On Dec 8, 2025 at 6:28:27 PM MST, ""Roy S."" wrote <XnsB3AFD0465E55112345678@62.164.182.28>:
I was asked by David B to post the information I recieved via a FOI
request to the Arizona court clerk.
So being that one of the conditions of the court clerk emailing the
case information to me is that I will not share it either
electronically or physically.
I suspect the documents are watermarked so I'm not going down that
path.
So here is some information taken from the document from the court
which shows that snit did indeed have an order of protection filed
against him by his ex wife Anne Glasser.
1. A screenshot of part of the document.
Take note of the case number.
https://ibb.co/n8K2nSTm
Notice on one part it says "Criminal"
On another it says "DR" -- Domestic Relations. That is Civil.
While I do not see any obvious proof that other "screenshot" *COULD
NOT* be real (Carroll talked about using the Console to just modify a
real one at one point), this one is clearly and obviously faked.
Going to ignore most of this nonsense... but in this case it was
trivial to show the image is faked.
Thanks for proving my point.
Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote in news:693787bf$0$26$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On Dec 8, 2025 at 6:28:27 PM MST, ""Roy S."" wrote
<XnsB3AFD0465E55112345678@62.164.182.28>:
I was asked by David B to post the information I recieved via a FOI
request to the Arizona court clerk.
So being that one of the conditions of the court clerk emailing the
case information to me is that I will not share it either
electronically or physically.
I suspect the documents are watermarked so I'm not going down that
path.
So here is some information taken from the document from the court
which shows that snit did indeed have an order of protection filed
against him by his ex wife Anne Glasser.
1. A screenshot of part of the document.
Take note of the case number.
https://ibb.co/n8K2nSTm
Notice on one part it says "Criminal"
On another it says "DR" -- Domestic Relations. That is Civil.
While I do not see any obvious proof that other "screenshot" *COULD
NOT* be real (Carroll talked about using the Console to just modify a
real one at one point), this one is clearly and obviously faked.
Going to ignore most of this nonsense... but in this case it was
trivial to show the image is faked.
Thanks for proving my point.
LOL!
Proving your point?
Which one would that be?
Maybe where you denied that a government site was posted?
Remember that one Brock?
the post is not nonsense, it's just the tip of the iceberg regarding your criminal offenses against your ex wife, who BTW is a common-law wife.
Yes that shows up as well.
Oh and she is no angel either. That shows up too.
Like I said already, it's trivial for anyone to request court records regarding your criminal, and quite frankly flagrant disregard for the law. Your lies and denials will not work this time Brock.
You are stone cold dead in de market. https://youtu.be/Xn72TyJkDS8?si=YPgI-itsT4mj9AUu
You cannot squirm your way out of this one Brock.
Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote in news:693787bf$0$26$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On Dec 8, 2025 at 6:28:27 PM MST, ""Roy S."" wrote
<XnsB3AFD0465E55112345678@62.164.182.28>:
I was asked by David B to post the information I recieved via a FOI
request to the Arizona court clerk.
So being that one of the conditions of the court clerk emailing the
case information to me is that I will not share it either
electronically or physically.
I suspect the documents are watermarked so I'm not going down that
path.
So here is some information taken from the document from the court
which shows that snit did indeed have an order of protection filed
against him by his ex wife Anne Glasser.
1. A screenshot of part of the document.
Take note of the case number.
https://ibb.co/n8K2nSTm
Notice on one part it says "Criminal"
On another it says "DR" -- Domestic Relations. That is Civil.
While I do not see any obvious proof that other "screenshot" *COULD
NOT* be real (Carroll talked about using the Console to just modify a
real one at one point), this one is clearly and obviously faked.
Going to ignore most of this nonsense... but in this case it was
trivial to show the image is faked.
Thanks for proving my point.
LOL!
Proving your point?
Which one would that be?
Maybe where you denied that a government site was posted?
Remember that one Brock?
the post is not nonsense, it's just the tip of the iceberg regarding your criminal offenses against your ex wife, who BTW is a common-law wife.
Yes that shows up as well.
Oh and she is no angel either. That shows up too.
Like I said already, it's trivial for anyone to request court records regarding your criminal, and quite frankly flagrant disregard for the law. Your lies and denials will not work this time Brock.
You are stone cold dead in de market. https://youtu.be/Xn72TyJkDS8?si=YPgI-itsT4mj9AUu
You cannot squirm your way out of this one Brock.
On 09/12/2025 03:01, Roy S. wrote:
Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote in
news:693787bf$0$26$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On Dec 8, 2025 at 6:28:27 PM MST, ""Roy S."" wrote
<XnsB3AFD0465E55112345678@62.164.182.28>:
I was asked by David B to post the information I recieved via a FOI
request to the Arizona court clerk.
So being that one of the conditions of the court clerk emailing the
case information to me is that I will not share it either
electronically or physically.
I suspect the documents are watermarked so I'm not going down that
path.
So here is some information taken from the document from the court
which shows that snit did indeed have an order of protection filed
against him by his ex wife Anne Glasser.
1. A screenshot of part of the document.
Take note of the case number.
https://ibb.co/n8K2nSTm
Notice on one part it says "Criminal"
On another it says "DR" -- Domestic Relations. That is Civil.
While I do not see any obvious proof that other "screenshot" *COULD
NOT* be real (Carroll talked about using the Console to just modify a
real one at one point), this one is clearly and obviously faked.
Going to ignore most of this nonsense... but in this case it was
trivial to show the image is faked.
Thanks for proving my point.
LOL!
Proving your point?
Which one would that be?
Maybe where you denied that a government site was posted?
Remember that one Brock?
the post is not nonsense, it's just the tip of the iceberg regarding your
criminal offenses against your ex wife, who BTW is a common-law wife.
Yes that shows up as well.
Oh and she is no angel either. That shows up too.
Like I said already, it's trivial for anyone to request court records
regarding your criminal, and quite frankly flagrant disregard for the law. >> Your lies and denials will not work this time Brock.
You are stone cold dead in de market.
https://youtu.be/Xn72TyJkDS8?si=YPgI-itsT4mj9AUu
You cannot squirm your way out of this one Brock.
Why are you telling folk a pack of lies, "Roy"?
Other folk can read your header information. You do KNOW that, eh?
"David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> news:mpqi7tFbb9kU1@mid.individual.net Tue, 09 Dec 2025 12:15:57 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
On 09/12/2025 03:01, Roy S. wrote:
Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote in
news:693787bf$0$26$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On Dec 8, 2025 at 6:28:27 PM MST, ""Roy S."" wrote
<XnsB3AFD0465E55112345678@62.164.182.28>:
I was asked by David B to post the information I recieved via a FOI
request to the Arizona court clerk.
So being that one of the conditions of the court clerk emailing the
case information to me is that I will not share it either
electronically or physically.
I suspect the documents are watermarked so I'm not going down that
path.
So here is some information taken from the document from the court
which shows that snit did indeed have an order of protection filed
against him by his ex wife Anne Glasser.
1. A screenshot of part of the document.
Take note of the case number.
https://ibb.co/n8K2nSTm
Notice on one part it says "Criminal"
On another it says "DR" -- Domestic Relations. That is Civil.
While I do not see any obvious proof that other "screenshot" *COULD
NOT* be real (Carroll talked about using the Console to just modify a
real one at one point), this one is clearly and obviously faked.
Going to ignore most of this nonsense... but in this case it was
trivial to show the image is faked.
Thanks for proving my point.
LOL!
Proving your point?
Which one would that be?
Maybe where you denied that a government site was posted?
Remember that one Brock?
the post is not nonsense, it's just the tip of the iceberg regarding your >>> criminal offenses against your ex wife, who BTW is a common-law wife.
Yes that shows up as well.
Oh and she is no angel either. That shows up too.
Like I said already, it's trivial for anyone to request court records
regarding your criminal, and quite frankly flagrant disregard for the law. >>> Your lies and denials will not work this time Brock.
You are stone cold dead in de market.
https://youtu.be/Xn72TyJkDS8?si=YPgI-itsT4mj9AUu
You cannot squirm your way out of this one Brock.
Why are you telling folk a pack of lies, "Roy"?
Other folk can read your header information. You do KNOW that, eh?
David the dumbass, you do realize people can verify what he shared is true don't you? It doesn't take much effort. He practically provided step by step instructions. Face the facts, dishonest shitstain on the underwear of life - you can't help snit fix his reputation as a very well known lying, obnoxious troll, no matter how hard you try to lie and cover for him.
That's all you're doing here. You aren't helping Snit a bit by doing this. You aren't helping the new comer establish any credibility here with this ruse, either, bro.
It's becoming very obvious as it does with others you've 'invited' here that you gave him your version of the lay of the land prior to his arrival. As I told him the other day/night? If it wasn't for two people I greatly respect vouching for him, I'd already consider him as yet another troll that you're responsible for bringing here.
So whats the end game with this one, anyhow? Is it really about tech discussions, or did you have something else in mind for him to be doing?
Keep in mind, he's already partially exposed...
"Roy S." <ukmanchU@uke.ork> news:XnsB3AFE0220500A12345678@62.164.182.25 Tue, 09 Dec 2025 03:01:59 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
LOL! As I suspected, snit opts to try the 'it's not real; it's all fake' routine.
On 10/12/2025 01:36, Gremlin wrote:
"Roy S." <ukmanchU@uke.ork> news:XnsB3AFE0220500A12345678@62.164.182.25 Tue, >> 09 Dec 2025 03:01:59 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
LOL! As I suspected, snit opts to try the 'it's not real; it's all fake'
routine.
I've been looking into this too. *The truth WILL out*!
Please comment, if you will, on this conclusion:-
https://i.ibb.co/RGrs1SFS/Screenshot-2025-12-10-at-13-00-58.png
The link they gave:
https://apps.azcourts.gov/publicaccess/caselookup.aspx
*IS* a real Arizona Judicial Branch website.
