately he hadn't bought enough of the EU or Briutaitin or Canada and especially he hadn't bough Ukraine, so he is on the point of losing a war he should never have started.

    To the point where even Belarus is deserting him and even Trump sees
    which way the wind is blowing and is doing another volte-face and about
    to help Ukraine.

    Bullshit baffles brains. Don't listen to what these groups and movements
    say, watch what they do and assume they are all in it for the money.

    The world then becomes a simpler place.
    --
    It's impossible for someone who is at war with themselves to be at peace with you.
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Kevin Kay@KevinkAmAn0o@gmail.com to comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.linux.misc on Thu Jun 25 21:11:19 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 25 Jun 2026 18:39:50 GMT
    Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Jun 24, 2026 at 3:00:37 AM MST, "The Natural Philosopher" wrote <111g9s5$2sr2f$8@dont-email.me>:

    On 24/06/2026 02:36, Brock McNuggets wrote:
    On Jun 23, 2026 at 1:53:50 PM MST, "The Natural Philosopher" wrote
    <111erou$2hojc$7@dont-email.me>:

    On 23/06/2026 19:22, Brock McNuggets wrote:
    On Jun 23, 2026 at 2:34:21 AM MST, "The Natural Philosopher"
    wrote <111djut$253r2$6@dont-email.me>:

    On 23/06/2026 08:09, Brock McNuggets wrote:
    I know I have done a lot of good in my life -- working at
    summer camps and as a teacher and as a teen mentor and far
    more.

    Are you a paedophile? That's generally their profile.

    The fact you tie those things with such filth speaks of who YOU
    are.
    Hit a nerve did I?

    No. I was stating a simple fact. You made an insane and unsupported
    accusation...

    Nop,. I made a very pertinent and well supported association

    No. You are not. You are making a gross assumption based on your
    feelings.
    You are insane.
    Get help.
    --
    Kevin
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Kevin Kay@KevinkAmAn0o@gmail.com to comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.linux.misc on Thu Jun 25 21:12:20 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 25 Jun 2026 18:42:13 GMT
    Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Jun 24, 2026 at 2:53:24 AM MST, "The Natural Philosopher" wrote <111g9ek$2sr2f$7@dont-email.me>:

    On 24/06/2026 02:35, Brock McNuggets wrote:
    On Jun 23, 2026 at 1:54:57 PM MST, "The Natural Philosopher" wrote
    <111err1$2hojc$8@dont-email.me>:

    On 23/06/2026 19:23, Brock McNuggets wrote:
    On Jun 23, 2026 at 2:33:33 AM MST, "The Natural Philosopher"
    wrote <111djtd$253r2$5@dont-email.me>:

    On 23/06/2026 08:08, Brock McNuggets wrote:
    Emotional issue
    Well, if you see not backing pedophiles as merely "emotional"
    that is a you issue.

    The left in this country see paedophilia as perfectly
    acceptable behviour.

    Notice you feel the need to lie to push insults.

    You ignored this.

    No, that's you. I sent a link to the issue.

    Meanwhile Trump refuses to
    release the Epstein files and speaks sexually of his own
    daughters -- even as infants.

    Trump isn't right wing. He's just a pervy cunt.

    Trump is what the American right wing has become.

    No, its what has usurped the right wing

    Right...
    You are insane.
    Get help.
    --
    Kevin
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Kevin Kay@KevinkAmAn0o@gmail.com to comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.linux.misc on Thu Jun 25 21:14:55 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 25 Jun 2026 18:45:50 GMT
    Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Jun 24, 2026 at 2:47:25 AM MST, "The Natural Philosopher" wrote <111g93d$2sr2f$6@dont-email.me>:

    On 24/06/2026 02:34, Brock McNuggets wrote:
    On Jun 23, 2026 at 1:56:56 PM MST, "The Natural Philosopher" wrote
    <111eruo$2hojc$9@dont-email.me>:

