• MX To The Rescue (Again)

    From c186282@c186282@nnada.net to comp.os.linux.misc on Tue May 5 01:35:27 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.misc

    My Manjaro box - which processes a few cameras via 'Motion'
    plus I use for streaming stuff to my TV - had become fatally
    balky. Could no longer update. Even with all the tricks it
    could not successfully load all the new stuff, a bunch of
    complaints about bad PGP signing and such. Can't get there
    from here.

    I waited several months to see if this resolved itself.
    It did not.

    Manjaro is a "rolling" distro like Tumbleweed ... you can do
    a FEW point updates, but it won't be long before it decides
    to re-do the entire thing (2+gb).

    First up, I decided to try Deb Trixie/LXDE. I like LXDE,
    straight-up, no bullshit.

    DID, after many version adjustments to the cam files, get
    Motion to work. For some reason they changed many of the
    param names in Motion 4.7x ... mostly to annoy it seems ...
    and some of the docs are kind of obscure on those points.
    There may be some giant clusterfuck 'camera def' that's
    suppose to go into many of those old slots. Didn't use
    any of those - and it worked OK.

    BUT ... *NO SOUND*

    Alas LXDE does not have any remotely easy (or documented)
    tweaks/methods to re-direct the sound to the HDMI port.
    Checked Lubuntu docs, but it's just too different.

    So, also installed XFCE. Alas even that didn't add what
    I needed.

    So ... hosed the whole thing, a full days work gone
    into the aether.

    Installed MX/XFCE instead. MX has a lot of goodies that
    make it easy to adjust weird stuff.

    Again got Motion working - I'd just made copies of my
    fixes from the Deb install.

    MX did have a just-good-enough sound utility however,
    and after thinking a bit I managed to switch the
    audio to the HDMI with a few clicks. You'd THINK distros
    would just automatically do that, but they don't.

    Finally, VNC. Managed to nuke the xstartup file and
    you CAN'T get that to re-install. However I had another
    MX/XFCE box so I copied that one and it all worked
    perfectly. ('xstartup' is black magic ... SO much
    advice on how to do it and 95% of that doesn't work)

    DO note that MX comes with the firewall ON ... which
    caused some puzzlement initially with my clients.

    SEEMS that if you use the 'live' MX installer, if
    you pick the systemd incarnation then it installs
    the systemd version (which I wanted). If you pick
    the non-systemd version then it won't. However
    you CAN use 'grub-customizer' to select the menu
    option to boot the systemd version later if you
    want.

    Anyway, I can see why MX remains near the top of
    the DistroWatch list for years. A very capable
    mid-Linux with a bunch of extra, useful, utilities
    thrown in.

    Manjaro ... never LOVED it, but after a fashion I did
    get it to do what I wanted and it worked OK for a
    couple of years. The updates fault though ... did
    not want to put up with that in these insecure
    times !

    I've mostly used Deb derivatives for the past 15
    years, so I know how they think, where they put
    stuff. So, not having youthful energy anymore,
    I'm just gonna stick with the best of the DebiVerse.
    No, do NOT like the 'Buntus ever since they tried
    to force their 'cloud' shit on everyone.

    Mint can be OK, but at this point I'm more
    familiar with MX.

    Anyway, just A Day In The Life of an average Linux
    user. NOW wanna re-do an old threaded Python/OpenCV
    video and snapshot grabber. It's 3 years old and
    already I've had problems figuring out what I wrote
    and why, despite lots of comments :-)

    Next, can I make a KVM machine on my other Trixie
    box ? VirtualBox isn't in the repos and getting
    the Trixie version from Oracle does NOT work,
    all kinds of bitching about unprovided/uninstalled
    dkms shit. My goal is an OpenSUSE-Leap VM for
    fun and experiments.

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From rbowman@bowman@montana.com to comp.os.linux.misc on Tue May 5 18:22:31 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.misc

    On Tue, 5 May 2026 01:35:27 -0400, c186282 wrote:

    Next, can I make a KVM machine on my other Trixie box ? VirtualBox isn't
    in the repos and getting the Trixie version from Oracle does NOT work,
    all kinds of bitching about unprovided/uninstalled dkms shit. My goal is
    an OpenSUSE-Leap VM for fun and experiments.

    I can't address Trixie on x64 but with most distros 'apt install virt-
    manager' installs all the dependencies including QEMU. Many sites give you
    a laundry list of things to install but I haven't found that to be
    necessary.

    I've seen it called different things in the menu but it's usually 'Virtual Machine Manager' in the System tools. At least that's what it is on the Raspberry Pi Trixie based OS.

    'lsmod | grep kvm' should show either kvm_amd or kvn_intel. Most distros
    load the module by default or you can use modprobe. Really old processors don't have the necessary instructions to support kvm but my LM is on a
    2011 netbook and has them.

    lsmod on the Pi doesn't show kvm but I do have a Ubuntu VM on it for
    kicks. It's a tty session but it does run.