But anyone can tell you “type this case number in” — and if a case does or doesn’t appear, they can spin a story.
The site itself does not confirm that the story told in the post is true
— it only verifies whether such a case number exists.
I was told the lookup and needed a VPN to appear in the USA.
That is already suspicious — the site normally works worldwide without a VPN, or so I have been told elsewhere.
On Dec 9, 2025 at 6:37:01 PM MST, "Gremlin" wrote <XnsB3B0D1BA0AC1DHT1@cF04o3ON7k2lx05.lLC.9r5>:
David the dumbass, you do realize people can verify what he shared is
true don't you? It doesn't take much effort. He practically provided
step by step instructions. Face the facts, dishonest shitstain on the
underwear of life - you can't help snit fix his reputation as a very
well known lying, obnoxious troll, no matter how hard you try to lie
and cover for him.
That's all you're doing here. You aren't helping Snit a bit by doing
this. You aren't helping the new comer establish any credibility here
with this ruse, either, bro.
It's becoming very obvious as it does with others you've 'invited' here
that you gave him your version of the lay of the land prior to his
arrival. As I told him the other day/night? If it wasn't for two people
I greatly respect vouching for him, I'd already consider him as yet
another troll that you're responsible for bringing here.
So whats the end game with this one, anyhow? Is it really about tech
discussions, or did you have something else in mind for him to be
doing? Keep in mind, he's already partially exposed...
There is an effort to leave the nonsense in the past. Can you join us in being a part of the solution?
Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> news:6938d21b$4$21961$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com Wed, 10 Dec 2025
01:51:24 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
On Dec 9, 2025 at 6:37:01 PM MST, "Gremlin" wrote
<XnsB3B0D1BA0AC1DHT1@cF04o3ON7k2lx05.lLC.9r5>:
David the dumbass, you do realize people can verify what he shared is
true don't you? It doesn't take much effort. He practically provided
step by step instructions. Face the facts, dishonest shitstain on the
underwear of life - you can't help snit fix his reputation as a very
well known lying, obnoxious troll, no matter how hard you try to lie
and cover for him.
That's all you're doing here. You aren't helping Snit a bit by doing
this. You aren't helping the new comer establish any credibility here
with this ruse, either, bro.
It's becoming very obvious as it does with others you've 'invited' here
that you gave him your version of the lay of the land prior to his
arrival. As I told him the other day/night? If it wasn't for two people
I greatly respect vouching for him, I'd already consider him as yet
another troll that you're responsible for bringing here.
So whats the end game with this one, anyhow? Is it really about tech
discussions, or did you have something else in mind for him to be
doing? Keep in mind, he's already partially exposed...
There is an effort to leave the nonsense in the past. Can you join us in
being a part of the solution?
That's the second time you've mentioned "us" - who is us specifically?
David makes people look like fools with ease. He's been doing it for years. He has zero credibility as a good guy but that hasn't stopped him from inviting people who don't know any better and blindly accept whatever he's already told them about some of us in advance.
You don't need to continue pretending that you're an honest joe who's being unfairly picked on at this point. YOu were able to do what you sought to do. If anything, you owe David Brooks a thank you for making the process as simple for you.
On 12/12/2025 07:44, Gremlin (aka Dustin J. Cook)
David makes people look like fools with ease. He's been doing it for
years.
He has zero credibility as a good guy but that hasn't stopped him from
inviting people who don't know any better and blindly accept whatever
he's
already told them about some of us in advance.
I tell folk the truth Dustin Cook!
I can even show them! Here's your name "up in lights" as I've said before! https://i.ibb.co/sdnRtsq7/Dustin-Cook-name-in-lights-copy-edited.jpg
I also try my best to verify what other folk tell me. Example:-
https://i.ibb.co/DgTYvxkd/For-Dustin.jpg
You don't need to continue pretending that you're an honest joe who's
being
unfairly picked on at this point. YOu were able to do what you sought
to do.
If anything, you owe David Brooks a thank you for making the process as
simple for you.
Brock McNuggets has been nothing but helpful to me on most of the
occasions when I've asked him for help.
I asked him to come to ACW specifically because he *WAS* being picked
upon in other Usenet groups.
On 12/12/2025 07:44, Gremlin (aka Dustin J. Cook)
David makes people look like fools with ease. He's been doing it for
years. He has zero credibility as a good guy but that hasn't stopped
him from inviting people who don't know any better and blindly accept
whatever he's already told them about some of us in advance.
I tell folk the truth Dustin Cook!
I can even show them! Here's your name "up in lights" as I've said
before!
https://i.ibb.co/sdnRtsq7/Dustin-Cook-name-in-lights-copy-edited.jpg
I also try my best to verify what other folk tell me. Example:-
https://i.ibb.co/DgTYvxkd/For-Dustin.jpg
You don't need to continue pretending that you're an honest joe who's
being unfairly picked on at this point. YOu were able to do what you
sought to do. If anything, you owe David Brooks a thank you for making
the process as simple for you.
Brock McNuggets has been nothing but helpful to me on most of the
occasions when I've asked him for help.
I asked him to come to ACW specifically because he *WAS* being picked
upon in other Usenet groups.
You weren't really emailing me requesting support for
BugHunter.
You were trying to recruit me to help you get even with those
server admins.
On 13/12/2025 20:35, Gremlin wrote:
You weren't really emailing me requesting support for
BugHunter.
When did I EVER claim I wanted help with BugHunter?
You were trying to recruit me to help you get even with those
server admins.
Not so. You NEVER listen.
On Dec 13, 2025 at 3:44:59 PM MST, ""David B."" wrote <mq68jbFa4d9U1@mid.individual.net>:
On 13/12/2025 20:35, Gremlin wrote:
You weren't really emailing me requesting support for
BugHunter.
When did I EVER claim I wanted help with BugHunter?
You were trying to recruit me to help you get even with those
server admins.
Not so. You NEVER listen.
Gremlin is not doing well. Something is stuck in his head... multiple things. Things which are not true.
* He denies my AIM chat bot code is mine. But it is. No reason to think otherwise and plenty of reason to think it is (who else would use AppleScript for such a purpose, LOL!)
* He denied numbers show up in call logs. They do.
* He insists bizarre things like discounts at shops in MY area (WTF?1?!?)
* He thinks quoting him is somehow "lying".
* He insists my business had no license.
* He insists he should not apologize even for doxxing complete strangers.
Just insanity... and worse he keeps repeating these things. He cannot move on.
I warned him how Carroll would chew him up and spit him out... and we are seeing the proof -- again -- of how I was right.
I wish he could pull himself out from under Carroll's thumb and be his own man. And do as he said he wanted and move forward in peace. You have known him
longer than I have -- did he used to be this "stuck" and unable to move forward from his own delusions?
David, you strut around like you’re some sage of credibility, but
watching you try to act like a “good guy” is like watching a toddler play chess—you don’t understand the board, you don’t understand the pieces, and yet you insist on lecturing everyone else. You’ve done
nothing but flail, point fingers, and hand out fake praise while Gremlin
has been doing the actual work, verifying facts, showing receipts, and keeping names straight. But of course, in your world, someone showing evidence is “being mean,” while your ego gets a free pass. Classic.
And Snit-please. His idea of helping is like a broken GPS: he shows up sometimes, acts like he's guiding people, and then vanishes the moment
it gets tricky. He's useless, you sidekick in incompetence, and somehow still think that makes you heroic. Every “helpful” thing he does is just a cameo in the chaos you contribute to.
Meanwhile, Gremlin is out here making things transparent, exposing the nonsense, and keeping everyone honest. You two? You’re a comedy duo no
one asked for: one puffing up his ego, the other fumbling around like a paperweight trying to look useful. Honestly, it’s impressive how consistently you both manage to make yourselves irrelevant while
claiming the moral high ground.
On 13/12/2025 20:35, Gremlin wrote:
You weren't really emailing me requesting support for
BugHunter.
When did I EVER claim I wanted help with BugHunter?
You were trying to recruit me to help you get even with those
server admins.
Not so. You NEVER listen.
DataPatrol99,
I have stated quite openly that I regard myself as a good guy. I dont
mean that as a claim to sainthood, merely as a statement of intent: I
try to act honestly, verify what Im told, and treat people fairly
unless given a reason not to.
Being a good guy doesnt mean avoiding disagreement or uncomfortable
facts. It means not inventing motives, not relying on abuse, and not >mistaking volume for evidence.
I judge people Gremlin and Snit included by how theyve interacted
with me and by what I can independently verify. That approach has been >consistent for years.
If you have evidence that contradicts anything Ive said, present it. If >there are errors, point them out.
This is indistinguishable from trolling, and I wont be engaging further.
Since I know you
On 14/12/2025 21:20, Kelly Phillips *LIED* again.
Since I know you
No, you don't!
On Dec 10, 2025 at 6:17:07 AM MST, ""David B."" wrote <mpta6kFpcadU1@mid.individual.net>:
On 10/12/2025 01:36, Gremlin wrote:
"Roy S." <ukmanchU@uke.ork> news:XnsB3AFE0220500A12345678@62.164.182.25 Tue,
09 Dec 2025 03:01:59 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
LOL! As I suspected, snit opts to try the 'it's not real; it's all fake' >>> routine.
I've been looking into this too. *The truth WILL out*!
Please comment, if you will, on this conclusion:-
https://i.ibb.co/RGrs1SFS/Screenshot-2025-12-10-at-13-00-58.png
Seems reasonable.
The link they gave:
https://apps.azcourts.gov/publicaccess/caselookup.aspx
*IS* a real Arizona Judicial Branch website.
But anyone can tell you “type this case number in” — and if a case does
or doesn’t appear, they can spin a story.
The site itself does not confirm that the story told in the post is true
— it only verifies whether such a case number exists.
Wait? It does? What is the case?
I was told the lookup and needed a VPN to appear in the USA.
That is already suspicious — the site normally works worldwide without a >> VPN, or so I have been told elsewhere.