    On 23/06/2026 19:23, Brock McNuggets wrote:
    On Jun 23, 2026 at 12:21:28 AM MST, ""Joel W. Crump"" wrote
    <Ytq_R.11181$vH8f.10834@fx45.iad>:

    On 6/23/2026 3:09 AM, Brock McNuggets wrote:
    On Jun 22, 2026 at 10:28:40 PM MST, ""Joel W. Crump"" wrote
    <cQo_R.5576$3qE9.619@fx44.iad>:
    On 6/23/2026 1:20 AM, Brock McNuggets wrote:
    On Jun 22, 2026 at 8:25:18 PM MST, ""Joel W. Crump"" wrote >>>>>>>> <y0n_R.7380$NCT2.5706@fx03.iad>:
    On 6/22/2026 11:20 PM, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
    On 22/06/2026 23:55, Brock McNuggets wrote:

    The right wingers feign offense to obfuscate their true >>>>>>>>>>> offenses.
    No, that's Left wingers.
    The right isn't interested in 'offence' or 'emotion'

    You can pretend so, but we see right through it, it is
    emotional reaction, you just cling to the idea that you're >>>>>>>>> in control of things, you're pigs. The emotion is greed. >>>>>>>>
    Greed and a need to feel special as they protect their
    "in-group" and hate the "right" people.

    I've only begun to understand how important my life is. It's
    not pride, but feeling very lucky, despite how difficult it
    was to get to this point.

    Good to hear.

    I know I have done a lot of good in my life -- working at
    summer camps and as a teacher and as a teen mentor and far
    more. The attacks I face online is pissing in the ocean... not
    something I worry about.


    It would be hard for anyone around here to get under my skin,
    yeah.

    They think they are so clever with their insults -- in reality
    they just prove us right.

    Indeed they do.

    See ,my attached cases of paedopjila among child mentors teachers
    and those in charge of children, and the evidence that many
    members of the radical Left thought it was fine for underage
    girls to have sex.

    Cite.

    What we know is that Trump -- unlike Clinton -- does not want the
    Epstein files released, has had many credible accusations of
    sexual misconduct, has publicly bragged about watching underage
    naked girls in dressing rooms (and his daughter agreed that is
    what he does), talked about his daughters in sexual ways (even
    when one was an infant!), and more.

    We know Trump is a rapist and a pedophile. But the right does not
    care. Not one whit. Just as they do not care about Jan 6, his tax
    nonsense, or any of his other crimes. They back a fascist oligarch
    pushing echoes of Nazi Germany.
    You keep identifying Trump with the Right.

    You have noted his ties to the right.
    You are insane.
    Get help.
    --
    Kevin
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Carlos E. R.@robin_listas@es.invalid to comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.linux.misc on Fri Jun 26 10:50:10 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 2026-06-26 03:11, Kevin Kay wrote:
    On 25 Jun 2026 18:39:50 GMT
    Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Jun 24, 2026 at 3:00:37 AM MST, "The Natural Philosopher" wrote
    <111g9s5$2sr2f$8@dont-email.me>:

    On 24/06/2026 02:36, Brock McNuggets wrote:
    On Jun 23, 2026 at 1:53:50 PM MST, "The Natural Philosopher" wrote
    <111erou$2hojc$7@dont-email.me>:

    On 23/06/2026 19:22, Brock McNuggets wrote:
    On Jun 23, 2026 at 2:34:21 AM MST, "The Natural Philosopher"
    wrote <111djut$253r2$6@dont-email.me>:

    On 23/06/2026 08:09, Brock McNuggets wrote:
    I know I have done a lot of good in my life -- working at
    summer camps and as a teacher and as a teen mentor and far
    more.

    Are you a paedophile? That's generally their profile.

    The fact you tie those things with such filth speaks of who YOU
    are.
    Hit a nerve did I?

    No. I was stating a simple fact. You made an insane and unsupported
    accusation...

