• [NEWS] M4 is dead ... M5 is coming

    From Your Name@YourName@YourISP.com to comp.sys.mac.system, comp.sys.mac.misc on Thu Feb 6 09:27:29 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.misc


    If you just bought a new M4 iPad or Mac, then you've been scammed. The
    new M5 chips are coming this year ... and no doubt the M6 will arrive
    next year.

    Forget the M4, the M5 iPad Pro and Macs
    are on track for release this year

    <https://www.macworld.com/article/2599225/rumor-claims-an-m5-ipad-pro-and-macs-are-on-track-for-this-year.html>



    Apple really needs to slow down and stop making continual minor tweaks
    (and gimmicky additions) to their products every year. All that does is
    piss off the customer who just bought something and cause most people
    to not bother buying the next new toy because another one will be
    released soon. Apple also needs to simplify their over-complicated
    product line-up, ditch the non-repair / non-upgrade designs, and get
    rid of the silly MacOS codenames. Time to bring back Steve Jobs again!
    ;-)



    --- Synchronet 3.20c-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From =?UTF-8?Q?J=C3=B6rg_Lorenz?=@hugybear@gmx.net to comp.sys.mac.system,comp.sys.mac.misc on Wed Feb 5 22:06:20 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.misc

    On 05.02.25 21:27, Your Name wrote:

    If you just bought a new M4 iPad or Mac, then you've been scammed. The
    new M5 chips are coming this year ... and no doubt the M6 will arrive
    next year.

    Forget the M4, the M5 iPad Pro and Macs
    are on track for release this year

    <https://www.macworld.com/article/2599225/rumor-claims-an-m5-ipad-pro-and-macs-are-on-track-for-this-year.html>



    Apple really needs to slow down and stop making continual minor tweaks
    (and gimmicky additions) to their products every year. All that does is
    piss off the customer who just bought something and cause most people
    to not bother buying the next new toy because another one will be
    released soon. Apple also needs to simplify their over-complicated
    product line-up, ditch the non-repair / non-upgrade designs, and get
    rid of the silly MacOS codenames. Time to bring back Steve Jobs again!
    ;-)

    You certainly do not have a degree in economics.
    --
    "Roma locuta, causa finita." (Augustinus)
    --- Synchronet 3.20c-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Jay@jay@jay.xyz to comp.sys.mac.system,comp.sys.mac.misc on Fri Feb 14 05:22:08 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.misc

    ["Followup-To:" header set to comp.sys.mac.system.]
    On 2025-02-05, Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote:

    If you just bought a new M4 iPad or Mac, then you've been scammed. The
    new M5 chips are coming this year ... and no doubt the M6 will arrive
    next year.

    Forget the M4, the M5 iPad Pro and Macs
    are on track for release this year



    Apple really needs to slow down and stop making continual minor tweaks
    (and gimmicky additions) to their products every year. All that does is
    piss off the customer who just bought something and cause most people
    to not bother buying the next new toy because another one will be
    released soon. Apple also needs to simplify their over-complicated
    product line-up, ditch the non-repair / non-upgrade designs, and get
    rid of the silly MacOS codenames. Time to bring back Steve Jobs again!
    ;-)




    Can't wait.
    --- Synchronet 3.20c-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Your Name@YourName@YourISP.com to comp.sys.mac.misc,comp.sys.mac.system on Fri Feb 14 19:39:46 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.misc

    On 2025-02-14 05:22:08 +0000, Jay said:
    ["Followup-To:" header set to comp.sys.mac.system.]
    On 2025-02-05, Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote:

    If you just bought a new M4 iPad or Mac, then you've been scammed. The
    new M5 chips are coming this year ... and no doubt the M6 will arrive
    next year.

    Forget the M4, the M5 iPad Pro and Macs
    are on track for release this year



    Apple really needs to slow down and stop making continual minor tweaks
    (and gimmicky additions) to their products every year. All that does is
    piss off the customer who just bought something and cause most people
    to not bother buying the next new toy because another one will be
    released soon. Apple also needs to simplify their over-complicated
    product line-up, ditch the non-repair / non-upgrade designs, and get
    rid of the silly MacOS codenames. Time to bring back Steve Jobs again!
    ;-)

    Can't wait.

