On 4/9/26 5:43 PM, Ross Finlayson wrote:
On 04/09/2026 12:55 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
On 4/9/2026 10:14 AM, Ross Finlayson wrote:
On 04/09/2026 05:46 AM, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
In sci.math Chris M. Thomasson <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> On 4/7/2026 12:46 PM, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
In comp.theory Chris M. Thomasson <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> >>>>>>> wrote:
[ .... ]
Why are seemingly trying to justify pedo's?
You're the sort of person who, 90 years ago in Europe, would be >>>>>>> asking
"why are you trying to justify Jews?".
Strange! pedo vs a person who is jewish?
I just don't believe you're dumb enough not to see the analogy. We're >>>>> talking about two groups of people who aren't popular in popular
culture
(of whatever time), and bullies like you think that justifies them in >>>>> harrassing members of those groups with degrading epithets.
You used the term "low-life pedo" in this thread, implying that the
target of your nastiness was less than human. I suggest you
reconsider
all the implications, and then apologise publicly to Peter Olcott in >>>>> this thread.
Besides everything else, individuals' sexual psychology is not on
topic
in the newsgroups this thread is posted to.
"Otherism" as a usual account is sometimes demonizing specters and then >>>> threatening sympathy with association, and furthermore threatening the >>>> rejection of otherism as association with the demonized, besides the
wider accounts of "otherism" and "we-think" and "in-group" types of
pecking and the like, then furthermore is the association with "thought >>>> police" and the like, here vis-a-vis "thought crimes" and "real
crimes".
So, besides "un-popular", it's a gross bludgeon.
Let us recall the stories we'd tell youth, or give youth to discover,
the fable.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fable
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aesop%27s_Fables#Select_fables
Now, plenty of these fables have consequences,
and some invoke a specter like "the boogey-man"
as variously threatens irresponsibility or the unwary,
or, punishes misbehavior, and even, when that
invoking the specter, invokes the specter.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Boy_Who_Cried_Wolf
The psycho-sexual in the psycho-logical, is an aspect
of thinking and feeling beings, largely biological.
Anyways children should be more concerned with if anybody
in their class likes them, not whether the world is full
of monsters, after them. (Nor that they'll become one.)
There is not a monster under the bed,
there is not a monster in the closet,
there is not a monster in the basement,
there is not a monster in the yard.
"The only thing to fear is fear itself."
"So, first of all, let me assert my firm belief that the only thing we >>>> have to fear is fear itself — nameless, unreasoning, unjustified terror >>>> which paralyzes needed efforts to convert retreat into advance." -- FDR >>>>
There is not a monster in your mind.
Then, basically it's insulting to make "ad hominem" fallacy.
I read a good book a few years ago about identity and including
a chapter on otherism, and how easy it is to see through it,
I'm thinking it was an "Ian B." or so, if I don't recall,
something about "politics of identity" or "psychology of identity"
or along these lines, in the philosophy section though as about
psychology. If I recall it I'll note it here.
Anyways, we still need a word for "loves children".
Thanks for writing.
A parent loves their children, indeed. Or at least they should? Olcott,
might love them too much? Oh shit, there I go again.
Try minding your own business and the old "innocent until proven
guilty", and not be sham "operant-conditioning" that is still
back on pigeons and dogs.
If your actual interests are "protecting the children", and everybody
else, from dangers real or imagined, how about investigating "ad-tech"
for billions of counts and counting of "luring", "corruption of a
minor", "child endangerment", and not even getting into slander and
libel, "identity theft", "computer crimes", and so on. The "ad-tech"
is not "social media", it's got no "safe harbor", and having
algorithm'ed itself it's poisoned itself and pierced its own veil.
Then, about what used to be "special services", these days with
the "surveillance tech" making it more like "secret stasis",
then that's also for busting surveillance tech. That and
busting all the "seals" covering all kinds of "mistakes".
Yes, let's protect the children by busting ad-tech and surveillance
tech. For example, they're liable for anything they know.
Sometimes: ignorance _is_ a defense.
idk if u've used the rest of the internet in the last decade or so,
but pedos are basically the ultimately boogieman that somehow sit below literal serial killers and mass murders on the social media hierarchy,
usenet (which i only joined last year) is the only place i've ever seen
any amount of nuance applied to subject, probably because censorship
doesn't really exist here, and therefore the discussion cannot be shaped
by the fear of people in charge
imo this is likely a reflection of an incredibly amount of systemic
sexual trauma we've received by how modern society represses sexuality during childhood, which i think is an appendage of how religion used to repress it, that somehow snuck it's way into secular society...
my wife just gave birth to a boy 6 hours ago, and i'm unsure of how to protect him from that during his childhood 😕
On 4/9/2026 11:01 PM, dart200 wrote:
Why are seemingly trying to justify pedo's?
my wife just gave birth to a boy 6 hours ago, and i'm unsure of how to
protect him from that during his childhood 😕
Don't ever let him onto the internet. It's addictive. Case in point.
