This is the common misunderstanding with both RCS in general and Apple's update in particular. RCS is not end-to-end encrypted.
Yet, for conversations between Google Messages users, end-to-end encryption is now enabled on your Android phone by default. https://www.forbes.com/sites/zakdoffman/2024/03/30/new-apple-iphone-16-pro-max-and-ios-18-leak-googles-imessage-warning/
So unlike iMessaging between iPhone users or Google Messaging between
Android users, or more importantly WhatsApping between iPhone and Android users, RCS between iPhone and Android will not have that level of security.
This is critical because it's the issue the DOJ highlighted in its lawsuit: "Apple is willing to make the iPhone less secure and less private... Text messages sent from iPhones to Android phones are unencrypted as a result of Apple's conduct. If Apple wanted to, Apple could allow iPhone users to send encrypted messages to Android users while still using iMessage on their iPhone, which would instantly improve the privacy and security of iPhone
and other smartphone users."
Yet more proof that the US DOJ has no clue what they're talking about. :-\
A. Apple doesn't even use RCS ... yet! It is rumoured to be coming in
later this year ("in the fall" if you believe a Google post)
B. Apple messages are end-to-end encrypted, at least between Apple
devices using Apple's messaging app (for other apps it is up to
their developers, not Apple):
"Your iMessage and FaceTime conversations are encrypted end-to-end,
so they can't be read while they're sent between devices."
On 2024-04-01 00:55:13 +0000, Tamborino said:
This is the common misunderstanding with both RCS in general and Apple's update in particular. RCS is not end-to-end encrypted.
Yet, for conversations between Google Messages users, end-to-end encryption is now enabled on your Android phone by default. https://www.forbes.com/sites/zakdoffman/2024/03/30/new-apple-iphone-16-pro-max-and-ios-18-leak-googles-imessage-warning/
So unlike iMessaging between iPhone users or Google Messaging between Android users, or more importantly WhatsApping between iPhone and Android users, RCS between iPhone and Android will not have that level of security.
This is critical because it's the issue the DOJ highlighted in its lawsuit: "Apple is willing to make the iPhone less secure and less private... Text messages sent from iPhones to Android phones are unencrypted as a result of Apple's conduct. If Apple wanted to, Apple could allow iPhone users to send encrypted messages to Android users while still using iMessage on their iPhone, which would instantly improve the privacy and security of iPhone and other smartphone users."
Yet more proof that the US DOJ has no clue what they're talking about. :-\
A. Apple doesn't even use RCS ... yet! It is rumoured to be coming in
later this year ("in the fall" if you believe a Google post)
B. Apple messages are end-to-end encrypted, at least between Apple
devices using Apple's messaging app (for other apps it is up to
their developers, not Apple):
"Your iMessage and FaceTime conversations are encrypted end-to-end,
so they can't be read while they're sent between devices."
On 2024-04-01 00:55:13 +0000, Tamborino said:
This is the common misunderstanding with both RCS in general and
Apple's update in particular. RCS is not end-to-end encrypted.
Yet, for conversations between Google Messages users, end-to-end
encryption is now enabled on your Android phone by default. >>https://www.forbes.com/sites/zakdoffman/2024/03/30/new-apple-iphone- >>16-pro-max-and-ios-18-leak-googles-imessage-warning/ So unlike >>iMessaging between iPhone users or Google Messaging between Android
users, or more importantly WhatsApping between iPhone and Android
users, RCS between iPhone and Android will not have that level of
security.
This is critical because it's the issue the DOJ highlighted in its
lawsuit: "Apple is willing to make the iPhone less secure and less >>private... Text messages sent from iPhones to Android phones are >>unencrypted as a result of Apple's conduct. If Apple wanted to,
Apple could allow iPhone users to send encrypted messages to
Android users while still using iMessage on their iPhone, which
would instantly improve the privacy and security of iPhone and
other smartphone users."
Yet more proof that the US DOJ has no clue what they're talking
about. :-\
A. Apple doesn't even use RCS ... yet! It is rumoured to be coming in
later this year ("in the fall" if you believe a Google post)
B. Apple messages are end-to-end encrypted, at least between Apple
devices using Apple's messaging app (for other apps it is up to
their developers, not Apple):
"Your iMessage and FaceTime conversations are encrypted end-to-end,
so they can't be read while they're sent between devices."
"If Apple wanted to, Apple could allow iPhone users to send encrypted messages to Android users while still using iMessage on their iPhone..."
"If Apple wanted to, Apple could allow iPhone users to send encrypted
messages to Android users while still using iMessage on their iPhone..."
If they allowed encryption between iPhone users and Android users it
would eliminate a key advantage of an organization being 100% iPhone.
My wife's company is 100% iPhone, for multiple reasons
(they could actually
use Android since they use Cortext for secure messaging since it's HIPAA compliant, while iMessage is not HIPAA compliant) mainly for the remote management (MDM) capability,
and the inability for employees to install any apps.
So she carries two phones, her personal Android and her
corporate iPhone.
Your Name wrote:
On 2024-04-01 00:55:13 +0000, Tamborino said:
This is the common misunderstanding with both RCS in general and
Apple's update in particular. RCS is not end-to-end encrypted.
Yet, for conversations between Google Messages users, end-to-end
encryption is now enabled on your Android phone by default.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/zakdoffman/2024/03/30/new-apple-iphone-
16-pro-max-and-ios-18-leak-googles-imessage-warning/ So unlike
iMessaging between iPhone users or Google Messaging between Android
users, or more importantly WhatsApping between iPhone and Android
users, RCS between iPhone and Android will not have that level of
security.
This is critical because it's the issue the DOJ highlighted in its
lawsuit: "Apple is willing to make the iPhone less secure and less
private... Text messages sent from iPhones to Android phones are
unencrypted as a result of Apple's conduct. If Apple wanted to,
Apple could allow iPhone users to send encrypted messages to
Android users while still using iMessage on their iPhone, which
would instantly improve the privacy and security of iPhone and
other smartphone users."
Yet more proof that the US DOJ has no clue what they're talking
about. :-\
A. Apple doesn't even use RCS ... yet! It is rumoured to be coming in
later this year ("in the fall" if you believe a Google post)
B. Apple messages are end-to-end encrypted, at least between Apple
devices using Apple's messaging app (for other apps it is up to
their developers, not Apple):
"Your iMessage and FaceTime conversations are encrypted end-to-end,
so they can't be read while they're sent between devices."
This is the relevant part of the article. There will not be encryption between Android and iOS users. The DOJ says Apple can make it happen
but are unwilling to.
If this is true then it looks like Apple is being the petulant child stamping their feet and saying "no, no, no..."
"So unlike iMessaging between iPhone users or Google Messaging between Android users, or more importantly WhatsApping between iPhone and
Android users, RCS between iPhone and Android will not have that level
of security."
"If Apple wanted to, Apple could allow iPhone users to send encrypted messages to Android users while still using iMessage on their iPhone..."
This is the relevant part of the article. There will not be encryption
between Android and iOS users. The DOJ says Apple can make it happen
but are unwilling to.
More know-nothing bollocks from the US DOJ. Just read note A. above,
Apple is already planning to support RCS, in some form.
If this is true then it looks like Apple is being the petulant child
stamping their feet and saying "no, no, no..."
