I look at an article like this <https://www.zdnet.com/article/lubuntu-versus-xubuntu/>, comparing two different GUIs on Ubuntu, and I immediately think “¿Por qué no los dos?”. Who says it has to be either/or? The only difference between
the two Ubuntu “flavours” is the choice of packages on initial installation. They’re both the same distro underneath, and there’s nothing stopping you from installing both GUIs (not to mention all the
others that come with Ubuntu), because they all come in the same
standard repo, and switching between them is as easy as logging out
and logging in again.
Lawrence D’Oliveiro wrote:
I look at an article like this
<https://www.zdnet.com/article/lubuntu-versus-xubuntu/>, comparing two
different GUIs on Ubuntu, and I immediately think “¿Por qué no los
dos?”. Who says it has to be either/or? The only difference between
the two Ubuntu “flavours” is the choice of packages on initial
installation. They’re both the same distro underneath, and there’s
nothing stopping you from installing both GUIs (not to mention all the
others that come with Ubuntu), because they all come in the same
standard repo, and switching between them is as easy as logging out
and logging in again.
Obligatory "your distro sucks" but if you are choosing between two Ubuntus, choose neither.
Likewise restricting the argument to Ubuntu suggests that no other
distro is *even worth considering*.
I could probably get along famously with any modern distro. I simply
keep using Mint 'because it was the one I arrived at first, that was
good enough that I looked no further'
On Wed, 24 Dec 2025 13:24:43 +0000, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
I could probably get along famously with any modern distro. I simply
keep using Mint 'because it was the one I arrived at first, that was
good enough that I looked no further'
My choice to put Ubuntu on the mini was entirely rational. I had a couple
of other isos that weren't responding well and the Ubuntu one worked. When
I revamped a couple of older machines I put different distros on them just for variety. I'm not a fan of Ubuntu GNOME but I can live with it.
On Wed, 24 Dec 2025 13:24:43 +0000, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
I could probably get along famously with any modern distro. I simply
keep using Mint 'because it was the one I arrived at first, that was
good enough that I looked no further'
My choice to put Ubuntu on the mini was entirely rational. I had a couple
of other isos that weren't responding well and the Ubuntu one worked. When
I revamped a couple of older machines I put different distros on them just for variety. I'm not a fan of Ubuntu GNOME but I can live with it.
It's all part of Marxist dialectic technique
On Wed, 24 Dec 2025 13:24:43 +0000, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
I could probably get along famously with any modern distro. I simply
keep using Mint 'because it was the one I arrived at first, that was
good enough that I looked no further'
My choice to put Ubuntu on the mini was entirely rational. I had a couple
of other isos that weren't responding well and the Ubuntu one worked. When
I revamped a couple of older machines I put different distros on them just for variety. I'm not a fan of Ubuntu GNOME but I can live with it.
The Natural Philosopher wrote:
It's all part of Marxist dialectic technique
You are overthinking it. It's just a simple expression of hatred against Ubuntu. Nothing more.
| Sysop: | DaiTengu |
|---|---|
| Location: | Appleton, WI |
| Users: | 1,090 |
| Nodes: | 10 (0 / 10) |
| Uptime: | 61:25:34 |
| Calls: | 13,949 |
| Calls today: | 2 |
| Files: | 187,035 |
| D/L today: |
3,080 files (873M bytes) |
| Messages: | 2,461,354 |