Hi,
I'm just considering switch from openbox to libwc on my rpi4b 4gb.
Is there a performance drop or increase of mem usage I should worry about?
I use it as a desktop.
So rarely do I load the gui on my systems. I sort of dwell in tty.
Hi,
I'm just considering switch from openbox to libwc on my rpi4b 4gb.
Is there a performance drop or increase of mem usage I should worry about?
I use it as a desktop.
Ondrej Bucek <usenet@vk3heg.net> wrote:
Hi,
I'm just considering switch from openbox to libwc on my rpi4b 4gb.
Is there a performance drop or increase of mem usage I should worry about? >> I use it as a desktop.
When I switched Kubuntu on Intel from X11 to Wayland performance notably improved, perhaps due to better use of the GPU. I haven't tried it on a Pi.
Theo
Hi,
I'm just considering switch from openbox to libwc on my rpi4b 4gb.
Is there a performance drop or increase of mem usage I should worry about?
I use it as a desktop.
Roto
.... expert (n): Someone who knows where to look for the answer.
There is a general rule that after a time, any chunk of software is so
full of bodges and patches and hacked on bug fixes and cruft that is
worth rewriting from the ground up.
On Tue, 21 Oct 2025 18:13:49 -0700, Daniel wrote:
So rarely do I load the gui on my systems. I sort of dwell in tty.
I use the command line a lot, too. But doing it in a GUI terminal emulator gives you so much more capability (e.g. copy/paste between windows, scrollback) than running a plain text console.
Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> writes:
On Tue, 21 Oct 2025 18:13:49 -0700, Daniel wrote:
So rarely do I load the gui on my systems. I sort of dwell in tty.
I use the command line a lot, too. But doing it in a GUI terminal
emulator gives you so much more capability (e.g. copy/paste between
windows, scrollback) than running a plain text console.
Yeah I use tmux.
On 22/10/2025 14:42, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
There is a general rule that after a time, any chunk of software is so
full of bodges and patches and hacked on bug fixes and cruft that is
worth rewriting from the ground up.
It's a great way of creating a whole new set of bodges and bugs, by
throwing away all the years of knowledge and bug fixes.
The Wayland crew decided to avoid some of this by simply not
implementing great chunks of functionality and refusing to ever get to feature parity with X11.
---druck--
Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> writes:
On Tue, 21 Oct 2025 18:13:49 -0700, Daniel wrote:
So rarely do I load the gui on my systems. I sort of dwell in tty.
I use the command line a lot, too. But doing it in a GUI terminal emulator >> gives you so much more capability (e.g. copy/paste between windows,
scrollback) than running a plain text console.
Yeah I use tmux. But for my use, a gui isn't necessary unless i need a
ful web experience - not often. Yes yes I'm a freak.
D--
Yeah I use tmux.
Try a GUI terminal emulator. Being able to have multiple windows/tabs
open at once is a game-changer.
On 22/10/2025 22:05, druck wrote:
On 22/10/2025 14:42, The Natural Philosopher wrote:Yes, but usually from a better starting point
There is a general rule that after a time, any chunk of software is
so full of bodges and patches and hacked on bug fixes and cruft that
is worth rewriting from the ground up.
It's a great way of creating a whole new set of bodges and bugs, by
throwing away all the years of knowledge and bug fixes.
The Wayland crew decided to avoid some of this by simply notIndeed. My one experience of trying to run X over a network revealed
implementing great chunks of functionality and refusing to ever get to
feature parity with X11.
dire performance and flaky behaviour.
Like, who needs it?
---druck
I run X apps across the home network all the time. I have a small 1L computer that acts as a NAS and runs headless. Mostly I just ssh into it
but there are times when it's easier to run X across the net.
At work I use RDP onto a Windows server over the VPN to access data
centre developmemt machines in Netherlands from my home. I use X for accessing the Linux machines onto the Windows server and RDP to get it
to my laptop. X across the data centre 1/2.5/10Gb network is plenty fast
and RDP compresses the data nicely to me. Fast enough to watch video generated on a Linux box, X its way to Windows and RDP its way to me.
ssh -C -X someone@somehost to enable compression and X11 forwarding.
mm0fmf <none@invalid.com> wrote:Current main home machine runs Debian 13 + Mate with X not Wayland. I
I run X apps across the home network all the time. I have a small 1L
computer that acts as a NAS and runs headless. Mostly I just ssh into it
but there are times when it's easier to run X across the net.
At work I use RDP onto a Windows server over the VPN to access data
centre developmemt machines in Netherlands from my home. I use X for
accessing the Linux machines onto the Windows server and RDP to get it
to my laptop. X across the data centre 1/2.5/10Gb network is plenty fast
and RDP compresses the data nicely to me. Fast enough to watch video
generated on a Linux box, X its way to Windows and RDP its way to me.
ssh -C -X someone@somehost to enable compression and X11 forwarding.
A while back I was playing running remote Wayland apps over ~50Mbps VDSL using Waypipe. It works impressively fast - eg remote Youtube video playing works well enough. You can also tunnel audio. Due to latency it works a
lot better than X forwarding over the same connection. However it doesn't let you have persistent apps, ie you close down the client (eg a laptop) and want the app to stay running to reconnect later.
wprs supports that, but there was a bug with screen scaling (for X11 apps using Xwayland) that made it awkward to use. I should go back and see if they've fixed that.
Theo
Yeah I use tmux.
Try a GUI terminal emulator. Being able to have multiple
windows/tabs open at once is a game-changer.
Yeah, but he mentioned he's using tmux.
| Sysop: | DaiTengu |
|---|---|
| Location: | Appleton, WI |
| Users: | 1,073 |
| Nodes: | 10 (0 / 10) |
| Uptime: | 19:58:40 |
| Calls: | 13,785 |
| Files: | 186,987 |
| D/L today: |
2,894 files (893M bytes) |
| Messages: | 2,436,542 |