"So unlike iMessaging between iPhone users or Google Messaging between
Android users, or more importantly WhatsApping between iPhone and
Android users, RCS between iPhone and Android will not have that level
of security."
Wrong ...
"Apple stated it will not use any type of proprietary
end-to-end encryption ¡V presumably referring to Google's
approach ¡X but did say it would work to make end-to-end
encryption part of the RCS standard."
Apple wants RCS to have a proper standard for encryption and not rely
on Google's version, which for any one who knows Google (or Microsoft's attempts to cripple HTML) knows is obviously a good thing. Just in
today's news is that Google's Chrome browser still collects data for
Google even when in the supposedly private 'Incognito' mode - Google
simply cannot be trusted, which is yet another good reason to avoid
Android OS. <https://www.wired.com/story/google-chrome-incognito-mode-data-deletion-settlement/>
"If Apple wanted to, Apple could allow iPhone users to send encrypted
messages to Android users while still using iMessage on their iPhone..."
As above.
On Tue, 2 Apr 2024 11:08:28 +1300, Your Name wrote:
This is the relevant part of the article. There will not be encryption
between Android and iOS users. The DOJ says Apple can make it happen
but are unwilling to.
More know-nothing bollocks from the US DOJ. Just read note A. above,
Apple is already planning to support RCS, in some form.
Apple has no plans to fully support RCS end-to-end encryption.
That's what the DOJ suit is partially about.
If this is true then it looks like Apple is being the petulant child
stamping their feet and saying "no, no, no..."
"So unlike iMessaging between iPhone users or Google Messaging between
Android users, or more importantly WhatsApping between iPhone and
Android users, RCS between iPhone and Android will not have that level
of security."
Wrong ...
Only the nut cases think Apple actually cares about them or their privacy.
"Apple stated it will not use any type of proprietary
end-to-end encryption – presumably referring to Google's
approach — but did say it would work to make end-to-end
encryption part of the RCS standard."
Apple does not want anyone, not even their own customers, to have the
privacy of RCS end-to-end encryption between Apple and Android users.
You've literally just quoted them saying they would allow it.
This is the common misunderstanding with both RCS in general and Apple's update in particular. RCS is not end-to-end encrypted.
Yet, for conversations between Google Messages users, end-to-end encryption is now enabled on your Android phone by default. https://www.forbes.com/sites/zakdoffman/2024/03/30/new-apple-iphone-16-pro-max-and-ios-18-leak-googles-imessage-warning/
So unlike iMessaging between iPhone users or Google Messaging between
Android users, or more importantly WhatsApping between iPhone and Android users, RCS between iPhone and Android will not have that level of security.
This is critical because it's the issue the DOJ highlighted in its lawsuit: "Apple is willing to make the iPhone less secure and less private... Text messages sent from iPhones to Android phones are unencrypted as a result of Apple's conduct. If Apple wanted to, Apple could allow iPhone users to send encrypted messages to Android users while still using iMessage on their iPhone, which would instantly improve the privacy and security of iPhone
and other smartphone users."
Your Name wrote:
On 2024-04-01 00:55:13 +0000, Tamborino said:
This is the common misunderstanding with both RCS in general and
Apple's update in particular. RCS is not end-to-end encrypted.
Yet, for conversations between Google Messages users, end-to-end
encryption is now enabled on your Android phone by default.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/zakdoffman/2024/03/30/new-apple-iphone-
16-pro-max-and-ios-18-leak-googles-imessage-warning/ So unlike
iMessaging between iPhone users or Google Messaging between Android
users, or more importantly WhatsApping between iPhone and Android
users, RCS between iPhone and Android will not have that level of
security.
This is critical because it's the issue the DOJ highlighted in its
lawsuit: "Apple is willing to make the iPhone less secure and less
private... Text messages sent from iPhones to Android phones are
unencrypted as a result of Apple's conduct. If Apple wanted to,
Apple could allow iPhone users to send encrypted messages to
Android users while still using iMessage on their iPhone, which
would instantly improve the privacy and security of iPhone and
other smartphone users."
Yet more proof that the US DOJ has no clue what they're talking
about. :-\
A. Apple doesn't even use RCS ... yet! It is rumoured to be coming in
later this year ("in the fall" if you believe a Google post)
B. Apple messages are end-to-end encrypted, at least between Apple
devices using Apple's messaging app (for other apps it is up to
their developers, not Apple):
"Your iMessage and FaceTime conversations are encrypted end-to-end,
so they can't be read while they're sent between devices."
This is the relevant part of the article. There will not be encryption between Android and iOS users. The DOJ says Apple can make it happen
but are unwilling to. If this is true then it looks like Apple is
being the petulant child stamping their feet and saying "no, no, no..."
"So unlike iMessaging between iPhone users or Google Messaging between Android users, or more importantly WhatsApping between iPhone and--- Synchronet 3.20a-Linux NewsLink 1.114
Android users, RCS between iPhone and Android will not have that level
of security."
"If Apple wanted to, Apple could allow iPhone users to send encrypted messages to Android users while still using iMessage on their iPhone..."
On Mon, 1 Apr 2024 16:39:58 -0700, Alan wrote:
You've literally just quoted them saying they would allow it.
Read the reference a few thousand time and maybe you'll yet understand.
On 2024-04-01 00:55:13 +0000, Tamborino said:
This is the common misunderstanding with both RCS in general and Apple's
update in particular. RCS is not end-to-end encrypted.
Yet, for conversations between Google Messages users, end-to-end encryption >> is now enabled on your Android phone by default.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/zakdoffman/2024/03/30/new-apple-iphone-16-pro-max-and-ios-18-leak-googles-imessage-warning/
So unlike iMessaging between iPhone users or Google Messaging between
Android users, or more importantly WhatsApping between iPhone and Android
users, RCS between iPhone and Android will not have that level of security. >>
This is critical because it's the issue the DOJ highlighted in its lawsuit: >> "Apple is willing to make the iPhone less secure and less private... Text
messages sent from iPhones to Android phones are unencrypted as a result of >> Apple's conduct. If Apple wanted to, Apple could allow iPhone users to send >> encrypted messages to Android users while still using iMessage on their
iPhone, which would instantly improve the privacy and security of iPhone
and other smartphone users."
Yet more proof that the US DOJ has no clue what they're talking about. :-\
A. Apple doesn't even use RCS ... yet! It is rumoured to be coming in
later this year ("in the fall" if you believe a Google post)
B. Apple messages are end-to-end encrypted, at least between Apple
devices using Apple's messaging app (for other apps it is up to
their developers, not Apple):
"Your iMessage and FaceTime conversations are encrypted end-to-end,
so they can't be read while they're sent between devices."
Your Name wrote:
On 2024-04-01 00:55:13 +0000, Tamborino said:
This is the common misunderstanding with both RCS in general and Apple's >>> update in particular. RCS is not end-to-end encrypted.
Yet, for conversations between Google Messages users, end-to-end
encryption is now enabled on your Android phone by default.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/zakdoffman/2024/03/30/new-apple-iphone-16-pro-max-and-ios-18-leak-googles-imessage-warning/
So unlike iMessaging between iPhone users or Google Messaging between
Android users, or more importantly WhatsApping between iPhone and Android >>> users, RCS between iPhone and Android will not have that level of security. >>>
This is critical because it's the issue the DOJ highlighted in its
lawsuit: "Apple is willing to make the iPhone less secure and less
private... Text messages sent from iPhones to Android phones are
unencrypted as a result of Apple's conduct. If Apple wanted to, Apple
could allow iPhone users to send encrypted messages to Android users
while still using iMessage on their iPhone, which would instantly
improve the privacy and security of iPhone and other smartphone users."