It is odd that it would be location based.
As I suspected, snit opts to try the 'it's not real; it's all fake'
routine.
On 10/12/2025 14:44, Brock McNuggets wrote:
On Dec 10, 2025 at 6:17:07 AM MST, ""David B."" wrote
<mpta6kFpcadU1@mid.individual.net>:
On 10/12/2025 01:36, Gremlin wrote:
"Roy S." <ukmanchU@uke.ork> news:XnsB3AFE0220500A12345678@62.164.182.25 Tue,
09 Dec 2025 03:01:59 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
LOL! As I suspected, snit opts to try the 'it's not real; it's all fake' >>>> routine.
I've been looking into this too. *The truth WILL out*!
Please comment, if you will, on this conclusion:-
https://i.ibb.co/RGrs1SFS/Screenshot-2025-12-10-at-13-00-58.png
Seems reasonable.
I think so.
The link they gave:
https://apps.azcourts.gov/publicaccess/caselookup.aspx
*IS* a real Arizona Judicial Branch website.
But anyone can tell you “type this case number in” — and if a case does
or doesn’t appear, they can spin a story.
The site itself does not confirm that the story told in the post is true >>> — it only verifies whether such a case number exists.
Wait? It does? What is the case?
Your divorce.
I was told the lookup and needed a VPN to appear in the USA.
That is already suspicious — the site normally works worldwide without a >>> VPN, or so I have been told elsewhere.
It is odd that it would be location based.
I don't think that should be the case. Maybe it is a spoof site?
On 10/12/2025 01:36, Gremlin wrote:
As I suspected, snit opts to try the 'it's not real; it's all fake'
routine.
Well, *IS* it fake, Dustin?
Btw, I found this. Do you like it?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Ju5Q67XU6c
On Dec 17, 2025 at 1:31:26 AM MST, ""David B."" wrote <mqf82uFpf8dU1@mid.individual.net>:
On 10/12/2025 14:44, Brock McNuggets wrote:
On Dec 10, 2025 at 6:17:07 AM MST, ""David B."" wrote
<mpta6kFpcadU1@mid.individual.net>:
On 10/12/2025 01:36, Gremlin wrote:
"Roy S." <ukmanchU@uke.ork>
news:XnsB3AFE0220500A12345678@62.164.182.25 Tue, 09 Dec 2025
03:01:59 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
LOL! As I suspected, snit opts to try the 'it's not real; it's all
fake' routine.
I've been looking into this too. *The truth WILL out*!
Please comment, if you will, on this conclusion:-
https://i.ibb.co/RGrs1SFS/Screenshot-2025-12-10-at-13-00-58.png
Seems reasonable.
I think so.
The link they gave:
https://apps.azcourts.gov/publicaccess/caselookup.aspx
*IS* a real Arizona Judicial Branch website.
But anyone can tell you “type this case number in” — and if a
case does or doesn’t appear, they can spin a story.
The site itself does not confirm that the story told in the post is
true — it only verifies whether such a case number exists.
Wait? It does? What is the case?
Your divorce.
I was told the lookup and needed a VPN to appear in the USA.
That is already suspicious — the site normally works worldwide
without a VPN, or so I have been told elsewhere.
It is odd that it would be location based.
I don't think that should be the case. Maybe it is a spoof site?
At this point the whole topic is just to dox me.
Yes. I was divorced. Carroll claimed it was initiated by my ex. The
site shows I am the one who filed (though she then responded by filing against me, which was weird, and the two cases were folded into one).
To get people to look at the site, Carroll and others lied about MANY
things tied to all sorts of charges that they say magically /
illegally went away.
Does not work that way.
When busted, Carroll
blamed some clerk saying it was an error... but then still blamed me!
Time to let this whole doxxing business just die.
But it is an attack avenue so they never will. Ten years from now they
will still be
attacking with these lies.
Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote in news:6942b870$1$27$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On Dec 17, 2025 at 1:31:26 AM MST, ""David B."" wrote
<mqf82uFpf8dU1@mid.individual.net>:
On 10/12/2025 14:44, Brock McNuggets wrote:
On Dec 10, 2025 at 6:17:07 AM MST, ""David B."" wrote
<mpta6kFpcadU1@mid.individual.net>:
On 10/12/2025 01:36, Gremlin wrote:
"Roy S." <ukmanchU@uke.ork>
news:XnsB3AFE0220500A12345678@62.164.182.25 Tue, 09 Dec 2025
03:01:59 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
LOL! As I suspected, snit opts to try the 'it's not real; it's all >>>>>> fake' routine.
I've been looking into this too. *The truth WILL out*!
Please comment, if you will, on this conclusion:-
https://i.ibb.co/RGrs1SFS/Screenshot-2025-12-10-at-13-00-58.png
Seems reasonable.
I think so.
The link they gave:
https://apps.azcourts.gov/publicaccess/caselookup.aspx
*IS* a real Arizona Judicial Branch website.
But anyone can tell you “type this case number in” — and if a
case does or doesn’t appear, they can spin a story.
The site itself does not confirm that the story told in the post is
true — it only verifies whether such a case number exists.
Wait? It does? What is the case?
Your divorce.
I was told the lookup and needed a VPN to appear in the USA.
That is already suspicious — the site normally works worldwide
without a VPN, or so I have been told elsewhere.
It is odd that it would be location based.
I don't think that should be the case. Maybe it is a spoof site?
At this point the whole topic is just to dox me.
Actually is most likely to prove you are a fucking liar and a dishonest
piece of shit.
On Dec 17, 2025 at 10:32:57 AM MST, ""Roy S."" wrote <XnsB3B87FA84BA5712345678@62.164.182.27>:
Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote in
news:6942b870$1$27$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On Dec 17, 2025 at 1:31:26 AM MST, ""David B."" wrote
<mqf82uFpf8dU1@mid.individual.net>:
On 10/12/2025 14:44, Brock McNuggets wrote:
On Dec 10, 2025 at 6:17:07 AM MST, ""David B."" wrote
<mpta6kFpcadU1@mid.individual.net>:
On 10/12/2025 01:36, Gremlin wrote:
"Roy S." <ukmanchU@uke.ork>
news:XnsB3AFE0220500A12345678@62.164.182.25 Tue, 09 Dec 2025
03:01:59 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
LOL! As I suspected, snit opts to try the 'it's not real; it's
all fake' routine.
I've been looking into this too. *The truth WILL out*!
Please comment, if you will, on this conclusion:-
https://i.ibb.co/RGrs1SFS/Screenshot-2025-12-10-at-13-00-58.png
Seems reasonable.
I think so.
The link they gave:
https://apps.azcourts.gov/publicaccess/caselookup.aspx
*IS* a real Arizona Judicial Branch website.
But anyone can tell you “type this case number in” — and if
a case does or doesn’t appear, they can spin a story.
The site itself does not confirm that the story told in the post
is true — it only verifies whether such a case number exists.
Wait? It does? What is the case?
Your divorce.
I was told the lookup and needed a VPN to appear in the USA.
That is already suspicious — the site normally works worldwide
without a VPN, or so I have been told elsewhere.
It is odd that it would be location based.
I don't think that should be the case. Maybe it is a spoof site?
At this point the whole topic is just to dox me.
Actually is most likely to prove you are a fucking liar and a
dishonest piece of shit.
If so the lies would be quotable. That is how it works in text. But
you trolls will never stop. You start with saying that it is to prove
I lied, but then fail to show it. Carroll lied and said she initiated
the divorce when proof shows I am the one who first filed.
You then say:
-----
The dates show you were the one, but a very short time frame, to
file
first.
Big deal.
----
When Carroll lies, and you acknowledge he did, you do not care. But
then you say I lied in a way you cannot show. Again, ALL of this has
been beaten to death:
* There is no evidence on the .gov site to back ANY of the
accusations.
* For ones where it is claimed there as a dismissal, it is POSSIBLE,
though very unlikely, that they could be sealed or expunged. Multiple
lawyer sites say they have never seen this, but it is at least legally possible.
* The idea there was a plea bargain (which implies a guilty finding)
but also no guilty finding is contradictory.
* The idea there was a restraining order and it was broken and then
removed is essentially impossible -- it would be breaking many laws
and court rules.
* The idea there was some monitoring program is also equally
impossible.
* The image shown is clearly false: it claims but Civil and
Criminal... no single charge is both (at least in my jurisdiction).
These are all facts. But they ignore the bigger one:
* The fact the trolls are obsessing over my life and doxxing me is
immoral and likely illegal.
Those are the facts, no matter how many times you dox, lie, and
attack. And you know it... if you REALLY thought I lied you would
quote said lies. You do not even try. Not even you think I lied.
On Dec 17, 2025 at 10:32:57 AM MST, ""Roy S."" wrote <XnsB3B87FA84BA5712345678@62.164.182.27>:
Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote in
news:6942b870$1$27$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On Dec 17, 2025 at 1:31:26 AM MST, ""David B."" wrote
<mqf82uFpf8dU1@mid.individual.net>:
On 10/12/2025 14:44, Brock McNuggets wrote:
On Dec 10, 2025 at 6:17:07 AM MST, ""David B."" wrote
<mpta6kFpcadU1@mid.individual.net>:
On 10/12/2025 01:36, Gremlin wrote:
"Roy S." <ukmanchU@uke.ork>
news:XnsB3AFE0220500A12345678@62.164.182.25 Tue, 09 Dec 2025
03:01:59 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
LOL! As I suspected, snit opts to try the 'it's not real; it's all >>>>>>> fake' routine.
I've been looking into this too. *The truth WILL out*!
Please comment, if you will, on this conclusion:-
https://i.ibb.co/RGrs1SFS/Screenshot-2025-12-10-at-13-00-58.png
Seems reasonable.
I think so.
The link they gave:
https://apps.azcourts.gov/publicaccess/caselookup.aspx
*IS* a real Arizona Judicial Branch website.