    Nop,. I made a very pertinent and well supported association

    No. You are not. You are making a gross assumption based on your
    feelings.

    You are insane.
    Get help.

    He is not.
    --
    Cheers,
    Carlos E.R.
    ES🇪🇸, EU🇪🇺;
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From The Natural Philosopher@tnp@invalid.invalid to comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.linux.misc on Fri Jun 26 10:26:47 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 25/06/2026 19:39, Brock McNuggets wrote:
    On Jun 24, 2026 at 3:00:37 AM MST, "The Natural Philosopher" wrote <111g9s5$2sr2f$8@dont-email.me>:

    On 24/06/2026 02:36, Brock McNuggets wrote:
    On Jun 23, 2026 at 1:53:50 PM MST, "The Natural Philosopher" wrote
    <111erou$2hojc$7@dont-email.me>:

    On 23/06/2026 19:22, Brock McNuggets wrote:
    On Jun 23, 2026 at 2:34:21 AM MST, "The Natural Philosopher" wrote >>>>> <111djut$253r2$6@dont-email.me>:

    On 23/06/2026 08:09, Brock McNuggets wrote:
    I know I have done a lot of good in my life -- working at summer camps and as
    a teacher and as a teen mentor and far more.

    Are you a paedophile? That's generally their profile.

    The fact you tie those things with such filth speaks of who YOU are. >>>>>
    Hit a nerve did I?

    No. I was stating a simple fact. You made an insane and unsupported
    accusation...

    Nop,. I made a very pertinent and well supported association

    No. You are not. You are making a gross assumption based on your feelings.

    And it has nothing to do with me. Not a damned thing.

    You think of working with kids and jump to pedophilia. You. Not me.

    So what does that say about YOU?

    Paedophiles are attracted to any job that gives them control over young
    children. Its established fact. The more they protest their do-goodery
    the more likely they are to be sticking their fingers up little girls
    cracks.

    This does not mean those who work with kids are all suspects. YOU are the one who made that jump. Not me.

    No, but it makes all the ones who self proclaim to be doing good
    extremely so

    So what does that say about YOU?


    Look up Sir Jimmy Savile.

    Your moralising do-goodery absolutely called out for that riposte.
    I have no idea whether I have 'done good' in this world or not.

    You should work on that. I know I do things to help others. I know I work to make things better.

    Ah The absolute conviction of the ignorant.
    We lnew a girkl onec. Nice goirl. She was going out with a 55 year old man.

    As she walked into a room with out him for an even party I glanced up
    and in a rare moment of candours asked 'where's the geriatric, Judes?'

    Needless to say the room went very quiet, and Judes rushed out. I felt terrible.
    A week later she came over and thanked me. "You made me realise what I
    was doing to myself" she said.

    Yoiu make know when you are 'doing good' I simply do not know at all.



    How could I possibly tell? I am an atheist. No big G tells me what is
    right and what is wrong.

    I am an atheist. That is not relevant.

    Then by definition you have no arbitrary external moral standards to
    judge whether you are 'doing good' or not.


    I haven[t the effrontery and sheer bald faced over inflated self esteem
    to claim that I have, and my experience is that most people who make a
    big thing out of it are trying to hide something else.

    I am not making a big thing out of it. It is just a fact.

    LOL!"!
    Don't talk 'facts' to a philosopher.
    Very slippery things 'facts'. Especially those based on value judgements
    of a moral sort.

    Perhaps your real problem is less that you are a suppressed paedophile,
    than that you Believe in the Truth Of Moral Compasses.


    I seek to make
    things better. Might be from my Jewish upbringing where we are taught Tikkun olam, healing the world. I take that to heart.

    Sure. Sounds great. Kum By ya and all that. Doesn't actually mean fuck
    all, but it sounds good


    one which came from YOUR way of thinking. It had nothing to do
    with me. You were sharing something about yourself.