Yet more proof that the US DOJ has no clue what they're talking about. :-\ >>
A. Apple doesn't even use RCS ... yet! It is rumoured to be coming in
later this year ("in the fall" if you believe a Google post)
B. Apple messages are end-to-end encrypted, at least between Apple
devices using Apple's messaging app (for other apps it is up to
their developers, not Apple):
"Your iMessage and FaceTime conversations are encrypted end-to-end,
so they can't be read while they're sent between devices."
Doj is picking on Poor apple.
Apple is just a small, old fashioned country telephone maker. They have never deliberately committed crimes or fraud, or screwed their
customers.
Sure, they've made mistakes, but all honest. This is all biden's fault.
He hates apple.
On 2024-04-03 22:54:04 +0000, Hank Rogers said:
Your Name wrote:
On 2024-04-01 00:55:13 +0000, Tamborino said:
Yet more proof that the US DOJ has no clue what they're talking about. :-\ >>>
This is the common misunderstanding with both RCS in general and Apple's >>>> update in particular. RCS is not end-to-end encrypted.
Yet, for conversations between Google Messages users, end-to-end
encryption is now enabled on your Android phone by default.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/zakdoffman/2024/03/30/new-apple-iphone-16-pro-max-and-ios-18-leak-googles-imessage-warning/
So unlike iMessaging between iPhone users or Google Messaging between
Android users, or more importantly WhatsApping between iPhone and Android >>>> users, RCS between iPhone and Android will not have that level of
security.
This is critical because it's the issue the DOJ highlighted in its
lawsuit: "Apple is willing to make the iPhone less secure and less
private... Text messages sent from iPhones to Android phones are
unencrypted as a result of Apple's conduct. If Apple wanted to, Apple >>>> could allow iPhone users to send encrypted messages to Android users
while still using iMessage on their iPhone, which would instantly
improve the privacy and security of iPhone and other smartphone users." >>>
A. Apple doesn't even use RCS ... yet! It is rumoured to be coming in
later this year ("in the fall" if you believe a Google post)
B. Apple messages are end-to-end encrypted, at least between Apple
devices using Apple's messaging app (for other apps it is up to
their developers, not Apple):
"Your iMessage and FaceTime conversations are encrypted end-to-end,
so they can't be read while they're sent between devices."
Doj is picking on Poor apple.
Apple is just a small, old fashioned country telephone maker. They have
never deliberately committed crimes or fraud, or screwed their customers.
Sure, they've made mistakes, but all honest. This is all biden's fault.
He hates apple.
The glacial pace that government departments work at, it's far more likely Trump the Chump's fault and yet another reason for every sane American to bin the lunatic at their next election. :-p
So is trump. They are
much alike and have never done anything wrong. Ever. Neither has ever committed a crime or screwed a customer or business partner.
Both are forced to pay billion dollar fines for shit they didn't do.
Every true american feels sorry for both apple and trump. And most are willing to give them money to help bail them out.
Only the MAGA cult disciples feel 'sorry' for the Orange Juju, every one
else wants him safely in jail where he can't cause any more harm.
On 04/04/2024 01:58, Hank Rogers wrote:
So is trump. They are much alike and have never done anything wrong.
Ever. Neither has ever committed a crime or screwed a customer or
business partner.
That is provably untrue, in that Trump has already lost two civil
cases, wherein one of which a jury found him to be a rapist - in most civilised people's view, that is both committing a crime and screwing someone. Further, he faces 91 further criminal charges in 4 separate
cases, in most of which his guilt seems to be beyond doubt, in that the known facts or even his own statements prove his guilt, and potentially
he only has to be found guilty on *one* of those 91 charges to end up
in jail. Indeed, if he carries on threatening judges' families the way
that he now done *twice* already, most likely he will be adjudged to
have breached the terms of his bail, and go to jail to await trial
anyway. The only thing actually in doubt is whether the lumbering US
legal system can complete a case and thereby convict him before the election, but the first trial starts this month, so probably they will, despite his barrage of absurd claims of Presidential immunity, which,
as an appeal judge pointed out, would, if taken literally as claimed,
enable him to send the Seals to wipe out political opponents.
Both are forced to pay billion dollar fines for shit they didn't do.
I'm not going to comment on Apple, but the whole point of the Trump
fines is that it's shit he *DID* do, as determined by independent
juries in two courts of law.
Every true american feels sorry for both apple and trump. And most are
willing to give them money to help bail them out.
Only the MAGA cult disciples feel 'sorry' for the Orange Juju, every
one else wants him safely in jail where he can't cause any more harm.
On 04/04/2024 01:58, Hank Rogers wrote:
So is trump. They are much alike and have never done anything wrong. Ever.
Neither has ever committed a crime or screwed a customer or business partner.
That is provably untrue, in that Trump has already lost two civil cases, wherein one of which a jury found him to be a rapist - in most civilised people's view, that is both committing a crime and screwing someone.
Further, he faces 91 further criminal charges in 4 separate cases,
Java Jive <java@evij.com.invalid> wrote:
Only the MAGA cult disciples feel 'sorry' for the Orange Juju, every one
else wants him safely in jail where he can't cause any more harm.
While I'm impartial towards US politics as I regard both candidates
to be unspeakable, TINEOE.
Java Jive wrote:
On 04/04/2024 01:58, Hank Rogers wrote:
So is trump. They are much alike and have never done anything wrong. Ever.
Neither has ever committed a crime or screwed a customer or business partner.
That is provably untrue, in that Trump has already lost two civil cases, wherein one of which a jury found him to be a rapist - in mostcivilised
people's view, that is both committing a crime and screwing someone.
Losing a civil case is not the same as a criminal conviction.
Further, he faces 91 further criminal charges in 4 separate cases,
All politically-motivated persecutions.
All that proves is that he should have crossed the Rubicon after the
massive election theft of 2020 and started having lots of Democrats
put up against the wall and shot.
On 2024-04-03 18:51, Sn!pe wrote:
Java Jive <java@evij.com.invalid> wrote:
Only the MAGA cult disciples feel 'sorry' for the Orange Juju, every one >>> else wants him safely in jail where he can't cause any more harm.
While I'm impartial towards US politics as I regard both candidates
to be unspeakable, TINEOE.
Why?
On 4/4/24 9:10 AM, Alan wrote:
On 2024-04-03 18:51, Sn!pe wrote:
Java Jive <java@evij.com.invalid> wrote:
Only the MAGA cult disciples feel 'sorry' for the Orange Juju, every
one
else wants him safely in jail where he can't cause any more harm.
While I'm impartial towards US politics as I regard both candidates
to be unspeakable, TINEOE.
This Is Not End Of Everything? Best I could come up with.
Why?
Trump is better than Biden. Period. You vote against the greater evil.
 Besides, did Trump actually hurt you when he was in?
On 2024-04-04 09:44, The Real Bev wrote:WTF does TINEOE stand for?