But anyone can tell you “type this case number in” — and if a >>>>>> case does or doesn’t appear, they can spin a story.
The site itself does not confirm that the story told in the post is >>>>>> true — it only verifies whether such a case number exists.
Wait? It does? What is the case?
Your divorce.
I was told the lookup and needed a VPN to appear in the USA.
That is already suspicious — the site normally works worldwide
without a VPN, or so I have been told elsewhere.
It is odd that it would be location based.
I don't think that should be the case. Maybe it is a spoof site?
At this point the whole topic is just to dox me.
Actually is most likely to prove you are a fucking liar and a dishonest
piece of shit.
If so the lies would be quotable. That is how it works in text. But you trolls
will never stop. You start with saying that it is to prove I lied, but then fail to show it. Carroll lied and said she initiated the divorce when proof shows I am the one who first filed.
You then say:
-----
The dates show you were the one, but a very short time frame, to file first.
Big deal.
----
When Carroll lies, and you acknowledge he did, you do not care. But then you say I lied in a way you cannot show. Again, ALL of this has been beaten to death:
* There is no evidence on the .gov site to back ANY of the accusations.
* For ones where it is claimed there as a dismissal, it is POSSIBLE, though very unlikely, that they could be sealed or expunged. Multiple lawyer
sites say they have never seen this, but it is at least legally possible.
* The idea there was a plea bargain (which implies a guilty finding) but
also no guilty finding is contradictory.
* The idea there was a restraining order and it was broken and then removed is essentially impossible -- it would be breaking many laws and court rules.
* The idea there was some monitoring program is also equally impossible.
* The image shown is clearly false: it claims but Civil and Criminal... no single charge is both (at least in my jurisdiction).
These are all facts. But they ignore the bigger one:
* The fact the trolls are obsessing over my life and doxxing me is immoral and
likely illegal.
Those are the facts, no matter how many times you dox, lie, and attack. And you know it... if you REALLY thought I lied you would quote said lies. You do not even try. Not even you think I lied.
Actually is most likely to prove you are a fucking liar and a
dishonest piece of shit.
If so the lies would be quotable. That is how it works in text. But
you trolls will never stop. You start with saying that it is to prove
I lied, but then fail to show it. Carroll lied and said she initiated
the divorce when proof shows I am the one who first filed.
You then say:
-----
The dates show you were the one, but a very short time frame,
to file first.
Big deal.
----
When Carroll lies, and you acknowledge he did, you do not care. But
then you say I lied in a way you cannot show. Again, ALL of this has
been beaten to death:
* There is no evidence on the .gov site to back ANY of the
accusations.
* For ones where it is claimed there as a dismissal, it is POSSIBLE,
though very unlikely, that they could be sealed or expunged. Multiple
lawyer sites say they have never seen this, but it is at least legally
possible.
* The idea there was a plea bargain (which implies a guilty finding)
but also no guilty finding is contradictory.
* The idea there was a restraining order and it was broken and then
removed is essentially impossible -- it would be breaking many laws
and court rules.
* The idea there was some monitoring program is also equally
impossible.
* The image shown is clearly false: it claims but Civil and
Criminal... no single charge is both (at least in my jurisdiction).
These are all facts. But they ignore the bigger one:
* The fact the trolls are obsessing over my life and doxxing me is
immoral and likely illegal.
Those are the facts, no matter how many times you dox, lie, and
attack. And you know it... if you REALLY thought I lied you would
quote said lies. You do not even try. Not even you think I lied.
So now your story morphs once again.
Thank you for unequivocally proving my points.
Brock McNuggets wrote:
On Dec 17, 2025 at 10:32:57 AM MST, ""Roy S."" wrotehe always lies he lied to me about me
<XnsB3B87FA84BA5712345678@62.164.182.27>:
Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote in
news:6942b870$1$27$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On Dec 17, 2025 at 1:31:26 AM MST, ""David B."" wrote
<mqf82uFpf8dU1@mid.individual.net>:
On 10/12/2025 14:44, Brock McNuggets wrote:
On Dec 10, 2025 at 6:17:07 AM MST, ""David B."" wrote
<mpta6kFpcadU1@mid.individual.net>:
On 10/12/2025 01:36, Gremlin wrote:
"Roy S." <ukmanchU@uke.ork>
news:XnsB3AFE0220500A12345678@62.164.182.25 Tue, 09 Dec 2025
03:01:59 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
LOL! As I suspected, snit opts to try the 'it's not real; it's all >>>>>>>> fake' routine.
I've been looking into this too. *The truth WILL out*!
Please comment, if you will, on this conclusion:-
https://i.ibb.co/RGrs1SFS/Screenshot-2025-12-10-at-13-00-58.png
Seems reasonable.
I think so.
The link they gave:
https://apps.azcourts.gov/publicaccess/caselookup.aspx
*IS* a real Arizona Judicial Branch website.
But anyone can tell you “type this case number in” — and if a >>>>>>> case does or doesn’t appear, they can spin a story.
The site itself does not confirm that the story told in the post is >>>>>>> true — it only verifies whether such a case number exists.
Wait? It does? What is the case?
Your divorce.
I was told the lookup and needed a VPN to appear in the USA.
That is already suspicious — the site normally works worldwide >>>>>>> without a VPN, or so I have been told elsewhere.
It is odd that it would be location based.
I don't think that should be the case. Maybe it is a spoof site?
At this point the whole topic is just to dox me.
Actually is most likely to prove you are a fucking liar and a dishonest
piece of shit.
If so the lies would be quotable. That is how it works in text. But you trolls
will never stop. You start with saying that it is to prove I lied, but then >> fail to show it. Carroll lied and said she initiated the divorce when proof >> shows I am the one who first filed.
You then say:
-----
The dates show you were the one, but a very short time frame, to file >> first.
Big deal.
----
When Carroll lies, and you acknowledge he did, you do not care. But then you >> say I lied in a way you cannot show. Again, ALL of this has been beaten to >> death:
* There is no evidence on the .gov site to back ANY of the accusations.
* For ones where it is claimed there as a dismissal, it is POSSIBLE, though >> very unlikely, that they could be sealed or expunged. Multiple lawyer
sites say they have never seen this, but it is at least legally possible.
* The idea there was a plea bargain (which implies a guilty finding) but
also no guilty finding is contradictory.
* The idea there was a restraining order and it was broken and then removed >> is essentially impossible -- it would be breaking many laws and court rules. >>
* The idea there was some monitoring program is also equally impossible.
* The image shown is clearly false: it claims but Civil and Criminal... no >> single charge is both (at least in my jurisdiction).
These are all facts. But they ignore the bigger one:
* The fact the trolls are obsessing over my life and doxxing me is immoral and
likely illegal.
Those are the facts, no matter how many times you dox, lie, and attack. And >> you know it... if you REALLY thought I lied you would quote said lies. You do
not even try. Not even you think I lied.
On Dec 17, 2025 at 11:23:08 AM MST, "%" wrote <E1CdnTKqIcmTaN_0nZ2dnZfqn_udnZ2d@giganews.com>:
Brock McNuggets wrote:
On Dec 17, 2025 at 10:32:57 AM MST, ""Roy S."" wrotehe always lies he lied to me about me
<XnsB3B87FA84BA5712345678@62.164.182.27>:
Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote in
news:6942b870$1$27$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On Dec 17, 2025 at 1:31:26 AM MST, ""David B."" wrote
<mqf82uFpf8dU1@mid.individual.net>:
On 10/12/2025 14:44, Brock McNuggets wrote:
On Dec 10, 2025 at 6:17:07 AM MST, ""David B."" wrote
<mpta6kFpcadU1@mid.individual.net>:
On 10/12/2025 01:36, Gremlin wrote:Seems reasonable.
"Roy S." <ukmanchU@uke.ork>
news:XnsB3AFE0220500A12345678@62.164.182.25 Tue, 09 Dec 2025 >>>>>>>>> 03:01:59 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
LOL! As I suspected, snit opts to try the 'it's not real; it's all >>>>>>>>> fake' routine.
I've been looking into this too. *The truth WILL out*!
Please comment, if you will, on this conclusion:-
https://i.ibb.co/RGrs1SFS/Screenshot-2025-12-10-at-13-00-58.png >>>>>>>
I think so.
The link they gave:
https://apps.azcourts.gov/publicaccess/caselookup.aspx
*IS* a real Arizona Judicial Branch website.
But anyone can tell you “type this case number in” — and if a >>>>>>>> case does or doesn’t appear, they can spin a story.
The site itself does not confirm that the story told in the post is >>>>>>>> true — it only verifies whether such a case number exists.
Wait? It does? What is the case?
Your divorce.
I was told the lookup and needed a VPN to appear in the USA.
That is already suspicious — the site normally works worldwide >>>>>>>> without a VPN, or so I have been told elsewhere.
It is odd that it would be location based.
I don't think that should be the case. Maybe it is a spoof site?
At this point the whole topic is just to dox me.
Actually is most likely to prove you are a fucking liar and a dishonest >>>> piece of shit.
If so the lies would be quotable. That is how it works in text. But you trolls
will never stop. You start with saying that it is to prove I lied, but then >>> fail to show it. Carroll lied and said she initiated the divorce when proof >>> shows I am the one who first filed.
You then say:
-----
The dates show you were the one, but a very short time frame, to file >>> first.
Big deal.
----
When Carroll lies, and you acknowledge he did, you do not care. But then you
say I lied in a way you cannot show. Again, ALL of this has been beaten to >>> death:
* There is no evidence on the .gov site to back ANY of the accusations.
* For ones where it is claimed there as a dismissal, it is POSSIBLE, though >>> very unlikely, that they could be sealed or expunged. Multiple lawyer
sites say they have never seen this, but it is at least legally possible. >>>
* The idea there was a plea bargain (which implies a guilty finding) but >>> also no guilty finding is contradictory.
* The idea there was a restraining order and it was broken and then removed >>> is essentially impossible -- it would be breaking many laws and court rules.