    You would say that, wouldn't you?

    I am stating a fact. What does YOUR jump say about YOU?

    No, you are not stating a 'fact'

    You are making a value judgment about yourself - which no one is in fact qualified to do - and claiming it as fact.

    Why you would want to do that is an interesting psychological point. It
    shows more about how you want to be seen by others, than how you want to
    be in yourself.

    And at that point I refer you back to Sir James Savile. knighted for his services to children's charities, and posthumously shown to be one of
    the most prolific paedophiles this country has ever seen.

    Or that nice mister Rolf Harris. Every kids favourite knee. But
    subsequently shown to be dangerous around small children

    There are people who in true humility go around doing what they think
    its right. Like the apocryphal story which only emerged decades later
    than when John Lennon's ex wife was strapped for cash and had to sell
    all his memorabilia, Paul McCartney bought them back and returned them
    to her.

    There are people who wan to tell you who they are. And people who let
    you find out.

    In general the first want you to believe something you would not
    otherwise believe.
    --
    New Socialism consists essentially in being seen to have your heart in
    the right place whilst your head is in the clouds and your hand is in
    someone else's pocket.


    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From The Natural Philosopher@tnp@invalid.invalid to comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.linux.misc on Fri Jun 26 10:29:05 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 25/06/2026 19:42, Brock McNuggets wrote:
    Both parties are horrible -- with the Republicans being
    clearly and objectively far worse.

    That depends on your POV and what you consider 'important'

    And that is a far more intelligent and nuanced conversation to have.
    --
    “Ideas are inherently conservative. They yield not to the attack of
    other ideas but to the massive onslaught of circumstance"

    - John K Galbraith


    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From The Natural Philosopher@tnp@invalid.invalid to comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.linux.misc on Fri Jun 26 10:30:11 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 25/06/2026 19:45, Brock McNuggets wrote:
    By "woke" do you mean having empathy and compassion?

    ROFLMAO!
    --
    “Ideas are inherently conservative. They yield not to the attack of
    other ideas but to the massive onslaught of circumstance"

    - John K Galbraith


    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Brock McNuggets@brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com to comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.linux.misc on Fri Jun 26 14:27:52 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On Jun 26, 2026 at 2:30:11 AM MST, "The Natural Philosopher" wrote <111lgr3$ct47$10@dont-email.me>:

    On 25/06/2026 19:45, Brock McNuggets wrote:
    By "woke" do you mean having empathy and compassion?

    ROFLMAO!

    No answer.
    --
    It's impossible for someone who is at war with themselves to be at peace with you.
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Brock McNuggets@brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com to comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.linux.misc on Fri Jun 26 14:28:45 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On Jun 26, 2026 at 2:29:05 AM MST, "The Natural Philosopher" wrote <111lgp1$ct47$9@dont-email.me>:

    On 25/06/2026 19:42, Brock McNuggets wrote:
    Both parties are horrible -- with the Republicans being
    clearly and objectively far worse.

    That depends on your POV and what you consider 'important'

    Equal rights and evidence based policies.

    And by that criteria it is not even close. Not that the Democrats are good. They are not. But they are not fascist oligarchs pushing echoes of Nazi Germany.


    And that is a far more intelligent and nuanced conversation to have.

    Sure.
    --
    It's impossible for someone who is at war with themselves to be at peace with you.
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Brock McNuggets@brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com to comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.linux.misc on Fri Jun 26 14:37:10 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On Jun 26, 2026 at 2:26:47 AM MST, "The Natural Philosopher" wrote <111lgkn$ct47$8@dont-email.me>:

    On 25/06/2026 19:39, Brock McNuggets wrote:
    On Jun 24, 2026 at 3:00:37 AM MST, "The Natural Philosopher" wrote
    <111g9s5$2sr2f$8@dont-email.me>:

    On 24/06/2026 02:36, Brock McNuggets wrote:
    On Jun 23, 2026 at 1:53:50 PM MST, "The Natural Philosopher" wrote
    <111erou$2hojc$7@dont-email.me>:

    On 23/06/2026 19:22, Brock McNuggets wrote:
    On Jun 23, 2026 at 2:34:21 AM MST, "The Natural Philosopher" wrote >>>>>> <111djut$253r2$6@dont-email.me>:

    On 23/06/2026 08:09, Brock McNuggets wrote:
    I know I have done a lot of good in my life -- working at summer camps and as
    a teacher and as a teen mentor and far more.