On 4/4/24 9:10 AM, Alan wrote:
On 2024-04-03 18:51, Sn!pe wrote:
Java Jive <java@evij.com.invalid> wrote:
Only the MAGA cult disciples feel 'sorry' for the Orange Juju, every >>>>> one
else wants him safely in jail where he can't cause any more harm.
While I'm impartial towards US politics as I regard both candidates
to be unspeakable, TINEOE.
As long as our President was genuinely unpredictable Putin minded hisThis Is Not End Of Everything? Best I could come up with.
Why?
Trump is better than Biden. Period. You vote against the greater evil. >>  Besides, did Trump actually hurt you when he was in?
Trump is a lying, cheating, defrauding conman who is severely
compromised by Putin.
What did Biden do that actually hurt you?
Was it the falling unemployment?
The GPD growth.. ...the record stock market... ...what?
On 4/4/24 12:16 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2024-04-04 09:44, The Real Bev wrote:
On 4/4/24 9:10 AM, Alan wrote:
On 2024-04-03 18:51, Sn!pe wrote:
Java Jive <java@evij.com.invalid> wrote:
Only the MAGA cult disciples feel 'sorry' for the Orange Juju,
**every one else** wants him safely in jail where he can't cause
any more harm.
While I'm impartial towards US politics as I regard
both candidates to be unspeakable, TINEOE.
WTF does TINEOE stand for?
This Is Not End Of Everything? Best I could come up with.
On 4/4/24 12:16 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2024-04-04 09:44, The Real Bev wrote:
On 4/4/24 9:10 AM, Alan wrote:
On 2024-04-03 18:51, Sn!pe wrote:
Java Jive <java@evij.com.invalid> wrote:
Only the MAGA cult disciples feel 'sorry' for the Orange Juju,
every one
else wants him safely in jail where he can't cause any more harm.
While I'm impartial towards US politics as I regard both candidates
to be unspeakable, TINEOE.
WTF does TINEOE stand for?
This Is Not End Of Everything? Best I could come up with.
Why?
Trump is better than Biden. Period. You vote against the greater
evil. Â Â Besides, did Trump actually hurt you when he was in?
Trump is a lying, cheating, defrauding conman who is severely
compromised by Putin.
What did Biden do that actually hurt you?
Was it the falling unemployment?
The GPD growth.. ...the record stock market... ...what?
As long as our President was genuinely unpredictable Putin minded his
own business. Having a loose cannon on your side is frequently a good thing. In a pissing contest between our loose cannon and N. Korea's
loose cannon, guess who backs down.
This is the common misunderstanding with both RCS in general and Apple's update in particular. RCS is not end-to-end encrypted.
Yet, for conversations between Google Messages users, end-to-end encryption is now enabled on your Android phone by default. https://www.forbes.com/sites/zakdoffman/2024/03/30/new-apple-iphone-16-pro-max-and-ios-18-leak-googles-imessage-warning/
So unlike iMessaging between iPhone users or Google Messaging between
Android users, or more importantly WhatsApping between iPhone and Android users, RCS between iPhone and Android will not have that level of security.
Tamborino, 2024-04-01 02:55:
This is the common misunderstanding with both RCS in general and Apple's
update in particular. RCS is not end-to-end encrypted.
RCS *is* end-to-end encrypted. But this is not mandatory, so using unencrypted connections is possible. But the Google messaging app in
Android will show you if the recipient has RCS and also if the
connection is encrypted.
Yet, for conversations between Google Messages users, end-to-end encryption >> is now enabled on your Android phone by default.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/zakdoffman/2024/03/30/new-apple-iphone-16-pro-max-and-ios-18-leak-googles-imessage-warning/
So unlike iMessaging between iPhone users or Google Messaging between
Android users, or more importantly WhatsApping between iPhone and Android
users, RCS between iPhone and Android will not have that level of security.
But this is not the fault of RCS.
On 4/4/24 12:16 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2024-04-04 09:44, The Real Bev wrote:
On 4/4/24 9:10 AM, Alan wrote:
On 2024-04-03 18:51, Sn!pe wrote:
Java Jive <java@evij.com.invalid> wrote:
Only the MAGA cult disciples feel 'sorry' for the Orange Juju, every >>>>>> one
else wants him safely in jail where he can't cause any more harm.
While I'm impartial towards US politics as I regard both candidates
to be unspeakable, TINEOE.
WTF does TINEOE stand for?
This Is Not End Of Everything? Best I could come up with.
Why?
Trump is better than Biden. Period. You vote against the greater evil. >>>  Besides, did Trump actually hurt you when he was in?
Trump is a lying, cheating, defrauding conman who is severely
compromised by Putin.
What did Biden do that actually hurt you?
Was it the falling unemployment?
The GPD growth.. ...the record stock market... ...what?
As long as our President was genuinely unpredictable Putin minded his
own business. Having a loose cannon on your side is frequently a good thing. In a pissing contest between our loose cannon and N. Korea's
loose cannon, guess who backs down.
On 2024-04-04 09:44, The Real Bev wrote:
On 4/4/24 9:10 AM, Alan wrote:
On 2024-04-03 18:51, Sn!pe wrote:
Java Jive <java@evij.com.invalid> wrote:
Only the MAGA cult disciples feel 'sorry' for the Orange Juju, every one >>>>> else wants him safely in jail where he can't cause any more harm.
While I'm impartial towards US politics as I regard both candidates
to be unspeakable, TINEOE.
This Is Not End Of Everything? Best I could come up with.
Why?
Trump is better than Biden. Period. You vote against the greater evil. >>   Besides, did Trump actually hurt you when he was in?
Trump is a lying, cheating, defrauding conman who is severely compromised by Putin.
What did Biden do that actually hurt you?
Was it the falling unemployment?
The GPD growth.. ...the record stock market... ...what?
Alan wrote:
On 2024-04-04 09:44, The Real Bev wrote:
On 4/4/24 9:10 AM, Alan wrote:
On 2024-04-03 18:51, Sn!pe wrote:
Java Jive <java@evij.com.invalid> wrote:
Only the MAGA cult disciples feel 'sorry' for the Orange Juju,
every one
else wants him safely in jail where he can't cause any more harm.
While I'm impartial towards US politics as I regard both candidates
to be unspeakable, TINEOE.
This Is Not End Of Everything? Best I could come up with.
Why?
Trump is better than Biden. Period. You vote against the greater
evil. Â Â Besides, did Trump actually hurt you when he was in?
Trump is a lying, cheating, defrauding conman who is severely
compromised by Putin.
What did Biden do that actually hurt you?
Was it the falling unemployment?
The GPD growth.. ...the record stock market... ...what?
United States GDP is fake and gay.
On 2024-04-09 23:14, Anonymous wrote:
Alan wrote:
On 2024-04-04 09:44, The Real Bev wrote:
On 4/4/24 9:10 AM, Alan wrote:
On 2024-04-03 18:51, Sn!pe wrote:
Java Jive <java@evij.com.invalid> wrote:
Only the MAGA cult disciples feel 'sorry' for the Orange Juju, every oneWhile I'm impartial towards US politics as I regard both candidates >>>>>> to be unspeakable, TINEOE.
else wants him safely in jail where he can't cause any more harm. >>>>>>
This Is Not End Of Everything? Best I could come up with.
Why?