* The idea there was some monitoring program is also equally impossible. >>>
* The image shown is clearly false: it claims but Civil and Criminal... no >>> single charge is both (at least in my jurisdiction).
These are all facts. But they ignore the bigger one:
* The fact the trolls are obsessing over my life and doxxing me is immoral and
likely illegal.
Those are the facts, no matter how many times you dox, lie, and attack. And >>> you know it... if you REALLY thought I lied you would quote said lies. You do
not even try. Not even you think I lied.
With multiple names.
Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote in news:6942f073$0$23$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:It's classic snit. He goes from the site is fake to the data is fake to everyone is lying to---->>>>>whatever his twisted mind thinks will fool people. snit believes that people are as stupid as he needs them to be but once again snit is wrong. People check his so called proof often and
On Dec 17, 2025 at 10:32:57 AM MST, ""Roy S."" wroteSo now your story morphs once again.
<XnsB3B87FA84BA5712345678@62.164.182.27>:
Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote in
news:6942b870$1$27$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On Dec 17, 2025 at 1:31:26 AM MST, ""David B."" wrote
<mqf82uFpf8dU1@mid.individual.net>:
On 10/12/2025 14:44, Brock McNuggets wrote:
On Dec 10, 2025 at 6:17:07 AM MST, ""David B."" wrote
<mpta6kFpcadU1@mid.individual.net>:
On 10/12/2025 01:36, Gremlin wrote:
"Roy S." <ukmanchU@uke.ork>
news:XnsB3AFE0220500A12345678@62.164.182.25 Tue, 09 Dec 2025
03:01:59 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
LOL! As I suspected, snit opts to try the 'it's not real; it's >>>>>>>> all fake' routine.
I've been looking into this too. *The truth WILL out*!
Please comment, if you will, on this conclusion:-
https://i.ibb.co/RGrs1SFS/Screenshot-2025-12-10-at-13-00-58.png
Seems reasonable.
I think so.
The link they gave:
https://apps.azcourts.gov/publicaccess/caselookup.aspx
*IS* a real Arizona Judicial Branch website.
But anyone can tell you “type this case number in” — and if a case
does or doesn’t appear, they can spin a story.
The site itself does not confirm that the story told in the post >>>>>>> is true — it only verifies whether such a case number exists.
Wait? It does? What is the case?
Your divorce.
I was told the lookup and needed a VPN to appear in the USA.
That is already suspicious — the site normally works worldwide >>>>>>> without a VPN, or so I have been told elsewhere.
It is odd that it would be location based.
I don't think that should be the case. Maybe it is a spoof site?
At this point the whole topic is just to dox me.
Actually is most likely to prove you are a fucking liar and a
dishonest piece of shit.
If so the lies would be quotable. That is how it works in text. But you
trolls will never stop. You start with saying that it is to prove I
lied, but then fail to show it. Carroll lied and said she initiated the
divorce when proof shows I am the one who first filed.
You then say:
-----
The dates show you were the one, but a very short time frame, to
file
first.
Big deal.
----
When Carroll lies, and you acknowledge he did, you do not care. But
then you say I lied in a way you cannot show. Again, ALL of this has
been beaten to death:
* There is no evidence on the .gov site to back ANY of the accusations.
* For ones where it is claimed there as a dismissal, it is POSSIBLE,
though very unlikely, that they could be sealed or expunged. Multiple
lawyer sites say they have never seen this, but it is at least legally
possible.
* The idea there was a plea bargain (which implies a guilty finding)
but also no guilty finding is contradictory.
* The idea there was a restraining order and it was broken and then
removed is essentially impossible -- it would be breaking many laws and
court rules.
* The idea there was some monitoring program is also equally
impossible.
* The image shown is clearly false: it claims but Civil and Criminal...
no single charge is both (at least in my jurisdiction).
These are all facts. But they ignore the bigger one:
* The fact the trolls are obsessing over my life and doxxing me is
immoral and likely illegal.
Those are the facts, no matter how many times you dox, lie, and attack.
And you know it... if you REALLY thought I lied you would quote said
lies. You do not even try. Not even you think I lied.
Thank you for unequivocally proving my points.
Brock McNuggets wrote:
On Dec 17, 2025 at 11:23:08 AM MST, "%" wroteno he used just one name but he offered me ,
<E1CdnTKqIcmTaN_0nZ2dnZfqn_udnZ2d@giganews.com>:
Brock McNuggets wrote:
On Dec 17, 2025 at 10:32:57 AM MST, ""Roy S."" wrotehe always lies he lied to me about me
<XnsB3B87FA84BA5712345678@62.164.182.27>:
Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote in
news:6942b870$1$27$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On Dec 17, 2025 at 1:31:26 AM MST, ""David B."" wrote
<mqf82uFpf8dU1@mid.individual.net>:
On 10/12/2025 14:44, Brock McNuggets wrote:
On Dec 10, 2025 at 6:17:07 AM MST, ""David B."" wrote
<mpta6kFpcadU1@mid.individual.net>:
On 10/12/2025 01:36, Gremlin wrote:Seems reasonable.
"Roy S." <ukmanchU@uke.ork>
news:XnsB3AFE0220500A12345678@62.164.182.25 Tue, 09 Dec 2025 >>>>>>>>>> 03:01:59 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
LOL! As I suspected, snit opts to try the 'it's not real; it's all >>>>>>>>>> fake' routine.
I've been looking into this too. *The truth WILL out*!
Please comment, if you will, on this conclusion:-
https://i.ibb.co/RGrs1SFS/Screenshot-2025-12-10-at-13-00-58.png >>>>>>>>
I think so.
The link they gave:
https://apps.azcourts.gov/publicaccess/caselookup.aspx
*IS* a real Arizona Judicial Branch website.
But anyone can tell you “type this case number in” — and if a >>>>>>>>> case does or doesn’t appear, they can spin a story.
The site itself does not confirm that the story told in the post is >>>>>>>>> true — it only verifies whether such a case number exists.
Wait? It does? What is the case?
Your divorce.
I was told the lookup and needed a VPN to appear in the USA. >>>>>>>>>
That is already suspicious — the site normally works worldwide >>>>>>>>> without a VPN, or so I have been told elsewhere.
It is odd that it would be location based.
I don't think that should be the case. Maybe it is a spoof site?
At this point the whole topic is just to dox me.
Actually is most likely to prove you are a fucking liar and a dishonest >>>>> piece of shit.
If so the lies would be quotable. That is how it works in text. But you trolls
will never stop. You start with saying that it is to prove I lied, but then
fail to show it. Carroll lied and said she initiated the divorce when proof
shows I am the one who first filed.
You then say:
-----
The dates show you were the one, but a very short time frame, to file
first.
Big deal.
----
When Carroll lies, and you acknowledge he did, you do not care. But then you
say I lied in a way you cannot show. Again, ALL of this has been beaten to >>>> death:
* There is no evidence on the .gov site to back ANY of the accusations. >>>>
* For ones where it is claimed there as a dismissal, it is POSSIBLE, though
very unlikely, that they could be sealed or expunged. Multiple lawyer
sites say they have never seen this, but it is at least legally possible. >>>>
* The idea there was a plea bargain (which implies a guilty finding) but >>>> also no guilty finding is contradictory.
* The idea there was a restraining order and it was broken and then removed
is essentially impossible -- it would be breaking many laws and court rules.
* The idea there was some monitoring program is also equally impossible. >>>>
* The image shown is clearly false: it claims but Civil and Criminal... no >>>> single charge is both (at least in my jurisdiction).
These are all facts. But they ignore the bigger one:
* The fact the trolls are obsessing over my life and doxxing me is immoral and
likely illegal.
Those are the facts, no matter how many times you dox, lie, and attack. And
you know it... if you REALLY thought I lied you would quote said lies. You do
not even try. Not even you think I lied.
With multiple names.
a deal to get out of the lie
On 13/12/2025 20:35, Gremlin wrote:
You weren't really emailing me requesting support for
BugHunter.
When did I EVER claim I wanted help with BugHunter?
On 10/12/2025 01:36, Gremlin wrote:
As I suspected, snit opts to try the 'it's not real; it's all fake'
routine.
Well, *IS* it fake, Dustin?
Btw, I found this. Do you like it?
"David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> news:mqf864Fpf8dU2@mid.individual.net Wed, 17 Dec 2025 08:33:08 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
On 10/12/2025 01:36, Gremlin wrote:
As I suspected, snit opts to try the 'it's not real; it's all fake'
routine.
Well, *IS* it fake, Dustin?
No, it's not. You were around when the information became public knowledge here, David. I provided you instructions to be able to check for yourself at the arizona.gov site. Mostly for his bad driving. Lack of proper insurance, multiple times.
Btw, I found this. Do you like it?
I tried to listen to it. But, My ears can't handle that for over an hour. :)
On Dec 17, 2025 at 5:20:42PM MST, "Gremlin" wrote <XnsB3B8C4C9E3B0EHT1@cF04o3ON7k2lx05.lLC.9r5>:Really?
"David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> news:mqf864Fpf8dU2@mid.individual.net Wed, 17 Dec 2025 08:33:08 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
On 10/12/2025 01:36, Gremlin wrote:
As I suspected, snit opts to try the 'it's not real; it's all fake'
routine.
Well, *IS* it fake, Dustin?
No, it's not. You were around when the information became public knowledge here, David. I provided you instructions to be able to check for yourself at
the arizona.gov site. Mostly for his bad driving. Lack of proper insurance, multiple times.
NONE of which exists.
In article <69435141$2$26$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>, brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
Really?
On Dec 17, 2025 at 5:20:42PM MST, "Gremlin" wrote
<XnsB3B8C4C9E3B0EHT1@cF04o3ON7k2lx05.lLC.9r5>:
"David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> news:mqf864Fpf8dU2@mid.individual.net Wed, 17 >>> Dec 2025 08:33:08 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
On 10/12/2025 01:36, Gremlin wrote:
As I suspected, snit opts to try the 'it's not real; it's all fake'
routine.