On 4/10/2026 4:24 PM, Dude wrote:
On 4/9/2026 11:01 PM, dart200 wrote:
Why are seemingly trying to justify pedo's?
;Don't ever let him onto the internet. It's addictive. Case in point.
my wife just gave birth to a boy 6 hours ago, and i'm unsure of how
to > protect him from that during his childhood 😕
;
Scary. He has to be able to use the internet, but its the wild west
filled with predators. Sigh.
On 4/11/2026 2:11 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
On 4/10/2026 4:24 PM, Dude wrote:
On 4/9/2026 11:01 PM, dart200 wrote:
Why are seemingly trying to justify pedo's?
;Don't ever let him onto the internet. It's addictive. Case in point.
my wife just gave birth to a boy 6 hours ago, and i'm unsure of how
to > protect him from that during his childhood 😕
;
Scary. He has to be able to use the internet, but its the wild west
filled with predators. Sigh.
Case in point: Olcott. Afaict, he never denied why he got arrested... Claimed to be god or some crazy shit like that.
On 4/11/2026 4:12 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
On 4/11/2026 2:11 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
On 4/10/2026 4:24 PM, Dude wrote:
On 4/9/2026 11:01 PM, dart200 wrote:
Why are seemingly trying to justify pedo's?
;Don't ever let him onto the internet. It's addictive. Case in point.
my wife just gave birth to a boy 6 hours ago, and i'm unsure of how >>>>> to > protect him from that during his childhood 😕
;
Scary. He has to be able to use the internet, but its the wild west
filled with predators. Sigh.
Case in point: Olcott. Afaict, he never denied why he got arrested...
Claimed to be god or some crazy shit like that.
Case dismissed official record expunged for more than a decade.
On 4/11/26 5:16 PM, olcott wrote:Or that there was never any case in the first place. We'll never know.
On 4/11/2026 4:12 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:Which just means you persuaded someone that the case wasn't worth persuing.
On 4/11/2026 2:11 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:Case dismissed official record expunged for more than a decade.
On 4/10/2026 4:24 PM, Dude wrote:Case in point: Olcott. Afaict, he never denied why he got arrested...
On 4/9/2026 11:01 PM, dart200 wrote:Scary. He has to be able to use the internet, but its the wild west
Why are seemingly trying to justify pedo's?
my wife just gave birth to a boy 6 hours ago, and i'm unsure of how >>>>> to > protect him from that during his childhood 😕Don't ever let him onto the internet. It's addictive. Case in point.
filled with predators. Sigh.
Claimed to be god or some crazy shit like that.
Case dismissed is NOT evidence of actual innocence. Maybe you shouldWe have a tradition in civilised societies of the assumption of innocence
look at the actual meaning of the words.
It is still a FACT that you have been reported (and haven't even triedIt is anything but a fact (or FACT). It is a vague allegation from long
to deny it) that you said it was ok to have the child porn "because you
were God".
That shows your level of mentality, and morality.Your post shows something about yours. The topic is entirely off-topic
Richard Damon <Richard@damon-family.org> wrote:
On 4/11/26 5:16 PM, olcott wrote:
On 4/11/2026 4:12 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
On 4/11/2026 2:11 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
On 4/10/2026 4:24 PM, Dude wrote:
On 4/9/2026 11:01 PM, dart200 wrote:
Why are seemingly trying to justify pedo's?
my wife just gave birth to a boy 6 hours ago, and i'm unsure of how >>>>>>> to > protect him from that during his childhood 😕
Don't ever let him onto the internet. It's addictive. Case in point.
Scary. He has to be able to use the internet, but its the wild west
filled with predators. Sigh.
Case in point: Olcott. Afaict, he never denied why he got arrested...
Claimed to be god or some crazy shit like that.
Case dismissed official record expunged for more than a decade.
Which just means you persuaded someone that the case wasn't worth persuing.
Or that there was never any case in the first place. We'll never know.
Case dismissed is NOT evidence of actual innocence. Maybe you should
look at the actual meaning of the words.
We have a tradition in civilised societies of the assumption of innocence until guilt is proven.
It is still a FACT that you have been reported (and haven't even tried
to deny it) that you said it was ok to have the child porn "because you
were God".
It is anything but a fact (or FACT). It is a vague allegation from long
ago.
That shows your level of mentality, and morality.
Your post shows something about yours. The topic is entirely off-topic
for this newsgroup. That you choose to harrass another poster with vague allegations of a criminal past irrelevant to the group does not reflect
well on you.
Please cease this harrassment, everybody.
| Sysop: | DaiTengu |
|---|---|
| Location: | Appleton, WI |
| Users: | 1,116 |
| Nodes: | 10 (0 / 10) |
| Uptime: | 86:13:01 |
| Calls: | 14,305 |
| Files: | 186,338 |
| D/L today: |
852 files (266M bytes) |
| Messages: | 2,525,504 |