Trump is better than Biden. Period. You vote against the greater evil.
  Besides, did Trump actually hurt you when he was in?
Trump is a lying, cheating, defrauding conman who is severely compromised by
Putin.
What did Biden do that actually hurt you?
Was it the falling unemployment?
The GPD growth.. ...the record stock market... ...what?
United States GDP is fake and gay.
Yes.
Every fact presented with which you disagree is fake.
Alan wrote:
On 2024-04-09 23:14, Anonymous wrote:
Alan wrote:
On 2024-04-04 09:44, The Real Bev wrote:
On 4/4/24 9:10 AM, Alan wrote:
On 2024-04-03 18:51, Sn!pe wrote:
Java Jive <java@evij.com.invalid> wrote:
Only the MAGA cult disciples feel 'sorry' for the Orange Juju, >>>>>>>> every oneWhile I'm impartial towards US politics as I regard both candidates >>>>>>> to be unspeakable, TINEOE.
else wants him safely in jail where he can't cause any more harm. >>>>>>>
This Is Not End Of Everything? Best I could come up with.
Why?
Trump is better than Biden. Period. You vote against the greater >>>>> evil.   Besides, did Trump actually hurt you when he was in?
Trump is a lying, cheating, defrauding conman who is severely
compromised by Putin.
What did Biden do that actually hurt you?
Was it the falling unemployment?
The GPD growth.. ...the record stock market... ...what?
United States GDP is fake and gay.
Yes.
Every fact presented with which you disagree is fake.
Why is Russia able to produce enough missiles and shells, and the United States can't? That's a tell right there.
On 2024-04-10 23:28, Anonymous wrote:
Alan wrote:
On 2024-04-09 23:14, Anonymous wrote:
Alan wrote:
On 2024-04-04 09:44, The Real Bev wrote:
On 4/4/24 9:10 AM, Alan wrote:
On 2024-04-03 18:51, Sn!pe wrote:
Java Jive <java@evij.com.invalid> wrote:
Only the MAGA cult disciples feel 'sorry' for the Orange Juju, every oneWhile I'm impartial towards US politics as I regard both candidates >>>>>>>> to be unspeakable, TINEOE.
else wants him safely in jail where he can't cause any more harm. >>>>>>>>
This Is Not End Of Everything? Best I could come up with.
Why?
Trump is better than Biden. Period. You vote against the greater evil.
  Besides, did Trump actually hurt you when he was in?
Trump is a lying, cheating, defrauding conman who is severely compromised
by Putin.
What did Biden do that actually hurt you?
Was it the falling unemployment?
The GPD growth.. ...the record stock market... ...what?
United States GDP is fake and gay.
Yes.
Every fact presented with which you disagree is fake.
Why is Russia able to produce enough missiles and shells, and the United
States can't? That's a tell right there.
And where do you get these supposed "facts"?
Where do you get that the US can't produce enough missiles OR shells?
Alan wrote:
On 2024-04-10 23:28, Anonymous wrote:
Alan wrote:
On 2024-04-09 23:14, Anonymous wrote:
Alan wrote:
On 2024-04-04 09:44, The Real Bev wrote:
On 4/4/24 9:10 AM, Alan wrote:Trump is a lying, cheating, defrauding conman who is severely
On 2024-04-03 18:51, Sn!pe wrote:
Java Jive <java@evij.com.invalid> wrote:
Only the MAGA cult disciples feel 'sorry' for the Orange Juju, >>>>>>>>>> every oneWhile I'm impartial towards US politics as I regard both
else wants him safely in jail where he can't cause any more harm. >>>>>>>>>
candidates
to be unspeakable, TINEOE.
This Is Not End Of Everything? Best I could come up with.
Why?
Trump is better than Biden. Period. You vote against the
greater evil. Â Â Besides, did Trump actually hurt you when he was in? >>>>>>
compromised by Putin.
What did Biden do that actually hurt you?
Was it the falling unemployment?
The GPD growth.. ...the record stock market... ...what?
United States GDP is fake and gay.
Yes.
Every fact presented with which you disagree is fake.
Why is Russia able to produce enough missiles and shells, and the United >>> States can't? That's a tell right there.
And where do you get these supposed "facts"?
Where do you get that the US can't produce enough missiles OR shells?
https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2023/08/19/artillery-ammunition-ukraine-pentagon/
https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2023/03/08/us-weapons-manufacturing-ukraine/
https://www.cnn.com/2023/07/18/politics/ukraine-critical-ammo-shortage-us-nato-grapple/index.html
Alan wrote:
On 2024-04-10 23:28, Anonymous wrote:
Alan wrote:
On 2024-04-09 23:14, Anonymous wrote:
Alan wrote:
On 2024-04-04 09:44, The Real Bev wrote:
On 4/4/24 9:10 AM, Alan wrote:Trump is a lying, cheating, defrauding conman who is severely
On 2024-04-03 18:51, Sn!pe wrote:
Java Jive <java@evij.com.invalid> wrote:
Only the MAGA cult disciples feel 'sorry' for the Orange Juju, >>>>>>>>>> every oneWhile I'm impartial towards US politics as I regard both
else wants him safely in jail where he can't cause any more harm. >>>>>>>>>
candidates
to be unspeakable, TINEOE.
This Is Not End Of Everything? Best I could come up with.
Why?
Trump is better than Biden. Period. You vote against the
greater evil. Â Â Besides, did Trump actually hurt you when he was in? >>>>>>
compromised by Putin.
What did Biden do that actually hurt you?
Was it the falling unemployment?
The GPD growth.. ...the record stock market... ...what?
United States GDP is fake and gay.
Yes.
Every fact presented with which you disagree is fake.
Why is Russia able to produce enough missiles and shells, and the United >>> States can't? That's a tell right there.
And where do you get these supposed "facts"?
Where do you get that the US can't produce enough missiles OR shells?
https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2023/08/19/artillery-ammunition-ukraine-pentagon/
https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2023/03/08/us-weapons-manufacturing-ukraine/
https://www.cnn.com/2023/07/18/politics/ukraine-critical-ammo-shortage-us-nato-grapple/index.html
On 2024-04-05 05:42, Arno Welzel wrote:
Tamborino, 2024-04-01 02:55:
This is the common misunderstanding with both RCS in general and Apple's >>> update in particular. RCS is not end-to-end encrypted.
RCS *is* end-to-end encrypted. But this is not mandatory, so using
unencrypted connections is possible. But the Google messaging app in
Android will show you if the recipient has RCS and also if the
connection is encrypted.
Incorrect.
RCS as implemented by Google has end-to-end encryption.
The RCS standard does not have encryption as a part of it.
Apple is not prepared to adopt Google's encryption, and given that
Google can't be trust with your privacy (Google Chrome sweeping up information while in incognito mode, anyone?), can you blame Apple?
On 2024-04-12, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
On 2024-04-11 19:55, Anonymous wrote:
Alan wrote:
On 2024-04-10 23:28, Anonymous wrote:
Alan wrote:
On 2024-04-09 23:14, Anonymous wrote:
Alan wrote:
On 2024-04-04 09:44, The Real Bev wrote:
On 4/4/24 9:10 AM, Alan wrote:
On 2024-04-03 18:51, Sn!pe wrote:
Java Jive <java@evij.com.invalid> wrote:
Only the MAGA cult disciples feel 'sorry' for the Orange Juju, >>>>>>>>>>>> every oneWhile I'm impartial towards US politics as I regard both >>>>>>>>>>> candidates
else wants him safely in jail where he can't cause any more harm. >>>>>>>>>>>
to be unspeakable, TINEOE.