Well, *IS* it fake, Dustin?
No, it's not. You were around when the information became public knowledge >>> here, David. I provided you instructions to be able to check for yourself at
the arizona.gov site. Mostly for his bad driving. Lack of proper insurance, >>> multiple times.
NONE of which exists.
Guess again snit.
Court, Arrest or Criminal Records
Offense Type: Criminal
Unique ID: Info Pending...
Offense: Info Pending...
County Of Origin: Info Pending...
Offense: SPEED GREATER THAN REASONABLE AND PRUDENT
Disposition: BAIL/DEPOSIT GIVEN/FORFEITED
Offense: HARASS-FOLLOW IN PUBLIC
Offense: DISORDERLY CONDUCT-FIGHTING
Disposition: COMPL DISMISSED BY CTY ATTY
Case Number: M-1343-CM-2022000047
Case Filing Date: 08/05/2023
State Of Origin: AZ
Level: NONE
Description: 14 - CHINO VALLEY MUNICIPAL
Level: UNKNOWN
Description: 183 - PRESCOTT MUNICIPAL
Level: UNKNOWN
Description: 183 - PRESCOTT MUNICIPAL
Offense Type: Criminal
Unique ID: Info Pending...
Offense: Info Pending...
County Of Origin: YAVAPAI
Offense: LOCAL CHARGE
Disposition: DEFENSIVE DRIVING/DISM NO MVD
Case Number: 22616154
Case Filing Date: 01/07/2008
State Of Origin: AZ
Level: TRAFFIC
Description: PRESCOTT VALLEY MUNICIPAL
Offense Type: Criminal
Unique ID: Info Pending...
Offense: Info Pending...
County Of Origin: YAVAPAI
Offense: LOCAL CHARGE
Disposition: COMPL DISMISSED BY OFFICER
Case Number: 27946890
Case Filing Date: 09/16/2010
State Of Origin: AZ
Level: TRAFFIC
Description: PRESCOTT VALLEY MUNICIPAL
Offense Type: Criminal
Unique ID: Info Pending...
Offense: Info Pending...
County Of Origin: YAVAPAI
Offense: LOCAL CHARGE
Disposition: DEFENSIVE DRIVING/DISM NO MVD
Case Number: 29544340
Case Filing Date: 10/27/2011
State Of Origin: AZ
Level: TRAFFIC
Description: PRESCOTT VALLEY MUNICIPAL
Offense Type: Criminal
Unique ID: Info Pending...
Offense: Info Pending...
County Of Origin: YAVAPAI
Offense: NOT SPECIFIED
Case Number: P-1300-DO-201000273
Case Filing Date: 03/25/2010
State Of Origin: AZ
Level: DOM REL
Description: 12 - YAVAPAI COUNTY SUPERIOR
Offense Type: Criminal
Unique ID: Info Pending...
Offense: Info Pending...
County Of Origin: PIMA
Offense: FAIL TO CARRY VEHICLE REGISTRATION CARD
Disposition: PLEA GUILTY/RESP SENT IMPOSED
Offense: FAIL TO PRODUCE EVIDENCE OF FINANCIAL RESP
Disposition: COMPL DISMISSED BY COURT
Offense: LOCAL CHARGE
Disposition: PLEA GUILTY/RESP SENT IMPOSED
Case Number: 11237946
Case Filing Date: 03/29/1999
State Of Origin: AZ
Level: TRAFFIC
Description: TUCSON MUNICIPAL COURT
Level: TRAFFIC
Description: TUCSON MUNICIPAL COURT
Level: TRAFFIC
Description: TUCSON MUNICIPAL COURT
"David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> news:mq68jbFa4d9U1@mid.individual.net Sat, 13 Dec 2025 22:44:59 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
On 13/12/2025 20:35, Gremlin wrote:
You weren't really emailing me requesting support for
BugHunter.
When did I EVER claim I wanted help with BugHunter?
Refresh your memory, drunk. Review the emails you sent me.
"David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> news:mq68jbFa4d9U1@mid.individual.net Sat, 13 Dec 2025 22:44:59 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
On 13/12/2025 20:35, Gremlin wrote:
You weren't really emailing me requesting support for
BugHunter.
When did I EVER claim I wanted help with BugHunter?
Refresh your memory, drunk. Review the emails you sent me.
On 18/12/2025 00:20, Gremlin wrote:
"David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> news:mq68jbFa4d9U1@mid.individual.net
Sat, 13
Dec 2025 22:44:59 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
On 13/12/2025 20:35, Gremlin wrote:
You weren't really emailing me requesting support for
BugHunter.
When did I EVER claim I wanted help with BugHunter?
Refresh your memory, drunk. Review the emails you sent me.
From: Dustin Cook <bughunter.dustin@gmail.com>
To: BoaterDaveTJ@aol.com
Subject: Re: Fwd: Second opinion
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 21:07:34 -0500
On 20 Nov 2007 at 4:20, BoaterDaveTJ@aol.com wrote:
Hi Dustin
I fear that I've irritated my real-life friend now.
=
It would seem so. I did not intend to belittle your friend. And I'm
not about to start what I suspect would be a pissing contest between
the two of us. I've reviewed the url he sent you, and it's mainly discussing virtual operating systems; which I already have a
reasonable amount of knowledge of; As a developer, I frequently make
use of vmware.. I wasn't aware of the paralles package, but it's
still an emulator/virtual os environment, and I understand those
exist; I run several here.
However, I haven't seen a virtual operating system co existing with
the same access privledges as your real one; and access to your data,
without you noticing it's presently running. As for it stealing clock
cycles, it's dual processing, (which this machine is more than
capable of, it's running in SMP mode as we speak); All applications
steal cycles. It's an aspect of multitasking. Better behaved apps ask permission to take unused cycles. However, due to the fact machines
can process multiple instructions per cycle now makes the whole
complaint irrevelent. If he's talking about a virtual OS running with
the real one, sure; I do not disagree about that existing or even
being possible; as I have windows98se and windowsME running on this
machine presently as well as Windows XP. However, by default and
unless I make changes to each's vm profile, they do not share the
same access; they don't even share the same internal IP address. I
can force them to do so, but by default, it's not going to happen.
Another aspect is this this.. Each of these virtualenvironments does
take several hundred megabytes of real hard drive space; and does put
a drain on available system resources when actually in use. This
virutal stealth OS co-existing with windows would be atleast 200-300 megabytes in size.
=
However ................... you may wish to review his new response
to me and comment further as appropriate.
=
You really shouldn't have cross forwarded our emails to one another
however, Your friend shouldn't have taken it as personally as he
apparently did. I don't mind 2nd opinions, In fact, I encourage them.
Dave, you have to understand something very important. Years of
experience essentially babysitting a network and reloading from
images if sometimes required is not the same kind of work that I have
been doing for nearly 20 years now myself. As in the medical
profession, each of us has the choice of whether or not to pursue a
specific aspect of the field or focus on general practitioner work;
as your friend seems to prefer. There is nothing wrong with either
direction you choose; But what often occurs in both professions and I
suspect in others as well, if your trained generally, you assume you
know the other fields as well; and to a certain extint you do, but as
you know from reading usenet, I am specifically trained in the field
of malware and OS security. It's my specialty. Your friends training
appears to be mainly network/support based. He wouldn't be expected
to fully understand malware.
What I'm trying to say is that you wanted information on malware, and
asked someone who doesn't specialize in the field. He gave his best
analysis of his experience, however, it's just not all
factually/logically right (yes, I'm being anal. lol) and then you
asked a specialist in the field to comment on his general opinion on
the matter. Sometimes, your going to run across a general
practitioner doctor who will be offended if you then get a 2nd
opinion from a specialist and then show the original doctor the
specialist disagrees with his findings.
This field and that of the medical is very competitive, and a lot of
times, people tend to say they have such and such experience with
this or that. Some of it's bs I suspect, and some is true. My only
defense to that claim is that some of my previous work speaks for
itself.
*** end email body
You are still asking the same fucking questions, because your memory
isn't for shit, twelve (12!) years later. So please, quit trying to
claim that you are retaining any knowledge on your own; you aren't.
Seems simple enough to me. <shrug>
That's because you have no idea what you're writing about, as usual.
On 18/12/2025 00:20, Gremlin wrote:
"David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> news:mq68jbFa4d9U1@mid.individual.net
Sat, 13 Dec 2025 22:44:59 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
On 13/12/2025 20:35, Gremlin wrote:
You weren't really emailing me requesting support for
BugHunter.
When did I EVER claim I wanted help with BugHunter?
Refresh your memory, drunk. Review the emails you sent me.
Nothing found, Dustin.
Hi Dustin.
Just a note to advise that I have tried to action your programme IAW
the instructions set out in your HOWTONT.TXT file - but without
success :(
It's a long time since I've played with DOS, yet I'm sure something
isn't quite right.
I've attached a screenshot of my desktop showing the black DOS screen
in normal mode. It is exactly the same in Safe mode. 'cd' if I
remember correctly, means 'change directory' so I do not understand
how your instruction 'cd\bughunt' can possibly work. As you can see
Hi Dustin
After banging my head a few times, I'm pleased to advise that I was, eventually, able to run your BugHunter scan. :)
I thought you might like to see the result. Log is attached for your review/comments.
That's because you have no idea what you're writing about, as usual.
"David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> news:mqi26nF9aebU1@mid.individual.net Thu,
18 Dec 2025 10:09:27 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
That's because you have no idea what you're writing about, as usual.
You're doing a great job emulating Snit here. :)
On 18/12/2025 00:20, Gremlin wrote:
"David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> news:mq68jbFa4d9U1@mid.individual.net Sat, 13 >> Dec 2025 22:44:59 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
On 13/12/2025 20:35, Gremlin wrote:
You weren't really emailing me requesting support for
BugHunter.