    Are you a paedophile? That's generally their profile.

    The fact you tie those things with such filth speaks of who YOU are. >>>>>>
    Hit a nerve did I?

    No. I was stating a simple fact. You made an insane and unsupported
    accusation...

    Nop,. I made a very pertinent and well supported association

    No. You are not. You are making a gross assumption based on your feelings. >>
    And it has nothing to do with me. Not a damned thing.

    You think of working with kids and jump to pedophilia. You. Not me.

    So what does that say about YOU?

    Paedophiles are attracted to any job that gives them control over young
    children. Its established fact. The more they protest their do-goodery
    the more likely they are to be sticking their fingers up little girls
    cracks.

    This does not mean those who work with kids are all suspects. YOU are the one
    who made that jump. Not me.

    No, but it makes all the ones who self proclaim to be doing good
    extremely so

    YOU made the jump. The question is what does that say about YOU? You keep dodging that.
    So what does that say about YOU?


    Look up Sir Jimmy Savile.

    Your moralising do-goodery absolutely called out for that riposte.
    I have no idea whether I have 'done good' in this world or not.

    You should work on that. I know I do things to help others. I know I work to >> make things better.

    Ah The absolute conviction of the ignorant.

    Not ignorant. I know myself. I know I work to make things better for others. Does not mean I never do things for myself, but I have a big focus on making things better for others around me. Think globally, act locally. I take that
    to heart.

    We lnew a girkl onec. Nice goirl. She was going out with a 55 year old man.

    As she walked into a room with out him for an even party I glanced up
    and in a rare moment of candours asked 'where's the geriatric, Judes?'

    Needless to say the room went very quiet, and Judes rushed out. I felt terrible.
    A week later she came over and thanked me. "You made me realise what I
    was doing to myself" she said.

    Yoiu make know when you are 'doing good' I simply do not know at all.

    How old was this "girkl" you know "onec"? Not making fun of your types -- I make them often myself -- just odd to have two in a row like that. But if she was 18 that is weird. If she was closer to his age maybe not an issue.



    How could I possibly tell? I am an atheist. No big G tells me what is
    right and what is wrong.

    I am an atheist. That is not relevant.

    Then by definition you have no arbitrary external moral standards to
    judge whether you are 'doing good' or not.

    I do not need or want one. And even those who THINK they do interpret their religious texts VERY differently. They are, in the end, still determine for themselves their own morality.


    I haven[t the effrontery and sheer bald faced over inflated self esteem
    to claim that I have, and my experience is that most people who make a
    big thing out of it are trying to hide something else.

    I am not making a big thing out of it. It is just a fact.

    LOL!"!
    Don't talk 'facts' to a philosopher.
    Very slippery things 'facts'. Especially those based on value judgements
    of a moral sort.

    Perhaps your real problem is less that you are a suppressed paedophile,
    than that you Believe in the Truth Of Moral Compasses.

    Again, this speaks of YOU -- this bizarre jump. So what do you think it says
    of YOU?

    You are good at trying to shine the light on others with bizarre leaps -- but not so good at shining the light on yourself even when you show so much.


    I seek to make
    things better. Might be from my Jewish upbringing where we are taught Tikkun >> olam, healing the world. I take that to heart.