This Is Not End Of Everything? Best I could come up with.
Why?
Trump is better than Biden. Period. You vote against the >>>>>>>>> greater evil.   Besides, did Trump actually hurt you when he was in?
Trump is a lying, cheating, defrauding conman who is severely
compromised by Putin.
What did Biden do that actually hurt you?
Was it the falling unemployment?
The GPD growth.. ...the record stock market... ...what?
United States GDP is fake and gay.
Yes.
Every fact presented with which you disagree is fake.
Why is Russia able to produce enough missiles and shells, and the United >>>>> States can't? That's a tell right there.
And where do you get these supposed "facts"?
Where do you get that the US can't produce enough missiles OR shells?
https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2023/08/19/artillery-ammunition-ukraine-pentagon/
https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2023/03/08/us-weapons-manufacturing-ukraine/
https://www.cnn.com/2023/07/18/politics/ukraine-critical-ammo-shortage-us-nato-grapple/index.html
And I forgot to ask:
Where do you get your supposed "facts" about how many missiles and
shells Russia can produce?
Straight from Mother Russia, of course.
On 2024-04-11 19:55, Anonymous wrote:
Alan wrote:
On 2024-04-10 23:28, Anonymous wrote:
Alan wrote:
On 2024-04-09 23:14, Anonymous wrote:
Alan wrote:
On 2024-04-04 09:44, The Real Bev wrote:
On 4/4/24 9:10 AM, Alan wrote:
On 2024-04-03 18:51, Sn!pe wrote:
Java Jive <java@evij.com.invalid> wrote:
Only the MAGA cult disciples feel 'sorry' for the Orange Juju, every oneWhile I'm impartial towards US politics as I regard both candidates >>>>>>>>>> to be unspeakable, TINEOE.
else wants him safely in jail where he can't cause any more harm. >>>>>>>>>>
This Is Not End Of Everything? Best I could come up with.
Why?
Trump is better than Biden. Period. You vote against the greater evil.
  Besides, did Trump actually hurt you when he was in?
Trump is a lying, cheating, defrauding conman who is severely compromised
by Putin.
What did Biden do that actually hurt you?
Was it the falling unemployment?
The GPD growth.. ...the record stock market... ...what?
United States GDP is fake and gay.
Yes.
Every fact presented with which you disagree is fake.
Why is Russia able to produce enough missiles and shells, and the United >>>> States can't? That's a tell right there.
And where do you get these supposed "facts"?
Where do you get that the US can't produce enough missiles OR shells?
https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2023/08/19/artillery-ammunition-ukraine-pentagon/
Out of date.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2023/03/08/us-weapons-manufacturing-ukraine/
Out of date.
https://www.cnn.com/2023/07/18/politics/ukraine-critical-ammo-shortage-us-nato-grapple/index.html
Out of date.
But moreover, this in no way supports the idea that the US GDP figures are fake.
All it shows is that the US needs to ramp up its production...
...which it is doing:
<https://www.shephardmedia.com/news/landwarfareintl/us-army-is-close-to-producing-80000-155mm-shells-per-month/>
<https://www.army.mil/article/273152/us_army_and_industry_partners_mobilize_to_boost_us_artillery_production>
Alan wrote:
On 2024-04-11 19:55, Anonymous wrote:
Alan wrote:
On 2024-04-10 23:28, Anonymous wrote:
Alan wrote:
On 2024-04-09 23:14, Anonymous wrote:
Alan wrote:
On 2024-04-04 09:44, The Real Bev wrote:
On 4/4/24 9:10 AM, Alan wrote:
On 2024-04-03 18:51, Sn!pe wrote:
Java Jive <java@evij.com.invalid> wrote:
Only the MAGA cult disciples feel 'sorry' for the Orange >>>>>>>>>>>> Juju, every one
else wants him safely in jail where he can't cause any more >>>>>>>>>>>> harm.
While I'm impartial towards US politics as I regard both >>>>>>>>>>> candidates
to be unspeakable, TINEOE.
This Is Not End Of Everything? Best I could come up with.
Why?
Trump is better than Biden. Period. You vote against the >>>>>>>>> greater evil.   Besides, did Trump actually hurt you when he >>>>>>>>> was in?
Trump is a lying, cheating, defrauding conman who is severely >>>>>>>> compromised by Putin.
What did Biden do that actually hurt you?
Was it the falling unemployment?
The GPD growth.. ...the record stock market... ...what?
United States GDP is fake and gay.
Yes.
Every fact presented with which you disagree is fake.
Why is Russia able to produce enough missiles and shells, and the
United
States can't? That's a tell right there.
And where do you get these supposed "facts"?
Where do you get that the US can't produce enough missiles OR shells?
https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2023/08/19/artillery-ammunition-ukraine-pentagon/
Out of date.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2023/03/08/us-weapons-manufacturing-ukraine/
Out of date.
https://www.cnn.com/2023/07/18/politics/ukraine-critical-ammo-shortage-us-nato-grapple/index.html
Out of date.
But moreover, this in no way supports the idea that the US GDP figures
are fake.
All it shows is that the US needs to ramp up its production...
Which will take years, if at all.
...which it is doing:
<https://www.shephardmedia.com/news/landwarfareintl/us-army-is-close-to-producing-80000-155mm-shells-per-month/>
<https://www.army.mil/article/273152/us_army_and_industry_partners_mobilize_to_boost_us_artillery_production>
Which is not enough:
https://edition.cnn.com/2024/03/10/politics/russia-artillery-shell-production-us-europe-ukraine/index.html
https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/russia-says-its-production-artillery-shells-has-soared-by-nearly-150-year-2024-03-21/
Jolly Roger wrote:
On 2024-04-12, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
On 2024-04-11 19:55, Anonymous wrote:
Alan wrote:
On 2024-04-10 23:28, Anonymous wrote:https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2023/08/19/artillery-ammunition-ukraine-pentagon/
Alan wrote:
On 2024-04-09 23:14, Anonymous wrote:
Alan wrote:
On 2024-04-04 09:44, The Real Bev wrote:
On 4/4/24 9:10 AM, Alan wrote:
On 2024-04-03 18:51, Sn!pe wrote:
Java Jive <java@evij.com.invalid> wrote:
Only the MAGA cult disciples feel 'sorry' for the Orange Juju, >>>>>>>>>>>>> every one
else wants him safely in jail where he can't cause any more >>>>>>>>>>>>> harm.
While I'm impartial towards US politics as I regard both >>>>>>>>>>>> candidates
to be unspeakable, TINEOE.
This Is Not End Of Everything? Best I could come up with. >>>>>>>>>>
Why?
Trump is better than Biden. Period. You vote against the >>>>>>>>>> greater evil.   Besides, did Trump actually hurt you when he >>>>>>>>>> was in?
Trump is a lying, cheating, defrauding conman who is severely >>>>>>>>> compromised by Putin.
What did Biden do that actually hurt you?
Was it the falling unemployment?
The GPD growth.. ...the record stock market... ...what?