When did I EVER claim I wanted help with BugHunter?
Refresh your memory, drunk. Review the emails you sent me.]
You are still asking the same fucking questions, because your memory
isn't for shit, twelve (12!) years later. So please, quit trying to
claim that you are retaining any knowledge on your own; you aren't.
Seems simple enough to me. <shrug>
That's because you have no idea what you're writing about, as usual.
On 18/12/2025 00:20, Gremlin wrote:
"David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> news:mq68jbFa4d9U1@mid.individual.net Sat, 13 >> Dec 2025 22:44:59 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
On 13/12/2025 20:35, Gremlin wrote:
You weren't really emailing me requesting support for
BugHunter.
When did I EVER claim I wanted help with BugHunter?
Refresh your memory, drunk. Review the emails you sent me.
Nothing found, Dustin.
On Dec 18, 2025 at 2:09:44 PM MST, "Gremlin" wrote <XnsB3B9A46901CF9HT1@cF04o3ON7k2lx05.lLC.9r5>:
"David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> news:mqi26nF9aebU1@mid.individual.net
Thu, 18 Dec 2025 10:09:27 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
That's because you have no idea what you're writing about, as usual.
You're doing a great job emulating Snit here. :)
Calling you out? How?
Seriously, please just move on from your petty squabbles. You have now directly admitted to doxxing me... I commend you for that, though you
should apologize not only for that but for targeting my ex and people
who are complete strangers.
You repeat insane stories about discounts which are absurd and
designed to do nothing but attack and promote doxxing of other
strangers.
You insist you number was not in databases even though it was publicly
shown to be. And tied to Johnson City. You somehow blamed me for that
one. LOL!
You pretend I somehow had court records that were taken down outside
of the law. No explanation as to how (though silly stories of them
timing out, as if that happens!).
Tons of lies and attacks.
And still I refuse to sink to your level. I
will not lie about you. I will and do ask for peace. Please.
Can you let go of your petty squabbles and seek peace?
Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote in news:69447de6$0$19$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On Dec 18, 2025 at 2:09:44 PM MST, "Gremlin" wrote
<XnsB3B9A46901CF9HT1@cF04o3ON7k2lx05.lLC.9r5>:
"David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> news:mqi26nF9aebU1@mid.individual.net
Thu, 18 Dec 2025 10:09:27 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
That's because you have no idea what you're writing about, as usual.
You're doing a great job emulating Snit here. :)
Calling you out? How?
Huh?
What the fuck are you reading snit?
Seriously, please just move on from your petty squabbles. You have now
directly admitted to doxxing me... I commend you for that, though you
should apologize not only for that but for targeting my ex and people
who are complete strangers.
Why would Gremlin, Carroll or any of your other targets apologize to you when you are the one who posted lies and fabrications about them?
You are the one who should be apologizing snit.
And you have some set of balls asking your victims to apologize.
You repeat insane stories about discounts which are absurd and
designed to do nothing but attack and promote doxxing of other
strangers.
I have no idea what you are referring to.
You insist you number was not in databases even though it was publicly
shown to be. And tied to Johnson City. You somehow blamed me for that
one. LOL!
Twisting your story again snit?
Nobody was BLAMED for you lies.
You own them and your proof as well as your claims keep changing.
You pretend I somehow had court records that were taken down outside
of the law. No explanation as to how (though silly stories of them
timing out, as if that happens!).
And your story changes yet again snit.
I've looked through the threads from the initial post where you claim the data was fabricated because you can't trust what you read on Usenet.
From that point on you ignored the fact that an official government site
was included in that OP.
Nobody claimed the records were taken down outside the law.
You made that up.
It seems to be a pattern with you.
Tons of lies and attacks.
Yes.
Mostly originating from you snit.
And still I refuse to sink to your level. I
will not lie about you. I will and do ask for peace. Please.
OMG!
You can't possibly be serious with a statement like that.
Can you let go of your petty squabbles and seek peace?
Your victims aren't the posters who are being asked to leave groups.
That would be you snit.
So no matter how many times you morph your lies you are the source of the problems.
No matter the group you join, the result is always the same. The group
turns into a shitshow. And it's because of you and nobody else.
You are in dire need of professional counseling.
Please seek it out because you are a true psychopath.
On Dec 18, 2025 at 12:21:08 AM MST, ""David B."" wrote <mqhob4F7m49U1@mid.individual.net>:
On 18/12/2025 00:20, Gremlin wrote:
"David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> news:mq68jbFa4d9U1@mid.individual.net
Sat, 13 Dec 2025 22:44:59 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
On 13/12/2025 20:35, Gremlin wrote:
You weren't really emailing me requesting support for
BugHunter.
When did I EVER claim I wanted help with BugHunter?
Refresh your memory, drunk. Review the emails you sent me.
Nothing found, Dustin.
Gremlin is speaking of other's memories... even though he rehashes the
same nonsense attacks over and over as if they have not been responded
to dozens of times.
Weird.
Maybe he just forgot he did that.
Hi Dustin.
Just a note to advise that I have tried to action your programme IAW
the instructions set out in your HOWTONT.TXT file - but without
success :(
It's a long time since I've played with DOS, yet I'm sure something
isn't quite right.
I've attached a screenshot of my desktop showing the black DOS screen
in normal mode. It is exactly the same in Safe mode. 'cd' if I
remember correctly, means 'change directory' so I do not understand
how your instruction 'cd\bughunt' can possibly work. As you can see
Hi Dustin
After banging my head a few times, I'm pleased to advise that I was, eventually, able to run your BugHunter scan. :)
I thought you might like to see the result. Log is attached for your review/comments.
On 18/12/2025 21:09, Gremlin provided the time and date!
The emails between us confirm all of that too. :)
You weren't really emailing me requesting support for
BugHunter.
"David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> news:mq68jbFa4d9U1@mid.individual.net Sat,
13 Dec 2025 22:44:59 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
On 13/12/2025 20:35, Gremlin wrote:
You weren't really emailing me requesting support for
BugHunter.
When did I EVER claim I wanted help with BugHunter?
Refresh your memory, drunk. Review the emails you sent me.
On 13/12/2025 20:35, Gremlin wrote:
You weren't really emailing me requesting support for
BugHunter.
When did I EVER claim I wanted help with BugHunter?
You were trying to recruit me to help you get even with those
server admins.
Not so. You NEVER listen.
"David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> news:mqjj58Fh742U1@mid.individual.net Fri,
19 Dec 2025 00:04:56 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
On 18/12/2025 21:09, Gremlin provided the time and date!
The emails between us confirm all of that too. :)
They also confirm that you are a liar. And, A stalker.
Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> news:69447f68$2$24$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com Thu, 18 Dec 2025 22:25:44
GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
On Dec 18, 2025 at 12:21:08 AM MST, ""David B."" wrote
<mqhob4F7m49U1@mid.individual.net>:
On 18/12/2025 00:20, Gremlin wrote:
"David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> news:mq68jbFa4d9U1@mid.individual.net
Sat, 13 Dec 2025 22:44:59 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
On 13/12/2025 20:35, Gremlin wrote:
You weren't really emailing me requesting support for
BugHunter.
When did I EVER claim I wanted help with BugHunter?
Refresh your memory, drunk. Review the emails you sent me.
Nothing found, Dustin.
Gremlin is speaking of other's memories... even though he rehashes the
same nonsense attacks over and over as if they have not been responded
to dozens of times.
I'm speaking of Davids. Mine is fine.
On 18/12/2025 21:09, Gremlin provided the time and date!
The emails between us confirm all of that too. :)
I've found THIS email for folk to re-read!
=
From: BoaterDaveTJ@aol.com
Message-ID: <c18.19104b23.33f22379@aol.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 17:13:29 EDT
Subject: Re: Malware and BugHunter
To: bughunter.dustin@gmail.com
Hi Dustin
What a refreshingly honest reply. Thank you.
I must admit to having never heard of a Vxer, let alone a 'retired'
one - and at such a young age too! I just had a feeling that you'd
be around 30,so I was pretty close to the mark. <g>
Could you once have written this?
=
//Hmm, I've considered it. But, i have to be honest with you. i don't
give a damn about most people; *people to me are like insects*, they
deserve to be treated as cruely as I can possibly treat them.
Notice, i said most people not all. Perhaps it's the way I myself
have been treated in my short miserable life (ah **** it, go ahead
cracky, nail me, wide open freebie). But, I was raised with the
"nail me, nail you" concept. I've been nailed since I began
breathing.. if I had my way, I'd long be dead... but, that's a
different topic, so I won't bore you with my life story.//
=
If you did, it's rather sad that you should ever have felt that
way. My son was just 28 when he died - and in comparison with you,
he was an Angel (well, perhaps he is now!). Perhaps in some
mysterious way he has led me to you. Regardless, it would seem that
such things are now behind you and I'm sure God will forgive any
sin committed in the past should you ask Him.
Should you ever want a friendly ear to listen to your woes, just
mail me! : )
"David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> news:mqhob4F7m49U1@mid.individual.net Thu,
18 Dec 2025 07:21:08 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
On 18/12/2025 00:20, Gremlin wrote:
"David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> news:mq68jbFa4d9U1@mid.individual.net
Sat, 13 Dec 2025 22:44:59 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
On 13/12/2025 20:35, Gremlin wrote:
You weren't really emailing me requesting support for
BugHunter.
When did I EVER claim I wanted help with BugHunter?
Refresh your memory, drunk. Review the emails you sent me.
Nothing found, Dustin.
Liar. Let's review a few:
He's writing about the snit discount. It's a real thing. A competitor local to his former area created it. They give those who had their computers
worked on by snit and fucked up as a result a discount on the service bill. I'm not the only one who called the store and checked out the story.
What is wrong with him to be so stuck on his petty squabbles?
On 18/12/2025 22:20, Brock McNuggets wrote:
What is wrong with him to be so stuck on his petty squabbles?
He has no support from his family?