    You may as well wait because the slightly better M6 will be released
    next year. :-\

    --- Synchronet 3.20c-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From =?UTF-8?Q?J=C3=B6rg_Lorenz?=@hugybear@gmx.net to comp.sys.mac.misc,comp.sys.mac.system on Fri Feb 14 08:50:27 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.misc

    On 14.02.25 07:39, Your Name wrote:
    On 2025-02-14 05:22:08 +0000, Jay said:
    Can't wait.

    You may as well wait because the slightly better M6 will be released
    next year. :-\

    *ROTFLSTC*!
    --
    "Gutta cavat lapidem." (Ovid)
    --- Synchronet 3.20c-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From WolfFan@akwolffan@zoho.com to comp.sys.mac.system, comp.sys.mac.misc on Sat Feb 22 17:42:33 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.misc

    On Feb 5, 2025, Your Name wrote
    (in article <vo0hjg$2hn1r$1@dont-email.me>):


    If you just bought a new M4 iPad or Mac, then you've been scammed. The
    new M5 chips are coming this year ... and no doubt the M6 will arrive
    next year.

    Hmm. I bought an M2 iPad Air. It was fast enough, and, more importantly,
    cheap enough, for my purposes. In a few years I’ll probably replace it with whatever’s current then.

    This is being typed on a 2014 Mac mini. It still works. I will probably be replacing it with a M4 unit later this year, and will keep that one for a decade, too.

    I have no particular desire for new shiny, as long as current systems work.


    Forget the M4, the M5 iPad Pro and Macs
    are on track for release this year

    <https://www.macworld.com/article/2599225/rumor-claims-an-m5-ipad-pro-and-macs
    -are-on-track-for-this-year.html>

    Apple really needs to slow down and stop making continual minor tweaks
    (and gimmicky additions) to their products every year. All that does is
    piss off the customer who just bought something and cause most people
    to not bother buying the next new toy because another one will be
    released soon. Apple also needs to simplify their over-complicated
    product line-up, ditch the non-repair / non-upgrade designs, and get
    rid of the silly MacOS codenames. Time to bring back Steve Jobs again!
    ;-)


    --- Synchronet 3.20c-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Your Name@YourName@YourISP.com to comp.sys.mac.misc,comp.sys.mac.system on Sun Feb 23 13:43:02 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.misc

    On 2025-02-22 22:42:33 +0000, WolfFan said:
    On Feb 5, 2025, Your Name wrote
    (in article <vo0hjg$2hn1r$1@dont-email.me>):

    If you just bought a new M4 iPad or Mac, then you've been scammed. The
    new M5 chips are coming this year ... and no doubt the M6 will arrive
    next year.

    Hmm. I bought an M2 iPad Air. It was fast enough, and, more importantly, cheap enough, for my purposes. In a few years I’ll probably replace it with whatever's current then.

    This is being typed on a 2014 Mac mini. It still works. I will probably be replacing it with a M4 unit later this year, and will keep that one for a decade, too.

    I have no particular desire for new shiny, as long as current systems work.

    I used my old beige G3 PowerMac for 20 years from new before it finally
    broke with a motherboard fault and had to be replaced - all of that
    time I was also using the internet via a dial-up modem. My car is 30
    years old and I've had it for 26 years. Our clothes dryer (not often
    used) is around 45 years old and still working fine. :-)

    A lot of people complain about "planned obsolesence", but the reality
    is it is more a case of "enforced obsolesence" because you can't get
    the parts to repair things (and in Apple's case, a fad of devices that
    can't even be repaired / upgraded) or more usually people's own simple greediness to own the latest toy on the block even though their current
    device / car / etc. is perfectly fine.


    --- Synchronet 3.20c-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From =?UTF-8?Q?J=C3=B6rg_Lorenz?=@hugybear@gmx.net to comp.sys.mac.misc,comp.sys.mac.system on Sun Feb 23 05:25:55 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.misc

    On 23.02.25 01:43, Your Name wrote:
    A lot of people complain about "planned obsolesence", but the reality
    is it is more a case of "enforced obsolesence" because you can't get
    the parts to repair things (and in Apple's case, a fad of devices that
    can't even be repaired / upgraded) or more usually people's own simple greediness to own the latest toy on the block even though their current device / car / etc. is perfectly fine.

    We know that you do not embrace the concept of technological progress.
    You even do not have an iPhone but you talk a lot about it.
    --
    "Ave! Morituri te salutant!"
    --- Synchronet 3.20c-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Jolly Roger@jollyroger@pobox.com to comp.sys.mac.system,comp.sys.mac.misc on Sun Feb 23 21:45:06 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.misc

    On 2025-02-22, WolfFan <akwolffan@zoho.com> wrote:
    On Feb 5, 2025, Your Name wrote
    (in article <vo0hjg$2hn1r$1@dont-email.me>):

    If you just bought a new M4 iPad or Mac, then you've been scammed.
    The new M5 chips are coming this year ... and no doubt the M6 will
    arrive next year.

