On 4/4/26 2:55 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
On 4/3/26 7:08 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
[...]
You are conversing with a special type of Olcott.
Keep that in mind.
It might even be one of those people that think there is a last digit
of pi. Never know.
posting insults, but refusing to listen to them back
On 4/4/26 9:04 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 4/4/26 2:55 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
On 4/3/26 7:08 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
[...]
You are conversing with a special type of Olcott.
Keep that in mind.
It might even be one of those people that think there is a last digit
of pi. Never know.
posting insults, but refusing to listen to them back
Yep, that's you.
On 4/11/26 9:50 AM, Richard Damon wrote:
On 4/4/26 9:04 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 4/4/26 2:55 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
On 4/3/26 7:08 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
[...]
You are conversing with a special type of Olcott.
Keep that in mind.
It might even be one of those people that think there is a last
digit of pi. Never know.
posting insults, but refusing to listen to them back
Yep, that's you.
no it's not, i read everything u write dick,
i just don't agree
completely different than blocking you
On 4/11/26 8:03 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 4/11/26 9:50 AM, Richard Damon wrote:
On 4/4/26 9:04 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 4/4/26 2:55 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
On 4/3/26 7:08 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
[...]
You are conversing with a special type of Olcott.
Keep that in mind.
It might even be one of those people that think there is a last
digit of pi. Never know.
posting insults, but refusing to listen to them back
Yep, that's you.
no it's not, i read everything u write dick,
i just don't agree
completely different than blocking you
But you can't answer the question back, so you just ignore the statements.
If you actually listened, you would justify your statements when the
error is pointed out,
That, or you are just agreeing that you are actually as stupid and being
an ignorant liar as is being pointed out.
Sorry, but you live in a world of fantasy, and the neglect of reality.
On 4/11/26 8:10 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
On 4/11/26 8:03 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 4/11/26 9:50 AM, Richard Damon wrote:
On 4/4/26 9:04 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 4/4/26 2:55 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
On 4/3/26 7:08 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
[...]
You are conversing with a special type of Olcott.
Keep that in mind.
It might even be one of those people that think there is a last
digit of pi. Never know.
posting insults, but refusing to listen to them back
Yep, that's you.
no it's not, i read everything u write dick,
i just don't agree
completely different than blocking you
But you can't answer the question back, so you just ignore the
statements.
If you actually listened, you would justify your statements when the
error is pointed out,
That, or you are just agreeing that you are actually as stupid and
being an ignorant liar as is being pointed out.
Sorry, but you live in a world of fantasy, and the neglect of reality.
i'm sorry that debunking a 100 year old consensus is a lot harder than
just supporting it
On 4/12/26 12:19 AM, dart200 wrote:
On 4/11/26 8:10 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
On 4/11/26 8:03 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 4/11/26 9:50 AM, Richard Damon wrote:
On 4/4/26 9:04 PM, dart200 wrote:
On 4/4/26 2:55 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
On 4/3/26 7:08 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
[...]
You are conversing with a special type of Olcott.
Keep that in mind.
It might even be one of those people that think there is a last >>>>>>> digit of pi. Never know.
posting insults, but refusing to listen to them back
Yep, that's you.
no it's not, i read everything u write dick,
i just don't agree
completely different than blocking you
But you can't answer the question back, so you just ignore the
statements.
If you actually listened, you would justify your statements when the
error is pointed out,
That, or you are just agreeing that you are actually as stupid and
being an ignorant liar as is being pointed out.
Sorry, but you live in a world of fantasy, and the neglect of reality.
i'm sorry that debunking a 100 year old consensus is a lot harder than
just supporting it
Yes, a LOT harder, as in IMPOSSIBLE.
Your CLAIMING to be doing so just shows your utter insanity, and stupidity.
Remember, YOU are the one claiming to have something, but can't actually show anything, because your work is just riddeled with mistakes.
Claiming a work that is riddled with errors is an easy task if you allow yourself to ignore those errors.
If you want to claim you are doing a hard task, you need to acknowled
and deal with those errors, not just use Olcottian logic and shuffle
words to try to sweep them under the rug.
| Sysop: | DaiTengu |
|---|---|
| Location: | Appleton, WI |
| Users: | 1,116 |
| Nodes: | 10 (0 / 10) |
| Uptime: | 86:13:12 |
| Calls: | 14,305 |
| Files: | 186,338 |
| D/L today: |
852 files (266M bytes) |
| Messages: | 2,525,504 |