Just a guess, mind! ;-)
On 18/12/2025 21:09, Gremlin *failed to understand*!
"David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> news:mqhob4F7m49U1@mid.individual.net Thu,
18 Dec 2025 07:21:08 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
On 18/12/2025 00:20, Gremlin wrote:
"David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> news:mq68jbFa4d9U1@mid.individual.net
Sat, 13 Dec 2025 22:44:59 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
On 13/12/2025 20:35, Gremlin wrote:
You weren't really emailing me requesting support for
BugHunter.
When did I EVER claim I wanted help with BugHunter?
Refresh your memory, drunk. Review the emails you sent me.
Nothing found, Dustin.
Liar. Let's review a few:
I couldn't find any on my computer.
No lie, dopey!
On 19/12/2025 03:10, Gremlin wrote:
He's writing about the snit discount. It's a real thing. A competitor local >> to his former area created it. They give those who had their computers
worked on by snit and fucked up as a result a discount on the service bill. >> I'm not the only one who called the store and checked out the story.
If true, provide the name and number and I will call them myself to
verify your claim.
On 18/12/2025 21:09, Gremlin *failed to understand*!
"David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> news:mqhob4F7m49U1@mid.individual.net Thu,
18 Dec 2025 07:21:08 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
On 18/12/2025 00:20, Gremlin wrote:
"David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> news:mq68jbFa4d9U1@mid.individual.net
Sat, 13 Dec 2025 22:44:59 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
On 13/12/2025 20:35, Gremlin wrote:
You weren't really emailing me requesting support for
BugHunter.
When did I EVER claim I wanted help with BugHunter?
Refresh your memory, drunk. Review the emails you sent me.
Nothing found, Dustin.
Liar. Let's review a few:
I couldn't find any on my computer.
No lie, dopey!
On 2025-12-19, David B. <BD@hotmail.co.uk> wrote:
On 18/12/2025 21:09, Gremlin *failed to understand*!
"David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> news:mqhob4F7m49U1@mid.individual.net Thu, >>> 18 Dec 2025 07:21:08 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
On 18/12/2025 00:20, Gremlin wrote:
"David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> news:mq68jbFa4d9U1@mid.individual.net
Sat, 13 Dec 2025 22:44:59 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
On 13/12/2025 20:35, Gremlin wrote:
You weren't really emailing me requesting support for
BugHunter.
When did I EVER claim I wanted help with BugHunter?
Refresh your memory, drunk. Review the emails you sent me.
Nothing found, Dustin.
Liar. Let's review a few:
I couldn't find any on my computer.
No lie, dopey!
Ask snit Brock McNuggets, Michael Glasser of Prescott Arizona.
He believes the entire Internet is stored on his hdisk.
So he should at least have an MID pointing to the discussion.
"David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> wrote in news:mqlrdnFsjfpU4 @mid.individual.net:
On 18/12/2025 22:20, Brock McNuggets wrote:
What is wrong with him to be so stuck on his petty squabbles?
He has no support from his family?
Just a guess, mind! ;-)
Is there any evidence of Steve being arrested for publically harassing
his wife like there is for your bestie snit?
Please post it if there is.
Otherwise stop making up shit.
On Fri, 19 Dec 2025 20:35:37 +0000, "David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> wrote:
On 19/12/2025 03:10, Gremlin wrote:
He's writing about the snit discount. It's a real thing. A competitor local >>> to his former area created it. They give those who had their computers
worked on by snit and fucked up as a result a discount on the service bill. >>> I'm not the only one who called the store and checked out the story.
If true, provide the name and number and I will call them myself to
verify your claim.
You won't call.
You've made that request before, and in response, someone posted the
name of the shop and their phone number *for you*. Not in some unrelated thread, but in direct response to you, in your thread. Ring any bells in
that dense fog of yours?
Do you remember what you did next? You went radio silent on the topic.
Why not use your sweet detective skills to find the info? SC showed you
how to do that.
On 19/12/2025 21:26, Roy S. wrote:
"David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> wrote in news:mqlrdnFsjfpU4
@mid.individual.net:
On 18/12/2025 22:20, Brock McNuggets wrote:
What is wrong with him to be so stuck on his petty squabbles?
He has no support from his family?
Just a guess, mind! ;-)
Is there any evidence of Steve being arrested for publically harassing
his wife like there is for your bestie snit?
Please post it if there is.
Otherwise stop making up shit.
To *WHICH* of Steve's wives do you refer?
On 19/12/2025 21:26, Roy S. wrote:
"David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> wrote in news:mqlrdnFsjfpU4
@mid.individual.net:
On 18/12/2025 22:20, Brock McNuggets wrote:
What is wrong with him to be so stuck on his petty squabbles?
He has no support from his family?
Just a guess, mind! ;-)
Is there any evidence of Steve being arrested for publically harassing
his wife like there is for your bestie snit?
Please post it if there is.
Otherwise stop making up shit.
To *WHICH* of Steve's wives do you refer?
"David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> wrote in news:mqm375Ftt3aU1 @mid.individual.net:
On 19/12/2025 21:26, Roy S. wrote:
"David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> wrote in news:mqlrdnFsjfpU4
@mid.individual.net:
On 18/12/2025 22:20, Brock McNuggets wrote:
What is wrong with him to be so stuck on his petty squabbles?
He has no support from his family?
Just a guess, mind! ;-)
Is there any evidence of Steve being arrested for publically harassing
his wife like there is for your bestie snit?
Please post it if there is.
Otherwise stop making up shit.
To *WHICH* of Steve's wives do you refer?
He has more than one?
Mormon perhaps? That ain't good. Who in their right mind would want more
than one wife at a time?
Better to have a wife and a side chick.
Even better if the wife knows and approves.
I suppose any of them will do.
Do you have proof?
If not, you are as bad as snit who makes up all kinds of shit.
On 19/12/2025 21:26, Roy S. wrote:
"David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> wrote in news:mqlrdnFsjfpU4
@mid.individual.net:
On 18/12/2025 22:20, Brock McNuggets wrote:
What is wrong with him to be so stuck on his petty squabbles?
He has no support from his family?
Just a guess, mind! ;-)
Is there any evidence of Steve being arrested for publically harassing
his wife like there is for your bestie snit?
Please post it if there is.
Otherwise stop making up shit.
To *WHICH* of Steve's wives do you refer?
Roy S. wrote:
"David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> wrote in news:mqm375Ftt3aU1and there's nothing about roy s's record either must be a sock
@mid.individual.net:
On 19/12/2025 21:26, Roy S. wrote:
"David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> wrote in news:mqlrdnFsjfpU4
@mid.individual.net:
On 18/12/2025 22:20, Brock McNuggets wrote:
What is wrong with him to be so stuck on his petty squabbles?
He has no support from his family?
Just a guess, mind! ;-)
Is there any evidence of Steve being arrested for publically harassing >>>> his wife like there is for your bestie snit?
Please post it if there is.
Otherwise stop making up shit.
To *WHICH* of Steve's wives do you refer?
He has more than one?
Mormon perhaps? That ain't good. Who in their right mind would want more
than one wife at a time?
Better to have a wife and a side chick.
Even better if the wife knows and approves.
I suppose any of them will do.
Do you have proof?
If not, you are as bad as snit who makes up all kinds of shit.
On 18/12/2025 22:20, Brock McNuggets wrote:
What is wrong with him to be so stuck on his petty squabbles?
He has no support from his family?
Just a guess, mind! ;-)
On 19/12/2025 03:10, Gremlin wrote:
He's writing about the snit discount. It's a real thing. A competitor local >> to his former area created it. They give those who had their computers
worked on by snit and fucked up as a result a discount on the service bill. >> I'm not the only one who called the store and checked out the story.
If true, provide the name and number and I will call them myself to
verify your claim.
I don't, actually, believe you - so I suspect that you will not do as I request.
By all means prove me wrong.
On Dec 19, 2025 at 3:51:17 PM MST, ""David B."" wrote <mqm375Ftt3aU1@mid.individual.net>:
On 19/12/2025 21:26, Roy S. wrote:
"David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> wrote in news:mqlrdnFsjfpU4
@mid.individual.net:
On 18/12/2025 22:20, Brock McNuggets wrote:
What is wrong with him to be so stuck on his petty squabbles?
He has no support from his family?
Just a guess, mind! ;-)
Is there any evidence of Steve being arrested for publically
harassing his wife like there is for your bestie snit?
Please post it if there is.
Otherwise stop making up shit.
To *WHICH* of Steve's wives do you refer?
Gee, new person shows up. Carroll attacks less. Socks appear spewing
his same lies.
I wonder what is happening. LOL!
He assumes everyone is stupid.
On 19/12/2025 21:43, Kelly Phillips wrote:
On Fri, 19 Dec 2025 20:35:37 +0000, "David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> wrote:
On 19/12/2025 03:10, Gremlin wrote:
He's writing about the snit discount. It's a real thing. A competitor local
to his former area created it. They give those who had their computers >>>> worked on by snit and fucked up as a result a discount on the service bill.
I'm not the only one who called the store and checked out the story.
If true, provide the name and number and I will call them myself to
verify your claim.
You won't call.
You've made that request before, and in response, someone posted the
name of the shop and their phone number *for you*. Not in some unrelated
thread, but in direct response to you, in your thread. Ring any bells in
that dense fog of yours?
Cite the MessageID
Do you remember what you did next? You went radio silent on the topic.
Prove it. Cite the MessageID
Why not use your sweet detective skills to find the info? SC showed you
how to do that.
Do your own dirty work.
| Sysop: | DaiTengu |
|---|---|
| Location: | Appleton, WI |
| Users: | 1,090 |
| Nodes: | 10 (0 / 10) |
| Uptime: | 07:45:25 |
| Calls: | 13,942 |
| Calls today: | 1 |
| Files: | 187,032 |
| D/L today: |
4,123 files (1,244M bytes) |
| Messages: | 2,459,960 |