    Hmm. I bought an M2 iPad Air. It was fast enough, and, more
    importantly, cheap enough, for my purposes. In a few years I’ll
    probably replace it with whatever’s current then.

    This is being typed on a 2014 Mac mini. It still works. I will
    probably be replacing it with a M4 unit later this year, and will keep
    that one for a decade, too.

    I have no particular desire for new shiny, as long as current systems
    work.

    That's pretty common amongst Mac users. But claiming people who bought a
    M4 Mac was "scammed" just because Apple dared to update the Mac line
    with faster processors is downright loony. 🤔

    People who bought last year's Macs weren't scammed. Apple just
    refreshed some Macs, as usual.
    --
    E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
    I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

    JR
    --- Synchronet 3.20c-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Anonymous@no_email@invalid.invalid to comp.sys.mac.misc,comp.sys.mac.system on Wed Mar 19 15:50:32 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.misc

    Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote:
    On 2025-02-22, WolfFan <akwolffan@zoho.com> wrote:
    On Feb 5, 2025, Your Name wrote
    (in article <vo0hjg$2hn1r$1@dont-email.me>):

    If you just bought a new M4 iPad or Mac, then you've been scammed.
    The new M5 chips are coming this year ... and no doubt the M6 will
    arrive next year.

    Hmm. I bought an M2 iPad Air. It was fast enough, and, more
    importantly, cheap enough, for my purposes. In a few years I’ll
    probably replace it with whatever’s current then.

    This is being typed on a 2014 Mac mini. It still works. I will
    probably be replacing it with a M4 unit later this year, and will keep
    that one for a decade, too.

    I have no particular desire for new shiny, as long as current systems
    work.

    That's pretty common amongst Mac users. But claiming people who bought a
    M4 Mac was "scammed" just because Apple dared to update the Mac line
    with faster processors is downright loony. 🤔

    People who bought last year's Macs weren't scammed. Apple just
    refreshed some Macs, as usual.

    Wasn’t the big complaint that Apple updated their hardware too slowly? Well, that’s not the case anymore. The refresh cycle is just a little too fast now, but if the performance gain is worth it I say “Go for it!”

    --- Synchronet 3.20c-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Your Name@YourName@YourISP.com to comp.sys.mac.misc,comp.sys.mac.system on Thu Mar 20 10:28:18 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.misc

    On 2025-03-19 15:50:32 +0000, Anonymous said:
    Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote:
    On 2025-02-22, WolfFan <akwolffan@zoho.com> wrote:
    On Feb 5, 2025, Your Name wrote
    (in article <vo0hjg$2hn1r$1@dont-email.me>):

    If you just bought a new M4 iPad or Mac, then you've been scammed.
    The new M5 chips are coming this year ... and no doubt the M6 will
    arrive next year.

    Hmm. I bought an M2 iPad Air. It was fast enough, and, more
    importantly, cheap enough, for my purposes. In a few years I’ll
    probably replace it with whatever’s current then.

    This is being typed on a 2014 Mac mini. It still works. I will
    probably be replacing it with a M4 unit later this year, and will keep
    that one for a decade, too.

    I have no particular desire for new shiny, as long as current systems
    work.

    That's pretty common amongst Mac users. But claiming people who bought a
    M4 Mac was "scammed" just because Apple dared to update the Mac line
    with faster processors is downright loony. 🤔

    People who bought last year's Macs weren't scammed. Apple just
    refreshed some Macs, as usual.

    Wasn’t the big complaint that Apple updated their hardware too slowly?

    Only by fools blinded by the silly "megahertz myth" asnd the geek
    brigade who always want a new shiny toy to play with.



    Well, that’s not the case anymore. The refresh cycle is just a little too fast now,

    It isn't just Apple either. Samsung, etc. all update their devices
    every year (at least) with little more than minor tweaks and pointless gimmickry.

    You then have most of the software developers that enforce their apps
    to only run on the latest and greatest hardware and operating systems.

    Combined, that induces a constant enforced upgrade cycle (at least for
    those with more money than sense) and simply ends up with huge piles of perfectly good devices being thrown out as e-waste every year.



    but if the performance gain is worth it I say “Go for it!”