United States GDP is fake and gay.
Yes.
Every fact presented with which you disagree is fake.
Why is Russia able to produce enough missiles and shells, and the >>>>>> United
States can't? That's a tell right there.
And where do you get these supposed "facts"?
Where do you get that the US can't produce enough missiles OR shells? >>>>
https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2023/03/08/us-weapons-manufacturing-ukraine/
https://www.cnn.com/2023/07/18/politics/ukraine-critical-ammo-shortage-us-nato-grapple/index.html
And I forgot to ask:
Where do you get your supposed "facts" about how many missiles and
shells Russia can produce?
Straight from Mother Russia, of course.
The approximate number of cruise missiles Russia has expended in the
Ukraine is known from observations.
This is the common misunderstanding with both RCS in general and Apple's update in particular. RCS is not end-to-end encrypted.
On 2024-04-12 23:05, Anonymous wrote:
Jolly Roger wrote:
On 2024-04-12, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
On 2024-04-11 19:55, Anonymous wrote:
Alan wrote:
On 2024-04-10 23:28, Anonymous wrote:https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2023/08/19/artillery-ammunition-ukraine-pentagon/
Alan wrote:
On 2024-04-09 23:14, Anonymous wrote:
Alan wrote:
On 2024-04-04 09:44, The Real Bev wrote:
On 4/4/24 9:10 AM, Alan wrote:
On 2024-04-03 18:51, Sn!pe wrote:
Java Jive <java@evij.com.invalid> wrote:
Only the MAGA cult disciples feel 'sorry' for the Orange Juju, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> every one
else wants him safely in jail where he can't cause any more harm.
While I'm impartial towards US politics as I regard both >>>>>>>>>>>>> candidates
to be unspeakable, TINEOE.
This Is Not End Of Everything? Best I could come up with. >>>>>>>>>>>
Why?
Trump is better than Biden. Period. You vote against the >>>>>>>>>>> greater evil.   Besides, did Trump actually hurt you when he was in?
Trump is a lying, cheating, defrauding conman who is severely >>>>>>>>>> compromised by Putin.
What did Biden do that actually hurt you?
Was it the falling unemployment?
The GPD growth.. ...the record stock market... ...what?
United States GDP is fake and gay.
Yes.
Every fact presented with which you disagree is fake.
Why is Russia able to produce enough missiles and shells, and the United
States can't? That's a tell right there.
And where do you get these supposed "facts"?
Where do you get that the US can't produce enough missiles OR shells? >>>>>
https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2023/03/08/us-weapons-manufacturing-ukraine/
https://www.cnn.com/2023/07/18/politics/ukraine-critical-ammo-shortage-us-nato-grapple/index.html
And I forgot to ask:
Where do you get your supposed "facts" about how many missiles and
shells Russia can produce?
Straight from Mother Russia, of course.
The approximate number of cruise missiles Russia has expended in the
Ukraine is known from observations.
But not the number that they've manufactured, doofus.
Alan wrote:
On 2024-04-12 23:05, Anonymous wrote:
Jolly Roger wrote:
On 2024-04-12, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
On 2024-04-11 19:55, Anonymous wrote:
Alan wrote:
On 2024-04-10 23:28, Anonymous wrote:
Alan wrote:
On 2024-04-09 23:14, Anonymous wrote:
Alan wrote:
On 2024-04-04 09:44, The Real Bev wrote:
On 4/4/24 9:10 AM, Alan wrote:
On 2024-04-03 18:51, Sn!pe wrote:
Java Jive <java@evij.com.invalid> wrote:
Only the MAGA cult disciples feel 'sorry' for the Orange >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Juju,
every one
else wants him safely in jail where he can't cause any >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> more harm.
While I'm impartial towards US politics as I regard both >>>>>>>>>>>>>> candidates
to be unspeakable, TINEOE.
This Is Not End Of Everything? Best I could come up with. >>>>>>>>>>>>
Why?
Trump is better than Biden. Period. You vote against the >>>>>>>>>>>> greater evil.   Besides, did Trump actually hurt you when he >>>>>>>>>>>> was in?
Trump is a lying, cheating, defrauding conman who is severely >>>>>>>>>>> compromised by Putin.
What did Biden do that actually hurt you?
Was it the falling unemployment?
The GPD growth.. ...the record stock market... ...what?
United States GDP is fake and gay.
Yes.
Every fact presented with which you disagree is fake.
Why is Russia able to produce enough missiles and shells, and >>>>>>>> the United
States can't? That's a tell right there.
And where do you get these supposed "facts"?
Where do you get that the US can't produce enough missiles OR
shells?
https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2023/08/19/artillery-ammunition-ukraine-pentagon/
https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2023/03/08/us-weapons-manufacturing-ukraine/
https://www.cnn.com/2023/07/18/politics/ukraine-critical-ammo-shortage-us-nato-grapple/index.html
And I forgot to ask:
Where do you get your supposed "facts" about how many missiles and
shells Russia can produce?
Straight from Mother Russia, of course.
The approximate number of cruise missiles Russia has expended in the
Ukraine is known from observations.
But not the number that they've manufactured, doofus.
The United States produces some 150 Tomahawk cruise missiles a year.
Russia has expended somewhere around 5,000 similar missiles as of a
year ago. Russia hasn't run out.
On 2024-04-13 22:03, Anonymous wrote:
Alan wrote:
On 2024-04-12 23:05, Anonymous wrote:
Jolly Roger wrote:
On 2024-04-12, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
On 2024-04-11 19:55, Anonymous wrote:
Alan wrote:
On 2024-04-10 23:28, Anonymous wrote:https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2023/08/19/artillery-ammunition-ukraine-pentagon/
Alan wrote:
On 2024-04-09 23:14, Anonymous wrote:
Alan wrote:
On 2024-04-04 09:44, The Real Bev wrote:
On 4/4/24 9:10 AM, Alan wrote:
On 2024-04-03 18:51, Sn!pe wrote:
Java Jive <java@evij.com.invalid> wrote:
Only the MAGA cult disciples feel 'sorry' for the Orange Juju, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> every one
else wants him safely in jail where he can't cause any more harm.
While I'm impartial towards US politics as I regard both >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> candidates
to be unspeakable, TINEOE.
This Is Not End Of Everything? Best I could come up with. >>>>>>>>>>>>>
Why?
Trump is better than Biden. Period. You vote against the >>>>>>>>>>>>> greater evil.   Besides, did Trump actually hurt you when he was in?
Trump is a lying, cheating, defrauding conman who is severely >>>>>>>>>>>> compromised by Putin.
What did Biden do that actually hurt you?
Was it the falling unemployment?
The GPD growth.. ...the record stock market... ...what? >>>>>>>>>>>>
United States GDP is fake and gay.
Yes.
Every fact presented with which you disagree is fake.
Why is Russia able to produce enough missiles and shells, and the United
States can't? That's a tell right there.
And where do you get these supposed "facts"?
Where do you get that the US can't produce enough missiles OR shells? >>>>>>>
https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2023/03/08/us-weapons-manufacturing-ukraine/
https://www.cnn.com/2023/07/18/politics/ukraine-critical-ammo-shortage-us-nato-grapple/index.html
And I forgot to ask:
Where do you get your supposed "facts" about how many missiles and >>>>>> shells Russia can produce?