    You're experience echos mine on LM. I could install VB, unload the kvm
    module, and start the manager but actually trying to spin up a VM threw
    the dkms errors. kvm/QEMU works fine.

    As far as Leap 16, I first spun up the GNOME version. It's plain vanilla
    GNOME and sucks. Rather than try to civilize it I switched to KDE.

    I think that was the iso that pointed out another problem. I had an old thumbdrive formatted with vfat. The iso was bigger than 4 GB so I had to reformat it to exfat.
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From c186282@c186282@nnada.net to comp.os.linux.misc on Wed May 6 00:42:42 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.misc

    On 5/5/26 14:22, rbowman wrote:
    On Tue, 5 May 2026 01:35:27 -0400, c186282 wrote:

    Next, can I make a KVM machine on my other Trixie box ? VirtualBox isn't
    in the repos and getting the Trixie version from Oracle does NOT work,
    all kinds of bitching about unprovided/uninstalled dkms shit. My goal is
    an OpenSUSE-Leap VM for fun and experiments.

    I can't address Trixie on x64 but with most distros 'apt install virt- manager' installs all the dependencies including QEMU. Many sites give you
    a laundry list of things to install but I haven't found that to be
    necessary.


    I'd tried a KVM/QEMU VM on Fedora about six months ago.
    There were many problems. The final annoying problem was
    that there was no clear way use a WiFi connection - had
    to fake a hardwire using an 'extender' that had a hardwire
    plug on it - otherwise no clear way to set a 'bridged'
    adapter that'd be on yer local network.

    So, I'll try again with Trixie. STILL think it's a
    bastard distro - lots of little stuff doesn't want
    to work properly even at 13.4

    This crap is why I like(d) VirtualBox ... so many tweaks
    just a click away. Alas something IS wrong in the VBox
    food chain right now. My download for Trixie was seriously
    deficit ... lots and lots of stuff missing. No 'official'
    VBox in the repos either - maybe for obvious reasons.

    I've seen it called different things in the menu but it's usually 'Virtual Machine Manager' in the System tools. At least that's what it is on the Raspberry Pi Trixie based OS.

    PIs are 'different'.

    Also a PI doesn't REALLY have the CPU power to
    make a VM worthwhile ... wonder why it's offered ?

    'lsmod | grep kvm' should show either kvm_amd or kvn_intel. Most distros load the module by default or you can use modprobe. Really old processors don't have the necessary instructions to support kvm but my LM is on a
    2011 netbook and has them.

    All my processors (except one on the box with floppies) are
    fairly current. Whether the correct kernel stuff/modules are
    loaded by default ... I'll see shortly. DID kinda-sorta get
    it to run on Fedora ..... kinda-sorta .........

    VMs do have some good uses. Has VMWare squished this down
    to just their expensive commercial solutions ???

    VBox used to be just plug-n-play NOT all that long ago.
    Would load all the new Linux distros into it for testing
    and it'd even do DOS and CP/M-86. SOMEthing's gone very
    wrong.

    Hmmm ... could always install a five year old version
    of Deb, install the old VBox, then use VBox to run
    newer versions of stuff :-)

    lsmod on the Pi doesn't show kvm but I do have a Ubuntu VM on it for
    kicks. It's a tty session but it does run.

    Good enough for fooling around :-)

    DID get TumbleWeed to install on a PI-4 ... not
    really 'snappy' but it worked.

    You're experience echos mine on LM. I could install VB, unload the kvm module, and start the manager but actually trying to spin up a VM threw
    the dkms errors. kvm/QEMU works fine.

    As said, SOMEthing has gone very wrong in the VM world.
    I used VBox on my biz servers, I've used KVM too.
    It all worked pretty easily (except having to do fiddly
    edits in KVM config files while VBox was just a few clicks.

    As far as Leap 16, I first spun up the GNOME version. It's plain vanilla GNOME and sucks. Rather than try to civilize it I switched to KDE.

    I've seen the recent KDE ... no No NO !!! :-)

    My plan is to use my full install image and put
    XFCE as the OSuse desktop. Might add LXDE too
    but XFCE is "good enough".

    I think that was the iso that pointed out another problem. I had an old thumbdrive formatted with vfat. The iso was bigger than 4 GB so I had to reformat it to exfat.

    Yep, been there !

    Remember when Linux distros were SMALL ??? :-)

    ANYhow ... MX 25.x did solve my dead Manjaro problems.
    It's all working very smoothly. Even watching an old
    Dr.Who stream right now - 200 channels of cable had
    SHIT for offerings this evening.

    Not sure WHAT's up with Manjaro ... distro bits with
    bad PGP sigs and such just shouldn't BE there at all !
    Are they down to one old guy at Manjaro ??? Not in
    love with Arch, but it DID serve OK for awhile.