    Most users' needs are extremely simple and peak performance for them
    was reached years ago - there is a limit as to how fast you can type in
    MS Word or move the mouse cursor. They have no real need for today's
    massively fast devices, other than to keep it running at a decent speed despite all the unnecessary gimmicks companies keep adding to them.


    --- Synchronet 3.20c-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Johnny LaRue@xxxxxx@yyyyyy.zzz to comp.sys.mac.misc,comp.sys.mac.system on Wed Mar 19 23:44:49 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.misc

    In article <vrfcti$1na48$1@dont-email.me>,
    Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote:

    On 2025-03-19 15:50:32 +0000, Anonymous said:
    Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote:
    On 2025-02-22, WolfFan <akwolffan@zoho.com> wrote:
    On Feb 5, 2025, Your Name wrote
    (in article <vo0hjg$2hn1r$1@dont-email.me>):

    If you just bought a new M4 iPad or Mac, then you've been scammed.
    The new M5 chips are coming this year ... and no doubt the M6 will
    arrive next year.

    Hmm. I bought an M2 iPad Air. It was fast enough, and, more
    importantly, cheap enough, for my purposes. In a few years I’ll
    probably replace it with whatever’s current then.

    This is being typed on a 2014 Mac mini. It still works. I will
    probably be replacing it with a M4 unit later this year, and will keep >>> that one for a decade, too.

    I have no particular desire for new shiny, as long as current systems
    work.

    That's pretty common amongst Mac users. But claiming people who bought a >> M4 Mac was "scammed" just because Apple dared to update the Mac line
    with faster processors is downright loony. ?

    People who bought last year's Macs weren't scammed. Apple just
    refreshed some Macs, as usual.

    Wasn’t the big complaint that Apple updated their hardware too slowly?

    Only by fools blinded by the silly "megahertz myth" asnd the geek
    brigade who always want a new shiny toy to play with.



    Well, that’s not the case anymore. The refresh cycle is just a little too fast now,

    It isn't just Apple either. Samsung, etc. all update their devices
    every year (at least) with little more than minor tweaks and pointless gimmickry.

    You then have most of the software developers that enforce their apps
    to only run on the latest and greatest hardware and operating systems.

    Combined, that induces a constant enforced upgrade cycle (at least for
    those with more money than sense) and simply ends up with huge piles of perfectly good devices being thrown out as e-waste every year.



    but if the performance gain is worth it I say “Go for it!”

    Most users' needs are extremely simple and peak performance for them
    was reached years ago - there is a limit as to how fast you can type in
    MS Word or move the mouse cursor. They have no real need for today's massively fast devices, other than to keep it running at a decent speed despite all the unnecessary gimmicks companies keep adding to them.

    None of that even matters. If you need a new phone, you get a new
    phone. End of discussion.

    Most people don't need all of the features/capabilities of new cars
    either. But if you need a new car, you get a new car. End of
    discussion.

    The people who get a new phone every year are the same people who get a
    new car every year. People with lots of money. Nothing wrong with
    that. That's the whole point of having lots of money.

    I have an iPhone 12 Pro Max. It still works fine. When I need a new
    one it will be the newest biggest bestest iPhone. Because I am not interested in the cheapest iPhone.

    Because I have SOME money. Not LOTS of money.

    And there is no "e-waste". I sell the old one on eBay. Because there
    are LOTS of people who want an iPhone but can't afford a new one. I
    know that because I used to be one. And since pristine used iPhones
    (mine are always in a case so no scratches/dents at all) get top
    dollars, it helps to offset the price of the new one.

    Win-win.
    --- Synchronet 3.20c-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Your Name@YourName@YourISP.com to comp.sys.mac.misc,comp.sys.mac.system on Thu Mar 20 18:45:45 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.misc

    On 2025-03-20 03:44:49 +0000, Johnny LaRue said:
    In article <vrfcti$1na48$1@dont-email.me>,
    Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote:
    On 2025-03-19 15:50:32 +0000, Anonymous said:
    Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote:
    On 2025-02-22, WolfFan <akwolffan@zoho.com> wrote:
    On Feb 5, 2025, Your Name wrote
    (in article <vo0hjg$2hn1r$1@dont-email.me>):

    If you just bought a new M4 iPad or Mac, then you've been scammed. >>>>>> The new M5 chips are coming this year ... and no doubt the M6 will >>>>>> arrive next year.