Straight from Mother Russia, of course.
The approximate number of cruise missiles Russia has expended in the
Ukraine is known from observations.
But not the number that they've manufactured, doofus.
The United States produces some 150 Tomahawk cruise missiles a year.
Russia has expended somewhere around 5,000 similar missiles as of a
year ago. Russia hasn't run out.
What does that prove, doofus?
Alan wrote:
On 2024-04-13 22:03, Anonymous wrote:
Alan wrote:
On 2024-04-12 23:05, Anonymous wrote:
Jolly Roger wrote:
On 2024-04-12, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
On 2024-04-11 19:55, Anonymous wrote:
Alan wrote:
On 2024-04-10 23:28, Anonymous wrote:
Alan wrote:
On 2024-04-09 23:14, Anonymous wrote:
Alan wrote:
On 2024-04-04 09:44, The Real Bev wrote:
On 4/4/24 9:10 AM, Alan wrote:
On 2024-04-03 18:51, Sn!pe wrote:
Java Jive <java@evij.com.invalid> wrote:
Only the MAGA cult disciples feel 'sorry' for the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Orange Juju,
every one
else wants him safely in jail where he can't cause any >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> more harm.
While I'm impartial towards US politics as I regard both >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> candidates
to be unspeakable, TINEOE.
This Is Not End Of Everything? Best I could come up with. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Why?
Trump is better than Biden. Period. You vote against the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> greater evil.   Besides, did Trump actually hurt you when >>>>>>>>>>>>>> he was in?
Trump is a lying, cheating, defrauding conman who is severely >>>>>>>>>>>>> compromised by Putin.
What did Biden do that actually hurt you?
Was it the falling unemployment?
The GPD growth.. ...the record stock market... ...what? >>>>>>>>>>>>>
United States GDP is fake and gay.
Yes.
Every fact presented with which you disagree is fake.
Why is Russia able to produce enough missiles and shells, and >>>>>>>>>> the United
States can't? That's a tell right there.
And where do you get these supposed "facts"?
Where do you get that the US can't produce enough missiles OR >>>>>>>>> shells?
https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2023/08/19/artillery-ammunition-ukraine-pentagon/
https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2023/03/08/us-weapons-manufacturing-ukraine/
https://www.cnn.com/2023/07/18/politics/ukraine-critical-ammo-shortage-us-nato-grapple/index.html
And I forgot to ask:
Where do you get your supposed "facts" about how many missiles and >>>>>>> shells Russia can produce?
Straight from Mother Russia, of course.
The approximate number of cruise missiles Russia has expended in the >>>>> Ukraine is known from observations.
But not the number that they've manufactured, doofus.
The United States produces some 150 Tomahawk cruise missiles a year.
Russia has expended somewhere around 5,000 similar missiles as of a
year ago. Russia hasn't run out.
What does that prove, doofus?
That Russia can outproduce the United States in weaponry at the very
least.
On 2024-04-14 19:49, Anonymous wrote:
Alan wrote:
On 2024-04-13 22:03, Anonymous wrote:
Alan wrote:
On 2024-04-12 23:05, Anonymous wrote:
Jolly Roger wrote:
On 2024-04-12, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
On 2024-04-11 19:55, Anonymous wrote:
Alan wrote:
On 2024-04-10 23:28, Anonymous wrote:
Alan wrote:
On 2024-04-09 23:14, Anonymous wrote:
Alan wrote:
On 2024-04-04 09:44, The Real Bev wrote:
On 4/4/24 9:10 AM, Alan wrote:
On 2024-04-03 18:51, Sn!pe wrote:
Java Jive <java@evij.com.invalid> wrote:
Only the MAGA cult disciples feel 'sorry' for the Orange Juju,
every one
else wants him safely in jail where he can't cause any more harm.
While I'm impartial towards US politics as I regard both >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> candidates
to be unspeakable, TINEOE.
This Is Not End Of Everything? Best I could come up with. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Why?
Trump is better than Biden. Period. You vote against the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> greater evil.   Besides, did Trump actually hurt you when he was in?
Trump is a lying, cheating, defrauding conman who is severely >>>>>>>>>>>>>> compromised by Putin.
What did Biden do that actually hurt you?
Was it the falling unemployment?
The GPD growth.. ...the record stock market... ...what? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
United States GDP is fake and gay.
Yes.
Every fact presented with which you disagree is fake.
Why is Russia able to produce enough missiles and shells, and the United
States can't? That's a tell right there.
And where do you get these supposed "facts"?
Where do you get that the US can't produce enough missiles OR shells?
https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2023/08/19/artillery-ammunition-ukraine-pentagon/
https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2023/03/08/us-weapons-manufacturing-ukraine/
https://www.cnn.com/2023/07/18/politics/ukraine-critical-ammo-shortage-us-nato-grapple/index.html
And I forgot to ask:
Where do you get your supposed "facts" about how many missiles and >>>>>>>> shells Russia can produce?
Straight from Mother Russia, of course.
The approximate number of cruise missiles Russia has expended in the >>>>>> Ukraine is known from observations.
But not the number that they've manufactured, doofus.
The United States produces some 150 Tomahawk cruise missiles a year.
Russia has expended somewhere around 5,000 similar missiles as of a
year ago. Russia hasn't run out.
What does that prove, doofus?
That Russia can outproduce the United States in weaponry at the very
least.
Simply wrong, doofus.
Where do you get your supposed "facts" about how many missiles and >>>>>>>>> shells Russia can produce?
Straight from Mother Russia, of course.
The approximate number of cruise missiles Russia has expended in the >>>>>>> Ukraine is known from observations.
But not the number that they've manufactured, doofus.
The United States produces some 150 Tomahawk cruise missiles a year. >>>>> Russia has expended somewhere around 5,000 similar missiles as of a
year ago. Russia hasn't run out.
What does that prove, doofus?
That Russia can outproduce the United States in weaponry at the very
least.
Simply wrong, doofus.
The industrial base of the United States has been hollowed out, and we
aren't producing more because we CAN'T. Stop being a retard.
https://www.defensenews.com/naval/2024/02/06/supplier-bottlenecks-threaten-us-navy-effort-to-grow-arms-stockpiles/
Tamborino, 2024-04-01 02:55:
This is the common misunderstanding with both RCS in general and Apple's
update in particular. RCS is not end-to-end encrypted.
RCS *is* end-to-end encrypted. But this is not mandatory, so using unencrypted connections is possible. But the Google messaging app in
Android will show you if the recipient has RCS and also if the
connection is encrypted.
Yet, for conversations between Google Messages users, end-to-end encryption >> is now enabled on your Android phone by default.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/zakdoffman/2024/03/30/new-apple-iphone-16-pro-max-and-ios-18-leak-googles-imessage-warning/
So unlike iMessaging between iPhone users or Google Messaging between
Android users, or more importantly WhatsApping between iPhone and Android
users, RCS between iPhone and Android will not have that level of security.
But this is not the fault of RCS.
| Sysop: | DaiTengu |
|---|---|
| Location: | Appleton, WI |
| Users: | 914 |
| Nodes: | 10 (2 / 8) |
| Uptime: | 236:35:36 |
| Calls: | 12,162 |
| Calls today: | 5 |
| Files: | 186,518 |
| Messages: | 2,232,719 |