    Oh ... little bandwidth trick. I used to have both
    the 2.4 and 5ghz from the router with the same SSID.
    The adapter/drivers on each unit had to kind of
    decide what stream to use when. This resulted in very
    irregular performance, esp between my main boxes.
    Gave the 5ghz a slightly different SSID so I can
    pick it out explicitly - notable improvement and
    it also took some of the load off the 2.4 stuff.

    NEXT week ... gotta find a working PPD for my Dymo-550
    label printer. Found SOME stuff on GitHub - TOO much
    actually. Can't tell what's best or ready-2-go. My
    handwriting was always bad, now being old I'd rather
    have machine-printed address labels for clarity, just
    to be sure. Yea yea, CAN theoretically do it with
    my everything print/scan machine, but getting sheets
    of labels or envelopes to print right is never easy.

    Well, super-WORST case, I've got an XP CD install
    somewhere ... but really really DON'T wanna go there.
    If not a VM then I'd need to nuke a machine and
    install XP as the primary (it doesn't like to share)
    and then Linux in other partitions like in the bad
    old days.

    Ah ... the initial Who with barbarian "Leila" is on :-)

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From rbowman@bowman@montana.com to comp.os.linux.misc on Wed May 6 06:35:52 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.misc

    On Wed, 6 May 2026 00:42:42 -0400, c186282 wrote:

    I'd tried a KVM/QEMU VM on Fedora about six months ago. There were
    many problems. The final annoying problem was that there was no clear
    way use a WiFi connection - had to fake a hardwire using an
    'extender' that had a hardwire plug on it - otherwise no clear way to
    set a 'bridged' adapter that'd be on yer local network.

    I don't believe that's in the cards for any distro. You can bridge to a
    wired router but not WiFi. I didn't dig too deeply since the virtual IP is satisfactory for internet connectivity even though it doesn't show up on
    the LAN.
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From c186282@c186282@nnada.net to comp.os.linux.misc on Wed May 6 10:55:01 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.misc

    On 5/6/26 02:35, rbowman wrote:
    On Wed, 6 May 2026 00:42:42 -0400, c186282 wrote:

    I'd tried a KVM/QEMU VM on Fedora about six months ago. There were
    many problems. The final annoying problem was that there was no clear
    way use a WiFi connection - had to fake a hardwire using an
    'extender' that had a hardwire plug on it - otherwise no clear way to
    set a 'bridged' adapter that'd be on yer local network.

    I don't believe that's in the cards for any distro. You can bridge to a
    wired router but not WiFi. I didn't dig too deeply since the virtual IP is satisfactory for internet connectivity even though it doesn't show up on
    the LAN.

    Well, MOST people connect via WiFi these days ... and
    want everything, not just to surf usenet.

    Wired is fine for yer server farm, but .....

    Just started up a VBox running TinyCore ... it's set
    to "bridged adapter". Running ifconfig it shows that
    it IS on my local network via 'wlan0'. Can also ping
    google. This is a laptop, no wired connections.

    May have to hose my nice, but as-yet unpurposed, Deb
    install on the box and install OSuse ... maybe I can
    run VBox on THAT and then make a Trixie VM ? :-)

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From The Natural Philosopher@tnp@invalid.invalid to comp.os.linux.misc on Wed May 6 17:47:47 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.misc

    On 06/05/2026 15:55, c186282 wrote:

      Well, MOST people connect via WiFi these days ... and
      want everything, not just to surf usenet.

    Bollocks.
    Wherever possible I wire

    Its reliable, better supported and more secure & faster


      Wired is fine for yer server farm, but .....

    That uses optical interfacing these days

      Just started up a VBox running TinyCore ... it's set
      to "bridged adapter". Running ifconfig it shows that
      it IS on my local network via 'wlan0'. Can also ping
      google. This is a laptop, no wired connections.

      May have to hose my nice, but as-yet unpurposed, Deb
      install on the box and install OSuse ... maybe I can
      run VBox on THAT and then make a Trixie VM ? 🙂
    --
    In a Time of Universal Deceit, Telling the Truth Is a Revolutionary Act.

    - George Orwell

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From rbowman@bowman@montana.com to comp.os.linux.misc on Wed May 6 19:22:50 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.misc

    On Wed, 6 May 2026 17:47:47 +0100, The Natural Philosopher wrote:

    On 06/05/2026 15:55, c186282 wrote:

      Well, MOST people connect via WiFi these days ... and want
      everything, not just to surf usenet.

    Bollocks.
    Wherever possible I wire

    Its reliable, better supported and more secure & faster

    I'd be careful of MOST in this context too. My entire internet is via a
    wifi hotspot. When I'm away from home I use whatever WiFi that is
    available. The BUT there is I'm not putting up a website on a VM and
    expecting to be able to connect to it using the wireless router at Joe's Coffee Shop.

    Even at home I'm not putting up a SPA on the openSUSE VM and expecting to connect to it from anywhere but the host machine. That is sufficient for testing.

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2