    Hmm. I bought an M2 iPad Air. It was fast enough, and, more
    importantly, cheap enough, for my purposes. In a few years I’ll
    probably replace it with whatever’s current then.

    This is being typed on a 2014 Mac mini. It still works. I will
    probably be replacing it with a M4 unit later this year, and will keep >>>>> that one for a decade, too.

    I have no particular desire for new shiny, as long as current systems >>>>> work.

    That's pretty common amongst Mac users. But claiming people who bought a >>>> M4 Mac was "scammed" just because Apple dared to update the Mac line
    with faster processors is downright loony. ?

    People who bought last year's Macs weren't scammed. Apple just
    refreshed some Macs, as usual.

    Wasn’t the big complaint that Apple updated their hardware too slowly?

    Only by fools blinded by the silly "megahertz myth" asnd the geek
    brigade who always want a new shiny toy to play with.



    Well, that’s not the case anymore. The refresh cycle is just a little too >>> fast now,

    It isn't just Apple either. Samsung, etc. all update their devices
    every year (at least) with little more than minor tweaks and pointless
    gimmickry.

    You then have most of the software developers that enforce their apps
    to only run on the latest and greatest hardware and operating systems.

    Combined, that induces a constant enforced upgrade cycle (at least for
    those with more money than sense) and simply ends up with huge piles of
    perfectly good devices being thrown out as e-waste every year.



    but if the performance gain is worth it I say “Go for it!”

    Most users' needs are extremely simple and peak performance for them
    was reached years ago - there is a limit as to how fast you can type in
    MS Word or move the mouse cursor. They have no real need for today's
    massively fast devices, other than to keep it running at a decent speed
    despite all the unnecessary gimmicks companies keep adding to them.

    None of that even matters. If you need a new phone, you get a new
    phone. End of discussion.

    Exactly, but most people do not need (many don't even want) a "faster", "bigger" "better" one ... they simply want one that works for what they
    want to do. In fact many would prefer the same model simply because
    that's what they're used to using, and when they are forced to buy a
    new one it is usually quite different and has lots of useless features
    they'll never use, which is frustrating and annoying.

    The average user is not like the uber-geek that invents all these silly features nor like the nerd brigade that salivates every time a new
    phone has a few more useless megapixels. Those that do want such
    software features should be able to simply download an app to do it,
    while everyone else gets a simple, efficient device, not clogged up
    with a load of stuff they'll never use or even notice.




    Most people don't need all of the features/capabilities of new cars
    either. But if you need a new car, you get a new car. End of
    discussion.

    Most people do not know, let alone use, all the fancy gimmickry on
    their car or their devices. A lot of that gimmickry can often be plain annoying. They just want something that works simply and usably.




    The people who get a new phone every year are the same people who get a
    new car every year. People with lots of money. Nothing wrong with
    that. That's the whole point of having lots of money.

    I have an iPhone 12 Pro Max. It still works fine. When I need a new
    one it will be the newest biggest bestest iPhone. Because I am not interested in the cheapest iPhone.

    Depends on how you define "need".

    If the phone breaks, then you do need a new one.

    If the telecoms company decides they no longer want to support 2G, then
    *you* don't need a new phone, you're forced into buying a new phone.

    If the developer of an app you use decides you're phone is "too old" to support, then *you* do not need a new phone, you're forced into buying
    a new phone.

    It is most easily seen in the games industry ... why does a version of
    Tetris now "need" an M4 CPU Mac with 32GB RAM when the same game ran
    perfectly well on a Commodore 64 decades ago? The fact is it doesn't,
    but by enforcing that "minimum spec" you are again being pushed into
    the ever-upgrade cycle.



    Because I have SOME money. Not LOTS of money.

    And there is no "e-waste". I sell the old one on eBay. Because there
    are LOTS of people who want an iPhone but can't afford a new one. I
    know that because I used to be one. And since pristine used iPhones
    (mine are always in a case so no scratches/dents at all) get top
    dollars, it helps to offset the price of the new one.

    Win-win.

    Big business companies continually release tweaked models every year
    simply because far too many people are stupid enough to keep wasting
    their money buying every new model, even though their current device is
    still perfectly fine. That's how big business makes their money.

    If people didn't keep buying the latest toy and were satisfied with
    their current device, the companies wouldn't keep doing it. With the ever-increasing prices of everything these days, more and more people
    are finally relaising they don't need to keep upgrading constantly.



    --- Synchronet 3.20c-Linux NewsLink 1.2