    Sure. Sounds great. Kum By ya and all that. Doesn't actually mean fuck
    all, but it sounds good

    Equal rights and evidence and making things better for those around you might not be important to you. OK. But they are to me.



    one which came from YOUR way of thinking. It had nothing to do
    with me. You were sharing something about yourself.

    You would say that, wouldn't you?

    I am stating a fact. What does YOUR jump say about YOU?

    No, you are not stating a 'fact'

    I am.

    You are making a value judgment about yourself - which no one is in fact qualified to do - and claiming it as fact.

    I am completely qualified to do so. Again, you are just making things up about me. And then refusing to say what you think that means about YOU.

    Which suggests you have ideas of what it does mean about you but you are not willing to face that.

    Why you would want to do that is an interesting psychological point. It
    shows more about how you want to be seen by others, than how you want to
    be in yourself.

    If I cared deeply about how I was seen by others I would have left Usenet LONG ago. Damn... the trolls in these waters get brutal when they are insecure.
    LOL!

    And at that point I refer you back to Sir James Savile. knighted for his services to children's charities, and posthumously shown to be one of
    the most prolific paedophiles this country has ever seen.

    Irrelevant to who and what I am. And you are looking at individual cases and making an assumption about an individual. Your logic is faulty. So what does this error say about YOU?

    Or that nice mister Rolf Harris. Every kids favourite knee. But
    subsequently shown to be dangerous around small children

    Again: what does this say about YOU to even think in such ways about someone you have no evidence against?

    You refuse to look at that. Shows you are not happy with yourself.

    There are people who in true humility go around doing what they think
    its right. Like the apocryphal story which only emerged decades later
    than when John Lennon's ex wife was strapped for cash and had to sell
    all his memorabilia, Paul McCartney bought them back and returned them
    to her.

    There are people who wan to tell you who they are. And people who let
    you find out.

    In general the first want you to believe something you would not
    otherwise believe.

    What are you saying about YOURSELF. You keep dodging that question.
    --
    It's impossible for someone who is at war with themselves to be at peace with you.
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From The Natural Philosopher@tnp@invalid.invalid to comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.linux.misc on Fri Jun 26 17:24:09 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 26/06/2026 15:28, Brock McNuggets wrote:
    On Jun 26, 2026 at 2:29:05 AM MST, "The Natural Philosopher" wrote <111lgp1$ct47$9@dont-email.me>:

    On 25/06/2026 19:42, Brock McNuggets wrote:
    Both parties are horrible -- with the Republicans being
    clearly and objectively far worse.

    That depends on your POV and what you consider 'important'

    Equal rights and evidence based policies.
    ROFLMAO

    As usual what the left says is in fact diametrically opposed to what it actually does.

    Evidence would say that to avoid repeat offenders, hang first time
    offenders,.

    For example


    And by that criteria it is not even close. Not that the Democrats are good. They are not. But they are not fascist oligarchs pushing echoes of Nazi Germany.

    Bo, they tend toward the Chairman Mao and Pol Pot way of doig things


    And that is a far more intelligent and nuanced conversation to have.

    Sure.

    --
    Climate Change: Socialism wearing a lab coat.

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From The Natural Philosopher@tnp@invalid.invalid to comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.linux.misc on Fri Jun 26 17:26:59 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 26/06/2026 15:37, Brock McNuggets wrote:
    Not ignorant. I know myself. I know I work to make things better for others. Does not mean I never do things for myself, but I have a big focus on making things better for others around me. Think globally, act locally. I take that to heart.
    Diddums
    What a bleeding heart you are to be sure

    How old was this "girkl" you know "onec"? Not making fun of your types
    -- I
    make them often myself -- just odd to have two in a row like that. But
    if she
    was 18 that is weird. If she was closer to his age maybe not an issue.

    Judes was our age. Early 30s. The man was in his 50s IIRC

    There wasn't anything sinister.

    Just perhaps a little lll judged.
    --
    "First, find out who are the people you can not criticise. They are your oppressors."
    - George Orwell

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2